cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dr. Iza Rumesten RS
Contact Email
izarumestenunsri@yahoo.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
repertoium.mkn@gmail.com
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. ogan ilir,
Sumatera selatan
INDONESIA
Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan
Published by Universitas Sriwijaya
ISSN : 2086809X     EISSN : 26558610     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan adalah jurnal berkala ilmiah yang dikelola oleh Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum Univesitas Sriwijaya. Jurnal ilmiah ini menjadi sarana publikasi bagi para akademisi dan praktisi dalam mempublikasi artikel ilmiah di bidang hukum kenotariatan dan ke-PPAT-an. Ruang lingkup jurnal Repertorium meliputi bidang: Hukum Kontrak, Hukum Perjanjian, Hukum Kepailitan, Hukum Perusahaan, Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual, dan Cyber Notary.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 313 Documents
 28   29   30   31   32 
Authority in the Management and Utilization of Agrarian/Land Resources in Indonesia Firman Muntaqo; Febrian; Alip Dian Pratama; Fadillah Mursid
Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): Repertorium
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/rpt.v15i1.4456

Abstract

As a nation founded upon belief in the One Almighty God, Indonesia recognizes that all things in the heavens and on earth, including agrarian resources and land, ultimately belong to God. Accordingly, the Indonesian nation possesses only the authority to manage and utilize agrarian resources as national wealth, resources, and assets for the greatest prosperity of the people. The Indonesian state acts merely as the recipient of a mandate from the nation to exercise such authority and is not the owner of agrarian resources or land. This study examines the relationship between the Indonesian nation, the state, and agrarian/land authority within the framework of Indonesian agrarian law. It argues that authority over land management and utilization should be centralized under the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency (ATR/BPN) to prevent overlapping authority and disputes among government institutions. Other ministries requiring land for the performance of their duties should obtain delegated authority through Management Rights Certificates issued by ATR/BPN. The study further highlights that the prevailing interpretation of state control over land has shifted toward viewing the state as the holder of ulayat rights, despite such a concept not being recognized under the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This interpretation has contributed to legal uncertainty, conflicts of authority, unequal land distribution, and the denial of the eternal magical-religious relationship between indigenous communities and their customary lands, including cases such as Rempang Island. The exclusion of ulayat land from land registration under Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 further weakens legal certainty for customary communities. This paper concludes that agrarian legal politics in Indonesia should reaffirm that the state merely exercises delegated authority, while the Indonesian nation remains the true holder of authority over agrarian resources and land.
Comparative Law on Notary Dual Position between Indonesia and Germany Nadia Maisa Alya; Rio Adrian
Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): Repertorium
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/rpt.v15i1.5263

Abstract

One of the important issues in notarial practice in Indonesia is the dual position of notaries, namely when a notary holds another profession that may potentially create conflicts of interest and disrupt their independence as a public official. Although the Notary Office Act (UUJN) explicitly prohibits dual positions, this practice still frequently occurs and raises problems that can affect the professionalism and integrity of notaries. In a comparative context, Germany has an interesting regulation through the Bundesnotarordnung (BNotO) which distinguishes two models of notary positions, namely Nur-Notar (pure notary) and Anwaltsnotar (lawyer simultaneously serving as notary). This study uses a normative juridical method with a comparative law approach to analyze the regulation and practice of prohibiting dual notary positions in Indonesia and Germany. The results show that both countries emphasize the independence and neutrality of notaries, yet Germany provides limited exceptions through the Anwaltsnotar model which is strictly regulated and supervised by notarial institutions at the state level. This system demonstrates a balance between the need for legal profession flexibility and protection of public interest. This comparison is expected to serve as a reference in strengthening the supervision system and professional ethics of notaries in Indonesia to be more professional, integrity-driven, and aligned with the principles of good governance in legal services. Keywords: Notary Dual Position; Indonesia; Germany
Analysis of Notarial Responsibility in Guaranteeing Gender Justice in the Division of Community Property after Divorce Dwi Utami Asriana Taufik; Devianty Fitri
Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): Repertorium
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/rpt.v15i1.5619

Abstract

This study examines the responsibility of notaries in ensuring gender justice in the distribution of joint property after divorce. The issue arises from the continued occurrence of unequal distribution of marital assets due to imbalances in power relations between husband and wife, despite positive law emphasizing equality within marriage. This study aims to analyze the scope of notarial responsibility in ensuring gender justice and to examine the civil liability of notaries based on Supreme Court jurisprudence. The research employed a normative juridical method using statutory and case approaches. Data were collected through library research on primary and secondary legal materials and analyzed qualitatively. The results indicate that the responsibility of a notary is not limited to fulfilling formal requirements in deed preparation, but also includes substantial verification regarding defects of consent, imbalance of power relations, and potential harm to weaker parties. Supreme Court Decision Number 1964 K/Pdt/2020 emphasizes balanced distribution of joint property as a form of material justice, while Supreme Court Decision Number 12 K/Pdt/2020 demonstrates that deeds neglecting the rights of wives may be annulled and may result in civil liability for notaries. Therefore, notaries are required to uphold the principle of prudence, provide legal counseling, and refuse the preparation of deeds that contradict justice and legal provisions.

Page 32 of 32 | Total Record : 313

 28   29   30   31   32 

Filter by Year

2015 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): Repertorium Vol. 14 No. 2 (2025): Repertorium Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025): Repertorium Vol 13, No 2 (2024): NOVEMBER 2024 Vol 13, No 1 (2024): Mei 2024 Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024): Repertorium Vol. 13 No. 1 (2024): Repertorium Vol 12, No 2 (2023): November 2023 Vol 12, No 1 (2023): Mei 2023 Vol. 12 No. 2 (2023): Repertorium Vol. 12 No. 1 (2023): Repertorium Vol 11, No 2 (2022): November 2022 Vol 11, No 1 (2022): Mei 2022 Vol. 11 No. 1 (2022): Repertorium Vol 10, No 2 (2021): Volume 10 Nomor 2 November 2021 Vol 10, No 1 (2021): VOLUME 10 NOMOR 1 MEI 2021 Vol. 10 No. 2 (2021): Repertorium Vol. 10 No. 1 (2021): Repertorium Vol 9, No 2 (2020): VOLUME 9 NOMOR 2 NOVEMBER 2020 Vol 9, No 1 (2020): VOLUME 9 NOMOR 1 MEI 2020 Vol. 9 No. 2 (2020): Repertorium Vol. 9 No. 1 (2020): Repertorium Vol. 8 No. 2 (2019): Repertorium Volume 8 Nomor 2 November 2019 Volume 8 Nomor 1 Mei 2019 Vol. 8 No. 1 (2019): Repertorium Vol. 7 No. 2 (2018): Repertorium Volume 7 Nomor 2 November 2018 Volume 7 Nomor 1 Mei 2018 Vol. 7 No. 1 (2018): Repertorium Volume 6 Nomor 2 November 2017 Vol. 6 No. 2 (2017): Repertorium Volume 6 Nomor 1 Mei 2017 Vol. 5 No. 2 (2016): Repertorium Volume 5 Nomor 2 November 2016 Vol. 5 No. 1 (2016): Repertorium Volume 5 Nomor 1 Mei 2016 Vol. 4 No. 2 (2015): Repertorium Volume 4 Nomor 2 November 2015 Volume 4 Nomor 1 Mei 2015 Vol. 4 No. 1 (2015): Repertorium More Issue