cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota bandung,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
JISPO (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik)
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
ISSN : 23033169     EISSN : 25793098     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Social Sciences
JISPO adalah Jurnal ilmiah yang dikelola dan diterbitkan oleh FISIP UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung yang telah terindeks di Moraref, Google Schoolar, Neliti dan Mendeley. Bagi anda yang berminat mengirimkan artikel ilmiah dapat melakukan registrasi sebagai Author dan mengikuti langkah -langkah selanjutnya.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 363 Documents
 33   34   35   36   37 
From Hashtag to Street Action: Applying SIMCA to the #IndonesiaGelap Movement in Samarinda Dhia Fachirah Chairunnisa; Niken Nurmiyati; Sanny Nofrima; Muhammad Reza Fahlevy; Dea Rizky Amalia
JISPO : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 15 No 2 (2025): JISPO Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik
Publisher : Faculty of SociaI and Political Sciences (FISIP), Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jispo.v15i2.51174

Abstract

This study examines #IndonesiaGelap as a digitally mediated new social movement through which Indonesians expressed dissatisfaction with contested government policies, focusing on mobilization in Samarinda. It aims to explain how affective expressions and moral evaluations circulating online contributed to collective identity formation and the translation of online resonance into offline collective action. Using a qualitative case-study design, data were drawn from in-depth interviews with movement participants, participatory observation, social media content (X and Instagram), and news coverage. Materials were analysed thematically and interpreted through the Social Identity Model of Collective Action (SIMCA), complemented by resource mobilization theory and Alfred Schutz’s phenomenological concepts of motive and intersubjectivity. Findings show that perceived injustice created a shared moral frame, while digitally amplified anger, outrage, and hope fostered solidarity and an inclusive coalition identity across student organizations, civil society groups, and unaffiliated citizens. Collective efficacy was enacted through open consolidations and coordinated mobilization of material, human, organizational, and symbolic resources, including the hashtag and Garuda imagery. The study concludes that #IndonesiaGelap in Samarinda was not merely a trending hashtag but a meaning-making process in which platformed emotions, identity alignment, and resource coordination jointly enabled offline collective action. The contribution lies in specifying how affective dynamics and morality operate within SIMCA in an Indonesian local context, and in showing how efficacy is organizationally produced. Practically, the results imply that transparent, participatory policymaking and responsive communication may reduce escalation, while movement organizers benefit from inclusive consolidation and clear symbolic strategies.
Indigenous Peoples’ Rights and Development Governance: Evaluating FPIC Compliance in Geothermal Power Development Konfridus Roynaldus Buku; Victoria Dalima; Hendrikus Reinald Wawo
JISPO : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 15 No 2 (2025): JISPO Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik
Publisher : Faculty of SociaI and Political Sciences (FISIP), Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jispo.v15i2.51176

Abstract

Indigenous communities in Indonesia continue to experience rights violations linked to development projects that proceed without meaningful participation. In such contexts, the principle of Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) is essential to ensure that Indigenous peoples can make voluntary decisions, receive timely information, and be recognized as legitimate decision-makers in their customary territories. This study examines FPIC implementation in the Mataloko Geothermal Power Plant (PLTP) project in Ngada Regency, East Nusa Tenggara, where project activities have been associated with social tension and conflict. The research aims to describe and analyse how FPIC has been applied in the Mataloko PLTP development process and how FPIC practices relate to community resistance. Using a concurrent triangulation mixed-methods design, this study combines a survey of 100 respondents from five villages with in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation review. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and supported by statistical testing, while qualitative evidence was used to contextualize and explain community perceptions and conflict dynamics. Findings indicate that FPIC has not been implemented substantively. Communities reported limited freedom in decision-making, incomplete and uneven information disclosure, and consultation processes that did not sufficiently involve all affected groups or respect collective customary procedures. These deficiencies contributed to polarization within the community and strengthened resistance framed as demands for justice and protection of communal rights. This study contributes empirical evidence on FPIC gaps in geothermal development and underscores the practical importance of transparent, inclusive, and culturally grounded FPIC processes. Policy implications include early-stage consultation, open dissemination of impact information (including EIA findings), and safeguards to prevent rights-based conflict escalation.
Reassessing ASEAN Regional Governance in Transnational Narcotics Control through Liberal Institutionalism Habibi Maulana Al-Fathin; Erdin Prayoga; Elly Nurlia
JISPO : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 15 No 2 (2025): JISPO Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik
Publisher : Faculty of SociaI and Political Sciences (FISIP), Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jispo.v15i2.51772

Abstract

Narcotics circulation and abuse in Southeast Asia have escalated into a transnational threat with significant implications for political stability, public security, and socio-economic development across ASEAN. Rising methamphetamine production in the Golden Triangle and the expansion of cross-border trafficking networks have reinforced the urgency of ASEAN’s collective response through the Drug-Free ASEAN 2025 agenda. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of cooperation among Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam in implementing this agenda, using Robert O. Keohane’s Liberal Institutionalism to explain how cooperation can persist in the absence of hegemonic enforcement. The study employed a qualitative descriptive approach based on a structured literature review of 25 scholarly journal articles, ASEAN policy reports, and secondary documents from UNODC and Indonesia’s National Narcotics Agency (BNN). The findings showed that ASEAN cooperation generated meaningful institutional and diplomatic progress, particularly through mechanisms such as ASOD, AMMTC, and ASEANAPOL that facilitated coordination, information exchange, and operational networking. However, substantive effectiveness in suppressing trafficking remained constrained by legal-system divergence, uneven national capacity, inconsistent transparency, and weak joint evaluation and monitoring arrangements. The study concluded that ASEAN’s anti-narcotics cooperation operated as a form of non-hegemonic institutional governance sustained by trust, reciprocity, and normative compliance, yet required stronger implementation linkages to achieve measurable impact. The study contributed theoretically by extending Liberal Institutionalism to ASEAN’s non-traditional security governance and practically by recommending strengthened data integration, peer performance review, legal harmonization, and technology-oriented responses to emerging digital trafficking.  

Page 37 of 37 | Total Record : 363

 33   34   35   36   37 

Filter by Year

2013 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 15 No 2 (2025): JISPO Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol. 15 No. 1 (2025): JISPO Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol. 14 No. 1 (2024): JISPO Vol. 14, No. 1, 2024 Vol. 14 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 13 No. 2 (2023): Vol. 13 No. 2, 2023 Vol. 13 No. 1 (2023): JISPO Vol 13 No 1 2023 Vol. 12 No. 2 (2022): JISPO Vol 12 No 2 2022 Vol 12, No 1 (2022): JISPO Vol 12 No 1 2022 Vol. 12 No. 1 (2022): JISPO Vol 12 No 1 2022 Vol. 11 No. 2 (2021): JISPO Vol 11 No 2 2021 Vol 11, No 2 (2021): JISPO Vol 11 No 2 2021 Vol 11, No 1 (2021): JISPO Vol 11 No 1 2021 Vol. 11 No. 1 (2021): JISPO Vol 11 No 1 2021 Vol 10, No 2 (2020): JISPO Vol 10 No 2 2020 Vol. 10 No. 2 (2020): JISPO Vol 10 No 2 2020 Vol 10, No 1 (2020): JISPO Vol 10 No 1 2020 Vol. 10 No. 1 (2020): Vol. 10 No. 1 2020 | JISPO Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol. 9 No. 2 (2019): JISPO Vol 9 No 2 2019 Vol 9, No 2 (2019): JISPO Vol 9 No 2 2019 Vol 9, No 1 (2019): JISPO Vol 9 No 1 2019 Vol 9, No 1 (2019): JISPO Vol 9 No 1 2019 Vol 9, No 1 (2019): JISPO : Vol 9 No 1 2019 Vol. 9 No. 1 (2019): JISPO Vol 9 No 1 2019 Vol. 8 No. 1 (2018): JISPO Vol. 8 No. 1 (2018): JISPO Vol 8 No 1 2018 Vol 8, No 2 (2018): JISPO Vol 8 No 2, 2018 Vol. 8 No. 2 (2018): JISPO Vol 8 No 2 2018 Vol 8, No 2 (2018): JISPO Vol 8 No 2 2018 Vol 8, No 1 (2018): JISPO Vol 8 No 1 2018 Vol 8, No 1 (2018): JISPO Vol 8 No 1 2018 Vol 7, No 2 (2017): JISPO 2017 Vol 7, No 1 (2017): JISPO 2017 Vol 7, No 1 (2017): JISPO 2017 Vol 6, No 2 (2016): JISPO Vol 6 No 2 2016 Vol 6, No 1 (2016): JISPO 2016 Vol 1, No 1 (2013): JISPO 2013 Vol 1, No 1 (2013): JISPO More Issue