Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Article Per Year (5 Year)

All

Jurnal Konstitusi

jk
Website

Published by Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

ISSN : 18297706 EISSN : 25481657 DOI : 10.31078

Core Subject : Education, Social,

Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Jurnal Konstitusi merupakan media triwulanan guna penyebarluasan (diseminasi) hasil penelitian atau kajian konseptual tentang konstitusi dan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi terbit empat nomor dalam setahun (Maret, Juni, September, dan Desember). Jurnal Konstitusi memuat hasil penelitian atau kajian konseptual (hasil pemikiran) tentang konstitusi, putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi serta isu-isu hukum konstitusi dan ketatanegaraan yang belum pernah dipublikasikan di media lain. Jurnal Konstitusi ditujukan untuk kalangan pakar, akademisi, praktisi, penyelenggara negara, LSM, serta pemerhati hukum konstitusi dan ketatanegaraan.

Arjuna Subject : -

Articles 896 Documents

48 49 50 51 52

Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional Melalui Pengaduan Konstitusional Achmad Edi Subiyanto
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 8, No 5 (2011)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

The idea of a constitutional complaint against the input (constitutional complaint) into the realm of the Constitutional Court is part of efforts to protect the rights of citizens protected by the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945. Protections that are stronger and more real to the constitutional rights of citizens in particular, and human rights in general, is one of the characteristics of the 1945 Constitution which has undergone a fundamental change in question. So, talking about the constitutional complaint in relation to the 1945 mean to talk about the 1945 Constitution which has undergone a fundamental change that. Therefore, an understanding of the occurrence of fundamental changes to the 1945 Constitution has become very important to explain that the constitutional complaint mechanisms and the need for the Constitutional Court is given authority to decide constitutional cases referred to the current complaint really has become a necessity.

Menguatkan Hak Masyarakat Adat Atas Hutan Adat (Studi Putusan MK Nomor 35/ PUU-X/2012) Faiq Tobroni
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 10, No 3 (2013)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

If the Government is always consistent to ensure the rights of indigenous people over ulayat forest, of course there will be no legislation which is contrary to the constitution, because the constitution had always guaranteed it. The Decision of Constitutional Court Number 35/PUU-X/2012 which declares that Article 1 point 6, Article 4 paragraph (3), article 5 paragraph (1), paragraph (2), paragraph (3) of Law 41/1999 on Forestry unconstitutional shows that there is inconsistency in regulating indigenous forest. In the perspective of human rights, the articles have a spirit of protection of indigenous peoples’ rights over ulayat forest which is repressive derogable in nature. Meanwhile, the Constitutional Court decision has the spirit of progressive derogable protection. The first spirit means that because the state could derogate the recognition of ulayat forest if it is incompatible with the development of society and contrary to the principles of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, then the ulayat forest should be seen as the state forest. In the contrary, the next spirit means that although the state could derogate the recognition based on the preceeding requirements, the ulayat forest should be defined as ulayat forests. The first spirit is a repressive one because it aims at subordinating ulayat forests in the name of state forests. Meanwhile, the progressive spirit has the character of liberation and empowerment, it aims at removing the term of ulayat forests from state forests.

Konstitusionalitas Penerapan Hukum Adat dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Elwi Danil
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 9, No 3 (2012)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Indonesia is a plural country with a lot of diversities in it. As a country that embracing positivistic in law perspective, Indonesia is applying the codification of law that has most popular maxim: the certainty of law. That maxim can reduce traditional law that believed by indigenous people. This paper talks about possibility of criminal law in traditional law perspective in Indonesian plural culture.

Inkonsistensi Paradigma Otonomi Daerah di Indonesia: Dilema Sentralisasi atau Desentralisasi Wasisto Raharjo Jati
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 9, No 4 (2012)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

This study aimed to analyze trajectory of regional autonomy in Indonesia. There are two important things in discussing about regional autonomy in Indonesia. Firstly, dilemma between decentralization or centralization as basic paradigm in the policy of regional autonomy. Secondly, regional autonomy just creates oligarchy regime, primordialism, and politic of clientelism. Implementation of regional autonomy has been became new problems for Indonesia which adopted unitary state system. Regional autonomy in post New-Order era intended to enhancing participation of society in development project and local democracy was hijacked by many interest from elite. In other words, regional autonomy more aligned to elite rather than the people.

Problematika Substantif Perppu Nomor 1 Tahun 2013 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi Ni’matul Huda
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 10, No 4 (2013)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Constitutionally, the issuance of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law is the subjective right of the President based on the state of exigencies, but its formation should alway fulfill good, proportional and prudent principles of lawmaking. Eventhough the objective of issuing the Government Regulation in Lieu of Law on Constitutional Court is to restore public trust and credibility of Constitutional Court Justices, the content of the regulation may not be contradictional with the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. In order that there is no distortion in the use of subjective right of the President in issuing the regulation, the House of Representatives must objectively scrutinize whether the regulation is reasonable to be promulgated as a law ar must be denied.

Suara Terbanyak dan Kualitas Anggota DPRD Provinsi DIY (Implementasi Putusan MK No. 22-24/ PUU-VI/2008 dalam Pemilu 2009) Pusat Kajian Konstitusi dan Pemerintahan FH-Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 8, No 1 (2011)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

The implementation of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 22-24/ PUU-VI/2008 about counting majority votes in 2009 legislative elections in the province of DIY has a significant effect. considering the system used in the vote count to determine the members of both national and local legislatures are new and very different from previous elections. However, these effects are not caused major problems, because before the election day, the decision has been disseminated by each political party internally and implemented by Electoral Commission. Although the Constitutional Court decision issued after a waiting list of legislative candidates have been announced by the KPU.

The Right of Self-Determination: Its Emergence, Development, and Controversy Munafrizal Manan
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 12, No 1 (2015)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

This paper discusses the right of self-determinationfrom international law and international human rights law perspective. It traces the emergence and development of self-determination from political principle to human right. It also explores the controversy of the right of self-determination. There have been different and even contradictory interpretations of the right of self-determination. Besides, there is no consensus on the mechanism to apply the right of self-determination. Both international law and international human rights law are vague about this.

Pemberhentian Antar Waktu Anggota KPu (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 80/Puu-Ix/2011) R. Nazriyah
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 9, No 4 (2012)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

The formulation of article 27 paragraph (1) letter b of Law Governing the election and article 27 paragraph (3) was considered discriminatory because it prohibits members of the general election commission to resign before the end of his term. If resigned for reasons that cannot be accepted and being dishonorably are required to reimburse the honor as much as 2 (two) times the accepted. That provision was filed judicial review to the Constitutional Court. The Constitutional Court states the phrase.... with an acceptable reason’ in article 27 paragraph (1) letter b and article 27 paragraph (3) of Law No. 15 of 2011 is contrary to the Constitution and has no binding legal force. The Constitutional Court also assess interpretation ‘acceptable reason’ it has narrowed the freedom of a person to get a job and a better income in order to be better able to meet the right to life, sustaining live and life.

Keterwakilan Perempuan Di Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 22-24/PUU-VI/2008 Nalom Kurniawan
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 11, No 4 (2014)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Affirmative action by giving 30% quota for women, is a constitutional rights that must be seen in proportional viewed without override the right of people sovereignty. As a major stakeholder in the democratic state, is the right of people to elect their representatives to sit in parliament. Waiver of the right of people to elect their representatives is a violation in the democracy system and a violation of people sovereignty.

Akuntabilitas Kekuasaan Kehakiman Rahayu Prasetianingsih
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 8, No 5 (2011)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Accountability in Indonesia has been known the extent of the public administration within the executive power, while for representative bodies and judicial power is only in the system administration. Public demands for accountability from all over the government institution are no exception of judicial power. It’s triggered by “mafia peradilan” issue and other distrust so it needs judicial accountability. Problems arise when faced with the principles of accountability and independence and impartiality of the judiciary. But in fact these two principles is not the core problem of accountability judiciary, there’s many factors influence.

Page 50 of 90 | Total Record : 896

48 49 50 51 52

Filter by Year

2010 2022

Filter By Issues

All Issue Vol 19, No 4 (2022) Vol 19, No 3 (2022) Vol 19, No 2 (2022) Vol 19, No 1 (2022) Vol 18, No 4 (2021) Vol 18, No 3 (2021) Vol 18, No 2 (2021) Vol 18, No 1 (2021) Vol 17, No 4 (2020) Vol 17, No 3 (2020) Vol 17, No 2 (2020) Vol 17, No 1 (2020) Vol 16, No 4 (2019) Vol 16, No 3 (2019) Vol 16, No 2 (2019) Vol 16, No 2 (2019) Vol 16, No 1 (2019) Vol 16, No 1 (2019) Vol 15, No 4 (2018) Vol 15, No 4 (2018) Vol 15, No 3 (2018) Vol 15, No 3 (2018) Vol 15, No 2 (2018) Vol 15, No 2 (2018) Vol 15, No 1 (2018) Vol 15, No 1 (2018) Vol 14, No 4 (2017) Vol 14, No 4 (2017) Vol 14, No 3 (2017) Vol 14, No 3 (2017) Vol 14, No 2 (2017) Vol 14, No 2 (2017) Vol 14, No 1 (2017) Vol 14, No 1 (2017) Vol 13, No 4 (2016) Vol 13, No 4 (2016) Vol 13, No 3 (2016) Vol 13, No 3 (2016) Vol 13, No 2 (2016) Vol 13, No 2 (2016) Vol 13, No 1 (2016) Vol 13, No 1 (2016) Vol 12, No 4 (2015) Vol 12, No 4 (2015) Vol 12, No 3 (2015) Vol 12, No 3 (2015) Vol 12, No 2 (2015) Vol 12, No 2 (2015) Vol 12, No 1 (2015) Vol 12, No 1 (2015) Vol 11, No 4 (2014) Vol 11, No 4 (2014) Vol 11, No 3 (2014) Vol 11, No 3 (2014) Vol 11, No 2 (2014) Vol 11, No 2 (2014) Vol 11, No 1 (2014) Vol 11, No 1 (2014) Vol 10, No 4 (2013) Vol 10, No 4 (2013) Vol 10, No 3 (2013) Vol 10, No 3 (2013) Vol 10, No 2 (2013) Vol 10, No 2 (2013) Vol 10, No 1 (2013) Vol 10, No 1 (2013) Vol 9, No 4 (2012) Vol 9, No 4 (2012) Vol 9, No 3 (2012) Vol 9, No 3 (2012) Vol 9, No 2 (2012) Vol 9, No 2 (2012) Vol 9, No 1 (2012) Vol 9, No 1 (2012) Vol 8, No 6 (2011) Vol 8, No 6 (2011) Vol 8, No 5 (2011) Vol 8, No 5 (2011) Vol 8, No 4 (2011) Vol 8, No 4 (2011) Vol 8, No 3 (2011) Vol 8, No 3 (2011) Vol 8, No 2 (2011) Vol 8, No 2 (2011) Vol 8, No 1 (2011) Vol 8, No 1 (2011) Vol 7, No 6 (2010) Vol 7, No 6 (2010) Vol 7, No 5 (2010) Vol 7, No 5 (2010) Vol 7, No 4 (2010) Vol 7, No 4 (2010) Vol 7, No 3 (2010) Vol 7, No 3 (2010) Vol 7, No 2 (2010) Vol 7, No 2 (2010) Vol 7, No 1 (2010) Vol 7, No 1 (2010) More Issue

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name
-

Contact Email
-

Phone
-

Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address
Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6. Jakarta 10110

Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,

Dki jakarta

INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name -

Contact Email -

Phone -

Journal Mail Official jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6. Jakarta 10110

Location Kota adm. jakarta pusat, Dki jakarta INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Contact Name
-

Contact Email
-

Phone
-

Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address
Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6. Jakarta 10110

Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,

Dki jakarta

INDONESIA