Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Article Per Year (5 Year)

All

Jurnal Konstitusi

jk
Website

Published by Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

ISSN : 18297706 EISSN : 25481657 DOI : 10.31078

Core Subject : Education, Social,

Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Jurnal Konstitusi merupakan media triwulanan guna penyebarluasan (diseminasi) hasil penelitian atau kajian konseptual tentang konstitusi dan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi terbit empat nomor dalam setahun (Maret, Juni, September, dan Desember). Jurnal Konstitusi memuat hasil penelitian atau kajian konseptual (hasil pemikiran) tentang konstitusi, putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi serta isu-isu hukum konstitusi dan ketatanegaraan yang belum pernah dipublikasikan di media lain. Jurnal Konstitusi ditujukan untuk kalangan pakar, akademisi, praktisi, penyelenggara negara, LSM, serta pemerhati hukum konstitusi dan ketatanegaraan.

Arjuna Subject : -

Articles 896 Documents

50 51 52 53 54

Konsep Negara Berbasis Hak sebagai Argumen Justifikasi Pengujian Konstitusionalitas Undang-undang Titon Slamet Kurnia
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 9, No 3 (2012)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

This article argues that the concept of right-based State and right-based constitution are substantively the basis or justification for constitutional review of legislation or laws. The constitutionality of laws is determined by the idea that human rights are supreme or superior over the legislature and its legal product. Therefore, the legislature should respect human rights in law-making. This article also rejects the view that hierarchy of laws is the only basis for constitutional review of legislation or laws because this view only explains it formally. This argument cannot be applied to Britain or Israel which does not have a formal constitution.

Tumpang Tindih Kewenangan dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah Abdul Jalil
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 10, No 4 (2013)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

This paper is going to discuss the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 93/ PUU-X/2012 related to granting of the petition for judicial review of Law No. 21 Year 2008 concerning Islamic Banking (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2008 Number 94, namely Article 55 paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) governing the settlement of disputes with respect to Article 28D paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution, which says that the Act should guarantee legal certainty and justice and do not have binding legal force. While in Article 55 paragraph (1), described Sharia Banking Dispute resolution by the court within the Religious Courts, while paragraph (2), stated in terms of the parties’ dispute has betoken than those referred to in paragraph (1), the settlement of disputes in accordance with the contents of the Agreement, then, in paragraph (3) Settlement of disputes referred to in paragraph (2) must not conflict with Sharia. In addition to this, the paper will also question the extent of absolute authority of the Religious Courts institutions related to the settlement of economic disputes shari’a as stipulated in Law No. 3 of 2006 on Religious Courts .

Rekonstruksi Politik Hukum Pidana Nasional (Telaah Kritis Larangan Analogi dalam Hukum Pidana) Tongat Tongat
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 12, No 3 (2015)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

A paradigm shift in the state of life—especially post the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945 amendments—have not been fully understood properly. Up to now—included in the lawless life—is still a gap between the paradigm and its implementation . This paradigmatic gap visible example of the lack of a comprehensive implementation of the basic principles of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945 in a national criminal law reform ( draft Code of Criminal Law ) . The draft Code of Criminal Law as one form of national criminal law reform is seen has not fully represent constitution demands. Prohibiting the use of analogy in criminal law is still seen at odds with the provisions of Article 1 ( 3 ) of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945. The gap is not only paradigmatic potential to cause difficulties in its application, but also potentially the cancellation clause in the legislation concerned.

Open Legal Policy dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Pembentukan Undang-Undang Iwan Satriawan; Tanto Lailam
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 16, No 3 (2019)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 46/PUU-XIV/2016 yang menolak perluasan makna zina yang ada dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana menjadi topik yang ramai diperdebatkan. Sebagian masyarakat berpendapat bahwa seharusnya Mahkamah Konstitusi berani melakukan terobosan hukum dalam isu yang sangat penting tersebut. Namun, Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi berpendapat perluasan makna zina tersebut bukan ranah kewenangan mereka. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji lebih jauh argumentasi hukum (ratio decidendi) putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang bersifat open legal policy dan bagaimana implikasinya terhadap pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kepustakaan dengan pendekatan undang-undang dan studi kasus terhadap beberapa putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang mengandung argumentasi open legal policy. Secara konseptual penelitian ini juga akan membahas bagaimana implikasi putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang mengandung open legal policy tersebut terhadap sistem legislasi nasional. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pertama, konsepsi open legal policy dalam putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi belum memiliki batasan yang jelas sehingga pengertian positive legislator dan negative legislator sering dikacaukan dalam praktik pembentukan dan pengujian undang-undang. Kedua, putusan yang bersifat open legal policy tersebut juga menunjukkan bahwa di antara hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi telah terjadi tarik menarik penggunaan paradigma judicial activism dan judicial restraints sehingga menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum di tengah masyarakat. Penelitian ini merekemomendasikan perlunya kajian yang lebih mendalam tentang disain open legal policy dalam putusan Mahkamah Konsitusi dan sistem legislasi nasional Indonesia.The Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU/XIV/2016 which rejected the petition of petitioners to broaden the meaning of zina (fornication) in the Criminal Code of Indonesia has been becoming an interesting issue to be discussed. Some argue that the Constitutional Court must use its authority to conduct a break-through in responding the crucial legal issue. On the other hand, the Court asserted that widening the meaning of zina in the Criminal Code of Indonesia is not its authority. The research aims at discussing further the ratio decidendi of the Constitutional Court Decision which contains the element of open legal policy and its implication to national legislation system. The research is a normative legal research which uses statute approach and case law approach. The result of research shows that firstly, the concept of open legal policy in the Constitutional Court decisions does not have a clear limitation which implies uncertainty of its implementation in the Court decisions and the national legislation system. Secondly, the Decision of the Constitutional Court with open legal policy also shows that on one hand, there is a trend of using judicial activism among the constitutional judges. On the other hand, some constitutional judges also use judicial restraint approach as their reasons which results uncertainty of law in Court decision. The research recommends that there should be a further study on design model of open legal policy in the Constitutional Court decisions and its implication to national legislation system.

Telaah Kritik Atas Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Perkara Perselisihan Hasil Pemilukada Provinsi Jawa Timur Widodo Ekatjahjana
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 8, No 1 (2011)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Decision of Constitutional Court of Number 41/PHPU.D-VI/2008 is a controversial judicial decison in practices of Constitutional Court in Indonesia. The decison had legal basis of Law of Number 18 of 2008 that against formally with the Constitutions of 1945. Nevertheless, in fact, inconstitutional practice of the court system has taken legitimacy source of convention. It is very important for development of constitutional law enforcement in Indonesia, that the decision was not only show how the Constitutional Court improves its constitutional authorities to handle disputes of regional head election result in Indonesia, but also that was first time how the Constitutional Court has brought its justice paradigm change toward process of substantial justice and law enforcement.

Penyelesaian Sengketa Kewenangan Lembaga Negara oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Luthfi Widagdo Eddyono
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 7, No 3 (2010)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

This article is about settlement disputes of authorities of state institutions by the Constitutional Court of Indonesia. Pursuant to Article 24C Paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution in conjunction with Article 10 Paragraph (1) of the Constitutional Court Law, the Constitutional Court of Indonesia has the authority to hear at the first and final level, the decision of which shall be final, among others in deciding disputes of authorities of state institutions, the authorities of which are granted by the Constitution. But, the 1945 Constitution and the Constitutional Court Law not provide enough rules for the Constitutional Court to decide the case, especially about objectum litis and subjectum litis.In the Decision Number 004/SKLNIV/2006 dated July 12, 2006 the Constitutional Court using gramatical interpretation (grammatische interpretatie) and declare that to decide upon disputes on authority granted by 1945 Constitution, the first thing to consider is the existence of certain authorities in the Constitution and then to which institutions those authorities are given. Constitutional authority not just textually specified in the 1945 Constitution, but also implicit authority derived from the principal authority, and necessary and proper authority to exercise the principal authority.Related to that, classification of state institutions can be based on the form of power/authority given to the state institution.

Perubahan Makna Pasal 6A Ayat (2) UUD 1945 Ziffany Firdinal
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 10, No 4 (2013)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

This article examines the changes in the meaning of Article 6A paragraph (2) of the Indonesian 1945 Constitution, related to the requirements for nominating Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates by a political party or an alliance of parties contesting in the parliamentary election prior to the Presidential election. Further provisions termed more precisely in Article 9 of Law No. 42 of 2008 on Presidential and Vice Presidential Election; some additional requirement that political parties or alliance of parties gain valid votes of at least 20% of total votes nationally or a minimum 25% of seats in the House of Representatives, which is conceptually known as ‘presidential threshold’. Based on the Constitutional Court Verdict No. 51-52-59/PUU-VI/2008, provisions on the candidacy at the Act level were declared constitutional with some terms, that there are some dissenting opinions among judges who adjudicated the constitutional norms during the judicial review of the Act. Examination results obtained is that there have been change in meaning, in this case, the change takes a form of narrowing of meaning of the normative provisions of Article 6A paragraph (2) in a consequence to the provisions set in Article 9 of Law No. 42 of 2008. In order to provide legal certainty associated to the narrowing of this provision’s meaning, an ammendment is required to Article 6A paragraph (2) to reinforce the measures in the Presidential and Vice Presidential candidate nomination, in this case whether it is in line with the Constitutional Court verdict on judicial review of Article 9 of Law No. 42 of 2008 on Election of President and Vice-President or not.

Penguatan Fungsi Pengawasan Legislatif terhadap Eksekutif Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Irfan Nur Rachman
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 8, No 2 (2011)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

The Constitutional Court in its decision Number 23-26/PUU- VIII/2010 have been cancelled the applicability of article 184, paragraph (4), which regulates the amount of quorum and approval of quorum in the decision-making process in the Forum related to the plenary meeting house “our opinion the proposal on the right.” In its legal considerations, the Constitutional Court confirmed that the provisions of quorum and the number of quorum approval of 3 / 4 shall be replaced with provisions in decision making on the basis of “simple majority”. This has an impact on the strengthening of the system of checks and balances for the role of legislative control the Executive branch that the abuse of power by the Executive branch can prevent.

Kejujuran dalam Bingkai Hak Memilih-Dipilih (Pelajaran dari Pemilukada Bengkulu Selatan) Abdul Ghoffar
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 8, No 1 (2011)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

This article discusses two decision of the Constitutional Court. First, the Constitutional Court Decision No. 57/PHPU.D-VI/2008 on Election Dispute of Regional Head of South Bengkulu, which disqualify the candidate elected, Dirwan Mahmud, because it proved to be dishonest if he had been sentenced 7 years in prison, to the detriment of the rights of citizens to choose obtain correct information about the future leaders will be chosen. Second, the Constitutional Court Decision No. 4/PUU-VII/2009 about the review of Article 12 sub-article g and Article 50 paragraph (1) sub-article g election law, and Article 58 sub-article f Local Government Act, which gives the right choosen to convict (common criminal) after five years sentence expired with the condition that he honestly convey to the public if he is a former convict. This paper focuses on the importance of honesty in the implementation of the right to vote and be elected citizens.

Prinsip Kedaulatan Rakyat Dalam Penentuan Sistem Pemilihan Umum Anggota Legislatif Khairul Fahmi
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 7, No 3 (2010)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

PendahuluanDalam proses perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945 terjadi pergulatan pemikiran tentang gagasan kedaulatan rakyat. Pergulatan pemikiran tersebut berujung dengan diubahnya ketentuan Pasal 1 ayat (2) UUD 1945. Awalnya, Pasal 1 ayat (2) UUD 1945 berbunyi “Kedaulatan adalah ditangan rakyat, dan dilakukan sepenuhnya oleh Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat”. Kemudian diubah pada saat perubahan ketiga UUD 1945 sehingga rumusannya menjadi “Kedaulatan berada di tangan rakyat dan dilaksanakan menurut Undang-Undang Dasar”. ...

Page 52 of 90 | Total Record : 896

50 51 52 53 54

Filter by Year

2010 2022

Filter By Issues

All Issue Vol 19, No 4 (2022) Vol 19, No 3 (2022) Vol 19, No 2 (2022) Vol 19, No 1 (2022) Vol 18, No 4 (2021) Vol 18, No 3 (2021) Vol 18, No 2 (2021) Vol 18, No 1 (2021) Vol 17, No 4 (2020) Vol 17, No 3 (2020) Vol 17, No 2 (2020) Vol 17, No 1 (2020) Vol 16, No 4 (2019) Vol 16, No 3 (2019) Vol 16, No 2 (2019) Vol 16, No 2 (2019) Vol 16, No 1 (2019) Vol 16, No 1 (2019) Vol 15, No 4 (2018) Vol 15, No 4 (2018) Vol 15, No 3 (2018) Vol 15, No 3 (2018) Vol 15, No 2 (2018) Vol 15, No 2 (2018) Vol 15, No 1 (2018) Vol 15, No 1 (2018) Vol 14, No 4 (2017) Vol 14, No 4 (2017) Vol 14, No 3 (2017) Vol 14, No 3 (2017) Vol 14, No 2 (2017) Vol 14, No 2 (2017) Vol 14, No 1 (2017) Vol 14, No 1 (2017) Vol 13, No 4 (2016) Vol 13, No 4 (2016) Vol 13, No 3 (2016) Vol 13, No 3 (2016) Vol 13, No 2 (2016) Vol 13, No 2 (2016) Vol 13, No 1 (2016) Vol 13, No 1 (2016) Vol 12, No 4 (2015) Vol 12, No 4 (2015) Vol 12, No 3 (2015) Vol 12, No 3 (2015) Vol 12, No 2 (2015) Vol 12, No 2 (2015) Vol 12, No 1 (2015) Vol 12, No 1 (2015) Vol 11, No 4 (2014) Vol 11, No 4 (2014) Vol 11, No 3 (2014) Vol 11, No 3 (2014) Vol 11, No 2 (2014) Vol 11, No 2 (2014) Vol 11, No 1 (2014) Vol 11, No 1 (2014) Vol 10, No 4 (2013) Vol 10, No 4 (2013) Vol 10, No 3 (2013) Vol 10, No 3 (2013) Vol 10, No 2 (2013) Vol 10, No 2 (2013) Vol 10, No 1 (2013) Vol 10, No 1 (2013) Vol 9, No 4 (2012) Vol 9, No 4 (2012) Vol 9, No 3 (2012) Vol 9, No 3 (2012) Vol 9, No 2 (2012) Vol 9, No 2 (2012) Vol 9, No 1 (2012) Vol 9, No 1 (2012) Vol 8, No 6 (2011) Vol 8, No 6 (2011) Vol 8, No 5 (2011) Vol 8, No 5 (2011) Vol 8, No 4 (2011) Vol 8, No 4 (2011) Vol 8, No 3 (2011) Vol 8, No 3 (2011) Vol 8, No 2 (2011) Vol 8, No 2 (2011) Vol 8, No 1 (2011) Vol 8, No 1 (2011) Vol 7, No 6 (2010) Vol 7, No 6 (2010) Vol 7, No 5 (2010) Vol 7, No 5 (2010) Vol 7, No 4 (2010) Vol 7, No 4 (2010) Vol 7, No 3 (2010) Vol 7, No 3 (2010) Vol 7, No 2 (2010) Vol 7, No 2 (2010) Vol 7, No 1 (2010) Vol 7, No 1 (2010) More Issue

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name
-

Contact Email
-

Phone
-

Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address
Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6. Jakarta 10110

Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,

Dki jakarta

INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name -

Contact Email -

Phone -

Journal Mail Official jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6. Jakarta 10110

Location Kota adm. jakarta pusat, Dki jakarta INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Contact Name
-

Contact Email
-

Phone
-

Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address
Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6. Jakarta 10110

Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,

Dki jakarta

INDONESIA