cover
Contact Name
Abdul Musqim
Contact Email
taqimlsq@gmail.com
Phone
+628156862548
Journal Mail Official
studiquranhadis@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Prodi Ilmu Alquran dan Tafsir, Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Pemikiran Islam, UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Jl. Marsda Adisucipto, telp. 62-0274-512156 Yogyakarta
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis
ISSN : 14116855     EISSN : 25484737     DOI : -
Core Subject : Religion, Education,
JURNAL STUDI ILMU ILMU AL-QUR’AN DAN HADIS is peer-reviewed journal that aims to encourage and promote the study of the Qur’an and designed to facilitate and take the scientific work of researchers, lecturers, students, practitioner and so on into dialogue. The journal contents that discuss various matters relate to the Qur’anic Studies, the Exegesis Studies, the Living Qur’an, the Qur’an and Social Culture, thoughts of figures about the Qur'anic Studies, the Exegesis Studies and so on; Similarly, matters relating to the Hadith, the Hadith Studies, Living Hadith, Hadith and Social Culture, thoughts of figures about hadith and so on.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 221 Documents
Articulating the Prophetic Authority: Some Notes on the Nature of Hadīth Collection in al-Muwatta and Musannaf Literature Musadad, Asep Nahrul
Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis Vol. 27 No. 1 (2026): Januari
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/qh.v27i1.7472

Abstract

This article investigates the early articulation of material that would later be established as hadīth, focusing on Mālik b. Anas’ (d. 179/795) al‑Muwattaʾ in the recension of Yahyā al‑Laythī (d. 234/848), ʿAbd al‑Razzāq al‑Sanʿānī’s al‑Musannaf (d. 211/827), and Ibn Abī Syaibah’sal‑Musannaf (d. 235/849). Through an intellectual‑historical approach, it explores how each text articulates its material, the assumptions it makes about prophetic authority, and the salient features of each work. The analysis of these works confirms the well-known pattern that the term hadīthin early usage often denotes non‑prophetic reports and is hermeneutically distinguished from related categories such as sunnah and ʿamal (in the case of al-Muwatta). However, it is also notable that embryonic uses of hadīth to signify prophetic reports are present albeit in limited cases. The works differ in how they frame prophetic authority. The Muwatta privileges embodied practice rooted in the inherited tradition of Madinah rather than narrative transmission. A subsequent reorientation toward prophetic authority emerges as the activity of recording the tradition becomes increasingly text-centered, exemplified by ʿAbd al‑Razzāq’s early trans‑regional efforts to record reports during the intensifying codification movement. Ibn Abī Syaibah represents a further development, in which the authority of post‑successor jurists becomes increasingly constrained in favor of privileging the first three generations of Muslims. In the later phase, hadīth acquires more epistemic significance, increasingly equated with religious knowledge itself, reflecting a trajectory associated with figures such as Ibn Sīrīn and Ibn al‑Mubārak alongside the growing emphasis on isnād authentication. This study is expected to further contribute and further complicate existing scholarship on early hadith literature, particularly regarding its formative period.