cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Cut Rahmawati
Contact Email
jurnalteknikunaya@gmail.com
Phone
+6281360024335
Journal Mail Official
jurnalteknikunaya@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Center for Research and Community Service (LPPM) Building, University of Abulyatama, Aceh
Location
Kab. aceh besar,
Aceh
INDONESIA
JURNAL TEKNIK SIPIL UNAYA
Published by Universitas Abulyatama
ISSN : 2407733X     EISSN : 24079200     DOI : https://doi.org/10.30601/jtsu
Core Subject : Science, Engineering,
Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Materials Science & Nanotechnology
JURNAL TEKNIK SIPIL UNAYA merupakan wadah bagi seluruh peneliti, pengambil kebijakan, perencana dan pelaksana konstruksi untuk saling berbagi dalam perkembangan pengetahuan dan teknologi di bidang konstruksi dan perencanaan lainnya. Frekuensi terbit dua kali setahun pada bulan Januari dan Juli.
Arjuna Subject : Teknik (semua kategori) - Bangunan dan Konstruksi
Articles 151 Documents
 12   13   14   15   16 
Asesmen Kerentanan Seismik Struktur Gedung Eksisting Berdasarkan FEMA P-154 dan ASCE/SEI 41-17 Eka Faisal Nurhidayatullah; Syendi Prima Syahputra
Jurnal Teknik Sipil Unaya Vol 12 No 2 (2026): Juli 2026
Publisher : Center for Research and Community Service (LPPM) University of Abulyatama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30601/jtsu.v12i2.7814

Abstract

Most regions of Indonesia are classified as earthquake-prone areas. The education is one of the sectors most affected by earthquakes. Records of major earthquakes show that not all educational buildings have adequate seismic performance. This study aims to assess the seismic performance of an existing multi-story educational building. If structural weaknesses are identified, mitigation measures can be formulated. In this study, the structural evaluation was conducted in two stages. Stage 1 evaluation used Rapid Visual Screening (RVS) based on FEMA P-154 guidelines. Stage 2 evaluation used equivalent static and dynamic response spectrum analyses based on ASCE/SEI 41-17 and SNI 1726:2019. The Stage 1 RVS evaluation produced a score of 2.1, which is below the threshold value of 2.5, so Stage 2 evaluation was required. Based on the Stage 2 evaluation, all column elements had Demand Capacity Ratio (DCR) values below 1 (linear elastic). Only some beam elements had DCR values between 1 and 2 (linear inelastic). The projected collapse mechanism satisfied the strong column–weak beam principle. No structural weaknesses that could trigger building collapse during an earthquake were identified. Stage 3 evaluation, namely nonlinear static pushover or nonlinear dynamic time history analysis, was not recommended.

Page 16 of 16 | Total Record : 151

 12   13   14   15   16 

Filter by Year

2015 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 12 No 2 (2026): Juli 2026 Vol 12 No 1 (2026): Januari 2026 Vol 11, No 2 (2025): Juli 2025 Vol 11 No 2 (2025): Juli 2025 Vol 11, No 1 (2025): Januari 2025 Vol 10, No 2 (2024): Juli 2024 Vol 10, No 1 (2024): Januari 2024 Vol 9, No 2 (2023): Juli 2023 Vol 9, No 1 (2023): Januari 2023 Vol 8, No 2 (2022): Juli 2022 Vol 8, No 1 (2022): Januari 2022 Vol 7, No 2 (2021): Juli 2021 Vol 7, No 1 (2021): Januari 2021 Vol 6, No 2 (2020): Juli 2020 Vol 6, No 1 (2020): Januari 2020 Vol 5, No 2 (2019): Juli 2019 Vol 5, No 1 (2019): Januari 2019 Vol 4, No 2 (2018): Juli 2018 Vol 4, No 1 (2018): Januari 2018 Vol 3, No 2 (2017): Juli 2017 Vol 3, No 1 (2017): Januari 2017 Vol 2, No 1 (2016): Januari 2016 Vol 1, No 2 (2015): Juli 2015 Vol 1, No 1 (2015): Januari 2015 More Issue