Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Article Per Year (5 Year)

All

Jurnal Konstitusi

jk
Website

Published by Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

ISSN : 18297706 EISSN : 25481657 DOI : 10.31078

Core Subject : Education, Social,

Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Jurnal Konstitusi merupakan media triwulanan guna penyebarluasan (diseminasi) hasil penelitian atau kajian konseptual tentang konstitusi dan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi terbit empat nomor dalam setahun (Maret, Juni, September, dan Desember). Jurnal Konstitusi memuat hasil penelitian atau kajian konseptual (hasil pemikiran) tentang konstitusi, putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi serta isu-isu hukum konstitusi dan ketatanegaraan yang belum pernah dipublikasikan di media lain. Jurnal Konstitusi ditujukan untuk kalangan pakar, akademisi, praktisi, penyelenggara negara, LSM, serta pemerhati hukum konstitusi dan ketatanegaraan.

Arjuna Subject : -

Articles 896 Documents

84 85 86 87 88

Kebijakan Impor Indonesia Atas Produk Hewan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 129/PUU-XIII/2015 Irna Nurhayati; Aminoto Aminoto
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 19, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

This article examines on how Indonesia’s import policy on animal products after the decision of Constitutional Court Number 129/PUU-XIII/2015 should be improved in accordance with the legislation formation and international trade rule. This article was based on normative juridical research supported by interviews with several officials of the Indonesian Ministry of Trade in Jakarta, and focus group discussion with some academics of the Universitas Gadjah Mada in Yogyakarta. The data were analyzed qualitatively using inductive approach. This article concludes that this Indonesia’s import policy is consistent with the formal principle of regulation formation, but does not fully comply with the substantive principle. This Indonesia’s import policy is in accordance with the regionalization and harmonization principles of the WTO SPS Agreement. However, it seems to be inconsistent with Article XI.1 GATT, because it requires certain conditions categorized as quantitative restrictions.

Menggagas Judicial Activism dalam Putusan Presidential Threshold di Mahkamah Konstitusi Bagus Surya Prabowo
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 19, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

This study aims to explain the application of judicial activism carried out by the Constitutional Court and the reasons for the need for the Constitutional Court to apply judicial activism in the presidential threshold decision through normative juridical research by explaining interrelated principles. The study results show that the Constitutional Court often uses judicial activism as in the Decisions of the Constitutional Court Number 5/PUU-V/2007 and Number 102/PUU-VII/2009. Based on the two decisions, there are at least three considerations of the Constitutional Court in implementing judicial activism that has been fulfilled in cases of presidential threshold, namely, 1) political discrimination, 2) violations of constitutional rights, and 3) a socio-political emergency occurs. Therefore, the Constitutional Court has a basis for testing the threshold that violates morality, rationality, and intolerable injustice. Thus, the Constitutional Court should use judicial activism to give appreciation for substantial justice to revive the value of expediency and justice in society.

Kegagalan Peraturan Penanganan Covid-19 di Indonesia Fikri Hadi; Farina Gandryani
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 19, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

COVID-19's occurrence in Indonesia requires the use of a variety of legal instruments related to COVID-19 in Indonesia. In practice, the existence of various legislative laws creates new legal concerns, such as failure to implement in connection to the original handling of COVID-19. Both Lon Fuller's concept of legal failure and Emergency Constitutional Law can be used to explain this failure. According to this article, failure to implement COVID-19 handling manifests itself in a variety of ways: First, laws and regulations have yet to incorporate the concept of an outbreak as a disaster. Second, the government neglected to adopt legislative rules through the provisions of the Health Authenticity Acts. Third, the failure to establish consistent and evolving regulations was not caused by the controlled medications or the regulations in place. According to this article, the regulation failed because the government did not declare a state of emergency prior to its enactment.

Calon Tunggal Pilkada: Krisis Kepemimpinan dan Ancaman Bagi Demokrasi Rofi Aulia Rahman; Iwan Satriawan; Marchethy Riwani Diaz
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 19, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

The single candidate became a political phenomenon in Indonesia. However, the phenomenon rarely happens, consistently increasing the number of single candidates in the local election. This research aims to analyze whether this political phenomenon alerts democracy decadency or a typical circumstance in a democratic state. The method used in this research is doctrinal legal research. The result shows several reasons the single candidate consistently increases from event-to-event sort of an epidemic virus that could spread across the province. Some factors supporting the rise of the single-candidate phenomenon, for instance, the local parliamentary threshold of proposing the candidate, public distrust to the political parties, disfunction of a political party to giving a political education for its members and constituents, and the political parties tend to avoid the political risks of losing (incumbent). Finally, this single candidate phenomenon is a bad alert for democracy development, notably in the local area.

Menakar Transformasi Bawaslu Menjadi Lembaga Independen Peradilan Pemilukada Aprilian Sumodiningrat
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 19, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Since Law Number 12 of 2008, there has been a change in the regulation of the institution's power that settles Regional Election disputes. The Constitutional Court was given jurisdiction to decide disputes regarding Regional Election results due to this reform. By judgment number 97/PUU-XI/2013, the Constitutional Court revoked this power. In response to this judgment, the President and the House of Representatives of Republic of Indonesia issued Law No.8 of 2015, which stated that the Constitutional Court would redetermine the Regional Election results until a special election court was established. The fundamental issue addressed in this paper is the necessity of converting Bawaslu into a special election court and the form and scope of Bawaslu after it has been changed. A normative legal research technique is used in this work. The study's findings show that Bawaslu actuality as a quasi-judicial entity that works as an investigator and public prosecutor in electoral crime cases supports the argument for its transition into an independent election special court.

Perluasan Kewenangan Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia Terhadap Pengawasan Media Digital Moch. Marsa Taufiqurrohman; Jayus Jayus; A'an Efendi
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 19, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

The problem of broadcasting is very complex, consisting of the definition and supervision of broadcasting which is still unclear and the authority of KPI is still weak to supervise digital media. The research objectives are: First, to look at the legal problems of the Indonesian Broadcasting Commission in supervising Digital Media. Second, the concept and practice of broadcasters on digital media surveillance in other countries. Third, the design of the Indonesian Broadcasting Commission's supervision of digital media supervision. The results of the study show that first, there are still legal problems with the position of KPI on digital media supervision. Second, digital media surveillance in Germany and Australia has been quite advanced which has strictly regulated broadcasting in digital with an integrated system. Third, the design is carried out by strengthening KPI institutions, institutional integration, and the "legislative convergence" approach.

Peninjauan Hukum Menurut Hukum Adat Kampar: Sumbangan dalam Mewujudkan Hukum yang Responsif Haniah Ilhami
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 19, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

The development of Indonesian constitutional law, especially judicial review, is influenced by the liberal continental and Anglo-Saxon legal systems. Meanwhile, Kampar customary law already has a legal review system with the philosophy "Adat tali bapilin tigo, tigo tunggku sajoghangan" with the ultimate goal "Adat bersendi syara’, syara’ bersendi Kitabullah". This paper examines legal review under Kampar customary law, using qualitative analysis, historical approaches, and the identification of unwritten laws. The concept presented is based on the concept of reasoning for the formation of a norm system that combines three elements, namely religion, custom, and government (the Trinity). The coherence of this concept should be a new offering in the expanded power of judicial review. The review of the legal norms should extend to the level of the ethical review. The expansion can be done by adopting the concept of legal testing reasoning according to Kampar customary law according to the moral system.

Aktualisasi Checks And Balances Lembaga Negara: Antara Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat dan Mahkamah Konstitusi Hanif Fudin
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 19, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

The 1945 Constitution as the constitution of the Indonesian state which adopts a distribution of power system accompanied by a mechanism of checks and balances between state institutions based on popular sovereignty. In this case, as the People's Consultative Assembly and the Constitutional Court which have the authority related to the 1945 Constitution directly. Then it contains the research distinction that is the actual inherence of the authority of the People's Consultative Assembly and the Constitutional Court institutions as the guardians of the constitution through a technical review of checks and balances. Therefore, to scientifically strengthen this legal research, a juridical-normative, philosophical and conceptual-critical approach is used. On that basis, it is considered that between the People's Consultative Assembly and the Constitutional Court have actual significance of the checks and balances mechanism on their institutional authority as the guardian of the constitution. Therefore, it has implications for strengthening the institutional authority of the said state institution and realizing the order of legal civilization and democracy in the 1945 Constitution as the state constitution which is the central point of the administration of the Indonesian state as a democratic law state.

Menguji Ketangguhan Realisme: Kritik terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013 Pasca Pemilu Serentak 2019 Titon Slamet Kurnia
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 19, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

This article examines Constitutional Court Decision Number 14/PUU-XI/2013 following the simultaneous elections of 2019. The object is the correctness of the utilisation of realism as a theory of adjudication by the Court in deciding the constitutionality of Law Number 42 of 2008. It can be concluded that, the Court’s decision is false, i.e. it fails to strengthen presidential in Indonesia, as expected by the Court, according to coattail effect theory. Hence, responding to this failure, this article suggests a caveat that the utilisation of realism should anticipate its fallibility. Therefore, responding to the issue to be more general, this article also suggests a proposal for a constitutional amendment to restructure the judicial review mechanism in accordance with the Canadian model known as, conceptually, judicial review with legislative finality. The recommendation aims to anticipate judicial error in constitutional interpretation as shown by the Constitutional Court Decision Number 14/PUU-XI/2013.

Konsep Fairness John Rawls, Kritik dan Relevansinya Sunaryo Sunaryo
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 19, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Justice is very fundamental in a pluralistic society. Rawls's view of justice, which is understood as fairness, tries to offer how we organize a pluralistic society fairly. This view is crucial to be considered. The concept of fairness is understood as the ability to act that is acceptable and supported reciprocally. In Rawls's view, the existence of mutual acceptance and support from free and equal citizens without intimidation and pressure signifies that the agreement is fair. He called this kind of attitude reasonableness. In a just society, people must be able to act reasonably. With this capacity, they will agree on the principles of justice, which will be the basis of their social unity. The concept of fairness is essential for a pluralistic society like Indonesia. If we fail to bring justice in a pluralistic society, then our unity as a society will be under serious threat.

Page 86 of 90 | Total Record : 896

84 85 86 87 88

Filter by Year

2010 2022

Filter By Issues

All Issue Vol 19, No 4 (2022) Vol 19, No 3 (2022) Vol 19, No 2 (2022) Vol 19, No 1 (2022) Vol 18, No 4 (2021) Vol 18, No 3 (2021) Vol 18, No 2 (2021) Vol 18, No 1 (2021) Vol 17, No 4 (2020) Vol 17, No 3 (2020) Vol 17, No 2 (2020) Vol 17, No 1 (2020) Vol 16, No 4 (2019) Vol 16, No 3 (2019) Vol 16, No 2 (2019) Vol 16, No 2 (2019) Vol 16, No 1 (2019) Vol 16, No 1 (2019) Vol 15, No 4 (2018) Vol 15, No 4 (2018) Vol 15, No 3 (2018) Vol 15, No 3 (2018) Vol 15, No 2 (2018) Vol 15, No 2 (2018) Vol 15, No 1 (2018) Vol 15, No 1 (2018) Vol 14, No 4 (2017) Vol 14, No 4 (2017) Vol 14, No 3 (2017) Vol 14, No 3 (2017) Vol 14, No 2 (2017) Vol 14, No 2 (2017) Vol 14, No 1 (2017) Vol 14, No 1 (2017) Vol 13, No 4 (2016) Vol 13, No 4 (2016) Vol 13, No 3 (2016) Vol 13, No 3 (2016) Vol 13, No 2 (2016) Vol 13, No 2 (2016) Vol 13, No 1 (2016) Vol 13, No 1 (2016) Vol 12, No 4 (2015) Vol 12, No 4 (2015) Vol 12, No 3 (2015) Vol 12, No 3 (2015) Vol 12, No 2 (2015) Vol 12, No 2 (2015) Vol 12, No 1 (2015) Vol 12, No 1 (2015) Vol 11, No 4 (2014) Vol 11, No 4 (2014) Vol 11, No 3 (2014) Vol 11, No 3 (2014) Vol 11, No 2 (2014) Vol 11, No 2 (2014) Vol 11, No 1 (2014) Vol 11, No 1 (2014) Vol 10, No 4 (2013) Vol 10, No 4 (2013) Vol 10, No 3 (2013) Vol 10, No 3 (2013) Vol 10, No 2 (2013) Vol 10, No 2 (2013) Vol 10, No 1 (2013) Vol 10, No 1 (2013) Vol 9, No 4 (2012) Vol 9, No 4 (2012) Vol 9, No 3 (2012) Vol 9, No 3 (2012) Vol 9, No 2 (2012) Vol 9, No 2 (2012) Vol 9, No 1 (2012) Vol 9, No 1 (2012) Vol 8, No 6 (2011) Vol 8, No 6 (2011) Vol 8, No 5 (2011) Vol 8, No 5 (2011) Vol 8, No 4 (2011) Vol 8, No 4 (2011) Vol 8, No 3 (2011) Vol 8, No 3 (2011) Vol 8, No 2 (2011) Vol 8, No 2 (2011) Vol 8, No 1 (2011) Vol 8, No 1 (2011) Vol 7, No 6 (2010) Vol 7, No 6 (2010) Vol 7, No 5 (2010) Vol 7, No 5 (2010) Vol 7, No 4 (2010) Vol 7, No 4 (2010) Vol 7, No 3 (2010) Vol 7, No 3 (2010) Vol 7, No 2 (2010) Vol 7, No 2 (2010) Vol 7, No 1 (2010) Vol 7, No 1 (2010) More Issue

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name
-

Contact Email
-

Phone
-

Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address
Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6. Jakarta 10110

Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,

Dki jakarta

INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name -

Contact Email -

Phone -

Journal Mail Official jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6. Jakarta 10110

Location Kota adm. jakarta pusat, Dki jakarta INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Contact Name
-

Contact Email
-

Phone
-

Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address
Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6. Jakarta 10110

Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,

Dki jakarta

INDONESIA