cover
Contact Name
Bambang Joyo Supeno
Contact Email
-
Phone
+6281336355089
Journal Mail Official
magistralawreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Program Studi Hukum Program Magister Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang Jl. Pemuda No. 70 Semarang, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
MAGISTRA Law Review
ISSN : -     EISSN : 27152502     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
MAGISTRA Law Review, selanjutnya disebut MaLRev adalah jurnal berkala ilmiah yang diterbitkan oleh Program Studi Hukum Program Magister, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 (UNTAG) Semarang. MaLRev diterbitkan dua kali dalam satu tahun pada bulan Januari dan Juli. Ditujukan sebagai sarana publikasi bagi akademisi, peneliti, dan praktisi di bidang hukum dalam menerbitkan artikel hasil penelitian (riset) maupun artikel telaah konseptual (review). Ruang lingkup kajian meliputi: Hukum Tata Negara; Hukum Administrasi; Hukum Pidana; Hukum Perdata; Hukum Internasional; Hukum Acara; Hukum Adat; Hukum Bisnis; Hukum Kepariwisataan; Hukum Lingkungan; Hukum Dan Masyarakat; Hukum Informasi Teknologi Dan Transaksi Elektronik; Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 84 Documents
Politik Hukum Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Tentang Desa Setiaji, Mukhamad Luthfan
MAGISTRA Law Review Vol 7, No 01 (2026): MAGISTRA Law Review
Publisher : PSHPM Untag Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/malrev.v7i01.7063

Abstract

The state has explicitly acknowledged the existence of villages and indigenous groups through the Law from past till the present. The most recent revision to the village regulations, Law Number 3 of 2024 concerning the Second revision to Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages, has drawn a lot of attention from many facets of society. The People's Representative Council of the Republic of Indonesia (DPR RI) wants the second amendment draft to Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages to be approved prior to the general election (Pemilu) in 2024, even though the most recent village regulations are not part of the priority National Legislation Program (Prolegnas) for 2023. It is fascinating to examine the legal politics and urgency involved in the creation of Law Number 3 of 2024, which amends Law Number 6 of 2014 about villages in the second place. Normative legal research employing secondary data sources and qualitative descriptive analytical methodologies is the research methodology employed in this work. The study's findings suggest that political factors and the need for quick changes to the legislation do not substantially alter the content of earlier rules.
Implementasi Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Dalam Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu Di Masyarakat (Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 Tentang Cipta Kerja) Rudin, Ahmad Akbar
MAGISTRA Law Review Vol 7, No 01 (2026): MAGISTRA Law Review
Publisher : PSHPM Untag Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/malrev.v7i01.7060

Abstract

Fixed-term employment agreements (PKWT) are a policy that is inseparable from the Job Creation Law. This study discusses the implementation of fixed-term employment agreements in society. The article evaluates the impact of the Job Creation Law on PKWT by analyzing changes in legal provisions that affect the characteristics, rights, and protections of workers. The method used in this study employs a descriptive approach; qualitative descriptive research can be understood as a series of activities related to analyzing events, phenomena, or conditions socially. This type of research is qualitative research. This study discusses obstacles such as mismatched worker qualifications, lack of understanding of employment contracts, lack of knowledge about labor laws, and insufficient understanding of government regulations related to fixed-term employment agreements (PKWT). Therefore, efforts are needed to improve understanding and compliance in the implementation of PKWT to create a fairer working environment.
Perkembangan Penerapan Sumpah Mubahalah Dalam Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia Akhmadi, Khoiri; Holijah, Holijah
MAGISTRA Law Review Vol 7, No 01 (2026): MAGISTRA Law Review
Publisher : PSHPM Untag Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/malrev.v7i01.7061

Abstract

The Mubahalah Oath and Corruption are interrelated issues that require a comprehensive and collaborative response from all sectors of society. The concept of the Mubahalah Oath serves as a powerful reminder of the consequences of corruption and criminal acts. Eradicating corruption and promoting transparency and accountability are believed to create a more just and equal society for all. By dismantling the systems that perpetuate corruption, we can build a society based on integrity, justice, and respect for all individuals. This paper discusses a literature review on the Mubahalah Oath and corruption in the development of criminal law in Indonesia. The Extended Systematic Literature Review approach, namely a systematic search for references based on scientific research and expanded with public information, is used in searching for related references to be analyzed. The results show that the Mubahalah Oath can play an important role in eradicating corruption in Indonesia. Implementing the Mubahalah Oath, moral pressure for corruptors, and a tool to strengthen transparency and accountability in government and organizations. The implementation of the Mubahalah Oath can have a positive impact on eradicating corruption and creating better governance in Indonesia. Promoting a culture of honesty and accountability as a first step in eradicating corruption can pave the way for a brighter future for law enforcement in the future
Kontroversi Penerapan Hukum Pidana Internasional Secara Retroaktif Terhadap Pelaku Kejahatan Perang Di Palestina Pranata, Ilyas Patu
MAGISTRA Law Review Vol 7, No 01 (2026): MAGISTRA Law Review
Publisher : PSHPM Untag Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/malrev.v7i01.7062

Abstract

The retroactive application of international criminal law to perpetrators of war crimes in Palestine has sparked deep debates regarding legality, legitimacy, and its impact on the international legal system. This study aims to analyze the juridical and political implications of such an application in the context of human rights protection, achieving justice for victims, and the dynamics of international relations between states. The principle of non-retroactivity in international criminal law, which is normatively recognized, is often confronted with exceptional circumstances, such as serious violations of international humanitarian law. Through a juridical-normative approach and literature study, this research evaluates the extent to which the legitimacy of the International Criminal Court (ICC) is accepted by the global community when its jurisdiction is considered to exceed the specified time limits. The findings indicate that retroactive application can be justified morally and legally in certain situations, although it has the potential to trigger geopolitical tensions, particularly from countries that have not ratified the Rome Statute. This study recommends the need for a stronger international consensus to ensure the accountability of war crime perpetrators without compromising global political stability.