cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 758 Documents
 22   23   24   25   26 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)" : 758 Documents clear
Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Terhadap Pemalsuan Kepemilikan Saham dalam Akta Otentik Clavelda Sheryl Wiweldy
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1465

Abstract

A notary, holding a dual role as a professional and a public official, plays a crucial preventive role in averting legal complications through the creation of authentic deeds, serving as conclusive evidence. As stipulated by Law Number 30 of 2004 on Notary Positions, notaries are obligated to justify the deeds they produce. This study aims to examine the comprehension regarding the regulation of the responsibilities of notaries found in violation of their duties and to ensure legal protection for parties affected by the notary's data falsification. The research outcomes indicate that, as a legal consequence, notarial deeds can be subject to annulment, and based on legally binding decisions, the implicated notary can face administrative, civil, and criminal accountability.
Tinjauan Hukum Pengunaan Aplikasi inDriver MOD Menurut Fatwa MUI Nomor 1/MUNAS VII/MUI/5/2005 Tentang Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Sutan Fahri; Khalid Khalid
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1470

Abstract

Several large companies are racing to establish app-based transportation companies, and one of them is inDriver. The inDriver app, particularly for drivers, is not immune to application modifications. One of the widely circulated modified applications among drivers is the inDriver MOD Autobid. Given the high interest and usage of inDriver by the public for their daily needs, it's undeniable that the number of inDriver drivers has significantly increased, intensifying the competition among them for orders.Despite this, the inDriver order system is still the one assigning orders to drivers, rather than a "first come, first served" basis. However, in the inDriver driver application, every incoming order must be manually accepted within a certain time frame. If there is no response from the driver within that period, the system will reassign the order to another driver. To minimize the occurrence of failed order acceptances, there is now the inDriver mod Autobid. inDriver Mod is a modified version of the inDriver driver application, with changes made to the system files to enable the automatic functioning of the autobid feature when the application is opened/activated.This modification allows drivers to avoid installing an autoclick application to activate the autobid feature, similar to autobid features in platforms like Lalamove or other online motorcycle taxi applications. Consequently, every time an order comes in, it is automatically accepted. The use of modified applications, especially among online motorcycle taxi drivers, particularly focuses on one online motorcycle taxi application— inDriver. Those involved, both the modifiers and users of the modified application, are found to be in violation of Article 9 paragraph 3 of the Copyright Law, which states, "Any person without the permission of the Creator or Copyright Holder is prohibited from duplicating and/or commercially using the Creation."In Islam, attention is also given to copyright, as it is seen as a form of protection of rights between individuals to achieve harmony in the rights of each person. The National Sharia Council (DSN) through the Decree of DSN Ulama Council has also issued a fatwa on the protection of Intellectual Property Rights outlined in the FATWA of the Indonesian Ulama Council Number: 1/MUNAS VII/MUI/5/2005, which states that selling and pirating others' intellectual property without legal rights is prohibited.
Prinsip Kepastian Hukum Pengesahan Perjanjian Perkawinan Oleh Notaris Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI Nomor 69/PUU/XIII/2015 Fitria Anas; Fanny Tanuwijaya; Aan Efendi
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1471

Abstract

The Constitutional Court's involvement of the notary profession in approving marriage agreements without the support of technical regulations regarding the legal mechanism of such agreements has led to normative conflicts, created legal uncertainties, and has the potential to harm husbands and wives who enter into marriage agreements. This situation involves informal changes in legislation and the absence of legal provisions regulating the notary's authority. The issues arising include juridical aspects related to the notary's authority, legal certainty issues, and sociological aspects related to the legality of marriage agreements not recognized by notaries. In this context, this research aims to examine whether the notary's authority to approve marriage agreements, as per the Constitutional Court Decision, is not contrary to the principle of legal certainty and how the understanding of the meaning of marriage agreements for objects other than marital property. The research findings indicate that the new authority granted by the Constitutional Court Decision No. 69/PUU/XII/2015 is an attribution-based authority derived from legislation. In other words, notaries obtain authority directly from the wording of Article 29 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law. Article 29 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law after the Constitutional Court Decision No. 69/PUU/XII/2015 stipulates that marriage agreements can be made before, during, and throughout the marriage with a written agreement certified by the Marriage Registrar or Notary. Although marriage agreements with objects other than marital property are not explicitly regulated, they are implicitly addressed, essentially governing family relationships. The existence of marriage agreements with objects other than marital property aims to protect and provide benefits to the parties involved in case of disputes.
Tinjauan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Sepihak dalam Perspektif Regulasi Hukum Ketenagakerjaan (Studi Kasus: Putusan Nomor 101/PDT.SUS-PHI/2019/PNSMR) Delvina Koniardy; Gunardi Lie
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1472

Abstract

Layoffs or what is usually called one-sided termination of employment is something that is still problematic to this day and causes the emergence of industrial relations disputes, as happened in Decision Number 101/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2019/PNSmr where industrial relations disputes occurred between PT. NALA PALMA CADUDASA with 6 people from the Public Relations Team and Senambah Village Verification Team. There was a misunderstanding regarding the definition of a partnership relationship and working relationship between the two parties which led to disputes when the relationship was terminated. The research method used in this research is normative juridical with a case approach. A partnership relationship is a relationship based on a partnership agreement, while an employment relationship is a relationship based on a work agreement. The position between parties in a partnership relationship and an employment relationship is also different. In a partnership relationship, each party has the same position in terms of rights and obligations, whereas in an employment relationship the positions of the entrepreneur and employee are superior and subordinate. However, when a partnership relationship has elements of a work relationship, the partnership relationship turns into a work relationship.
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pekerja yang Mengalami Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Secara Sepihak Pasca Perusahaan Merger Aureelia Nourani Mirza Djafar; Gunardi Lie
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1473

Abstract

There are still many violations of workers' or laborers' rights that they should receive in situations where a company is merging or merging where there is legal uncertainty in protecting workers or laborers from companies that are merging or merging in violation of the 1945 Law. The aim of this research is to conduct research regarding the rights of workers or laborers who experience unilateral termination of employment by companies carrying out a merger. The method used in this research is a normative legal method with secondary data collection techniques through literature study. The results of this research show that the implementation of a company merger (merger) has a legal impact on employees, one of the impacts that can be received by employees is the loss of their job. As regulated in legal regulations both in the Limited Liability Company Law and in the Employment Law which provides legal protection for employees. . If the company does not want to take responsibility, employees can sue the company either through litigation or non-litigation.
Eksistensi Penerapan Penjatuhan Hukuman Mati di Indonesia Terhadap Kejahatan Narkotika di Indonesia Juan Valedra Sitorus; Hery Firmansyah
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1474

Abstract

The implementation of the death penalty in Indonesia is something that is seen as contrary to humanity and human rights. The death penalty in Indonesia is still used, but its application is only used for certain types of crimes. The existence of the death penalty is still widely discussed in the national and international realm, as is whether the death penalty still needs to be applied to be used as punishment for a crime.
Perlindungan Hak Cipta dalam Kasus Penggunaan Lagu SKJ88 Tanpa Izin Oleh O Shop (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 991/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2022) Agung Basuki Wicaksono
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1475

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the copyright infringement of the song SKJ88 by O Shop in the context of Law No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright in Indonesia, based on Decision Number 991/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2022. The main focus is on the exclusive rights of the creator, including moral and economic rights, as well as the implications of using the song without permission in commercial advertisements. This study uses a normative method, focusing on legal regulations and relevant legal cases. The author explores licensing aspects in copyright, including various types of licenses such as Mechanical Rights, Performing Rights, and Synchronization Rights, as well as the importance of licensing agreements in managing the economic rights of creators. This case highlights the importance of copyright protection in a commercial context and the legal consequences of copyright infringement. The author concludes that the legal considerations by the Panel of Judges in this case are appropriate and in accordance with the Copyright Law. The decision strengthens the principle of the creator's exclusive rights, acknowledges copyright infringement through the unauthorized use of the song, and applies appropriate sanctions, including compensation for copyright infringement.
Prinsip Deklaratif Dalam Regulasi Hak Cipta Di Indonesia Dina Nurusyifa
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1476

Abstract

Hak cipta timbul secara otomatis berdasarkan prinsip deklaratif, menimbulkan pertanyaan penting tentang bagaimana prinsip ini mempengaruhi hak cipta atas suatu ciptaan. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menggali lebih dalam konsep prinsip deklaratif dengan mengaitkannya dengan hak cipta yang bersifat otomatis. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini ialah Penelitian berisifat normatif. Data yang gunakan dalam penulisan ini adalah data sekunder berupa bahan-bahan hukum yang terdiri dari: Bahan hukum primer, Sekunder, dan tersier yang membahas tentang Hak Cipta dan prinsip deklaratif dan topik-topik terkait yang dibutuhkan untuk menysun tulisan ini. Kesimpulan yang didapat dari penulisan ini adalah berbeda dengan jenis KI lain, Perlindungan hak cipta lahir secara otomatis atau langsung, berdasarkan prinsip deklaratif, dan setelah ciptaannya memiliki syarat-syarat subjektivitas yaitu: orisinal, dan sudah difiksasi. UHC 2014 tidak memberikan definisi langsung terkait prinsip deklaratif tersebut. Meskipun tidak secara eksplisit dijelaskan dalam regulasi, prinsip ini memegang peranan penting dalam menentukan lahirnya perlindungan hak cipta. Prinsip deklaratif hanya dimiliki hak cipta. Beberapa jenis ciptaan hak ekonominya dimulai setelah pengumuman tergantung subjek dan/atau objek hak cipta. Jika dilihat dari definisi Deklaratif dan pengumumaan, deklaratif lebih sederhana dan umum. Sedangkan Pengumuman, pembacaan, penyiaran, dan pameran memberi definisi lebih khusus. Dengan melakukan pengumuman, dapat diartikan telah melakukan prinsip deklaratif. Prinsip deklaratif dapat menjadi dasar bagi Pencipta untuk mengkomunikasikan karyanya yang telah diwujudkan dalam bentuk nyata kepada pihak lain.
Perlindungan Hukum Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Atas Ketidaksesuaian Hasil Pengecekan Sertipikat Oleh Badan Pertanahan Nasional Sheila Binti Devina Binti
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1477

Abstract

The results of checking the certificate by the National Land Agency stating that the certificate is the same as the physical certificate issued by the National Land Agency is a mandatory requirement before the Land Deed Making Official makes a Deed for the transfer of land rights. But what about the results of the check which turns out to be inconsistent with the original condition of the certificate and results in the transfer of rights not being able to continue? Based on this background, the researcher used normative juridical research methods, in this case Land Deed Making Officials do not yet have clear enough legal protection for their profession, on the other hand, in carrying out their mandate as Public Officials, especially if there are cases or disputes related to the transfer of land rights.
Keabsahan Surrogate Mother Menurut Hukum Positif Di Indonesia dengan Peraturan Di Negara Inggris, Denmark dan Belgia Cindy Alisia Sinaga; Lewiandy Lewiandy
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1478

Abstract

Surogasi menjadi topik yang semakin relevan dalam ranah hukum dan etika, memicu perdebatan di banyak negara, termasuk Indonesia. Artikel ini menganalisis regulasi surogasi di Inggris, Denmark, dan Belgia untuk mengeksplorasi pendekatan yang berbeda dalam menangani isu ini. Sementara Inggris memiliki regulasi terinci, Denmark dan Belgia menekankan keseimbangan etika dan kesejahteraan. Indonesia, tanpa regulasi khusus, perlu mempertimbangkan langkah-langkah untuk menciptakan regulasi yang sesuai dengan nilai-nilai budaya dan kebutuhan lokal. Saran termasuk perluasan regulasi, melibatkan pemangku kepentingan, perlindungan hak ibu pengganti, pendidikan publik, pengawasan efektif, dan adaptasi dengan nilai-nilai lokal. Dengan demikian, artikel ini memberikan kontribusi pada pemahaman global tentang regulasi surogasi dan memberikan dasar untuk pengembangan regulasi yang sesuai di Indonesia.

Page 24 of 76 | Total Record : 758

 22   23   24   25   26 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue