Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist
Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist has a focus to provide a venue for academicians, researchers, and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. It is an open access and peer-reviewed journal, published by Faculty of Law, Muhammadiyah University of Buton. The journal is a biannual which is published on April and December. Articles submitted might cover topical issues in Constitutional Law, Human Rights, Criminal Law, Islamic Law, Civil Law, International Law, Agrarian Law, Adat Law, Criminal Procedural Law, Commercial Law, Administrative Law, Environmental Law and so forth which related to the Science of Law
Articles
246 Documents
<![CDATA[TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PERILAKU PENGGUNA HELM DI UNIVERSITAS HALUOLEO ]]>
<![CDATA[Widiasih, Ni Putu Sri]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Vol 2 No 2 (2018): JUNE ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (664.394 KB)
|
DOI: 10.35326/volkgeist.v2i2.106
<![CDATA[Violations committed by motorists with not using a helmet shows compliance (compliance) are low traffic rules as regulated in section 57 subsection (2) of Act No. 22 of year 2009 about traffic Transport and streets. This type of research is conducted with the normative-legal research efforts are empirical. The research results showed that the factors cause motorists not wearing a helmet at the cross roads and surrounding A H.E. Mokodompit still in Kecamatan Kambu is a factor of consciousness and behavior, because almost all violations and traffic accidents on the road sekitasrnya and H.E. à Mokodompit that Kecamatan Kambu is still in its primary cause is the rider. These factors gave rise to differences of level of knowledge and/or understanding of the people against the prevailing rules resulted in a disparity that potentially gave rise to traffic problems in particular knowledge of the importance of the benefits the use of helmets for motorbike riders of vehicles that do not wear a helmet, both between road users themselves as well as between road users with apparatus that served to carry out law enforcement on highways, environmental factors contribute active in creating behavior-behavior that deviates. The citizens of the society like the breach of rules that have been set out in the legislation are likely to form a bad or aberrant personality on the individual efforts being done Satlantas Polres Kendari in tackling traffic offences caused by motorcyclists not wearing a helmet at the cross streets of H.E. à Mokodompit is by way of enforcing methods of pre-emptif, is an effort or prevention efforts against irregularities.]]>
<![CDATA[YURIDIS TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENGANCAMAN YANG DILAKUKAN SECARA BERSAMA-SAMA ]]>
<![CDATA[Furqon, Al]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Vol 2 No 2 (2018): JUNE ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (661.938 KB)
|
DOI: 10.35326/volkgeist.v2i2.107
<![CDATA[This research was carried out at the Makassar District Court in Makassar, with research methods using data collection techniques by means of research library and field research. The results of this research indicate that all the elements of a criminal offence committed by the pengancaman the second defendant had sesuasi with the elements contained in article 335 of the PENAL CODE with Article 55 paragraph (1) of the CRIMINAL CODE. This is apparent from satisfy all the elements in accordance with the article didakwakan on the defendant. Article didakwakan, namely Article 335 paragraph (1) of the CRIMINAL CODE. With satisfy the elements and look at the application of the criminal law against the crime pengancaman, then the defendant must account for his actions in accordance with the ruling of the District Court Judges deposed by the Makassar imprisonment of three (3) months and pay the fees. In deciding the matter State Court judge Makassar has pretty much consideration, starting from the demands of the public prosecutor, the accused, description of witnesses, as well as satisfy the elements pursuant to article didakwakan, as well as the things that are incriminating and relieve. So defendants are convicted with imprisonment for 3 (three) months and pay the fees, not fully contain the benefit law. Considering the act committed by the two defendants, then according to the author, the criminal who dropped by the Tribunal of judges rated very lightly.
]]>
<![CDATA[KEDUDUKAN DISSENTING OPINION DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI ]]>
<![CDATA[Rustam, Dewi Ratnasari]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Vol 2 No 2 (2018): JUNE ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (774.859 KB)
|
DOI: 10.35326/volkgeist.v2i2.108
<![CDATA[Dissenting opinion is the difference of opinion between the Tribunal judges who handle certain a matter with other judges of the Tribunal dealing with certain cases. Dissenting opinion does not have the force of law because it cannot be the Foundation for the inception of the award. Dissenting opinion itself is an aspect of the law that need to be examined in order to prevent the formation of false opinion among the public. So, nowadays have started to formed the perception that dissenting opinion was an engineering law, instead of enforcing the rule of law but rather media that gave the opportunity for the defendant in corruption regardless of criminal trapping; but on the other hand is a form of difference of opinion and the independence of the judges as the metre is guaranteed by the provisions of the law; that the importance of dissenting opinion in the Court ruling was the judge's opinion be weighted, in an attempt of law appeal or cassation; as an indicator to determine the career judge, as an attempt to avoid the practice of corruption, Collusion and Nepotism (KKN) and the judicial mafia; as a real step towards the transparency of judicial democratization; the judiciary; and kemandiarian the judge require the freedom of speech.]]>
<![CDATA[RESIKO MEDIS DAN KELALAIAN MEDIS DALAM ASPEK PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA ]]>
<![CDATA[Ilahi, Wahyu Rizki Kartika]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Vol 2 No 2 (2018): JUNE ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (774.104 KB)
|
DOI: 10.35326/volkgeist.v2i2.109
<![CDATA[Healthy is very important for every people, keep healthy is very important, if some people ill and must opname when the doctor must get to make medic for some people, but the end of get medic is unsatisfactory result.in the term of unsatisfactory result from get medic, make medical loss for patient and patient’s family, in medical loss result make many issues for doctor. but must know in the fact, not every unsatisfactory result get responsibility.this thesis make a normative yuridis metode with statue approach and conceptualapproach metode. in this thesis discuss about responsibility doctor for medical risks and medical risks which can be account for by doctor]]>
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN TERHADAP ANAK
BERHADAPAN DENGAN HUKUM ]]>
<![CDATA[Pribadi, Dony]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Vol 3 No 1 (2018): DECEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (688.996 KB)
|
DOI: 10.35326/volkgeist.v3i1.110
<![CDATA[Undang-Undang No. 11 tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak (SPPA) sudah disahkan oleh Pemerintah Indonesia, UU No. 11 tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak ini menggantikan UU No. 3 tahun 2007 tentang Pengadilan Anak. UU SPPA ini telah memberikan perlindungan terhadap anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum sejak proses awal penanganannya sampai pada pelaksanaan hukuman. Hasil kajian ini menunjukkan bahwa menurut UU No. 11 tahun 2012, perlindungan terhadap anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum melalui beragam bentuk. Anak Berhadapan Hukum (ABH) dibagi atas 3 klasifikasi yaitu sebagai Anak Pelaku, Anak Korban dan Anak saksi. Selain itu dalam penanganannya Anak berhadapan hukum harus dibedakan dari orang dewasa pada setiap tingkatan proses, baik itu dari mulai penyelidikkan, penyidikkan maupun saat litigasi. Selain itu, setiap pelaksanaan proses Anak wajib didampingi oleh pendamping. Pada aturan yang baru ini juga mengenalkan dan menekankan diversi, yaitu aspek non litigasi dalam menyelesaikan perkara. Pada proses diversi, penyelesaian kasus diupayakan sebisa mungkin di luar peradilan.]]>
<![CDATA[PENERAPAN SANKSI PIDANA BAGI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA ABORSI MENURUT PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN YANG BERLAKU ]]>
<![CDATA[Manohara, Ida Bagus Made Putra]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Vol 3 No 1 (2018): DECEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (701.999 KB)
|
DOI: 10.35326/volkgeist.v3i1.111
<![CDATA[Aborsi merupakan masalah kesehatan masyarakat karena memberikan dampak pada kematian ibu. Sebagaimana diketahui penyebab utama kematian ibu hamil dan melahirkan adalah perdarahan, infeksi, dan eklampsia namun sebenarnya aborsi juga merupakan penyebab kematian ibu dalam bentuk komplikasi perdarahan sepsis. Dibeberapa negara seperti di Amerika Serikat memperbolehkan aborsi dengan alasan medis tertentu, aborsi ini disebut sebagai aborsi terapeutik di negara Jepang dan Eropa Timur memperbolehkan aborsi dengan alasan terbatasnya jumlah penduduk sehingga praktik aborsi di negara tersebut dilegalkan. Namun di Indonesia melarang keras praktik aborsi dalam bentuk apapun, namun menurut Undang-Undang Kesehatan Tahun 1992 praktik aborsi diperbolehkan dengan indikasi medis, namun dalam ketentuan yang tertera dalam Undang-Undang Kesehatan Tahun 1992 menjadi dilematis antara memperbolehkan atau melarang tindakan aborsi tersebut. Setelah mengalami gejolak yang sangat panjang pemerintah mencabut peraturan tentang Undang-Undang Kesehatan Tahun 1992 dan diganti dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 seiring dengan perkembangan jaman dan banyak penolakan terhadap peraturan yang lama. Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana sendiri perbuatan aborsi merupakan tindakan kriminal atau dikatagorikan sebagai kejahatan terhadap nyawa, Pasal yang mengatur terhadap kejahatan terhadap nyawa adalah Pasal 229, Pasal 346, Pasal 349, dan Pasal 535. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Serta menggunkan sumber bahan hukum sekunder sebagai sumber data utama, yang didasarkan pada bahan hukum primer yaitu Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 tentang Kesehatan, dan bahan hukum sekunder berupa buku, catatan-catatan ilmiah dan sumber bahan hukum lainnya.. Hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa hanya Undang-Undang Kesehatan yang memperbolehkan seorang wanita melakukan aborsi dengan alasan faktor penyakit bawaan, dimana ternyata pada ibu hamil yang sudah melakukan pemeriksaan kehamilan mendapatkan kenyataan bahwa bayi yang dikandungnya mengalami cacat secara fisik sehingga apabila bayi tersebut lahir akan mengancam jiwa ibu maupun bayi yang akan dilahirkan.]]>
<![CDATA[KEWENANGAN PEMERINTAH DAERAH DALAM MENENTUKAN HARGA JUAL DALAM TRANSAKSI JUAL BELI TANAH DAN ATAU BANGUNAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Afriyandi, Tis’at]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Vol 3 No 1 (2018): DECEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (947.572 KB)
|
DOI: 10.35326/volkgeist.v3i1.112
<![CDATA[Bisnis properti tanah, rumah, dan bangunan merupakan suatu aktivitas bisnis yang mulai banyak diminati oleh masyarakat. Mengingat tanah dan bangunan merupakan benda tidak bergerak, maka terdapat ketentuan-ketentuan yang harus dilakukan oleh para pihak sebelum proses peralihan haknya. Dalam proses jual beli tanah dan atau bangunan menimbulkan kewajiban pajak bagi masing-masing pihak. Sebagaimana amanat dari Undang-Undang No. 28 tahun 2008 tentang Pajak Daerah dan Retribusi Daerah, pihak pembeli dibebankan BPHTB sebesar 5% dari harga transaksi yang telah disepakati. Kesepakatan para pihak dalam menentukan harga transaksi harus pula memperhatikan nilai wajar yang berpedoman pada nilai NJOP tanah dan atau bangunan pada saat terjadi transaksi. Pemerintah daerah sebagai pemungut pajak dapat melakukan proses validasi perhitungan BPHTB yang telah dibayarkan oleh pembeli. Dengan adanya proses validasi BPHTB ini pemerintah daerah memiliki wewenang untuk melakukan penelitian perhitungan dan penelitian lapangan terkait objek jual beli tersebut. Proses validasi BPHTB ini dapat mempengaruhi harga transaksi jual beli karena dianggap harga transaksi yang disepakati masih terlalu rendah dari harga pasar.]]>
<![CDATA[Audit of state losses by the Gorontalo attorney general in a corruption case ]]>
<![CDATA[RAIS, SUARDI]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Vol 3 No 2 (2019): JUNE ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (485.207 KB)
|
DOI: 10.35326/volkgeist.v3i2.120
<![CDATA[In the process of proving Corruption Crime, it must fulfill the three elements contained in corruption, one of the elements of which is the loss of state finances as well as the Corruption Act. To prove the State's loss, the institutions that are authorized to audit the results of State losses will be involved. In this case the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK). As in Law No. 15 of 2006 and other institutions regulated outside the constitution, based on Circular of the Chief of the Supreme Court Number 4 of 2016, and based on the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number. 31 / PUU-X / 2012. But in some of the decisions of the Corruption Criminal Court, the process of proving the loss of state finances was carried out by the Gorontalo High Prosecutor's Office who did not have the authority to audit state financial losses in cases of corruption]]>
<![CDATA[Price agreement and market provision between principal and distributor in the constitution no. 5, 1999 ]]>
<![CDATA[Sukma, Ria Permata]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Vol 3 No 2 (2019): JUNE ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (476.225 KB)
|
DOI: 10.35326/volkgeist.v3i2.121
<![CDATA[Market structure is one of the things that determines potential occurance of price fixing. Market characteristics with large entry barriers for newcomers causing difficulties for competitors to enter so that there are no substitutes. Distributor is one of the business actors namely a national trading company that acts for and in its own name based on an agreement with the principal to make purchases, storage, sales and marketing of goods and/or services. There are pricing activities in business activities carried out by distributors with their networks in controlled markets, so the main issue in this study is whether the pricing is included in the price fixing agreement which is prohibited by the Law Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition. The approach used to analyze the problem is statute and conceptual approach to examine and find legal concepts that are relevant to the issues raised, thus finding a way out and produce solution for business actors to become more competitive and avoid anti-competitive behavior.business competition, price fixing, market share, distributors, principals]]>
<![CDATA[Legal law and principles in the credit in banking ]]>
<![CDATA[Mustika, Mega]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Vol 3 No 2 (2019): JUNE ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (464.547 KB)
|
DOI: 10.35326/volkgeist.v3i2.122
<![CDATA[In lending from banks to the public for financing purposes, each bank is required to implement the principle of prudence. The formulation of the problem in the research is how to apply the law and the principle of prudence in anticipating the occurrence of bad credit. This study aims to find conformity in the law and the practice of applying the precautionary principle. This research is normative research, using the statutory approach. In this study using legal materials to conduct analysis in the form of primary legal materials, tertiary legal materials or non-legal legal materials and analyzed using descriptive methods. The results of the study indicate that the application of the prudential banking principle in granting credit can be interpreted as the principle applied by the bank in carrying out its business, so that it is always in accordance with applicable banking provisions, in order to avoid irregularities in unhealthy banking practices and to minimize losses incurred on banks such as bad credit.prudential principle; bad credit; banking]]>
