cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Kamirsyah Wahyu
Contact Email
kwahyu@uinmataram.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jurnalbeta@gmail.com
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota mataram,
Nusa tenggara barat
INDONESIA
Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram
ISSN : 20855893     EISSN : 25410458     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education, Social,
Education Social Sciences
Bετα: Jurnal Tadris Matematika (p-ISSN: 2085-5893 | e-ISSN: 2541-0458) is scientific, peer-reviewed, and open access journal published by Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Mataram in collaboration with Asosiasi Dosen Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika PTKIN (Ad-Mapeta) half-yearly on May and November. It has been indexed in SINTA 2 (Accredited Journal, Decree No.21/E/KPT/2018) by Director General of Strengthening Research and Development, Ministry of Research Technology and Higher Education of the Republic of Indonesia in 2018. The indexing status will be active until 2020.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 181 Documents
 15   16   17   18   19 
Assessing the problem-solving test items and self-efficacy questionnaire in statistics education Imam Nursahid; Agus Maman Abadi; Wahyu Anugerah Sianipar
Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika Vol. 19 No. 1 (2026): Beta May
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20414/betajtm.v19i1.779

Abstract

[English]: The study aims to analyze the quality of problem-solving test items and a self-efficacy questionnaire using the AnBuso. The problem-solving test items were developed to measure the students’ cognitive abilities ranging from understanding (C2) to evaluating (C5) in statistical topics. This study employed a quantitative descriptive approach focusing on eight-grade students at a public school SMP Negeri 1 Mlati with a sample consisted of 32 students. The analysis was proceeded in terms of test item characteristics, including discriminative power, difficulty level, expert validity, and item reliability. The findings indicated that 53.33% of the items had good discriminative function, 20% had fairly good function, and 26.67% had poor function. A total of 33.33% of the items were classified as easy, 66.67% as moderate, and none as difficult. The validity was 0.90 (highly valid), and the reliability of multiple-choice items was 0.51 (moderate), while open-ended items reached 0.72 (high). Meanwhile, the self-efficacy questionnaire had a validity of 0.89 (highly valid) and a reliability of 0.83 (very high). Overall, the test instruments and questionnaire showed high validity and adequate reliability. It is hoped that the research finding can serve as a reference for educators and curriculum developers in designing better evaluation tools so that the learning objectives can be optimally achieved. [Bahasa]: Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis kualitas butir soal kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan angket self-efficacy berbantuan aplikasi AnBuso. Soal kemampuan pemecahan masalah dikembangkan untuk mengukur kemampuan kognitif siswa pada level memahami (C2) hingga mengevaluasi (C5) pada materi statistika. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kuantitatif dengan fokus utama pada siswa kelas VIII di SMP Negeri 1 Mlati dengan sampel sebanyak 32 orang siswa. Proses analisis dilakukan dari segi karakteristik soal yaitu daya pembeda, tingkat kesulitan kemudian validitas ahli, dan reliabilitas soal. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa instrumen pemecahan masalah memiliki daya pembeda yaitu 53.33% soal memiliki fungsi pembeda yang baik, 20% cukup baik, dan 26.67% tidak baik. Sebanyak 33.33% soal tergolong mudah, 66.67% sedang, dan tidak ada soal yang tergolong sulit. Kevalidan sebesar 0.90 (sangat valid) dan reliabilitas soal pilihan ganda sebesar 0.51 (sedang), soal uraian 0.72 (tinggi). Sementara angket self-efficacy memiliki kevalidan sebesar 0.89 (sangat valid) dan reliabilitas sebesar 0.83 (sangat tinggi). Secara keseluruhan, instrumen tes dan angket yang dikembangkan menunjukkan tingkat kevalidan yang tinggi serta reliabilitas yang memadai. Hasil analisis ini diharapkan dapat menjadi acuan bagi pendidik dan pengembang kurikulum dalam menyusun alat evaluasi yang lebih baik, sehingga tujuan pembelajaran dapat tercapai secara optimal. 

Page 19 of 19 | Total Record : 181

 15   16   17   18   19 

Filter by Year

2010 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 19 No. 1 (2026): Beta May Vol. 18 No. 2 (2025): Beta November Vol. 18 No. 1 (2025): Beta May Vol. 17 No. 2 (2024): Beta November Vol. 17 No. 1 (2024): Beta May Vol. 16 No. 2 (2023): Beta November Vol. 16 No. 1 (2023): Beta May Vol. 15 No. 2 (2022): Beta November Vol. 15 No. 1 (2022): Beta May Vol. 14 No. 2 (2021): Beta November Vol. 14 No. 1 (2021): Beta May Vol. 13 No. 2 (2020): Beta November Vol. 13 No. 1 (2020): Beta May Vol. 12 No. 2 (2019): Beta November Vol. 12 No. 1 (2019): Beta May Vol. 11 No. 2 (2018): Beta November Vol. 11 No. 1 (2018): Beta Mei Vol. 10 No. 2 (2017): Beta Nopember Vol. 10 No. 1 (2017): Beta Mei Vol. 9 No. 2 (2016): Beta Nopember Vol. 9 No. 1 (2016): Beta Mei Vol. 8 No. 2 (2015): Beta Nopember Vol. 8 No. 1 (2015): Beta Mei Vol. 7 No. 2 (2014): Beta Nopember Vol. 7 No. 1 (2014): Beta Mei Vol. 6 No. 2 (2013): Beta Nopember Vol. 6 No. 1 (2013): Beta Mei Vol. 5 No. 2 (2012): Beta Nopember Vol. 5 No. 1 (2012): Beta Mei Vol. 4 No. 2 (2011): Beta Nopember Vol. 4 No. 1 (2011): Beta Mei Vol. 3 No. 2 (2010): Beta Nopember More Issue