cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Hezron Sabar Rotua Tinambunan
Contact Email
jurnalsuarahukum@unesa.ac.id
Phone
+6285726365956
Journal Mail Official
jurnalsuarahukum@unesa.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Ketintang Gedung K1.02.04, Ketintang, Gayungan, Kota SBY, Jawa Timur 60231
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Jurnal Suara Hukum
Published by Universitas Negeri Surabaya
ISSN : 2656534X     EISSN : 26565358     DOI : 10.26740
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Suara Hukum memiliki standar untuk perilaku etis yang diharapkan oleh semua pihak yang terlibat dalam tindakan penerbitan: penulis, editor jurnal, peer reviewer dan penerbit. Jurnal Suara Hukum adalah jurnal peer-review, diterbitkan dua kali setahun di bulan Maret dan September oleh Departemen Hukum, Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Jurnal suara hukum telah memiliki akun Google scholar dengan tautan https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&authuser=1&user=clJJoeIAAAAJ Jurnal Suara Hukum saat ini berstatus belum terakreditasi.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 149 Documents
 5   6   7   8   9 
Kedaulatan dan Yurisdiksi Negara terhadap Pulau Buatan dalam Perspektif UNCLOS 1982 Irfa Ronaboyd
Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jsh.v1n1.p51-60

Abstract

The provisions in UNCLOS 1982 are also historical representations in following developments and demands of the times to solve various problems of sea use. A number of principles in marine law instruments were reaffirmed, in addition to the new principles or provisions added to UNCLOS 1982 in order to resolve future and future maritime territorial disputes. Nevertheless, there are a number of things that have not been regulated in detail by UNCLOS 1982, for example artificial islands.The artificial island discourse was again a concern by various parties, especially international law experts. The debate surfaced after China in the South China Sea built five artificial islands and military installations on it. The artificial island is built on the reefs of the Spartly islands, the South China Sea. Apart from the Chinese polemic in building artificial islands in disputed areas, basically every coastal country has exclusive jurisdiction to build artificial islands within the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). Even under international law all countries have the freedom to build artificial islands on the high seas
Harmonisasi Perlindungan Harta Kekayaan Anak dalam Perwalian melalui Penguatan Peran Wali Pengawas Yulita Dwi Pratiwi
Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jsh.v1n1.p61-90

Abstract

Guardianship is the supervision of children who are no longer under the authority of their parents, and the management of objects or property of the children carried out by the guardian. In carrying out their duties, the guardian is supervised by the guardian supervisor, which based on Article 366 Indonesian Civil Code, the authority is given to the Weskamer. This office is one of the technical implementation units under the Ministry of Law and Human Rights. However, the supervision process can hardly be carried out by the Weskamer, that relates to its role that requires synergy with the role of other institutions. It shows that there is disharmony in the implementation of protection of children's assets in guardianship, which eliminates the element of supervision by the state through the Weskamer. Therefore, an idea is needed in harmonizing the protection of children's assets in guardianship through strengthening the role of guardian. This research uses normative method which is a part of legal research. Normative legal research aims to find solutions to juridical problems that arise from legal issues and provide prescriptions on these legal issues. Based on the results of the study, systematic and concrete steps are needed to improve the rules by harmonizing laws as well as institutions regarding the protection of the assets of the children by strengthening the role of guardian supervisor.  
Governments Legal Responsibility Upon Entrepreneurs Economic Loss Caused by the Failure in Implementing the Legislation Regarding Business Licensing and Registration Sujana Donandi S
Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jsh.v1n2.p186-198

Abstract

The Regulation of Minister of Trade No. 14 Year 2016 (Permendag 14/2016) Regarding Trading Business License (SIUP) and Company Registration ID (TDP) states that SIUP and TDP should be issued no longer than 2 working days. However, This regulation failed to be implemented by Regional Government of Kabupaten Bekasi when PT. EIM managed their SIUP and TDP in five working days. It caused economic losses for PT. EIM because they need the documents as a requirement to earn training project worthed Rp. 50.000.000. This research tried to examine the governments responsibility upon entrepreneurs economic loss caused by the failure in implementing the legislation regarding Business Licensing and Registration. The methodology used in this research is Normative-Empirical Legal Research. Normative-Empirical Legal Research is a research which the object including the legislation (in abstracto) and its implementation at the concrete situation. The Result showed that the economic loss gained by PT. EIM is the responsibility of Regional Government of Kabupaten Bekasi since their failure to issue SIUP and TDP on time is a tort. As result, every party committed to tort have to pay compensation. Form of the compensation consists of material and immaterial compensation. To apply the compensation, PT. EIM could follow the non-litigation and litigation procedures. 
Content Analysis (Analisis Isi) terhadap Peraturan Daerah Bernuansa Syariat Islam di Kabupaten Banyumas Dody Nur Andriyan
Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jsh.v1n2.p121-141

Abstract

Regional Regulation (Perda) which regulates public issues such as prostitution, alcoholic beverages, gambling, and the relationship between men and women turns out to be identified as a Regional Regulation with nuances of Islamic law. in Banyumas Regency there is a Regional Regulation which if used by the identification of Arfiansyah above, it can be referred to as a Regional Regulation with nuances of Islamic law. The regulation is: Banyumas District Regulation Number 15 of 2014 concerning Control, Supervision and Control of Circulation of Alcoholic Beverages and Regional Regulations of Banyumas Regency Number 16 of 2015 concerning Community Disease Management. This research has two formulations of the first problem related to the results of the content of the analysis on the Perda that are nuanced by Islamic law in Banyumas Regency. Both of the results of the analysis content on the Regional Regulations that are nuanced by Islamic law in Banyumas Regency are not contrary to Law-Invitation Number 12 of 2011? This research is a qualitative-descriptive study. The research method used is normative juridical. The main source of data is the Banyumas District Regulation Number 15 of 2014 concerning Control, Supervision and Control of Circulation of Alcoholic Beverages and Regional Regulations of Banyumas Regency Number 16 of 2015 concerning Community Disease Management. Interviews were also conducted with resource persons. Furthermore, the results of the analysis were carried out. Regional Regulation No. 15 of 2014 is actually a Regional Regulation that has a broad purpose of public interest, for the nation and state. So that the claim that Perda No 15 of 2014 as a Regional Regulation with nuances of Islamic law is not true. Regional Regulation No. 16 of 2015 is actually a Regional Regulation that has a broad purpose of public interest, for the nation and state. So that the claim that Perda No 16 of 2015 as a Regional Regulation with nuances of Islamic law is not true. Both of these Perda (Perda No 15 of 2014 and Perda No. 16 of 2015) are not in conflict with Law No. 12 of 2011 concerning the Establishment of Legislation. Both in terms of content, principles, goals, arrangements, administrative sanctions and criminal sanctions. Formally and procedurally the two Perda are in accordance with Law Number 12 of 2011
Analisis Pemberian Wasiat Wajibah terhadap Ahli Waris Beda Agama Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 331 K/Ag/2018 Alip Pamungkas Raharjo; Elok Fauzia Dwi Putri
Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jsh.v1n2.p172-185

Abstract

In Article 171 letter (c) Instruction of the President of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1991 concerning Compilation of Islamic Law affirms that the rights of non muslim heirs to the inheritance of Islamic heirs do not obtain inheritance from the inheritor's inheritance. However, in its development because it felt unfair, the Supreme Court through The Supreme Court Decision Number 368.K / AG / 1995 provided a way for joint cooperation of different inheritance through a wasiat wajibah. But in its development, this provision was changed again by a landmark decision from the Supreme Court, namely through the Decision of the Supreme Court Number 331 K / AG / 2018 because there was a change in the value of justice in the community. The research method used normative research with constitutional approach, conceptual approach and case approach. This study aims to explain the rights of non muslim heirs to the inheritance of Islamic heirs before and after the Decision of the Supreme Court Number 331 K / AG / 2018. The results showed that prior to the Supreme Court Decision Number 331 K / AG / 2018, heirs of non muslim religions were given a share of inheritance in the form of a wasiat wajibah for ¾ of the inheritance inheritance. Post the Decision of the Supreme Court Number 331 K / AG / 2018, the amount of wasiat wajibah will change to ¼ from the inheritor's inheritance. 
Perwujudan Pemilu yang Luberjurdil melalui Validitas Daftar Pemilih Tetap Risdiana Izzaty; Xavier Nugraha
Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jsh.v1n2.p155-171

Abstract

In Article 22E paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, it is explained that General Elections (Elections) are held based on the principle of œluberjudil (direct, general, free, confidential, honest and fair). One of the manifestations of this principle is through the final voter list in the implementation of the election. This research is normative research with statute approach and conceptual approach. The issues discussed in this study are 1. Can the validity of the Permanent Voters List be seen as a manifestation of a direct, general, free, confidential, honest and fair election? 2. What are the problems that arise in determining the Permanent Voters List? 3. How is the guarantee of political rights for citizens due to problems that arise in the determination of the Permanent Voters List? Based on this research, it was found that the validity of the Permanent Voters List was part of the realization of the election system which was direct, general, free, confidential, honest and fair. This research also describes the problems in determining the Permanent Voters List and the mechanism for protecting the political rights of citizens in the event of problems in the final voter list 
Harmonisasi terhadap Peraturan Daerah No. 14 Tahun 2006 tentang Pengelolaan Pelestarian Kawasan Konservasi Laut Daerah dalam Perlindungan Pulau Pariwisata Kabupaten Indramayu Saiful Kholik; Imas Khaeriyah
Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jsh.v1n2.p142-154

Abstract

Inconsistency Regional Regulation No.14 of 2006 about marine conservation area of the island of Biawak, Gososng, which Cendekian provides protection but in fact failed to provide protection as evidenced by dredging island sandbar and cendekian conducted PT.Pertamina UP VI Balongan INDRAMAYU. The problem in this research How Formulation Policy Act No. 10 Year 2009 on the Indonesian Tourism with the Indramayu Regional Regulation No. 14 of 2006 regarding marine conservation area of the island of Biawak, Gososng, Cendekian And How Harmonization Act No. 10 of 2009 with the Indramayu Regional Regulation No. 14 of 2006 regarding formulation Act No. 10 Year 2009 on the Indonesian Tourism with the Indramayu Regional Regulation No. 14 of 2006 about marine conservation area of the island of Biawak, Gososng, Cendekian, the purpose of this research to understand and analyze the extent to which policy The findings of the community or field of law local governments about the environmental damage done by companies or individuals are not equal accordance with regional regulations in force, nor the Law in force so that the function of law in society indramayu not fit the mandate to establish a change and justice based Formulation public corporate criminal liability.Inskonsitensi happens to local regulation No.14 of 2006 makes no harmonized with the regulations of each other so that the impact of this inskonsistensi makes the sector particularly environmental law enforcement get uncertainties that result in coastal communities Indramayau.Conclusion Harmonization of regulations of the center and regions delivering the policy formulation of the rule of law area to comply with the regulations above in order to avoid inconsistency, the occurrence of this inconsistency resulted in the rule of law and justice for the indramayu, suggestion that the government should was nearly revise regulations related area, especially the government must dare to take action to give effect to the perpetrator deterrent effect rule-based running as well as possible.
Keabsahan Putusan Pengadilan yang Belum Inkracht sebagai Novum dalam Pengajuan Peninjauan Kembali Yoefanca Halim; Hardy Salim
Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jsh.v2n1.p86-104

Abstract

A judicial institution is called good, not only if the process is honest, clean, and impartial. But in addition there are more criteria that must be met, namely principles that are open, corrective, and recordive. In this criterion, one side that deserves the attention of judicial management is the existence of a good legal remedial system as part of the principle of fairness and trial independence which are universally recognized principles. The broadest opportunity to submit corrections and recordings of decisions that have permanent legal force (inkracht) deemed unfair by justice seekers can be done through a Judicial Review. However, the Judicial Review is very limitative, one of them with the requirement for novum. But the regulation of conditions can be said to be a condition as a novum not strictly regulated. Seeing this raises a problem about, "What is the validity of a court decision that has not been inkracht as a novum in submitting a review?". The method used in this study is a normative or juridical legal research method.
Prinsip Kehati-hatian bagi Bank Selaku Kustodian di Pasar Modal Indonesia Rezandha Hutagalung
Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jsh.v2n1.p1-20

Abstract

This journal aims to find out how to apply the precautionary principle of a bank as a custodian bank in Indonesian capital market. Whereas with the enactment of Law Number 1995 concerning the Capital Market, it is deemed necessary to enact a Bapepam Decision regarding the Custodian Bank's Report. In the context of carrying out Indonesia's economic development, of course the challenges are not insignificant for financial institutions, one of which is in banking institutions. The role of banking institutions that carry out the main task as a vehicle that can collect and distribute funds effectively and efficiently, requires continuous improvement in order to be able to have a comparative advantage. This journal is how about the application of the precautionary principle in the capital market in Indonesia. Custodian Bank is a commercial bank that has obtained the approval of the Financial Services Authority (OJK) to carry out business activities as a custodian. The object of legal research is legal norms, which have the aim of examining whether or not a regulation is appropriated and applied.
Kedudukan Legal Opinion sebagai Sumber Hukum Ery Agus Priyono; Kornelius Benuf
Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jsh.v2n1.p54-70

Abstract

Law is a means to achieve the order and welfare of the community. One of the sources of law is doctrine. The doctrine is essentially the opinion of a legal expert on a real legal issue. When discussing legal opinions, the term legal opinion is also known. Doctrine and Legal Opinion are mostly the same, namely the legal opinion of a legal expert on a real legal problem. If we agree that Doctrine and Legal Opinion are the same way in much of the literature that is mentioned as a source of law is the only doctrine, whereas where is legal opinion placed in the formation of a law? This paper will explain the position of Legal opinion as a source of law.

Page 7 of 15 | Total Record : 149

 5   6   7   8   9 

Filter by Year

2019 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021) Vol 3, No 1 (2021) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2020) Vol 2, No 2 (2020) Vol 2, No 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020) Vol 1, No 2 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019) Vol 1, No 1 (2019) More Issue