cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Abdul Musqim
Contact Email
taqimlsq@gmail.com
Phone
+628156862548
Journal Mail Official
studiquranhadis@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Prodi Ilmu Alquran dan Tafsir, Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Pemikiran Islam, UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Jl. Marsda Adisucipto, telp. 62-0274-512156 Yogyakarta
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
ISSN : 14116855     EISSN : 25484737     DOI : -
Core Subject : Religion, Education,
Religion Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Other
JURNAL STUDI ILMU ILMU AL-QUR’AN DAN HADIS is peer-reviewed journal that aims to encourage and promote the study of the Qur’an and designed to facilitate and take the scientific work of researchers, lecturers, students, practitioner and so on into dialogue. The journal contents that discuss various matters relate to the Qur’anic Studies, the Exegesis Studies, the Living Qur’an, the Qur’an and Social Culture, thoughts of figures about the Qur'anic Studies, the Exegesis Studies and so on; Similarly, matters relating to the Hadith, the Hadith Studies, Living Hadith, Hadith and Social Culture, thoughts of figures about hadith and so on.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 234 Documents
 20   21   22   23   24 
Articulating the Prophetic Authority: Some Notes on the Nature of Hadīth Collection in al-Muwatta and Musannaf Literature Asep Nahrul Musadad
Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis Vol. 27 No. 1 (2026): Januari
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/qh.v27i1.7472

Abstract

This article investigates the early articulation of material that would later be established as hadīth, focusing on Mālik b. Anas’ (d. 179/795) al‑Muwattaʾ in the recension of Yahyā al‑Laythī (d. 234/848), ʿAbd al‑Razzāq al‑Sanʿānī’s al‑Musannaf (d. 211/827), and Ibn Abī Syaibah’sal‑Musannaf (d. 235/849). Through an intellectual‑historical approach, it explores how each text articulates its material, the assumptions it makes about prophetic authority, and the salient features of each work. The analysis of these works confirms the well-known pattern that the term hadīthin early usage often denotes non‑prophetic reports and is hermeneutically distinguished from related categories such as sunnah and ʿamal (in the case of al-Muwatta). However, it is also notable that embryonic uses of hadīth to signify prophetic reports are present albeit in limited cases. The works differ in how they frame prophetic authority. The Muwatta privileges embodied practice rooted in the inherited tradition of Madinah rather than narrative transmission. A subsequent reorientation toward prophetic authority emerges as the activity of recording the tradition becomes increasingly text-centered, exemplified by ʿAbd al‑Razzāq’s early trans‑regional efforts to record reports during the intensifying codification movement. Ibn Abī Syaibah represents a further development, in which the authority of post‑successor jurists becomes increasingly constrained in favor of privileging the first three generations of Muslims. In the later phase, hadīth acquires more epistemic significance, increasingly equated with religious knowledge itself, reflecting a trajectory associated with figures such as Ibn Sīrīn and Ibn al‑Mubārak alongside the growing emphasis on isnād authentication. This study is expected to further contribute and further complicate existing scholarship on early hadith literature, particularly regarding its formative period.
Qur’an Reading Methods in Post-Soeharto Indonesia: The Conservative Turn, Commodified Piety, and the Reconfiguration of Qur’anic Authority Mubaidi Sulaeman; Kemas M. Intizham; Abd. Halim; Shinta Nurani
Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis Vol. 27 No. 2 (2026): Juli
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/qh.v26i2.6294

Abstract

Existing studies on Qur’an reading methods in Indonesia have largely examined individual pedagogical models—such as Iqra’, Ummi, Yanbu’a, or Baghdadiyah—while paying limited attention to the political-economic forces shaping their emergence, circulation, and legitimacy in the post-Soeharto era. This article addresses that gap by analyzing Qur’an reading methods not merely as instructional tools but as products embedded within shifting configurations of power, market competition, and religious authority. Using a qualitative library-based approach, the study engages historical scholarship, policy documents, institutional publications, and contemporary literature on Islamic education and religious capitalism. Drawing on Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of field and capital and Talal Asad’s concept of Islam as a discursive tradition, the article demonstrates that Qur’an reading methods function simultaneously as modes of religious transmission, arenas of symbolic and economic competition, and mechanisms for forming pious subjects. The findings show that commodification does not erode religious normativity but rearticulates Qur’anic authority through standardization, certification, branding, and digital mediation. Positioned as a critical test case, Indonesia reveals how Qur’anic education becomes a dynamic site of negotiation between spirituality, authority, and market logic.
The Evolution of Translation Ideology in the 2019 Edition of Qur’an Kemenag: A Comparison with Translations by Shihab, Thalib, Ali, and Pickthall Moch Syarif Hidayatullah; Karlina Helmanita; Mirwan Akhmad Taufiq
Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis Vol. 27 No. 2 (2026): Juli
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/qh.v27i1.6910

Abstract

This article examines the evolution of translation ideology in the 2019 edition of the Indonesian Ministry of Religious Affairs’ Qur’an translation (Qur’an Kemenag) by comparing it with the 1965, 1971, 1989–1990, and 2002 editions. It also compares selected renderings with Indonesian translations by M. Quraish Shihab and Muhammad Thalib and, where relevant, the English translations of Abdullah Yusuf Ali and Marmaduke Pickthall. Using comparative textual analysis, the study evaluates translation method, diction, language style, and the treatment of verses with political and theological implications. The analysis finds that the 2019 edition gives greater priority to domestication than to foreignization, particularly through contextual equivalents and explanatory notes. This orientation differs from the stronger foreignizing tendency of the earliest edition. In politically contested verses, especially those involving awliyāʾ and qawwāmūn, the 2019 edition adopts more contextual and politically moderate renderings than earlier editions. In verses concerning divine attributes, its explanatory notes generally accord with Ashʿarī theology, the dominant theological orientation among Indonesian Muslims. Overall, the 2019 edition is more informative and context-sensitive than its predecessors. Its development illustrates how an official Qur’an translation negotiates linguistic accessibility, state responsibility, political contestation, and theological plurality.
The Semantic Field of Tazkiyah al-Nafs in the Qur’an: A Psychospiritual Framework for Islamic Psychology Nur Ardhiansyah K. Ibrahim; Zulfi Fadhlurrahman; Farhani Azkia; Putri Salsabila Azkya
Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis Vol. 27 No. 2 (2026): Juli
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/qh.v27i1.7542

Abstract

This article reconstructs the semantic field of tazkiyah al-nafs in the Qur’an as a conceptual foundation for Islamic psychology. It addresses a methodological problem in contemporary Islamic psychological discourse: tazkiyah is often used as a normative or therapeutic concept before its Qur’anic semantic structure has been carefully mapped. Combining thematic exegesis (tafsīr mauḍūʻī) with semantic-field analysis, the article examines the root z-k-w, its morphological distribution, contextual anchor loci, oppositional relations, and exegetical corroboration. It identifies QS al-Syams (91):7–10 as the primary structural locus of the field, where nafs, taqwā–fujūr, tazkiyah–tadsiyah, and falāḥ–khaibah are arranged in a layered moral structure. The study argues that tazkiyah cannot be reduced to purification alone. While taṭhīr primarily denotes the removal of impurity, tazkiyah includes purification and exceeds it through cultivation, growth, moral elevation, and teleological orientation toward falāḥ. By distinguishing tazkiyah from related concepts such as taṭhīr, taubah, and iṣlāḥ, the article offers a more precise Qur’anic account of moral formation. Its contribution is therefore pre-clinical and conceptual: it provides a Qur’anic semantic foundation for Islamic psychology without claiming to establish a finalized therapeutic model.
The Distinctive Qur’anic Manuscript of Nāfiʿ’s Qirāʾah Transmitted by Qālūn in the Sang Nila Utama Museum, Riau: A Philological Study Afriadi Putra; Maharsi; Adib Sofia
Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis Vol. 27 No. 2 (2026): Juli
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/qh.v27i1.6362

Abstract

Qur’anic manuscripts preserve material evidence of copying practices and reading traditions. This article analyses Qur’anic manuscript 07.15/2017 in the Sang Nila Utama Museum, Riau, which records the qirāʾah of Nāfiʿ transmitted by Qālūn. Using a qualitative philological approach, the study combines codicological description with a textological examination of reading variants. The codicological analysis covers the manuscript’s paper, watermark, dimensions, textual arrangement, illumination, and dated colophon. Juz 30 is used for the textological analysis because the relevant folios are legible and contain numerous points at which canonical readings differ. The manuscript comprises 863 pages, begins at Q 3:82, and contains several displaced or missing folios. Its colophon names Ibrāhīm bin Aḥmad bin Aḥmad bin al-Amīn al-Khalīl, a Shāfiʿī from Zabīd, and dates completion to 4 Jumādā al-Ūlā 1153 AH (28 July 1740 CE). The analysed portion records four groups of morphological variants and twenty-seven phonological forms associated with Qālūn’s transmission. Because the examination is limited to Juz 30, the findings establish the reading pattern only for that section. The manuscript nevertheless provides material evidence that Nāfiʿ–Qālūn readings circulated within the wider manuscript environment of the Malay world alongside the region’s more common ʿĀṣim–Ḥafṣ tradition.
From Theological Loyalty to Humanistic Integrity: A Maqāṣidī Reconstruction of the Qur’anic Verses on Al-Walā’ wa Al-Barā’ Fathurrosyid; Achmad Lutfi; Mustofa As’ady; Mahmudi
Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis Vol. 27 No. 2 (2026): Juli
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/qh.v27i1.6363

Abstract

This article reconstructs the theological concept of Al-Walā’ wa Al-Barā’ through a maqāṣidī interpretive approach within the context of Indonesia’s plural and multicultural society. The study stems from an epistemological problem regarding literal readings of Qur’anic verses on loyalty, which tend to foster identity-based exclusivism and the delegitimization of non-Muslim groups. Unlike previous studies that predominantly examine Al-Walā’ wa Al-Barā’within the frameworks of Salafi-jihadi ideology and identity politics, this article offers a maqāṣidī reinterpretation by integrating textual analysis, socio-historical context, and the universal objectives of Islamic law (maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah). Employing a qualitative library-based method focusing on Q. 5:57, Q. 9:23, and Q. 60:1, the study demonstrates that the prohibition of loyalty in these verses is not inherently based on non-Muslim identity, but rather on acts of religious mockery, active hostility, political betrayal, and security threats to the Muslim community. Consequently, the effective cause (‘illah) of the prohibition is ethical and contextual rather than theological-discriminatory. The study further argues that Al-Walā’ should be reinterpreted as a commitment to justice, communal protection, and public welfare, while Al-Barā’ signifies the rejection of destructive actions that threaten social peace. Through this approach, the paradigm shifts from identity-based theological loyalty toward humanistic integrity and civic loyalty compatible with religious pluralism, democracy, and Indonesia’s constitutional principles. This study contributes to the development of contemporary maqāṣidī exegesis, particularly in reinterpreting Qur’anic verses on religious loyalty within multicultural societies.
Between Machines and the Tafsīr Tradition: Reorienting Tafsīr bi al-Ma’ṡūr in the Age of Computational Interpretation Saifullah; Soleh Hasan Wahid; Muhammad Ihza Fazrian
Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis Vol. 27 No. 2 (2026): Juli
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/qh.v27i1.7499

Abstract

This study examines authority and attribution in Qur’anic interpretation mediated by artificial intelligence. The phrase fī sabīlillāh in Q 9:60 serves as a test case because its meaning has been disputed since the earliest period, its transmission is layered, and its implications extend to zakat distribution. The same interpretive question was submitted to seven mainstream language models and assessed through tafsīr bi al-ma’ṡūr, understood as an evaluative hermeneutic centered on traceable attribution, isnād, tarjīḥ, and fidelity to sources. Interpretations by al-Ṭabarī, al-Qurṭubī, and Ibn Kaṡīr provided the basis for an analytic rubric. Two raters independently evaluated 28 model responses and reconciled their judgments through consensus, producing 248 audited error findings. Although the models generally identified the three exegetes and their works, they performed poorly in preserving isnād, narration structure, citation accuracy, and attribution. Unsupported additions and shifts of meaning dominated the errors. Higher-performing models produced more polished answers but did not eliminate source-level failures. The findings indicate that greater model capacity alone cannot secure credible machine-mediated tafsir; verification must restore the attributional discipline of tafsīr bi al-ma’ṡūr.
Competing Grounds of Hadith Authority in the Thought of Kassim Ahmad and M. Syuhudi Ismail in Late-Twentieth-Century Malaysia and Indonesia Abbas Langaji; Nur Laili Nabilah Nazahah Najiyah; Saifuddin Zuhri Qudsy
Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis Vol. 27 No. 2 (2026): Juli
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/qh.v27i1.7570

Abstract

Modern debates about hadith are often organized through the binary of rejection and defense. That classification identifies polemical positions but obscures the different standards by which prophetic reports are made religiously binding. This article compares Kassim Ahmad and M. Syuhudi Ismail as two parallel, asymmetrical projects in late twentieth century Malaysia and Indonesia. Using qualitative document analysis, contextual close reading, directed content analysis, and structured-focused comparison, it examines seven primary works through five dimensions: foundational norm, status of hadith, validation procedure, authorized mediator, and normative reach. The analysis finds that Kassim does not deny the possible historical existence of reports about the Prophet; he subordinates their authority to Qur’anic, historical, and rational adjudication and treats them as defeasible historical precedents. Syuhudi, by contrast, preserves hadith as a normative source while conditioning its acceptance and application on disciplined sanad-matn criticism, identification of the Prophet's function, and contextual interpretation. Both projects reject unexamined reception, but they assign final jurisdiction to different procedures and forms of competence. The comparison therefore reframes modern hadith controversy as a contest over how authority is organized rather than a simple conflict between tradition and reason.
What the Qur’an Rules Out: Mā Kāna Constructions and the Rhetoric of Restriction in The Qur’an Muhammad Shohib; Muhammad Azizan Fitriana; Ade Naelul Huda; Sabri Mohamad
Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis Vol. 27 No. 2 (2026): Juli
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/qh.v27i1.7638

Abstract

A translation that treats every Qur’anic mā kāna clause as a report that something “did not happen” misses the work performed by many of these passages. Some rule out conduct, others deny a right or autonomous power, and still others reject claims about God or the course of divine action. This article examines these differences across the Qur’an. A search of a verse-indexed Arabic text identified 213 candidate sequences; morphological and syntactic screening narrowed them to 127 negative clauses and a core of 37 instances in 36 verses. Close reading of clause structure, subject, complement, exceptions, local argument, classical grammar, iʿrāb, and tafsīr reveals no single meaning of prohibition or impossibility. Instead, the clauses restrict propositions on different grounds: communal norm, prophetic office, legitimate standing, created agency, divine permission, doctrinal propriety, divine justice, and a narrated history of refusal. Grammatical form guides these readings but does not determine them apart from context. Repeated mā kāna clauses therefore form a rhetoric of restriction: they mark what may not properly be done, claimed, attributed, or expected within Qur’anic discourse.
Qur’anic Exegesis in a Pedagogical Milieu: A Gadamerian Reading of the Tarbawī Spectrum in Thaifur ʿAli Wafa’s Firdaws al-Naʿīm Muhammad Afifudin Dimyathi; Khobirul Amru; Fejrian Yazdajird Iwanebel
Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis Vol. 27 No. 2 (2026): Juli
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/qh.v27i1.7215

Abstract

This article examines the tarbawī (pedagogical) dimension of Firdaws al-Naʿīm bi Tawḍīḥ Maʿānī Āyāt al-Qurʾān al-Karīm, a complete thirty-juz Arabic commentary by Kiai Thaifur ʿAli Wafa of Sumenep that is taught daily at Pesantren Assadad in Madura. It argues that the tarbawī character of pesantren tafsīr is not inherent in the words on the page; rather, it emerges from the interpretive event in which the commentary is composed, taught, and received. Drawing on Hans-Georg Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics, the study reconstructs the commentary’s pedagogical milieu, the Vorurteil that shapes its composition, the resulting exegetical form, and the tarbawī spectrum produced by the fusion of horizons. This spectrum comprises five registers: al-tarbiyah al-lughawīyah, al-tarbiyah al-kalāmīyah, al-tarbiyah al-fiqhīyah, al-tarbiyah al-ijtimāʿīyah, and al-tarbiyah al-ṣūfīyah. The article contributes to scholarship on tafsīr tarbawī by proposing a category not confined to textual content; to scholarship on pesantren tafsīr by introducing a neglected analytical lens; and to the study of scriptural pedagogy by demonstrating that a commentary acquires its meaning in the setting in which it is taught.

Page 23 of 24 | Total Record : 234

 20   21   22   23   24 

Filter by Year

2014 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 27 No. 2 (2026): Juli Vol. 27 No. 1 (2026): Januari Vol. 26 No. 2 (2025): Juli Vol. 26 No. 1 (2025): Januari Vol. 25 No. 2 (2024): Juli Vol. 25 No. 1 (2024): Januari Vol. 24 No. 2 (2023): Juli Vol. 24 No. 1 (2023): Januari Vol. 23 No. 2 (2022): Juli Vol. 23 No. 1 (2022): Januari Vol. 22 No. 2 (2021): Juli Vol. 22 No. 1 (2021): Januari Vol. 21 No. 2 (2020): Juli Vol. 21 No. 1 (2020): Januari Vol 20, No 2 (2019): Juli Vol 20, No 1 (2019): Januari Vol 19, No 2 (2018): Juli Vol 19, No 1 (2018): Januari Vol. 18 No. 1 (2017): Januari Vol. 17 No. 1 (2016): Januari Vol 18, No 2 (2017): Juli Vol 18, No 1 (2017): Januari Vol 17, No 2 (2016): Juli Vol 17, No 1 (2016): Januari Vol 16, No 2 (2015): Juli Vol 16, No 1 (2015): Januari Vol 15, No 2 (2014): Juli Vol. 15 No. 2 (2014): Juli Vol 15, No 1 (2014): Januari More Issue