cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Otto Fajarianto
Contact Email
ofajarianto@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
witaayu77@yahoo.co.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota samarinda,
Kalimantan timur
INDONESIA
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris
Published by Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long Samarinda
ISSN : 25800299     EISSN : 25808370     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
JURNAL ILMU HUKUM "THE JURIS" adalah Jurnal ilmiah yang diterbitkan secara berkala oleh SEKOLAH TINGGI ILMU HUKUM AWANG LONG, SAMARINDA. Pemilihan dan penggunaan kata THE JURIS dimaksudkan untuk menunjukkan pemetaan lingkup ide dan gagasan dari para praktisi, akademisi, dan ilmuan hukum yang difokuskan pada berbagai isu strategis mengenai hukum baik di tingkat nasional maupun internasional.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 574 Documents
 54   55   56   57   58 
PERBANDINGAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERUSAHAAN MELALUI LITIGASI DAN NON LITIGASI: PERSPEKTIF PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM HAK ASASI MANUSIA Mona Wulandari; Desni Raspita; Hendra Apriyanto
The Juris Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v10i1.2350

Abstract

Rapid societal advancement inevitably gives rise to disputes. Dispute resolution efforts can be pursued through two avenues: litigation and non-litigation. Non-litigation options include deliberation, mediation, and arbitration. Court-based resolution (litigation) is often time-consuming and costly, frequently resulting in one satisfied party and one dissatisfied party. Conversely, non-litigation methods such as mediation, negotiation, or arbitration are considered more efficient and better at preserving relationships between the disputing parties. This study employs a normative-juridical research method. The findings indicate that, despite the shortcomings inherent in the judicial process, the judiciary must be maintained as a "pressure valve" within a state governed by the rule of law and democracy. However, its position needs to shift to that of a "last resort," while alternative mechanisms are positioned as the "first resort." This line of thinking requires further development. Courts cannot simply be abolished in a democratic state governed by the rule of law, as they serve as the foundation upon which alternative dispute resolution mechanisms were established. The study demonstrates that dispute resolution whether through litigation or non-litigation combined with planned risk management, is key to maintaining operational continuity and business sustainability; success depends on agreements that offer "win-win solutions," thereby upholding human rights protections.
KONSTITUSIONALITAS PENGATURAN BATAS USIA CALON WAKIL PRESIDEN Jessica Carolina Jaya; Rorry Pramudya; Yuli Fitriah
The Juris Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v10i1.2351

Abstract

This research examines the legal dynamics and constitutional implications of age requirements for vice-presidential candidates in Indonesia. The study focuses on two main legal aspects: the original legal reasoning (ratio legis) of the age limit and the shift in judicial interpretation following the Constitutional Court's landmark ruling. The findings indicate that while the original age limit aimed to ensure leadership stability, the Constitutional Court's decision has shifted the paradigm toward acknowledging the political experience of the younger generation. However, this shift has raised critical concerns regarding legal certainty and the boundaries of judicial authority.
TOPENG NASIONALISME PALSU: ANALISIS VIKTIMOLOGI DAN KRIMINOLOGI TINDAKAN KRIMINAL KORUPSI OLEH PEJABAT NEGARA Appe Hutauruk; Fendi Maruba Parlindungan Hutahaean
The Juris Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v10i1.2368

Abstract

President Soekarno’s “JASMERAH” commemoration has now experienced a degradation of meaning in the hands of state actors trapped in the character of “Drunken God.” The phenomenon of White Collar Crime disguised as a “Mask of Nationalism” has mutated into a latent danger that threatens national sovereignty through policy conspiracies at the regional level. This study aims to deconstruct the mask of false nationalism and offer a legal argument that eradicating corruption without sacrificing remission is an absolute prerequisite for achieving constitutional national goals. The method used is a normative-prescriptive legal study by integrating legislative, conceptual, and victimological approaches as well as criminology. Data are analyzed descriptively and critically through deduction of legal syllogisms regarding regulations and jurisprudence on regional head corruption. The results of the study indicate that corruption has been institutionalized through the mechanism of “Politics of Revenge” after the Regional Head Election, which makes the people the main victims due to the loss of economic rights and general welfare. These findings conclude that the policy of amnesty for corruption perpetrators is a form of secondary victimization that strengthens the culture of impunity and betrays the constitutional mandate. As a solution, this study recommends a complete rejection of pardons, asset confiscation, and permanent revocation of political rights. This step is crucial to breaking the chain of corruption, restoring public trust, and restoring the government’s mandate to focus on the welfare of the people.
PENERAPAN SANKSI PIDANA TERHADAP KOTA-KOTA YANG MELAKUKAN KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA TERHADAP SUAMI MEREKA Susana Kifli
The Juris Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v10i1.2375

Abstract

This study aims to analyze how the application of criminal sanctions determined by the court in resolving cases of domestic violence where in this case the victim is the husband. The type of research used in this study is normative. The results of this study are in the imposition of criminal sanctions against perpetrators of domestic violence against husbands based on Law No. 23 of 20024 concerning Domestic Violence (which remains in effect complementary to Law No. 1 of 2023 concerning the new Criminal Code), which is regulated in Article 5 letter a and Article 44 of Law No. 23 of 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence, where specifically for physical violence that does not cause illness or obstacles to carrying out daily work, this crime is a complaint offense (the legal process only runs if the husband who is the victim himself reports it). Perpetrators of light physical domestic violence can be sentenced to a maximum of 4 months in prison or a maximum fine of IDR 5 million. If the violence results in serious injury or death, the penalty is much higher, namely a maximum of 5 to 15 years in prison. Furthermore, in the New Criminal Code, there are several classifications of domestic violence that can be processed as ordinary crimes, allowing law enforcement officials to process the perpetrator even without a direct complaint from the husband as the victim. Criminal sanctions remain part of the effort to provide justice to victims of domestic violence and ensure that perpetrators of domestic violence receive appropriate punishment for their actions.

Page 58 of 58 | Total Record : 574

 54   55   56   57   58 

Filter by Year

2017 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS Vol 6 No 1 (2022): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS Vol 5 No 2 (2021): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS Vol 5 No 1 (2021): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS Vol 4 No 2 (2020): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS Vol 4 No 1 (2020): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS Vol 3 No 2 (2019): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS Vol 3 No 1 (2019): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS Vol 2 No 2 (2018): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS Vol 2 No 2 (2018): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS Vol 2 No 1 (2018): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS Vol 2 No 1 (2018): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS Vol 1 No 2 (2017): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS Vol 1 No 2 (2017): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS Vol 1 No 1 (2017): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS Vol 1 No 1 (2017): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS More Issue