cover
Contact Name
Kholis Roisah
Contact Email
jphi.mihundip@gmail.com
Phone
+6282220383060
Journal Mail Official
jphi.mihundip@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jalan Imam Bardjo, SH No.1 Pleburan Semarang (UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO-PLEBURAN)
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM INDONESIA
Published by Universitas Diponegoro
ISSN : 26566737     EISSN : 26563193     DOI : 10.14710/jphi.v1i1.1-17
Core Subject : Social,
Fokus dan ruang lingkup Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia meliputi artikel-artikel hasil penelitian maupun gagasan konseptual yang bertujuan untuk meningkatkan pemahaman dan penerapan hukum Indonesia dalam rangka membangun keilmuan di bidang hukum baik teori maupun praktek. Artikel Ilmiah terkait Hukum Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana, Hukum Internasional dan Hukum Tata Negara dalam rangka pengembangan, pembaharuan, dan pembangunan hukum Indonesia yang lebih baik diutamakan untuk diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 2 Documents
Search results for , issue "vol 8, no 2 (2026)" : 2 Documents clear
Law and Regulatory Certainty: An Analysis of Its Impact on the Investment Climate and Business Governance in Indonesia Ali Huristak Hartawan Hasibuan; Nur-Amimi Tahe
Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia Vol 8, No 2 (2026)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jphi.v8i2.204-222

Abstract

Legal reform is an important way to create regulatory certainty which improves the investment climate and business governance in Indonesia. Yet complexity and disharmony in regulation, inconsistent policy implementation and weak institutional coordination still hinder legal certainty for businesses. The objective of this research is to analyse the implementation of legal reforms in achieving regulatory certainty, to determine the impact of the legal reform on the investment climate and business governance in Indonesia. The research uses a normative legal research approach with descriptive-analytical specifications through legislative, conceptual, and analytical approaches. The data used is in the form of secondary data obtained through literature studies, then analyzed qualitatively through the interpretation and synchronization of laws and regulations. The results of the study show that legal reform has encouraged the simplification of regulations, digitization of services, and improvement of the licensing system, but its effectiveness is still constrained by regulatory disharmonization, inconsistency of implementation, and weak institutional coordination. Regulatory certainty has been proven to increase investor confidence, support ease of doing business, strengthen the implementation of good governance, and increase national investment competitiveness. Therefore, strengthening regulatory harmonization, consistency of law enforcement, and institutional reform are the main prerequisites in creating a sustainable investment climate and more effective governance of the business world.  
A Normative Reconstruction of the Rights of Spouses and Children in Mixed Marriages Wahidullah Wahidullah; Muntaha Artalim Zaim
Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia Vol 8, No 2 (2026)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jphi.v8i2.223-247

Abstract

The growing occurrence of mixed marriages between individuals of different nationalities offers opportunities for cultural enrichment while also creating difficulties in legal protection. Matters such as citizenship, custody, and cross-border rights frequently generate uncertainty and discrimination for spouses and children. This study investigates the normative reconstruction of mixed marriages, with particular attention to spousal and child rights, by examining national legal frameworks and how they intersect with international law. Employing a juridical-normative and comparative method, the research analyzes legal practices in Indonesia, the Netherlands, Germany, Canada, and Australia. The findings show inconsistencies and discrimination within domestic regulations, especially regarding determinations of children’s citizenship status, which may lead to statelessness and unequal treatment. Jurisdictions with human rights–oriented legal systems tend to adopt more flexible and inclusive policies, whereas those with strongly nationalistic approaches are reluctant to fully recognize rights across borders. The study emphasizes the urgent need to harmonize domestic laws with international human rights instruments in order to achieve legal certainty and fairness. It article a normative reconstruction model grounded in equality, recognition across jurisdictions, and the protection of children as subjects of international law. More broadly, it underscores the value of creating a humanistic and binding transnational legal framework to enhance cooperation and ensure justice for families affected by mixed marriages.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 2