cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 552 Documents
 12   13   14   15   16 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)" : 552 Documents clear
PANDANGAN HERMENEUTIKA TERHADAP KASUS MEREK DAGANG GOTO VS GoTo Imelda Martinelli; Ivan Richard Sugiarto; Ernita Dewy Hartono
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.615

Abstract

Hermeneutics is a discipline or method of interpretation used to understand and interpret texts, especially complex texts such as literature, religious texts, or philosophy. Hermeneutics involves the process of studying texts comprehensively, analyzing the structure of the text, understanding the context, and searching for the meaning contained therein. A mark is a sign used to distinguish a product or service from similar products or services provided by other parties. A trademark is a mark that is registered with the Mark Registration Office and Geographical Indications, which grants an exclusive right to use the mark in business activities. This study examines the hermeneutical view of the GOTO vs GoTo trademark case contained in the Court Decision Number 71/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2021/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst. The purpose of this study is to find out the protection regarding Trademarks in Indonesia and how the hermeneutical view of the case of the GOTO vs GoTo Trademarks. The research method used in this journal is normative juridical, which is an approach made by examining the principles, theories, concepts, principles, and legislation related to the research problem being studied. The results of this study are that PT TFT has a class and type that is different from Gojek Tokopedia, therefore in the trial the lawsuit against PT TFT was rejected. In this case, hermeneutics or interpretation is also used so that we can find out the existing meaning and the causes of the case.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN GB DAN PELAKU USAHA ATAS KERUGIAN KONSUMEN AKIBAT MENGKONSUMSI LAPCHIONG Tri Putra Gunawan; Anita Cornelia
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.616

Abstract

GB sebagai platform penyedia jasa layanan memiliki berbagai fitur yang dipergunakan untuk mempermudah hidup manusia. Salah satu fitur GB yang sering digunakan oleh konsumen dalam hal pemesanan makanan. Hal tersebut dikarenakan pemesanan makanan melalui GB memiliki berbagai keuntungan seperti menghemat waktu dan tenaga. Konsumen tidak perlu datang pada toko konvensional untuk mendapatkan makanan yang diinginkannya karena driver GB akan mengirimkan makanan sesuai dengan alamat yang diinginkan oleh konsumen. Lapchiong merupakan sosis keras berbahan dasar daging babi. Pelaku usaha lapchiong yang tidak mencantumkan keterangan tidak halal pada aplikasi GB mengakibatkan konsumen beragama Islam membeli dan mengkonsumsi lapchiong tersebut. Konsumen mengetahui bahwa lapchiong mengandung daging babi setelah konsumen tersebut mengkonsumsinya. Dalam Surat Al-Baqarah 173 terdapat larangan bagi Umat Islam untuk mengkonsumsi makanan yang mengandung daging babi. Dalam penelitian ini, penulis ingin mengetahui pihak yang bertanggung jawab akibat kerugian yang dialami oleh konsumen akibat mengkonsumsi makanan yang mengandung daging babi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode yuridis normatif dengan menelaah peraturan perundang-undangan yang telah sah dan berlaku di Indonesia dan dikaitkan dengan kasus yang terjadi.
PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN TERHADAP PRODUK KADALUWARSA (STUDI PERBANDINGAN HUKUM PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN INDONESIA DAN MALAYSIA) Alicia Valda Veyfra Walangitang
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.618

Abstract

In buying and selling activities, business actors as product providers try to avoid losses as much as possible. Not a few frauds are committed by business actors who sell expired products that are detrimental to consumers. Consumer protection is urgently needed given the weaker position of the consumer. Indonesia and Malaysia as ASEAN members regulate consumer protection. Indonesia established Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection and Malaysia holds Consumer Protection in the 1999 Consumer Protection Act (CPA). The problem formulation of this writing is to discuss the regulatory provisions regarding expired products and the perpetrators are responsible for losses due to expired products in Indonesia and Malaysia. In this paper the research method is normative legal research. The approach in this paper is the statutory approach and the comparative approach. The conclusion of this paper is that the provisions of Indonesian and Malaysian consumer protection laws both regulate business actors who are prohibited from trading expired products and require business actors to put information labels or explanations including the expiration date of a product. For the responsibility of business actors, Indonesia and Malaysia apply reverse verification in the Consumer Protection Law.
TINJAUAN HUKUM PENJATUHAN SANKSI ADAT TERHADAP PEMBURUAN DAGING PENYU SEBAGAI SATWA YANG DILINDUNGI (STUDI KASUS KECAMATAN PULAU BANYAK) Siti Khatijah; Nila Trisna
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.619

Abstract

Article 21 paragraph 2 of law number 5 of 1990 concerning living natural resources and their ecosystems. Violation of the provisions of article 21 paragraph 2 is regulated in article 40 of law number 5 of 1990. However, the reality that occurred in the Pulau Banyak sub-district was resolved through customary law that grew within the community and the community still violates the provisions of customary law that exist in society. The type of research method is empirical juridical using primary data through interview data, literature study of written materials such as books and documents. The results of this study say that in the Pulau Banyak District area there are still violations of customary law provisions that live in the community, so that people still violate customary law regarding turtle protection. Based on the case of turtle meat hunting, customary law cannot provide a definite resolution, so it is contrary to the law, therefore it must be resolved through positive law.
ANALYSIS OF DECISION OF CENTRAL JAKARTA COURT NUMBER 757/Pdt.G/2022/PN Jkt.Pst (FROM PMH TO ABUSE OF POWER) Ratu Faridatul Fauziyah
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.621

Abstract

On March 2, 2023, the Central Jakarta District Court decided to accept the PRIMA party's lawsuit, declared the PRIMA party the party that was harmed, ordered the defendant to pay a fine of five hundred billion, punished the defendant in this case, the KPU not carrying out the remaining stages of the KPU, and so on. On the one hand, this decision is considered to be in the wrong room, and the JAKPUS District Court judges exceeded their authority, especially regarding the election postponement clause. However, on the other hand, this decision was aimed at justice for the PRIMA party due to the KPU's negligence. Based on this, the research seeks to analyze more deeply and comprehensively whether the JAKPUS District Court decision was in the wrong chamber and the judge exceeded his authority or whether this decision was indeed in his room. This research is normative research with a normative juridical approach. The legal material used in this study is secondary legal material, namely in the form of a JAKPUS District Court decision number 757/Pdt.G/2022/PN.Jkt.Pst, laws and regulations, doctrine, expert opinions, and so on related to the theme of this research. In addition, no research specifically examines this decision. The results of this study indicate that the unlawful act referred to in this case is a legal act committed by a government agency/institution, which is the authority of the Administrative Court as outlined in PERMA Number 2 of 2019. In addition, the judge's actions in handling this case fall into the category of abuse of power for exceeding their authority and not implementing the written rules, in this case, PERMA Number 2 of 2019
HAK PENCIPTA FILM TERHADAP KARYANYA YANG DIBAJAK SECARA ILEGAL PADA WEBSITE LK21 Jason Marcellino; Imelda Martinelli; Reisa Arrifa
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.622

Abstract

Due to the rise in cases of film piracy in Indonesia, this has motivated the writer to conduct research on this case. By using a qualitative descriptive writing method, the data is obtained from observations and also from literature studies. The concludes from the author's research, someone who uploads a film without any permission from relevant party can be declared as film piracy, but unfortunately there are still many people who even support this. Because if you watch through illegal websites it is free, but they arn’t aware that this act is a violation of the ITE Law. The main factor is that the perpetrators of piracy get a lot of profit from the audience, and also get a good response from the public who prefer to use illegal websites rather than using illegal websites. with a legal film player application. Stopping film piracy carried out by the LK 21 website has been terminated by blocking the lk 21 website by the Ministry of Communication and Informatics, for viewers to be wiser by watching films through the official site or application so that piracy does not occur.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN DEBT COLLECTOR SEBAGAI PIHAK ALIH DAYA ATAS PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM DALAM PENAGIHAN PADA PENYELENGGARAAN LAYANAN PENDANAAN BERSAMA BERBASIS TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI (LPBBTI) Della Nanda Iswanto; Adhitya Widya Kartika
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.623

Abstract

Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan guna (1) mencari tahu hubungan hukum pihak penyelenggara dengan debt collector sebagai pihak alih daya pada diadakannya Layanan Pendanaan Bersama Berbasis Teknologi Informasi (2) guna mencari tahu kepastian hukum sistem pertanggungjawaban pihak penyelenggara dengan debt collector sebagai pihak alih daya pada diadakannya Layanan Pendanaan Bersama Berbasis Teknologi Informasi berdasaran ius constitutum. Metodoe pada penelitian penulis ialah memakai metode penelitian hukum normatif serta berkarakteristik deskriptif kualitatif. Teknik kepustakaan digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data, yang selanjutnya diperiksa secara deskriptif dan kualitatif untuk menunjukkan hasil yang diantisipasi dan menarik kesimpulan tentang masalah tersebut. Temuan penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa ada hubungan hukum antara pihak penyelenggara dengan debt collector yang berperan sebagai pihak alih daya dalam penyelenggaraan LPBBTI terjadi dikarenakan sebuah perikatan yang terjadi antara pihak penyelenggara dengan debt collector dalam menjalankan layanan pendanaan. Dalam mempertanggungjawabkan seluruh kegiatannya, pihak penyelenggara dengan debt collector diikat dengan hukum yang tertera di Peraturan OJK 10/2022 mengenai Layanan Pendanaan Bersama Berbasis Teknologi Informasi.
PENANGANAN BAGI PEJABAT PEMERINTAH YANG TIDAK MELAKSANAKAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA Andre Lumban Batu; Tri Hayati
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.624

Abstract

The study aimed to discover an understanding of the handling of government officials who do not carry out the decisions of the State Administrative Court. In the mechanism for implementing decisions, the State Administrative Court has no implementing agency, and hence, the State Administrative Officers often disobey and do not implement the decisions of the State Administrative Court. Therefore, citizens' constitutional rights to justice decided by the State Administrative Court can be threatened. This study aimed to compare the state administrative justice systems in Indonesia and Thailand. This research uses doctrinal research with a statutory approach. The results of this study are that there is no institution for implementing the decisions of the State Administrative Court in Indonesia. Meanwhile, in Thailand, there is already an implementing agency, and functionally the executive body executes litigants. Therefore, regulation and implementation of State Administrative Officers who do not implement State Administrative Court Decisions is an urgency to increase the effectiveness of implementing State Administrative Court decisions in Indonesia.
IMPLIKASI YURIDIS UNDANG-UNDANG CIPTA KERJA NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2020 PASAL 88C AYAT 1 DAN 2 TENTANG UPAH MINIMUM KABUPATEN ATAU KOTA TERHADAP DUNIA BISNIS Dila Fatmala; Retno Catur Kusuma Dewi; Avindo a Charima Wardan
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.626

Abstract

Along with the national development program carried out by the government, a work copyright law was enacted which is expected to provide ease of doing business, inflow of investment, so as to create jobs and improve people's welfare. This study aims to examine the impact of Article 88C paragraphs 1 and 2 of the work copyright law number 11 of 2020 on district minimum wages in Indonesia. Because there were many controversies, demonstrations by workers and students emerged who understood that this article is more detrimental to workers because it lowers the district or city minimum wage. The research method used is descriptive and normative methods in the form of literature studies. In the perspective of Indonesian law, this article provides protection for workers and companies in order to create economic stability. However, there are still challenges and problems in determining efforts to determine the District/City Minimum Wage, such as if it only follows the Provincial Minimum Wage then the District/City Minimum Wage may be lower and vice versa. Therefore, discussions and in-depth studies are needed to consider the interests of all parties, including workers, employers, and the general public.
PELAKSANAAN RAPAT UMUM PEMEGANG SAHAM PERUSAHAAN TERBUKA SECARA ELEKTRONIK (E- RUPS) DENGAN SISTEM E-PROXY DI PT. TELEKOMUNIKASI INDONESIA (Persero), Tbk Harsa Khairu; Busyra Azheri; Yussy Adelina Mannas
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.627

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out the implementation of the electronic General Meeting of Shareholders (e-RUPS) using the e-proxy method at PT Telkom and to find out how the Notary's authority is in holding the General Meeting of Shareholders electronically. The research method that researchers use is Empirical Juridical law (sociolegal research). The data that has been collected will then be analyzed using a qualitative approach, namely research procedures that produce descriptive data. The research results of PT Telkom as one of the users of the easy.KSEI applications have carried out e-RUPS since the Covid-19 pandemic hit Indonesia in 2020 until the last e-RUPS in 2022.

Page 14 of 56 | Total Record : 552

 12   13   14   15   16 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue