cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
Department of Medical-Health Professions Education and Bioethics Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing Universitas Gadjah Mada Radioputro Bld, 6th floor, West Wing Farmaco St., Sekip Utara, Yogyakarta, 55281
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education
Published by Asosiasi Institusi Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia
ISSN : 22525084     EISSN : 26545810     DOI : https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.46690
Core Subject : Health,
Health Professions Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health
The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education (Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia) is a peer-reviewed open-access journal which publishes research and innovation in curriculum development, student-centred learning, faculty development, assessment, and learning resources in health professions education. Aiming to improve literacy on health professions education in Indonesia and globally, this journal publishes three issues annually in English and Bahasa Indonesia.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 3, No 2 (2014): JULI" : 6 Documents clear
Perbandingan Tingkat Motivasi Mahasiswa yang Menempuh Kuliah Konvensional dengan Collaborative Learning Herman Herman; Titi Savitri P; Widyandana Widyandana
Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education Vol 3, No 2 (2014): JULI
Publisher : Asosiasi Institusi Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (290.551 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpki.25228

Abstract

Background: Collaborative learning is a learning method which centered on students’ learning process. Although many theories and research results showed that  interactive lecture is better than conventional lecture, but in fact, only few lecturers use the interactive method in teaching and learning process. Literature stated that using conventional method in teaching and learning process does not motivate students to learn more while using the other one (interactive lecture) will enhance students’ motivation. Collaborative learning is one of interactive lecture method. Based on the facts mentioned above, the researcher wants to compare students’ motivation who participate in conventional method and those who participate in collaborative learning method.Method: This was a quantitative research with experimental approach, used posttest only with control group design. This research measured students’ learning motivation by using Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Subjects for the research were the second semester students of  Public Health Scince of Tadulako University which divided into two groups randomly. Data were analyzed by Mann-Whitney test method.Results: There were a distinct disparity in students’ learning motivation after following learning process with conventional and collaborative learning method. Students who followed collaborative learning had higher motivation than students who followed conventional lecture.Conclusion: Collaborative learning improves students’ learning motivation toward the nutrient topic on Public Health Sciences. 
Validasi Approaches to Learning and Studying Inventory di Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta Michael A. Leman; Rossi Sanusi; Yayi Suryo Prabandari
Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education Vol 3, No 2 (2014): JULI
Publisher : Asosiasi Institusi Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (476.701 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpki.25229

Abstract

Background: Short version instruments are being developed to meet the needs of social sciences researchers who simulataneously use a number of instruments. The Approaches to Learning and Studying Inventory (ALSI) is a short version instrument to measure learning approaches used by students. This analysis is part of a study that is published in different medical education periodicals. The objective of this assessment was to validate the ALSI in a population of second year medical students of the Gadjah Mada University Faculty of Medicine (GMU FM), Yogyakarta.Method: 225 second year students in the regular program at the GMU FM were invited to complete the ALSI questionnaire. To suport construct validities of ALSI, an item’ validity, Crönbach alpha, factor analysis, convergent validity, and discriminant validity were measured.Results: A total of 160 students participated in this study (71,11% response rate). The data collected did not support the construct validities of ALSI.Conclusion: ALSI requires improvement, in particular the items of the surface approach subscale. Instead of the initial five subscales, it is probably more appropriate if the instrument is divided in only three subscales - surface approach, effort management-organized studying, and deep approach-monitoring studying. 
Perbedaan Efektivitas Diskusi Kelompok, Motivasi Intrinsik dan Nilai Modul dari Mahasiswa yang Difasilitasi Dosen dan Tutor Sebaya I Made Pariartha; Rossi Sanusi; Tridjoko Hadianto
Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education Vol 3, No 2 (2014): JULI
Publisher : Asosiasi Institusi Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (294.205 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpki.25230

Abstract

Background: Peer teaching is a teaching method that widely applied in many medical institutions. This research was designed to evaluate group discussion effectiveness, intrinsic motivation, and student achievement differences between peer tutor−facilitated students and faculty tutor−facilitated students.Method: This research is an experimental research using post−test only control group design during the implementation of third and fourth module of the Cardiovascular Block (consist of five modules). Fifty-nine third year students were randomly assigned into two groups. Three experimental groups (n= 30) was facilitated by peer tutors (PT) and three control groups (n= 29) was facilitated by faculty tutors (FT). Two students were randomly elected from each PT group as peer tutor. A six hour training was given to the peer tutors. In the end of the third and fourth module, group discussion effectiveness, intrinsic motivation, and student achievement in those modules were evaluated using Tutorial Group Effectivenes Instrument (TGEI) questionnaire, Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) questionnaire, and 20 multiple choice questions, respectively. Mean differences between groups were measured by Cohen's d with the practical significance at Cohen's d > 1.Results: There was no significant differences of group discussion effectiveness (Cohen’s d= -0.41) and intrinsic motivation (Cohen’s d= -0.83) between two groups. Significant difference in student achievement is found between those groups, peer tutor−facilitated students score higher than faculty tutor−facilitated students (Cohen’s d= 2.96). Peer tutors showed higher achievement than discussants (Cohen’s d= 1.86).Conclusion: The results showed that peer tutor can facilitated group discussion as well as faculty tutor in group discussion effectiveness, intrinsic motivation and student achievement paramaters. There was advantage for students who given role as peer tutor.  
Persepsi terhadap Training From Senior Student dalam Penugasan Keterampilan Klinik Oktadoni Saputra; Widyandana Widyandana; Tridjoko Hadianto
Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education Vol 3, No 2 (2014): JULI
Publisher : Asosiasi Institusi Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (369.464 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpki.25231

Abstract

Background: Peer-Assisted Learning (PAL) has been widely used in medical education. Training From Senior Student (TFSS) is a PAL-scheme program in Skills-Lab FM GMU which one of its aim is to facilitate students to master their cinical skills. However, failure rate in OSCE is still high. This research conducted to explore students’, assistants’ and faculty’s perceptions on the benefits of TFSS in students’ clinical skills acquisition.Method: This study used exploratory focus group discussion (FGD) and in-depth interview with respondents, which were chosen purposively. The data were then transcribed and analysed for themes using deductive content analysis.Results: Thirty-six respondents joined the study (13 medical students; 17 assitants; 6 faculty staffs). The respondents’ perceptions were categorized in 3 aspects: cognitive aspects, social aspects, and organizational aspects of clinical skills learning. As a whole, the view of each respondent was not much differents. TFSS enhanced cognitive and social aspects of both students’ and assistants’ learning, but it didn’t provide the optimal opportunity to practice their skills. Various related problems in organizing were also found.Conclusion: TFSS provided positive benefits on both cognitive and social aspects of clinical skills learning, but not for the opportunity to practice the skills. Improvements need to be done to enhance the quality and quantity of skills training.
Refleksi Pembelajaran Aplikasi Medical Writting Presentation pada Mahasiswa Semester Satu Fakultas Kedokteran Kevin Yulianto; Elisabeth Rukmini
Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education Vol 3, No 2 (2014): JULI
Publisher : Asosiasi Institusi Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (500.742 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpki.25232

Abstract

Background: Medical students need the ability to write and present research. Skills needed are referencing, using internet to help their research, and searching literatures through search engines. The lack of students’ ability about searching a valid and reliable literature in the field of health and medicine according to EBM principle is a profound problem. Reflective thinking is also needed for the students to be able to reach meaningful learning. This study aimed to analyze the students’ reflective writings within the Medical Writing Program. Method: This research was a descriptive-explorative study using a qualitative approach. Subjects comprised 207 first semester medical students of Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia batch 2012. Qualitative data were collected from students’ written reflections about their learning experiences in MWP program. Qualitative analysis utilized content analysis included identification, coding, categorization, and synthesis.Results: Students found that Zotero® was helpful as reference manager program in their writings. Zotero® Volunteer Troops also helped them in learning to use Zotero® and they felt more comfortable learning from their peers. EBM helped students searching and synthetizing literatures. Students also indirectly learned soft skills such as teamwork, time management, and speed reading in English (not their natives language)Conclusion: Students had positive views of the program and its implementation. Students understood the importances of learning the MWP and felt that they could implement their studies directly in their academic careers.
Determinan Pilihan Karir Mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran sebagai Spesialis di Indonesia Rizma Adlia Syakurah; Dwi Atika Sari; Dendy Riansyah; Priska Yolanda
Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education Vol 3, No 2 (2014): JULI
Publisher : Asosiasi Institusi Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (250.807 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpki.25233

Abstract

Background: In this “Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional” (JKN) era, career preference among medical students became an important issue to be concerned with, especially regarding career as a specialist physician in order to ensure equal distribution of doctor's quantity and profession variation. Several studies had been conducted abroad with aim to analyse career preference's determinants of medical students, but these kind of studies are rarely found in Indonesia. The objective of this study is to analyse the determinants of career preferences in medical speciality among medical students in Indonesia.Method: Cross-sectional study with questionnaire. Population of the study were first year students in 13 public universities with “A” accreditation. Samples collected by stratified consecutive sampling method. Chi square was used to evaluate the association between career preferences with socio-demographic and academic factors.Results: Among 315 samples, 83,8% students chose medical speciality as their preferred career. Determinants which influence career preferences are having parents that works in medical field (P= 0.036), higher parents earning (P= 0.04), and deciding to enrol to medical school since before high school (P= 0.036).Conclusion: Parents social economic state and background, along with personal motivation are some of important determinants to be considered. More studies need to be conducted in this area, especially regarding the underlying behaviour that affect further career preferences. Socialization about the importance and merits of other medical professions needs to be implement to prevent gap in medical profession's distribution later on.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2014 2014


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 14, No 4 (2025): December Vol 14, No 3 (2025): September Vol 14, No 2 (2025): June Vol 14, No 1 (2025): March Vol 13, No 4 (2024): December Vol 13, No 3 (2024): September Vol 13, No 2 (2024): June Vol 13, No 1 (2024): March Vol 12, No 4 (2023): Desember Vol 12, No 3 (2023): September Vol 12, No 2 (2023): Juni Vol 12, No 1 (2023): Maret Vol 11, No 4 (2022): Desember Vol 11, No 3 (2022): September Vol 11, No 2 (2022): JUNI Vol 11, No 1 (2022): Maret Vol 10, No 3 (2021): November Vol 10, No 2 (2021): July Vol 10, No 1 (2021): Maret Vol 9, No 3 (2020): November Vol 9, No 2 (2020): July Vol 9, No 1 (2020): MARET Vol 8, No 3 (2019): November Vol 8, No 2 (2019): Juli Vol 8, No 1 (2019): Maret Vol 7, No 3 (2018): November 2018 Vol 7, No 2 (2018): JULI Vol 7, No 1 (2018): MARET Vol 6, No 3 (2017): NOVEMBER Vol 6, No 2 (2017): JULI Vol 6, No 1 (2017): MARET Vol 5, No 3 (2016): NOVEMBER Vol 5, No 2 (2016): JULI Vol 5, No 1 (2016): MARET Vol 4, No 3 (2015): NOVEMBER Vol 4, No 3 (2015): NOVEMBER Vol 4, No 2 (2015): JULI Vol 4, No 1 (2015): MARET Vol 3, No 3 (2014): NOVEMBER Vol 3, No 2 (2014): JULI Vol 3, No 1 (2014): Maret Vol 2, No 3 (2013): November Vol 2, No 2 (2013): JULI Vol 2, No 1 (2013): Maret Vol 1, No 3 (2012): NOVEMBER Vol 1, No 2 (2012): JULI More Issue