cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Mathematics
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 347 Documents
 10   11   12   13   14 
PROFIL TINGKAT BERPIKIR KREATIF SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI 16 SURAKARTA DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH ARITMATIKA SOSIAL DITINJAU DARI MOTIVASI DAN GENDER Linda Sunarya; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Gatut Iswahyudi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract. This study aimed to describe: (1) the creative thinking level of male Junior High School students, who had high motivation in solving some problems in appropriate to Polya’s Steps, (2) the creative thinking level of female Junior High School students, who had high motivation in solving some problems in appropriate to Polya’s steps, (3) the creative thinking level of male Junior High School students, who had medium motivation in solving some problems in appropriate to Polya’s steps, (4) the creative thinking level of female Junior High School students, who had medium motivation in solving some problems in appropriate to Polya’s steps, (5) the creative thinking level of male Junior High School students, who had low motivation in solving some problems in appropriate to Polya’s steps, (6) the creative thinking level of female Junior High School students, who had low motivation in solving some problems in appropriate to Polya’s steps. This study was a qualitative study. The subject of this study was 7th grade students of Public Junior High School 16 Surakarta. The subject selection procedure of this study was purposive sampling. The subject used in this study were six subjects of study that was a male student with high motivation, a female student with high motivation, a male student with medium motivation, a female student with medium motivation, a male student with low motivation, and a female student with low motivation. The instrument in collecting data was classification of students’ learning motivation, problem solving assignment sheet, and interview manual. Based on the study had been carried out, there was one student, who was belonged to the creative thinking abilities level 4, one student was belonged to the creative thinking abilities level 2, and four student was belonged to the creative thinking abilities level 0. In the creative thinking abilities level 4, the student was able to demonstrate fluency, flexibility, and novelty. In the creative thinking abilities level 2, the student was able to demonstrate novelty, but not able to demonstrate any fluency and flexibility. In the creative thinking abilities level 0, the student was not able to demonstrate the fluency, flexibility, or novelty. Keywords: Creative thinking level, Problem solving, Motivation, Gender
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAME TOURNAMENT (TGT) DAN MAKE A MATCH (MM) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI HIMPUNAN DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN SRAGEN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2016 Rini Dewi Safitri; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Budi Usodo
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed form reasoning ability of the students. The learning models compared were learning model of the scientific Teams Games Tournament (TGT), scientific Make a Match (MM), and scientific classical. The type of this study was a quasi-experimental study with a 3x3 factorial design. The population was all grade VII students of Public Junior High Schools in Sragen Regency. Sample was collected by stratified cluster random sampling. Instruments used for data collection were mathematics achievement test and reasoning ability questionnaire. The data analysis technique used was the two-way ANOVA  with unequal cell. The conclusions of the study were as follows. (1) The mathematics learning achievement of students treated with TGT-PS learning model was better than that of those treated with MM-PS learning model and K-PS learning model.   the mathematics learning achievement of students treated with learning model was as good as that of those treated with K-PS learning model. (2) The mathematics learning achievement of students with high reasoning ability was better than that of those with medium reasoning ability and low reasoning ability. The mathematics learning achievement of students with medium reasoning ability was better than that of those with low reasoning ability. (3) In TGT-PS learning model, the learning achievement of students with high reasoning ability was as good as that of those with medium reasoning ability, and that of those with high reasoning ability was better than that of those with low reasoning ability, and that of those with medium reasoning ability was as good as that of those with low reasoning ability. In MM-PS and K-PS learning models, the learning achievement of students with high reasoning ability was better than that of those with medium reasoning ability and low reasoning ability. And that of those with medium reasoning ability was as good as that of those with low reasoning ability. (4) In students with high reasoning ability and low reasoning ability, the students treated with TGT-PS model had the same learning achievement to those treated with MM-PS model, the students treated with TGT-PS model had the same learning achievement to those treated with K-PS model, the students treated with MM-PS model had the same learning achievement to those treated with K-PS model. In students with medium reasoning ability, the students treated with TGT-PS model had better learning achievement to those treated with K-PS model. The students treated MM-PS model had the same learning achievement to those treated with K-PS learning model.Keywords: Cooperative Learning, Teams Games Tournament, Make a Match, Classical Learning, Scientific Approach, Reasoning ability.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TAI DENGAN PENDEKATAN KONTEKSTUAL PADA POKOK BAHASAN BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP SE-KOTA KEDIRI Nanndo Yannuansa; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models of TAI Type with contextual approach, learning models of TAI and direct learning model on mathematics achievement viewed from learning style. The type of the research was quasi experimental research using design factorial 3x3. The population was the students in grade VIII junior high school in a city of Kediri. The samples of the research consisted of 321 students; 107 students belonged to experiment class one, 103 students belonged to experiment class two, and 111 students belonged to control class. The data of the research were gathered through multiple choice test of learning achievement and questionnaire of learning style. Before giving the treatment, the population  had to be in balanced condition. The balance test used one way analysis of variance with unequal cell frequencies. Test requirements included normality test used Lilliefors method and the homogeneity test used Bartlett method. The hypothesis test used two ways analysis of variance with unequal cell frequencies at the significance level of 0.05. The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) Students who taught by cooperative learning model of TAI type with contextual approach have better mathematics learning achievement than TAI type and direct learning, the students who taught by cooperative learning model of TAI type have better mathematics learning achievement than direct learning. (2) Each of the learning styles of visual, auditory or kinesthetic does not have an influence on learning achievement. (3) In each learning style, the students who taught by the TAI with contextual approach have better mathematics learning achievement than TAI type and direct learning and the students who taught by cooperative learning model of TAI type have better mathematics learning achievement than direct learning. (4) In each learning model, the students with the visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles have an equal learning achievement in Mathematics.Keywords: TAI learning models, contextual approaches, and learning style.
EKSPERIMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF JIGSAW DAN TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT (TGT) DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN INTRAPERSONAL SISWA Noor Hidayati; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract. The aims of the research were to determine: (1) which one has better learning achievement, Jigsaw learning model, TGT, or conventional, (2) which one has better learning achievement, students with high, middle or low intrapersonal, (3) based on learning model, which one has better learning achievement, students with high, middle, or low intrapersonal intelligence, (4) based on intrapersonal intelligence, which one has better learning achievement, Jigsaw learning model, TGT, or conventional. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental research with  a 3 x 3 factorial design. The population was XI science  students  of Senior High School in Kudus regency on academic year 2013/2014. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The size of the sample were 277 students consisted of 95 students in the first experimental group, 87 students in the second and 95 for the control class. The instruments used were mathematics  achievement test and  intrapersonal intelligence questionnaire. The hypotheses testing used unbalanced two ways ANOVA. Based on hypothesis testing, it can be concluded as follow. (1) Student learning achievement  treated by TGT  is better than Jigsaw  and conventional, and Jigsaw model is better than conventional, (2) Learning achievement of students who have high intrapersonal intelligence is better than students who have middle and low intrapersonal intelligence, and students who have middle intrapersonal intelligence is better than students who have low intrapersonal intelligence, (3) Based on  all types of learning models,    students who have high intrapersonal intelligence have better learning achievement than students who have middle and low intrapersonal intelligence, and students who have  middle intrapersonal intelligence have better learning achievement than student  who have low intrapersonal intelligence. (4)  For high intrapersonal intelligence, students learning achievement treated by TGT is better than Jigsaw, for both learning models,  Jigsaw  and conventional have the same learning achievement. For middle intrapersonal intelligence, students learning achievement treated by TGT  is better than conventional, while both learning models,  Jigsaw and conventional have the same learning achievement. For low intrapersonal intelligence,  conventional and TGT are better than Jigsaw, while both learning models, TGT and conventional have the same learning achievement.Keywords: Jigsaw, TGT,  intrapersonal intelligence, learning achievement.  
INTUISI SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI 1 NGANJUK DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) Erdyna Dwi Etika; Imam Sujadi; Sri Subanti
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this research were to  describe: (1) the category of intuition of seventh grade student of SMPN 1 Nganjuk with type of climber, camper, and  quitter in solving mathematics problems. (2) the type of intuition of seventh grade student of SMPN 1 Nganjuk with type of climber, camper, and quitter in solving mathematics problems. The type of this research was a case study research. The prosedure of selecting the subject used purposive snowball sampling. Data was collected by using think aloud method. To determine the validity of data was undertaken with time-triangulation. The results showed as follows: (1) The category of intuition on the students of SMP N 1 Nganjuk : (a) students with climbers type, students used category affirmatory intuition in understanding the problem; students used affirmatory intuition in devising a plan; students used anticipatory intuition in carrying out the plan; students used affirmatory intuition in looking back the answer. (b) Students with campers types, students used affirmatory intuition in understanding the problem; students used  antisipatori intuition in devising a plan; students didn’t use intuition in carrying out the plan; students  didn’t use intuition in looking back the answer. (c) Students with quitters types, students didn’t use intuition in understanding the problem; students used affirmatory intuition in devising a plan; students used anticipatory intuition in carrying out the plan; students didn’t use intuition in looking back the answer. (2) Type of intuition on students of SMP N 1 Nganjuk: (a) Students with climber types, students used intuition based on the senses in understanding the problem; students used intuition based on the senses in devising a plan; students use intuition based on the senses in carrying out the plan; students used intuition based on the senses in looking back the answer. (b) Students with campers types, students used intuition based on the senses in understanding the problem; students used intuition based on real mathematical thinking in devising a plan; students didn’t use intuition in carrying out the plan; students didn’t use intuition in looking back the answer. (c) Students with quitters types, students didn’t use intuition in understanding the problem; students used intuition based on the senses in devising a plan; students used intuition based on the sense in carrying out the plan; students didn’t use intuition in looking back the answer.Keywords: Intuition, Category of intuition, Type of intuition, Adversity Quotient (AQ) 
EKSPERIMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN INKUIRI DAN PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH PADA MATERI POKOK BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN NGAWI Ony Syaiful Rizal; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Budi Usodo
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of this research were to find out: (1) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, the students with inquiry learning, problem based learning model, or direct instruction; (2) which one having better mathematics learning achievement, the students with visual, auditory, or kinesthetic learning style; (3) at each learning model, are there any difference in mathematics learning achievement between the students with visual, auditory, or kinesthetic learning style; (4) at each type of learning style, are there any difference in mathematics learning achievement between students taught using inquiry learning model, problem based learning model, or direct instruction. This study was a quasi-experimental research with a 3x3 factorial design. The hypotheses testing used two ways ANOVA with unequal cell. From the research, it could be concluded as follows. (1) The students taught with problem based learning model had better learning achievement than those taught with both inquiry learning model and direct instruction. The students taught with inquiry learning model had better learning achievement than direct instruction. (2) The learning achievement of the students with auditory learning style was better than that of those with visual and kinesthetic learning style. The learning achievement of the students with visual learning style was better than that of those with kinesthetic learning style. (3) In inquiry learning model, problem based learning model and In the direct instruction, there was no difference in learning achievement in each learning style. (4) In the students with visual learning style, the use of problem based learning model provided the better mathematics learning achievement than the use of inquiry learning model and direct instruction. The use of inquiry learning model provided the mathematics learning achievement as good as the use of direct instruction. In the students with auditory and kinesthetic learning style, there was no difference in learning achievement in each learning model.Keywords: Problem Based Learning Model, Inquiry Learning, Mathematics Learning                         Achievement
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK-PAIR-SHARE (TPS), TIPE MAKE A MATCH (MAM) DAN TIPE GUIDE NOTE TAKING (GNT) DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF SISWA SMA MUHAMMADIYAH KOTA SURAKARTA Nurul Amalia K W; Riyadi Riyadi; Imam Sujadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of this research were to know: (1) which of  learning model gives a better learning mathematics achievement, learning model of TPS, learning model of MAM or learning model of GNT on logarithm, (2) which has better learning mathematics achievement, students with cognitive style FD or FI cognitive style, (3) in each learning model (TPS, MAM, GNT), which cognitive style that give a better learning mathematics achievement, the cognitive style of FD or cognitive styles of FI. (4) in each cognitive style (field dependent (FD) and field independent (FI)), which of the learning model give a better learning mathematics result, learning model of TPS, MAM or GNT. This research was a quasi-experimental research with a 3 x 2 factorial design. The population in this research was senior high school students of grade X in Surakarta. The sample was taken by using the cluster random sampling technique. The study samples of this research were the students of SMA Muhammadiyah 1, SMA Muhammadiyah 2, and SMA Muhammadiyah 3. The instruments that was used to collect the data were cognitive test styles and the learning mathematics achievement test of logarithms. Testing of hypothesis used  two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells using significance level  a = 0.05. Based on hypothesis testing, it can be concluded that: (1) the learning achievement in mathematics on topic of discussion of logarithm resulting from the learning model of the TPS model  is as good as that of the MAM model  and that of the GNT model, (2) the students with the FI cognitive styles have a better learning achievement in mathematics on the topic of logarithm than those with the FD cognitive style, (3) in each of the learning models (TPS, MAM, GNT) the FI cognitive style results in  a better learning achievement in mathematics on the topic of logarithm than the FD cognitive style, (4) in FD cognitif style, the learning models of TPS, learning models of MAM, learning models of GNT give the same learning achievement, whereas in FI cognitive style, the learning models of GNT gives a better learning mathematics achievement than learning models of MAM and learning models of TPS.Keywords: TPS, MAM, GNT, Cognitive Styles, Learning Mathematics achievement
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH (PBM) DAN PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH (PBM) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN SRAGEN Reka Pramukti; Budi Usodo; Sri Subanti
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract : The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from mathematic communication ability. The learning model compared were direct, PBM with scientific approach, and PBM. This was quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population were all students of Junior High School in Sragen. The samples are the students of SMPN 2 Gemolong, SMPN 1 Kedawung, and SMPN 2 Masaran, which taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and mathematic communication ability test. The data analysis technique was used unbalanced two ways anova. Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded as follows. (1) The students receiving PBM learning model with scientific approach and PBM learning model had better learning achievement than those receiving direct learning model. The students receiving PBM learning model with scientific approach had equal learning achievement to those receiving PBM learning model. (2) The students with high mathematic communication ability had better learning achievement than those with medium and low mathematic communication abilities. Those with medium mathematic communication ability had equal learning achievement to those with low one. (3) In each groups of student mathematic communication ability PBM learning model with scientific approach and PBM learning model provided better learning achievement than direct learning model, PBM learning model with scientific approach provided equal learning achievement to PBM learning model. (4) In each learning model, the students with high mathematic communication ability had better learning achievement than those with medium and low mathematic communication abilities. Those with medium mathematic communication ability had equal learning achievement to those with low one.Keywords: Direct  learning  model,  PBM  learning  model with scientific approach, PBM learning model, Mathematic Communication Ability.
PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DENGAN STUDENT ACTIVE LEARNING BERBANTUAN MEDIA VISUAL MATH PADA POKOK BAHASAN PELUANG KELAS XI IPA SMA NEGERI 2 PURWOKERTO TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Anggrahini Anggrahini; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract. The aims of the research were: (1) to find a proper Mathematics-teaching learning-kit using Student Active Learning (SAL) with Media Visual Math on Probability, (2) to know which one resulting in better students' achievement, Student Active Learning (SAL) with visual math media or direct teaching in improving the students' achievement. This research was conducted in two stages. The first stage was developing and deciding teaching learning kit using Student Active Learning (SAL) with media visual math involved in the research and development. In this stage, information collecting, planning, developing, trying out the teaching learning kit, and treating teaching learning kit using Student Active Learning (SAL) with media visual math were done. The try out was held in three teaching learning processes. The second stage was testing the effectiveness of the teaching learning kit in quasi experimental research. The population was XI Science program students of  SMA N 2 Purwokerto in the first semester year of 2013/2014. The sample was split in 2 groups, they were experiment group and control group. The technique of data analysis used here was student’s t analysis. From the analysis, we find that: (1) teaching learning kit using Student Active Learning (SAL) with Media Visual Math was a valid device based on  validator’s scoring, activity observation, skill and response of students, so it can be applied in SMA Negeri 2 Purwokerto; (2) the students taught using SAL with visual math media had better mathematics achievement than students taught using direct teaching. Keywords: Teaching learning kit, Student Active Learning (SAL), Visual Math Media
KARAKTERISTIK PENALARAN SISWA KELAS XI SEKOLAH MENENGAH ATAS TENTANG SAMPEL Muhammad Saifuddin Zuhri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This research aims to describe how the reasoning characteristics of the 11th students of Senior High School about samples. This study was a descriptive qualitative research. The subject of research was the 11th students of SMA Negeri 1 Purwodadi consisting of two students for each level of mathematics competency. The subject selection criteria were based on student mathematics competency and opinion expressing competency, either in spoken and written form. The data was collected using written test and interview technique. The data analysis was done based on the data on written test and interview results. Then the method triangulation was run to produce a valid data from the research subject. The result of research showed that the students with low mathematics competency were at level 1 with the following characteristics: the students can give example of sample, can describe term of sample, approve the small number of sample selection in the research, do not recommend appropriate selection in sample taking. The students with medium mathematics competency were at level 2 with the following characteristics: the students can give example about the sample, can describe term of sample, combine small size with appropriate selection methods or large sample size with inappropriate selection methods. Some students with high mathematics competency were at level 2 and some other were at level 3 with the following characteristics: the students can give example about sample, can describe term of sample, recommend of the larger size sampling from the population, recommend the selection through random sampling technique and can explain the procedures randomly, and can identify the potentially biased sampling in a research.Keywords: Reasoning, Reasoning about Sample, Sample Concept, Reasoning Characteristics about Sample.

Page 12 of 35 | Total Record : 347

 10   11   12   13   14 

Filter by Year

2013 2018


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 5, No 3 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 5, No 2 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 5, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika More Issue