cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
infoijies@telkomuniversity.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota bandung,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
IJIES (International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System)
Published by Universitas Telkom
ISSN : -     EISSN : 25803050     DOI : -
Core Subject : Science, Engineering,
Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 258 Documents
 17   18   19   20   21 
Utilization of Service Oriented Architecture to Customize Accounting Business Process in Open ERP System for Smart SME’s Muhardi Saputra; Sanny Putra Hendarsyah; R. Wahjoe Witjaksono
International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol. 4 No. 2 (2020): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System
Publisher : School of Industrial and System Engineering, Telkom University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25124/ijies.v4i02.63

Abstract

Small and medium enterprises or commonly referred to as SMEs in Indonesia are business activities that are in great demand after the economic crisis which resulted in the termination of employment (PHK) experienced by most companies. The role of SMEs in the Indonesian economy has now been recognized by the wider community. However, many SMEs in Indonesia are still running their business processes separately, especially in the accounting system, so that the business processes are running poorly, financial transactions that are still recorded and reported manually and separately, sales/purchase account items that are still recorded manually, and there's no system that supports the accounting process for SMEs.The output from this research is an Open Source ERP-based Smart SME system design in the accounting module by embedding the "smart" feature, namely analytic accounting. This design expected to be the standard and best practice in the SME accounting system so that SME's actors can create and get more structured financial reports and can design an integrated system that supports a real-time data management system.The research method used in this research uses the Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) approach. This method also refers to certain services on one platform such as services for making payments, transferring payments, and checking the status of a bank account in one application. In general, all the research processes carried out refer to the step by step of SOA and there must be input and output in designing the business model. This method is used to design business process models and services based on the accounting system problems experienced by SMEs.
Selecting Benchmarking Partners Using Analytical Hierarchy Process Approach Sari Wulandari; Ardian Cahya Utama; Muhammad Arfidh
International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol. 4 No. 2 (2020): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System
Publisher : School of Industrial and System Engineering, Telkom University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25124/ijies.v4i02.66

Abstract

Benchmarking is a method to improve performance and improve company competitiveness. Thismethod has been commonly practiced by large companies and has recently been extended tosmall and medium enterprises (SMEs). However, the implementation between large and SMEsis very different. These differences are debated as an impact of company characteristics,specifically differences in the ability to develop and improve business. Typical SMEs face toughchallenges to overcome their resource constraints. This limitation affects the decisions of SMEsin choosing their comparison partners. This research was conducted to fill the research gapregarding the use of the Benchmarking method and the AHP approach to SMEs, especially indetermining Benchmark partners using the AHP approach. The use of benchmarking and AHPis illustrated by using SME objects that are engaged in the fashion sector, namely UKMCotton.Go. The problem faced by UKM Cotton.Go is marketing communication that is noteffective in creating sales so it needs to be determined benchmarking partner in makingimprovements to marketing communication. The use of AHP in determining benchmark partnershelps SMEs to find out which benchmark partners have the best marketing communicationperformance.
LinkAja Business Models Strategy Development Using BMC Approaches Novreyna Alda; Sari Wulandari
International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol. 4 No. 2 (2020): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System
Publisher : School of Industrial and System Engineering, Telkom University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25124/ijies.v4i02.86

Abstract

In the first quarter of 2019, there was an increase in the value and the volume transaction onelectronic money transactions in Indonesia. The development of electronic money is directlyproportional to the high competition of companies engaged in the field of mobile payment.LinkAja is a mobile payment application product that is representative of collaborationbetween Telkomsel and the number of State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs). One of the keys tosuccess in facing competition is to develop continuously. Therefore, it is necessary to developthe right business model to determine the optimal strategy in developing the LinkAjaapplication business. The objectives of this research are formulating and developing LinkAjabusiness models strategy. This result of this study proposed business model in the form ofimprovement for each element of its business model including: elements (1) Customersegments: Adding target customers to e-marketplaces and e-commerce, (2) Customerrelationships: Developing cooperation with LinkAja competitors, (3) Value Proposition:Developing customer consulting services by providing training for using the LinkAjaapplication, (4) Key Activities: Developing collaboration with partners and competitors, (5)Key Partners: Collaborating with the competitors such as Gopay, OVO, FUND, etc., (6) KeyResources: Using digital budget information systems to facilitate transparency of companybudgets, (7) Revenue streams: Upgrading fees for premium services, and (8) Cost Structure:Research costs.
Key Factors in Improving the Maturity of Information Technology Governance: A Case Study of State-owned Enterprise in Indonesia Rokhman Fauzi; Rahmat Mulyana
International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol. 4 No. 2 (2020): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System
Publisher : School of Industrial and System Engineering, Telkom University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25124/ijies.v4i02.75

Abstract

The assessment of IT governance maturity is part of the assurance function. The assessment iscarried out to ensure technology support in achieving business goals. In this context, companiesshould comply with regulations, as well as the need to continue to improve the quality ofimplementation of IT governance. The average value of PT X's IT governance maturity in Year2 has increased from 3.21 to 3.26. There is an increase in the average score of 0.05 over oneyear. Success factors in implementing IT governance must be maintained and encouraged tocontinue the grow. This research was conducted to identify what organizational initiatives toincrease the maturity and what the key factors are. Factors identification is done using evidenceanalysis method based on CSF references and attributes criteria. The results of the analysisobtained key factors that strengthen the maturity. The main factors are CSF2 providing ITinfrastructure that supports the development and exchange of IT applications and services(21.72%), and CSF4 staff development to meet professional IT HR qualifications (17.39%). Onthe other hand, maturity attribute which gave the biggest contribution was ATR1 related topolicies and procedures (34.6%), and ATR3 related to defining goals and actions (30.77%).
How to Create E-Purchasing Based on Open ERP for Integrated Hospital Service System Using QuickStart Methodology Nesya Irianis; Warih Puspitasari; Muhardi Saputra
International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol. 4 No. 2 (2020): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System
Publisher : School of Industrial and System Engineering, Telkom University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25124/ijies.v4i02.78

Abstract

In this research, the researcher carries out the health Industry of public hospitals in Indonesia.One of the main processes in company business processes is the purchasing of goods. One ofthe problems in purchasing is the absence of the system that Integrates business processesbetween the Inventory Department and the Purchasing Department. Hence, interfere with dailyoperational in RSUD XYZ like due to notification’s update delay of the goods causesunavailability stock in the warehouse, so will affect the late purchase of goods at RSUD XYZ.Odoo is a software of Enterprise Resource Planning opensource used by various types ofcompanies. Odoo provides solutions package for Purchase Management to overcome theproblem in the company. The researcher used the QuickStart Methodology to implement ERPsystems. Odoo implementation with QuickStart needs through five main stages. The result ofthis research is the design of a planning model for Enterprise Resource Planning system ofpurchasing in RSUD XYZ. Moreover, Odoo makes business processes in the RSUD XYZ canbe automated with real-time information, this automation and real-time data will support theRSUD XYZ to make better decision in the future
Validating Scope Design in Project STTF Case Study PT.XYZ Agustian Mauludin; Wawan Tripiawan; Achmad Fuad Bay
International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol. 4 No. 2 (2020): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System
Publisher : School of Industrial and System Engineering, Telkom University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25124/ijies.v4i02.88

Abstract

PT.XYZ is a company in the Telecommunication Industry. Due to increase theproduct sales, PT.XYZ performed an annual project to build network infrastructureto the uncovered network areas, called the STTF project. As a project owner,conducting a high performance of scope validation is very crucial to make sure thequality of the result meets requirements. However, the previous project result hasshown to the unsatisfactory result, i.e. titled pole resulting in high cable attenuationand over budget. To see the extent of the performance and effectiveness of thevalidation process, an evaluation of the current validate scope process is necessary.One of the methods is by comparing the operational implementation in the currentSTTF project against the project management standard to ensure the processperformed effectively. Data collected using a questionnaire based on PMBOK 6thed. standard processes using a self-assessment survey, and two project locations arechosen as a comparative sample. The verified questionnaires then distributedpurposively to validate the scope team. In the end, the result of the research showsthe implementation of validate scope activity is not comply with the standard processin PT.XYZ and there are gaps against standard practices in PMBOK.
ManTool: Application as Manufacturing Tools for Resources Management based on GIS Ika Arum Puspita; Arrivan Dika Santosa; Muhammad Agung Hambali; Faridhah Raehanisa Pribadi; Stevanus Yustiawan
International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System
Publisher : School of Industrial and System Engineering, Telkom University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25124/ijies.v5i01.71

Abstract

Competition in the textile industry is very high. Companies must be able to meet market needs byproducing goods according to demand. In producing an item, it is necessary to design the amount ofraw material required. This study aims to publish geographic information system (GIS) basedapplication design as a tool in resource management. This application is named ManTool. ManToolcan provide a reminder when raw material stocks run out. With this system, the company can orderraw materials, and the production system continues to run well. This system is designed based on aGeographical Information System (GIS), it is easier for companies to determine which supplier ofraw materials to choose. The method of making this system is by using the waterfall method. Thismethod produces the right system because each stage is identified sequentially. The result of thisresearch is a geographic information system-based application. With this application, the companywill get a notification when the raw material runs out, and the company will get the right supplier'srecommendation to buy raw material.
Decision Support System Design for Wedding Organizer Tradeshow Selection using AHP and TOPSIS Rayinda Pramuditya Soesanto; Afrin Fauzya Rizana
International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System
Publisher : School of Industrial and System Engineering, Telkom University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25124/ijies.v5i01.96

Abstract

Wedding organizers, as one of the creative industries, often participate in a trade show as one of themarketing mediums. Many wedding-related trades show events are held every year. But the cost toparticipate in one trade show event is quite expensive and increases from time to time. Thus, beforedeciding to participate in a trade show, it is important to evaluate whether the trade show events arerecommended to join or not. The purpose of this study is to design a decision support system thatwill help the wedding organizer to decide their participation in a trade show. The decision modelwas constructed using AHP and TOPSIS methods. There are seven factors considered in the model,i.e., tradeshow location, reputation and professionalism of the organizer, cost estimation, trade showprestige, tenant reputation, time of the event, the attractiveness of the event. By using the AHPmethod, the priority weight of each factor was calculated. Moreover, the weight obtained will beused in developing a decision model combined with the TOPSIS method. The decision supportsystem was developed afterward by using the SCRUM method. The feature of the system isdiscussed in the paper
Analysis of Online Learning Readiness Level at Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya (UNUSA) Endang Sulistiyani; Rizqi Putri Nourma Budiarti; Muhammad Aidir Rafly
International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System
Publisher : School of Industrial and System Engineering, Telkom University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25124/ijies.v5i01.102

Abstract

Since a few years ago, blended learning has been implemented by UNUSA. However, until now, theimplementation is still not optimal. Various obstacles, such as network access, availability ofdevices, and unclear rules in implementing online learning, still occur. Readiness analysis is one ofthe critical success in online learning implementation. The main objective of this research is toconduct online learning readiness studies at UNUSA. This research was carried out in three mainstages: the preparation of measurement instruments, data collection, and analysis of readiness level.The method used is descriptive research method with quantitative and qualitative approaches. TheSeakow & Samson e-learning readiness model with five dimensions of readiness, namely policy,technology, financial, human resource, and infrastructure, is used in this study. The result of thisstudy shows that that UNUSA's level of readiness in implementing online learning is in the Readycategory, requiring improvement to implement it with a readiness score of 3.68. The dimension withthe highest score is technology, which is 3.84. Meanwhile, infrastructure and policy scored 3.77 and3.72, respectively. The human resources dimension has a readiness score of 3.6. In contrast, thedimension with the lowest score is the financial dimension.
Cotton.Go’s Electronic Service Quality Improvement Using Importance Performance Competitor Analysis Approach Tara Aldiera; Sari Wulandari; Ima Normalia Kusmayanti
International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System
Publisher : School of Industrial and System Engineering, Telkom University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25124/ijies.v5i01.103

Abstract

The number of competitors that have sprung up in the field of fashion especially in men'sclothing, has caused Cotton.Go need to evaluate its e-commerce services to compete withthem. Therefore, this research was conducted to evaluate the attributes of Cotton.Go’s ecommerce services by integrating the dimensions of Electronic Service Quality andImportance Performance Competitor Analysis (IPCA) method. According to researchresult, seven attributes of services in Cotton.Go’s e-commerce is needed for furtherresearch, which are web design, reliability, efficiency, responsiveness, security,flexibility, and fulfillment. This research produced that all of the attributes need urgentaction to improve by looking at the negative performance differences value with itscompetitor. All attributes that need to be improved indicated that the performances areconsidered to be lower compared to the competitor and need immediate action to improve.

Page 19 of 26 | Total Record : 258

 17   18   19   20   21 

Filter by Year

2017 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol 7 No 02 (2023): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol 7 No 01 (2023): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol 6 No 02 (2022): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol 6 No 01 (2022): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol 5 No 02 (2021): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol 5 No 01 (2021): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol. 5 No. 2 (2021): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol 4 No 02 (2020): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol 4 No 01 (2020): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol. 4 No. 2 (2020): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol. 4 No. 1 (2020): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol 3 No 02 (2019): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol 3 No 02 (2019): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System (In Press) Vol 3 No 01 (2019): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System (In Press) Vol 3 No 01 (2019): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol. 3 No. 2 (2019): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol. 3 No. 1 (2019): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol 2 No 02 (2018): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol 2 No 02 (2018): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System (In Press) Vol 2 No 01 (2018): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol 2 No 01 (2018): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol. 2 No. 2 (2018): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol. 2 No. 1 (2018): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol 1 No 02 (2017): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol 1 No 01 (2017): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol 1 No 01 (2017): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System Vol. 1 No. 1 (2017): International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System More Issue