This study examines the associations of mastery-approach goals and academic entitlement with academic dishonesty and evaluates entitlement as a potential moderator among undergraduate students. The source manuscript describes convenience recruitment of 257 respondents through an online questionnaire, although the analytical sample requires confirmation. Academic dishonesty and entitlement were assessed using published instruments; the achievement goal instrument requires documentation. The reported correlations indicate a negative mastery approach–dishonesty association (r = −.12) and a positive entitlement–dishonesty association (r = .51). However, inconsistencies between regression coefficients, standard errors, and test statistics prevent a defensible decision concerning moderation. The available evidence therefore supports only a provisional discussion of motivational and responsibility-related correlates of academic integrity. Verified participant information and original statistical output are required before empirical conclusions can be finalized.
Copyrights © 2025