cover
Contact Name
Nicky Rosadi
Contact Email
literatus@neolectura.com
Phone
+6281295499396
Journal Mail Official
literatus@neolectura.com
Editorial Address
Golden Boulevard Blok AT 16 No. 1 Harapan Indah, Bekasi Jawa Barat, Indonesia.
Location
Kab. bogor,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Literatus
Published by Neolectura
ISSN : -     EISSN : 26865009     DOI : https://doi.org/10.37010
Literatus adalah jurnal yang diterbitkan oleh Neolectura, diterbitkan dua kali dalam satu tahun. Literatus adalah media publikasi ilmiah dalam bentuk makalah konseptual dan penelitian lapangan yang terkait dengan bidang kajian sosial dan budaya. Diharapkan Literatus dapat menjadi media bagi akademisi dan peneliti untuk menerbitkan karya ilmiah mereka dan menjadi sumber referensi untuk pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 353 Documents
Ketimpangan Kontrak Baku dalam Platform Digital: Analisis Hukum terhadap Perlindungan Pelaku Usaha Mitra berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen Ananda, Salsabila Putri
LITERATUS Vol 8 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Sosial-Budaya Internasional
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/lit.v8i1.2255

Abstract

The rapid development of platform-based digital economy has significantly transformed legal relationships between digital platform companies and their business partners, particularly through the use of standard form contracts drafted unilaterally. This study aims to analyze the inequality of standard contracts in digital platforms and to examine the relevance of legal protection for business partners based on Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. This research applies a qualitative approach using normative juridical methods, focusing on the analysis of statutory regulations, legal doctrines, and contractual practices in the digital economy. The results indicate that standard form contracts in digital platforms create an unequal bargaining position between platforms and their partners, reflected in the presence of exemption clauses, transfer of operational risks, and unilateral authority to modify policies and terminate partnerships. Such conditions potentially contradict the principles of justice, fairness, and good faith in contract law. Furthermore, the position of business partners substantively reflects characteristics of a weaker party, thereby justifying the need for legal protection. Through an extensive interpretation, the provisions of Consumer Protection Law, particularly Article 18, can be applied as a legal basis to invalidate unfair standard clauses. Therefore, stronger regulatory frameworks and government supervision are required to establish a more equitable, balanced, and sustainable digital business envi
Analisa Digitalisasi Hukum: Kajian terhadap Pembaharuan Sistem Hukum Nasional Rahmat Dwi Putranto
LITERATUS Vol 4 No 3 (2022): Pergeseran Sosial, Budaya, dan Hukum dalam Menghadapi Era Society 5.0
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/lit.v4i3.1119

Abstract

The implications of globalization which is marked by the rapid development of technology, especially information and communication technology, will force the legal order to converge so as to achieve economic efficiency. This is because the regulatory framework related to a legal order will make one legal system unable to provide optimal solutions to the problems that arise. The problem is how to apply legal technology in designing legislation in Indonesia today and how is the concept of legal technology in designing technology-based laws and regulations in Indonesia in industry 4.0. This research method uses a statutory approach, a conceptual approach and a comparative approach. This type of research is prescriptive explanatory. This type of research is normative-empirical. Data collection obtained is secondary data and primary data through literature searches or from official documents, namely books. While the primary data in this study is sourced from interviews with respondents and informants. Data Analysis Method This data analysis method was analyzed qualitatively. Location Library research is conducted at the Library of the Faculty of Law, University of Padjadjaran and anywhere via the internet. While interviews with informants in Jakarta or other cities adjust to the whereabouts of the informants. The conclusion is that the application of legal technology in the drafting of laws and regulations in Indonesia today is essentially based on earlier legal disciplines. Meanwhile, the concept of forming laws and regulations in Indonesia in the future as ius constituendum must really comply with the basic norms and principles in the formation of laws and regulations that are das sollen in nature.
Analisis Perkawinan Beda Agama yang disahkan oleh Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat (Penetapan Nomor 155/Pdt.P/2023/PN.Jkt.Pst) Siti Sugianti; Padimun Lumban Tobing; Rahmat Dwi Putranto
LITERATUS Vol 5 No 2 (2023): Jurnal Ilmiah Internasional Sosial dan Budaya
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/lit.v5i2.1388

Abstract

The concept of interfaith marriage is not uncommon in Indonesian society, which is diverse in terms of race, ethnicity, culture, and religion. Law Number 1 of 1974 Governing Marriage governs marriages in general, however, it makes no distinctions for marriages based on specific religions. This paper examines the Central Jakarta District Court's rulings on interfaith unions and how they relate to the relevant legal statutes. This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach to analyze data gathered from primary legal sources, such as court decisions. The purpose of the analysis was to determine if the Central Jakarta District Court's ruling accords with Law Number 1 of 1974's Article 2 Paragraph 1 on marriage. The court granted the request for an interfaith marriage based on the Population Administration Law's Article 35 letter a and the Supreme Court's decision in Case Number 1400 K/PDT/1986, according to study findings. Despite taking into account both legal and societal factors, the judgment falls short of meeting all of Law Number 1 of 1974's conditions for a valid marriage. This research contributes to our understanding of Indonesian interfaith marriages and the future direction of family law. It is crucial to have more debates and analyses regarding the legitimacy of interfaith unions as well as to pass legislation that addresses this matter. To facilitate just interfaith weddings, coordination between religious, legal, and social organizations must also be taken into account.