cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 758 Documents
 12   13   14   15   16 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)" : 758 Documents clear
Telaah Pergeseran Paradigma Asas dan Prinsip Dalam Pendirian Perusahaan Pasca Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja: Tinjauan Konsep dan Penerapannya Terhadap Perusahaan Perorangan Jessica Fionita; Ariawan Gunadi
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1344

Abstract

Establishing a single person limited company is a concept for establishing a company that emerged after the Job Creation Law was passed. Single person limited company allow a company to be established with only one person. This is of course regarding the debate regarding shifting the paradigm regarding the principles and concepts of responsibility that have been adhered to in the corporate legal regime. In this research, the author aims to examine the concept of establishment and responsibility for the formation of single person limited companies after the enactment of the Job Creation Law. This research is normative legal research using conceptual and statutory approaches. In fact, the paradigm shift from the concept of a capital partnership which can be established by a single shareholder is not something new because this has been explained in Article 7 paragraph (5) of the Limited Liability Company Law which states that a company can be established with only one shareholder entity such as an entity. State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN). Single person limited Companies that provide flexibility to shareholders to create a company that can be established by a single shareholder provided that it meets the existing criteria for Small and Medium Enterprises (UMK). The liability of this single person limited company remains the same as that of a Limited Liability Company which has liability limited to the shares owned by the shareholder as explained in article 153 J paragraph (2) of the Job Creation Law as long as there are no matters excluded in that article.
Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Saham Minoritas dalam Perjanjian Pemegang Saham di Indonesia Isabella Leoni Trika A
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1345

Abstract

In a company, the interests of majority shareholders often take precedence over those of minority shareholders, and shareholder agreements can be used by majorities to regulate matters that primarily benefit them. To safeguard the rights of minority shareholders, they can create several provisions in shareholder agreement. The research question that forms the basis of this paper is: (i) What is the legal status of shareholder agreements in Indonesia?; (ii) What are the general provisions included in shareholder agreements?; and (iii) What special provisions in shareholder agreements offer legal protection for minority shareholders? Ultimately, the following conclusions were reached: (i) Shareholder agreements are legally binding contracts based on Article 1320 of the Indonesian Civil Code; (ii) While there are several general provisions found in shareholder agreements in Indonesia, there are no standard rules governing them; and (iii) The rights of minority shareholders that can be regulated through these agreements include shareholders remedies, rights based on their share class, tag along rights, drag along rights, rights of first offer, and rights of first refusal.
Karakteristik-Karakteristik Perjanjian Pengelolaan Portofolio Efek antara Manajer Investasi Pasar Modal dengan Para Nasabahnya Muhammad Satria Jaya
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1346

Abstract

Pasar modal merupakan salah satu upaya untuk mewujudkan kesejahteraan masyarakat melalui peranannya sebagai sarana penghimpun dana pembangunan dan demokratisasi kepemilikan perusahaan. Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1995 tentang Pasar Modal kemudian disahkan sebagai landasan hukum utama kegiatan pasar modal di Indonesia. Berdasarkan undang-undang tersebut, manajer investasi menjadi salah pihak yang dikenal di dalam kegiatan pasar modal. Manajer investasi melakukan pengelolaan portofolio efek untuk para nasabahnya berdasarkan perjanjian. Perjanjian antara manajer investasi dengan para nasabahnya inilah yang menjadi fokus di dalam artikel ini. Artikel ini akan menganalisis perjanjian pengelolaan portofolio efek antara manajer investasi dengan para nasabahnya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah studi dokumen atau kepustakaan. Perjanjian pengelolaan portofolio efek tersebut akan ditinjau dari tiga aspek, antara lain: syarat sahnya perjanjian, jenis perjanjian, dan pertanggungjawaban. Perjanjian pengelolaan portofolio efek antara manajer investasi dengan para nasabahnya mempunyai karakteristik-karakteristik khusus yang merupakan akibat dari perpaduan berbagai ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan lainnya yang turut mengikat perjanjian tersebut.
Fenomena Consumer Lock-In dalam Pasar Amdk dilihat dari Aspek Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia Daniel Chesar Prasetya Dirgantara
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1347

Abstract

Monopolistic practices are prohibited in business competition because their impact can create imbalances in the market or in other words can create unfair business competition. In this research, the author brings up the topic of the existence of Consumer Lock-In practices. Business competition in the Bottled Drinking Water market or commonly known as AMDK. In practice, the sale of bottled drinking water uses the gallon exchange method which, if examined further, can result in consumer dependence which has implications for the difficulty of other business actors to enter the same market. On the other hand, the commonality of the practice makes its position unclear whether it is classified as prohibited under Law No. 5 of 1999 on the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition. This research uses doctrinal research methods using secondary data consisting of laws and regulations, books, scientific magazines, clippings, journals, papers, internet sites and other data sources. In closing, the author intends to convey that the practices carried out by business actors in the bottled water market have the potential to harm fair business competition.
Efektivitas Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 2007 Tentang Cukai dalam Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Ekonomi Rokok Ilegal di Indonesia Vincent Candela; Rasji Rasji
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1348

Abstract

This research aims to analyze legal regulations related to the distribution of excise-free cigarettes in Indonesia and law enforcement efforts. The research method used is normative juridical legal research with a conceptual and problem approach. The research results show that the distribution of illegal cigarettes has become a significant problem in Indonesia, with a large number of the population purchasing cigarettes outside the registered system. Even though Law Number 39 of 2007 concerning Excise has relevant provisions, there are still problems in enforcing the law against illegal cigarettes. Law enforcement is carried out both preventively and repressively, but there are still obstacles such as lack of awareness of producers and the public, weak regulations, as well as obstacles in supervision and enforcement. However, there are criminal and administrative sanctions that have been regulated to deal with the distribution of illegal cigarettes. In conclusion, the existing legal regulations are relatively effective but further efforts are still needed in enforcing the law against the distribution of illegal cigarettes in Indonesia.
Status Hukum Rumah Berdasarkan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Ketika Developer Pailit Felicia Vanesa Japri; Richard C. Adam
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1350

Abstract

The demand for housing creates business opportunities for private individuals to venture into the residential property sector. Housing development companies, also referred to as developers, can face bankruptcy. When declared bankrupt, the developer often maintains a legal relationship with the homebuyer, based on the Sale and Purchase Agreement. This research aims to determine the legal status of a house in situations where the developer goes bankrupt, in accordance with Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations. This study employs a qualitative research method with a normative approach, focusing on statutory aspects. The research findings indicate that, as per the Bankruptcy Law, the Sale and Purchase Agreement between the developer and the homebuyer is voided. This occurs because ownership rights to both the land and house remain with the developer, making them assets subject to bankruptcy proceedings. Consequently, the homebuyer may apply as a creditor simultaneously, seeking compensation.
Mekanisme Aset yang Diambil Alih pada Fasilitas Kredit Pemilikan Rumah PT Bank X Christina Pratiwi; Nadia Maulisa
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1351

Abstract

Aset Yang Diambil Alih (AYDA) dilakukan oleh Bank sebagai salah satu cara dalam menyelesaikan kredit yang bermasalah. Kredit bermasalah yang dihadapi oleh bank salah satunya dalam Fasilitas Kredit Pemilikan Rumah (KPR) apabila debitor wanprestasi. Penelitian ini melakukan analisis terhadap mekanisme AYDA untuk fasilitas KPR yang bermasalah dan hambatan yang ditemui oleh Bank X. Hambatan yang ditemui oleh Bank X berasal baik dari internal maupun eksternal. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum empiris berdasarkan hasil observasi penulis dengan didukung data sekunder berupa perundang-undangan yaitu Undang-Undang Perbankan, Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, dan Peraturan Menteri Keuangan dan literatur hukum. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa penyelesaian fasilitas KPR yang macet melalui AYDA dilakukan dengan penjualan di bawah tangan secara langsung dan lelang dengan menggunakan akta de command. Faktor-faktor internal yang menjadi hambatan yaitu besarnya biaya proses AYDA, penjualan kembali AYDA yang membutuhkan waktu lebih dari 1 (satu) tahun, dan minimnya tertib administrasi. Faktor eksternal yang menjadi hambatan yaitu gugatan dari pemilik agunan dan/atau pihak ketiga dan penyitaan aset.
Tinjauan Yuridis Mengenai Sengketa Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah Antara TNI dan Warga Sipil di Indonesia Mayang Fitria Putri Deslin
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1352

Abstract

Land disputes are conflicts that occur between individuals or groups who have the same relationship or interest in an object of ownership of land rights which give rise to legal consequences for one another. One form of land dispute that occurs between individuals/groups and government institutions is between the Indonesian National Army (TNI) and civilians in Indonesia. Land disputes between the TNI and civilians occurred because there was no proof of ownership or certificate for the disputed land. The TNI is a government institution under the Ministry of Defense, therefore the right to land used for the TNI's interests is the right to use as regulated in Article 41 of the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). The land obtained came from state land, land controlled by the Dutch army, historical control by the Japanese army and land obtained by purchasing, acquiring, procuring, revoking and relinquishing land rights. Settlement of land disputes between civilians and the TNI can be carried out through legal channels for resolving land disputes which includes several stages including the preparation stage, the dispute handling and resolution stage and the litigation stage in court.
Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pelaku Usaha yang Dirugikan Akibat Adanya Ulasan Negatif Fiktif Ditinjau dari Fatwa DSN MUI No 24 Tahun 2017 (Studi Kasus Pada Aplikasi Google Maps) Adelia Budiman Budiman; Iwan Iwan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1353

Abstract

This study examines the impact and legal protection provided to businesses facing fictitious negative reviews on the Google Maps application based on the guidelines recommended by the Fatwa DSN MUI No. 24 of 2017. The research aims to understand how fictitious negative reviews on the Google Maps application affect businesses and to evaluate the extent to which the fatwa has been implemented in protecting the rights and reputation of affected businesses. Additionally, it seeks to identify effective legal protection measures for businesses. The research utilizes a qualitative method with a case study approach, allowing for an in-depth understanding of real cases experienced by businesses suffering losses due to fictitious negative reviews on Google Maps. The research findings indicate that Fatwa DSN MUI No. 24 of 2017 plays a crucial role in providing legal protection guidelines for businesses affected by fictitious negative reviews. The impacts include decreased revenue, damaged reputation, and financial losses. Therefore, the study provides recommendations for protecting against fictitious negative reviews, including through legal approaches and reputation management. In conclusion, this fatwa holds significant relevance in legal protection and maintaining the reputation of businesses in the digital era.
Penerapan Sanksi Administratif Terhadap Notaris Yang Melakukan Pelanggaran Terhadap Jabatannya (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara No. 235/G/2019/PTUN.KT) Marcelina Siti Nabila; Pieter E. Latumeten
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1354

Abstract

Notaries as public officials in carrying out their positions must comply with the Law on Notary Positions and the Notary Code of Ethics. The implementation of administrative sanctions against notaries who have violated their position is the authority of the Notary Supervisory Council and the Minister of Law and Human Rights. MPN in imposing sanctions on notaries cannot act arbitrarily. In the Decision of the State Administrative Court No. 235/G/2019/PTUN.KT, the MPN imposes sanctions for dishonorably dismissing a notary for violations in the form of signing a deed outside the Notary's office area, not providing a copy of the deed to the parties, and in carrying out his or her position not acting in a trustworthy, honest, thorough and effective manner. independent. In this case, the author examines whether the administration of administrative sanctions carried out by MPN is in accordance with the Law on Notary Positions and the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights concerning Procedures for Imposing Administrative Sanctions. This research is normative legal research which is known as research for academic purposes. namely the process of searching for legal rules, legal doctrines, and legal principles to answer the legal issues being discussed.

Page 14 of 76 | Total Record : 758

 12   13   14   15   16 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue