cover
Contact Name
Heri Firmansyah
Contact Email
herifirmansyah@uinsu.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jurnaltaqnin@uinsu.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
Taqnin: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum
ISSN : -     EISSN : 2685399X     DOI : -
Taqnin: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum menerbitkan artikel dalam bidang ilmu-ilmu syariah dan hukum. Terbit dua kali satu tahun, edisi Januari-Juni dan Juli-Desember.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 84 Documents
Comparison of Hanafi and Mutakallimin Methods in Islamic Jurisprudence Formulation Alpaten, Ulil Albab Al aulia; Harahap, Rustam Dahar Karnadi Apollo; Zulfikhar, Akbar Fatih
TAQNIN: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 7, No 02 (2025): Juli-Desember 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30821/taqnin.v7i02.25736

Abstract

The study examines the effectiveness of the Hanafi method in establishing jurisprudence rules and compares it with the Mutakallimin method. Through a qualitative descriptive approach, utilizing primary data from Hanafi fiqh and Mutakallimin books along with secondary data from scholarly journals and online articles, the research elucidates the nuances of both methodologies. The Hanafi method, rooted in the teachings of Imam Abu Hanifah and his companions, prioritizes practical aspects and real-world experience in jurisprudence formulation. Employing an inductive approach, it offers flexibility and rational interpretation, ensuring relevance in evolving contexts. In contrast, the Mutakallimin method focuses on establishing rules of usuliyah without considering fiqh branches, emphasizing reasoning but criticized for its rigidity and lack of practical examples. The findings suggest that the Hanafi method, with its clarity, comprehensiveness, and flexibility, is more effective in jurisprudential development. It incorporates principles derived from earlier imams, facilitating understanding and application. Conversely, the Mutakallimin method, while valuing reasoning, faces challenges in application due to its detachment from fiqh branches. Thus, the Hanafi method emerges as a more practical and relevant approach, contributing significantly to the evolution and application of Islamic law in contemporary contexts
HARTA WARIS YANG DIBAGIKAN SEBELUM MUWARIS MENINGGAL DI DESA SINGOSARI PERSPEKTIF FIQIH MAWARIS Septian, Mohammad Arinto Yudo; Khoirunnisa, Khoirunnisa Khoirunnisa; Nisa, Devie Khoirun Nisa Khoirun; Sari, Sofia Nofita Sari Nofita
TAQNIN: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 7, No 02 (2025): Juli-Desember 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30821/taqnin.v7i02.27161

Abstract

HARTA WARIS YANG DIBAGIKAN SEBELUM MUWARIS MENINGGAL
Fenomena Sex in the Car di Aceh dalam Perspektif Fiqh Jinayah dan Maqashid Syariah Rizqi, Retanisa
TAQNIN: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 7, No 02 (2025): Juli-Desember 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30821/taqnin.v7i02.26362

Abstract

This study examines the phenomenon of sex in the car in Aceh within the framework of fiqh jinayah (Islamic criminal law) and maqasid al-syari‘ah (the objectives of Islamic law) to explore its legal, moral, and policy implications in the enforcement of Islamic law. The research focuses on how sexual activity inside a vehicle is classified within the categories of jarimah (hudud/ta‘zir) and the extent to which such acts violate the five essential objectives of Islamic law (al-dharūriyyat al-khams). The study employs a normative legal research method, analyzing statutory regulations (Qanun Aceh No. 6/2014), classical and contemporary fiqh literature, and the maqasid framework as a conceptual basis. Secondary data were obtained from books, journals, and official reports published within the last six years. The findings reveal that the sex in the car phenomenon is generally categorized as a jarimah ta‘zir, which requires discretionary punishment by the authorities, while simultaneously violating the core elements of maqasid (particularly hifẓ al-din, hifẓ al-nafs, and hifẓ al-nasl). The study further emphasizes the need to recontextualize fiqh jinayah to address contemporary forms of khalwat, such as in vehicles, through preventive legal measures (sadd al-dzari‘ah), clear evidentiary guidelines, and the integration of educational approaches. The novelty of this research lies in its empirical focus on vehicles as modern spaces of khalwat in Aceh and its maqasid-based normative recommendations for adaptive Islamic law enforcement.
Epistemology of al-Hukm al-Taklifi in Islamic Family Law: Integrating Haqq and Iltizam as the Normative Foundation of the Kompilasi Hukum Islam in Indonesia Hanapi, Agustin; Husnul, Muhammad
TAQNIN: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 7, No 02 (2025): Juli-Desember 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30821/taqnin.v7i02.27922

Abstract

This study explores the epistemology of al-hukm al-taklifi in explaining the integration of haqq (rights) and iltizam (obligations) as the normative foundation of the Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI) in Indonesia. It aims to reconstruct the moral coherence of Islamic family law by grounding it in the epistemic structure of taklif. Using a qualitative, normative-philosophical approach, the study analyzes classical texts of usūl al-fiqh-including works by al-Ghazali, al-Āmidi, and al-Shaṭibi-alongside modern legal thought on Islamic normativity and pluralism.The findings reveal that al-hukm al-taklifi functions as an epistemic bridge linking divine revelation, rational cognition, and moral purpose. The codification of the KHI, however, has fragmented this unity by emphasizing legal form over ethical substance. Reintegrating haqq and iltizam within taklif restores law's moral dimension and theological legitimacy.The study concludes that reform in Islamic family law must begin with epistemological reconstruction. The implications suggest that taklif provides a universal framework for harmonizing revelation and reason, transforming Islamic law into a living moral discourse grounded in justice, compassion, and wisdom.