cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Afandi Sitamala
Contact Email
asitamala@untirta.ac.id
Phone
+62254-280330
Journal Mail Official
jurnalnuranihk@untirta.ac.id
Editorial Address
Faculty of Law, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa. Jl. Raya Jakarta, KM. 4, Pakupatan, Kota Serang, Provinsi Banten. Telp. (0254) 280330 Ext. 218, Fax.: (0254) 281254
Location
Kab. serang,
Banten
INDONESIA
Nurani Hukum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Published by Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
ISSN : 26557169     EISSN : 26560801     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.51825/nhk
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Nurani Hukum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Nurani Hukum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum also known as Nurani Hukum is national peer review journal on legal studies. The journal aims to publish new work of the highest calibre across the full range of legal scholarship, which includes but not limited to works in the law and history, legal philosophy, sociology of law, Socio-legal studies, International Law, Environmental Law, Criminal Law, Private Law, Islamic Law, Agrarian Law, Administrative Law, Criminal Procedural Law, Commercial Law, Constitutional Law, Human Rights Law, Civil Procedural Law and Adat Law. Nurani Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is published by Faculty of Law, University of Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa in Collaboration with Pusat Kajian Konstitusi Perundang-Undangan dan Pemerintahan (PKKPUP). periodically published in December and June and the approved and ready to publish in the website and hardcopy version will be circulated at every period. Therefore, all articles published by Nurani Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum will have unique DOI number. In 2021, the Nurani Hukum requires English as its main language, and therefore accepts journals only in English.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 7 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 2 No. 1 Juni 2019" : 7 Documents clear
Dinamika Negara Hukum Indonesia: Antara Rechtsstaat dan Rule Of Law Rokilah Rokilah
Nurani Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 Juni 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/nhk.v2i1.8167

Abstract

The Indonesian state of law, originating from Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. This is reaffirmed in Article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution, that the State of Indonesia is a state of law. The use of Rechtsstaat and Rule of Law in the concept of a state of law is to distinguish the civil law legal system called the Continental European legal system and the common law legal system called Anglo Saxon, the legal system used in the UK. The relationship between the rule of law and democracy is that democracy must operate within the corridor of the law. This study uses a normative juridical approach, which is the law in reality in social life, as the law is operated by the community in everyday life. Data collection techniques are carried out by means of library research, namely the study of documents that are relevant to research in the libraryNegara hukum Indonesia, bersumber pada Pancasila dan UUD 1945. Hal ini dipertegas dalam pasal 1 ayat (3) UUD 1945, bahwa Negara Indonesia adalah negara hukum. Pemakaian Rechtsstaat dan Rule of Law dalam konsep negara hukum ini untuk membedakan sistem hukum civil law yang disebut sistem hukum Eropa Kontinental dan sistem hukum common law yang disebut Anglo Saxon, yaitu sistem hukum yang digunakan di Inggris. Hubungan negara hukum dengan demokrasi adalah bahwa demokrasi harus berjalan dalam koridor hukum. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif, yaitu hukum dalam kenyataannya di dalam kehidupan sosial kemasyarakatan, sebagaimana hukum itu dioperasikan oleh masyarakat dalam kehidupan sehari-hari.  Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan cara studi pustaka (library research) yakni studi terhadap dokumen-dokumen yang relevan dengan penelitian di perpustakaan. 
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Anak Sebagai Korban Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga Vivin Restia; Ridwan Arifin
Nurani Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 Juni 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/nhk.v2i1.5018

Abstract

Kekerasan di dalam rumah tangga adalah suatu hal yang sering terjadi di dalam kehidupan setiap manusia. Terdapat beberapa bentuk dalam kekerasan yaitu baik di bidang soial, politk dan ekonomi, pendidikan dan korbannya adalah perempuan serta anak-anak di dalam keluarga. Di dalam Undang-Undang Pasal 44 Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 menyatakan pemerintah harus bisa memenuhi fasilitas serta menyelenggarakan usaha kesehatan yang baik untuk semua anak dan masyarakat. Agar semua warga dan anak-anak mendapatkan hak kesehatan yang optimal dan baik dari sebelum mereka lahir. Pada Undang-Undang diatas juga menjelaskan tentang perlindungan terhadap anak untuk bisa menentukan sanksi pidana yang berupa denda dengan sejumlah uang ataupun dipenjara. Semua dilakukan untuk kepentingan anak, karena anak merupakan generasi penerus bangsa untuk bisa hidup, berkembang, bersosialisai serta berpartisipasi untuk semua orang dan bangsa kita agar menjadi bangsa yang berkembang dan maju. Violence has become a phenomenon in the lives of Indonesian people. Domestic violence is something that often happens in every human life. There are several forms of violence, namely in the social, political and economic fields, education and the victims are women and children in the family. In Law Article 44 Number 23 of 2002 states that the government must be able to fulfill facilities as well as conduct health businesses that are good for all children and the community. So that all citizens and children get the right to optimal health and good before they are born. The Act above also explains the protection of children in order to determine criminal sanctions in the form of fines with a sum of money or imprisonment. All is done for the benefit of children, because children are the next generation of the nation to be able to live, develop, socialize and participate for all people and our nation to become a developing and developed nation.
Upaya Peningkatan Daya Dukung Lingkungan Hidup Melalui Instrumen Pencegahan Kerusakan Lingkungan Hidup Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup Ferina Ardhi Cahyani
Nurani Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 Juni 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/nhk.v2i1.5488

Abstract

Development that carried out every day requires policies to limit and regulate these activities. Development that still relies on natural resources is still abundant in Indonesia. Continuous development will have a positive impact, but it cannot be denied if the development also has a negative impact. One of them is the declining capacity of the environment. If this happens continuously it can have an impact on the survival of all living things, not only humans. Therefore, a policy that regulates permits related to the development is needed. Indonesia has a legal basis relating to environmental destruction instruments that regulate about the types of environmental-related permits such as Environmental Impact Analysis. If there are legal rules, the rules are also important. Implementation of Environmental Permits that will have an impact on maintaining the carrying capacity of the environment.
Peran Fikih Indonesia dalam Modernisasi Hukum Islam (Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974) Muhamad Muslih
Nurani Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 Juni 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/nhk.v2i1.5477

Abstract

There are several views of thought that hinder the process of developing Islamic law, even they argue that Islamic law cannot be developed. Joseph Schacht (1955) argued that the purpose of Muhammad SAW was appointed as a Prophet not to create a new legal system, but to guide humans to be able to go to heaven. Muhammad Khalid Mas'ud (1955), Asaf Ali Asghar Fyzee (1955), and Yahya Harahap (2003) argue that the process of modernizing Islamic law cannot be done by everyone, because it requires certain skills to do it and there are limits to objects that cannot be modernized. Islamic law is not a law in the sense of modern law.This study aims to prove that Islamic law in Indonesia always develops according to the needs of the society. Hasbi Ash-Shiddieqy (1975) argue that Islamic law is an attempt by legal experts to apply the Sharia to the needs of the society. ‘Fikih Indonesia’ initiated by Hasbi Ash-Shiddieqy has an important role in the process of modernizing Islamic law in Indonesia.The research method used in this research is Descriptive Qualitative and research data sources are classified as Library Research. The approach used is a Socio-Legal and Normative Juridical Approach. Primary data sources are Hasbi Ash-Shiddieqy's books and Undang-undang No. 1 Tahun 1974. Secondary data sources used are all writings, journals, books, articles, and other sources that are relevant to the discussion.The results of this study that Islamic law in Indonesia always develops according to the needs of the society. In terms of history, the role of ‘Fikih Indonesia’ initiated by Hasbi Ash-Shiddieqy has a very important role in the process of modernizing Islamic law in Indonesia. Because ‘Fikih Indonesia’ became the idea of the Draft Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974. So there are many similarities between Undang-undang No. 1 Tahun 1974 and ‘Fikih Indonesia’. Keywords: Islamic Law, Modernization, Fikih Indonesia
Omnibus Law : Dalam Perspektif Hukum Responsif Pudjo Utomo
Nurani Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 Juni 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/nhk.v2i1.8168

Abstract

One of the problems with investing in Indonesia is legal certainty in the field of licensing. The number of overlapping regulations, and bad services, have an impact on the lack of investor interest. Therefore it is necessary to regulate investment regulations and legal systems. This research is analytical descriptive with normative juridical approach. This study finds legislation related problems and synchronization problems, with reference to the concept of responsive law. It was concluded, the need to formulate a model of law that could bridge and at the same time resolve regulatory issues with the establishment of the Omnibus Law / Omnibus Law.Salah satu masalah berinvestasi di Indonesia adalah kepastian hukum bidang perizinan. Jumlah peraturan yang tumpang tindih, dan pelayanan buruk, berdampak pada kurangnya minat investor. Oleh karena itu perlu untuk mengatur peraturan dan sistem hukum investasi. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif analitis dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Studi ini menemukan masalah legislasi terkait dan masalah sinkronisasi, dengan merujuk pada konsep hukum responsif. Disimpulkan, perlunya merumuskan model undang-undang yang bisa menjembatani dan sekaligus menyelesaikan masalah regulasi dengan pembentukan Undang-Undang Omnibus/ Omnibus Law.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN DOKTER TERHADAP KERUGIAN PASIEN AKIBAT PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM Hasuri Hasuri; Khoirul Anam
Nurani Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 Juni 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/nhk.v2i1.6563

Abstract

 This study raises the legal relationship between civil and public responsibility for the loss of patients who promise treatment or cure the patiennts illness. Using this by the liabriary Research Method a normative legal approach based on the strick Liabilitu theory results in the doctor being liable for violations of law both intentinally dolus an culpas’s negligence, physivian liability can also be in the form of material and immaterial compensation.Penelitian Ini mengangkat hubungan hukum secara keperdataan dan kepidanan pertanggungjawaban Dokter terhadap kerugian pasien yang menjanjikan pengobatan atau meyembuhkan penyakit pasien. Dengan menggunakan metode Liabriary Research pendekatan hukum normatif berdasar teori Strick liability dihasilkan dokter dapat dibebani pertanggungjawaban atas tindalan melanggar hukum baik yang disangaja dolus maupun karna kelalaian culpa, pertanggungjawaban dokter bisa juga berupa pergantian ganti rugi materil dan immateril.
Pelaksanaan Hak Prerogatif Presiden dalam Penyusunan Kabinet Berdasarkan Pasal 17 UUD 1945 Amandemen Suatu Tinjauan Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Sulkiah Sulkiah
Nurani Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 Juni 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/nhk.v2i1.8169

Abstract

Article 17 of Law-1945 assert that, granting prerogative to the president substantially limiting the powers of the president. Right as Prerogative. This can be understood broadly and narrowly. narrowly prerogative rights are only given to the president in choosing ministers - minister  of state. While at large. not only the existance of the rights prerogative appointment and dismissal of ministers, but also includes the authority to run the gpvernment, ass well as matters state, including appoint ambassadors and conculs, granting pardons, amnesty, abolition and restoration, giving the title and decorations, but in the right order prerogative practice there are constraints, indicated the presence of interference from political parties support (coalitions). Under these conditions, the formulation of the problem as follows : 1 . How prerogative rights owned by the President in the preparation of the cabinet, before and after the amendment of the Act of 1945. 2. What is a constraint in implementing the prerogative of the President. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the application of constellation Political Rights prerogative President under Article 17 of Law - 1945. This writing method normative juridical approach. The problems in the implementation of rights prerogative president president 1 system generally occurs when the system is combined with a coalition with the party support multy-pertay system.Pasal 17 Undang- Undang Dasar 1945 menegaskan bahwa pemberian hak prerogatif kepada presiden. Hakekatnya pembatasan terhadap kewenangan Presiden dengan sebutan hak prerogatif. Hal ini dapat dipahami secara luas dan sempit. Secara sempit hak prerogatif hanya diberikan kepada presiden dalam hal memilih menteri-menteri negara, sedangkan secara luas keberadaan hak prerogatif tidak hanya pengangkatan dan pemberhentian menteri, tetapi juga termasuk kewenangan dalam menjalankan roda pemerintahan, serta urusan kenegaraan diantaranya mengangkat duta dan konsul, memberikan grasi, amnesti, abolisi, dan rehabilitasi, memberikan gelar dan tanda jasa. Namun dalam tatanan praktek hak prerogatif ini terdapat kendala, terindikasi adanya interpensi dari partai politik pendukung (koalisi).Berdasarkan hal tersebut maka rumusan permasalahan sebagai berikut: (1).Bagaimana hak prerogatif yang dimiliki oleh presiden dalam penyusunan kabinet. Sebelum dan sesudah adanya amandemen Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. (2).Apa yang menjadi kendala dalam melaksanakan hak prerogatif presiden. Tujuan Penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh konstalasi Politik terhadap penerapan hak prerogatif presiden berdasarkan Pasal 17 Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. Penulisan ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif. Problematika penerapan hak prerogatif presiden pada sistem presidensial pada umumnya terjadi ketika dikombinasikan dengan sistem koalisi dengan partai-partai (sistem multi partai).

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 7

 1 

Filter by Year

2019 2019


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 8, No 2 (2025): Justice, Equity, and Human Rights in the Globalized Era: Towards a Harmonized Le Vol 8, No 1 (2025): Assessing National and International Perspectives on Justice and Legal Protectio Vol 7, No 2 (2024): Addressing Inequities and Seeking Certainty within Asian Legal Frameworks Vol 7, No 1 (2024): Justice, Equity, and Human Rights in the Globalized Era: Towards a Harmonized Le Vol 6, No 2 (2023): Delving into Global Laws: A Journey through Justice and Legal Protections Vol 6, No 1 (2023): Assessing National and International Perspectives on Justice and Legal Protectio Vol. 5 No. 2 December 2022 Vol. 5 No. 1 June 2022 Vol. 4 No. 2 Desember 2021 Vol. 4 No. 1 Juni 2021 Vol. 3 No. 2 Desember 2020 Vol. 3 No. 1 Juni 2020 Vol. 2 No. 2 Desember 2019 Vol. 2 No. 1 Juni 2019 Vol 1, No 1 (2018): Vol. 1 No. 1 Desember 2018 More Issue