cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Agung Suharyanto
Contact Email
agungsuharyanto@staff.uma.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
doktrina@uma.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
DOKTRINA: JOURNAL OF LAW
Published by Universitas Medan Area
ISSN : 26207141     EISSN : 2620715X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Doktrina : Journal Of Law is a Journal of Law for information and communication resources for academics, and observers of Business Law, International law, Criminal law, and Civil law. The published paper is the result of research, reflection, and criticism with respect to the themes of Business Law, International law, Criminal law, and Civil law.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 134 Documents
 10   11   12   13   14 
Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia yang Berada Dibawah Penguasaan Debitur yang Wanprestasi Pasca Putusan MK Nomor 2/PUU XIX/2021 (Studi Putusan Nomor 83/Pdt.G/2022/PN.Pbr) Satya Gunawan, Grace Wahyu; Zeihan Shona Shafira; Yanti Agustina; Chris Anggi Natalia B
DOKTRINA: JOURNAL OF LAW Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Doktrina:Juornal of Law Oktober 2025
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/doktrina.v8i2.14955

Abstract

The Constitutional Court Decision No. 2/PUU-XIX/2021 affirms that the execution of fiduciary collateral objects may not be carried out unilaterally by the creditor if the debtor refuses to voluntarily surrender the object. Under such circumstances, execution must be conducted through judicial proceedings to ensure legal protection and uphold the principle of justice for both parties. This study aims to examine the judicial considerations in the Decision of the Pekanbaru District Court No. 83/Pdt.G/2022/PN.Pbr concerning the execution of fiduciary collateral still under the control of a defaulting debtor. The research applies a normative juridical approach and case study method by analyzing the application of legal norms following the Constitutional Court's decision. The findings indicate that the judge considered the principles of fairness, balanced legal protection, and legal certainty in rendering the verdict. The study concludes that, in accordance with constitutional mandates post-Decision No. 2/PUU-XIX/2021, the execution of fiduciary security objects contested by the debtor must obtain judicial authorization.
Konflik Hak Cipta di Balik Naskah Film Soekarno Siregar, Bismar
DOKTRINA: JOURNAL OF LAW Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Doktrina:Juornal of Law Oktober 2025
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/doktrina.v8i2.15202

Abstract

This research discusses the copyright conflict between Rachmawati Soekarnoputri and PT Tripar Multivision Plus and director Hanung Bramantyo regarding the film Soekarno. The main focus of the study is the violation of moral and economic rights over film scripts which are claimed to be Rachmawati's creation. The method used is normative legal research with a descriptive-analytical approach, which is based on a study of Supreme Court Decision No. 305 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2014. The research results show that there is an element of breach of contract regarding the creator's moral rights because Rachmawati's name is not included as the script writer. However, the Supreme Court was of the opinion that Soekarno's life could not be claimed as an individual copyrighted work and no formal legal copyright infringement had been proven. These findings highlight the gaps in legal protection for works based on biographies of public figures and the importance of formal proof in copyright disputes.
Hak Konstitusional Terkait Hak Ekonomi Pencipta dan Pelaku Pertunjukan Berdasarkan UU No. 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta Gabriel Tololiu, Yudi; Tri Srilaksmi, Ni Ketut; Adi Susila, I Nyoman
DOKTRINA: JOURNAL OF LAW Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Doktrina:Juornal of Law Oktober 2025
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/doktrina.v8i2.15673

Abstract

This study discusses how the constitutional rights related to the economic rights of creators and performers are regulated under the Copyright Law, and how the future regulations (ius constituendum) will be regulated regarding the economic rights of creators and performers. This study is a normative legal study using a statute approach and a case approach. Based on the results of the analysis, constitutional rights related to the moral rights and economic rights of creators have been regulated in Article 5 paragraph (1) and Article 9 paragraph (1) of the Copyright Law, while the economic rights of performers are regulated in Article 23 of the Copyright Law. However, in the case of performers using other people's creations commercially, there are differences in the regulations in the Copyright Law regarding the economic rights that must be paid to the creator. Article 9 paragraph (3) essentially states that anyone who wants to use a work of creation commercially must first obtain the creator's permission, but Article 25 paragraph (3) sets this aside because by paying compensation through LMK it is considered to have obtained permission from the copyright holder.
Penerapan Hukum Bagi Pelaku Aborsi Secara Ilegal hanafi, Yusuf
DOKTRINA: JOURNAL OF LAW Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Doktrina:Juornal of Law Oktober 2025
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/doktrina.v8i2.15729

Abstract

The enforcement of law concerning illegal abortion encompasses a range of criminal penalties outlined in the Criminal Code (KUHP) and other legislative frameworks. These legal actions are not only directed at the primary perpetrators, such as healthcare providers or individuals who perform abortions, but also extend to others involved, including parents or partners who assist or support the act. The purpose of this article is to examine the factors contributing to the occurrence of illegal abortions and the application of legal measures against those who commit them. The methodology employed in this study uses a normative approach, utilizing a literature review of relevant laws and court decisions. The findings reveal that although the legal framework imposes severe penalties on individuals involved in illegal abortions, various obstacles hinder effective law enforcement. These include lack of oversight, ineffective enforcement mechanisms, and socio-economic factors that contribute to the high prevalence of illegal abortion. Therefore, collaborative efforts are needed to raise legal awareness, improve regulations, and implement more compassionate strategies in addressing illegal abortion cases.

Page 14 of 14 | Total Record : 134

 10   11   12   13   14 

Filter by Year

2018 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Doktrina:Juornal of Law Oktober 2025 Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Doktrina:Juornal of Law April 2025 Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Doktrina:Juornal of Law Oktober 2024 Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Doktrina:Juornal of Law April 2024 Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): Doktrina:Juornal of Law Oktober 2023 Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): Doktrina:Juornal of Law April 2023 Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): Doktrina:Juornal of Law Oktober 2022 Vol 5, No 1 (2022): Doktrina:Juornal of Law April 2022 Vol 4, No 2 (2021): Doktrina:Juornal of Law Oktober 2021 Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Doktrina:Journal of Law April 2021 Vol 3, No 2 (2020): Doktrina:Journal of Law Oktober 2020 Vol 3, No 1 (2020): Doktrina:Journal of Law April 2020 Vol 2, No 2 (2019): Doktrina:Journal of Law Oktober 2019 Vol 2, No 1 (2019): Doktrina:Journal of Law April 2019 Vol 2, No 1 (2019): Doktrina:Journal of Law April 2019 Vol 1, No 2 (2018): Doktrina:Journal of Law Oktober 2018 Vol 1, No 2 (2018): Doktrina:Journal of Law Oktober 2018 Vol 1, No 1 (2018): Doktrina:Journal of Law April 2018 Vol 1, No 1 (2018): Doktrina:Journal of Law April 2018 More Issue