cover
Contact Name
Ahmad Harakan
Contact Email
ahmadharakan@ppishk.org
Phone
+6285656010878
Journal Mail Official
journal@ppishk.org
Editorial Address
Pusat Penelitian Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Kontemporer Jl. Tala Salapang No.34, Makassar 90221, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Email: journal@ppishk.org URL : https://journal.ppishk.org/index.php/jcgpp
Location
Kota makassar,
Sulawesi selatan
INDONESIA
Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy
ISSN : 27223981     EISSN : 27223973     DOI : https://doi.org/10.46507/jcgpp
Core Subject : Social,
Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy is an international peer-reviewed journal which aims to spread conceptual thinking or ideas, review and the research findings obtained in the field of Contemporary issues of Governance and Public Policy Studies. Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy promotes scholarly, theoretical, pragmatic, and contemporary research, which makes a clear conceptual and methodological contribution to existing international literature. These may include discuss about Contemporary issues of Governance and Public Policy.
Articles 64 Documents
Universal Health Coverage and Hospital Service Satisfaction in Socio-Economically Vulnerable Tourism Areas Agustina, Nurillah; Hidayat, Rahmad; Dermawan, Ariy; Hadi, Ayatullah
Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): (October 2025)
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Kontemporer, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46507/jcgpp.v6i2.705

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of Universal Health Coverage (UHC) at the Mataram City General Hospital—a referral facility situated in a socio-economically vulnerable, tourism-dependent area of West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. Service quality is assessed across three dimensions: (1) administrative service quality, (2) accessibility of health services, and (3) clinical service quality, framed against the challenges of achieving SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-Being), SDG 1 (No Poverty), and SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities). Using a descriptive qualitative design, we conducted interviews, observations, and document analysis, and coded the data in NVivo 12 Plus. Findings indicate that administrative processes have improved in clarity, speed, and ease of registration; however, responsiveness and lengthy waiting times persist. Digital platforms have enhanced access, yet geographical barriers and a digital divide continue to constrain equity. Overall clinical quality is satisfactory but limited by insufficient empathy and suboptimal communication from health workers. The study contributes empirically by showing how systemic constraints—uneven resource allocation, workforce shortages, and infrastructure deficits—undermine UHC objectives in vulnerable, tourism-reliant settings. Policy implications include the need for area-based planning, stronger inter-agency coordination, and context-sensitive innovation to deliver more equitable and inclusive services across West Nusa Tenggara.
Strengthening Local Government Organisation Capacity for Adaptive Development Policy Responsive to Community Needs Djafar, Franky; S. Akibu, Rifka; Namdech, Puthisat
Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): (October 2025)
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Kontemporer, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46507/jcgpp.v6i2.715

Abstract

This study examines how to strengthen institutional capacity for regional development planning in Gorontalo Regency, Indonesia, with a focus on policies that are responsive to local community needs. A qualitative case study design was employed, drawing on in-depth interviews, observations, and analyses of planning documents, including the Regional Medium-Term Development Plan and the Regional Annual Work Plan. The findings indicate that robust institutional capacity, inclusive public participation, and the effective use of information technology are pivotal to producing adaptive and sustainable development policy. However, two principal challenges persist: insufficiently trained human resources for adaptive planning and the suboptimal use of information technology. The analysis links these results to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)—notably SDG 11 (sustainable cities and communities) and SDG 16 (strong, transparent, and accountable institutions). Strengthening institutional capacity and deepening participation are expected to accelerate local SDG progress and to support the design of more inclusive, efficient, and data-driven policy. The study contributes to understanding—and improving—the implementation of adaptive, sustainable regional development policy amid social, economic, and environmental change.
Gender Equality and Social Inclusion Twin-Track Approach: Institutional Weaknesses and Promising Practices for Post-Eruption Recovery in Lumajang, Indonesia Yumarni, Tri
Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): (October 2025)
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Kontemporer, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46507/jcgpp.v6i2.722

Abstract

This study examines the operationalisation of Gender Equality and Social Inclusion (GESI) principles in post-disaster mitigation following the 2021 Mount Semeru eruption in Lumajang, Indonesia. Inadequate GESI integration undermines progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), notably SDG 5 (Gender Equality), SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities), and SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities). We ask: how are GESI principles incorporated into disaster planning, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation, and what factors shape their application? Using a qualitative single-case design, we conducted 17 semi-structured interviews with government officials, NGO representatives, community leaders, and marginalised groups, and undertook thematic analysis in NVivo 14. Findings indicate that, contrary to policy commitments, GESI integration was fragmented, tokenistic, and overly reliant on civil-society actors rather than embedded within governance systems. Targeted initiatives—such as women’s leadership training and disability-accessible information channels—showed short-term promise but lacked sustainability, were weakly connected to formal decision-making, and failed to address structural inequalities. Disaster plans were largely gender-blind, monitoring frameworks omitted disaggregated data, and evaluation processes overlooked equity indicators. To our knowledge, this is the first empirical analysis of the GESI twin-track approach in a Global South disaster context, illuminating the gap between policy rhetoric and lived realities. The study advances an analytical framework and context-specific evidence to inform the institutionalisation of GESI in disaster governance, offering practical pathways towards more equitable and sustainable resilience.
Collaborative Policy Innovation for Accelerating Land Acquisition in the Economic Hub of Indonesia Marhendra, R Agus; Aminah, Siti; Burhanuddin, Burhanuddin; Rahman, Aulia
Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): (October 2025)
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Kontemporer, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46507/jcgpp.v6i2.729

Abstract

Land acquisition for the public interest in Indonesia frequently encounters complex bureaucracy, inefficiencies, and community resistance, which impede the implementation of National Strategic Projects (NSPs). This study examines policy innovation in land acquisition through multi-stakeholder collaboration in South Sulawesi Province, where Makassar is the provincial capital and the economic hub of eastern Indonesia. The analysis also highlights urban expansion into Gowa Regency, which heightens both the urgency and the complexity of land provision for infrastructure projects. Using a qualitative case-study design, data were gathered through in-depth interviews, participant observation, and documentary analysis. The findings indicate that collaborative approaches expedite land acquisition, improve transparency, and reduce the risk of social conflict. Models that involve central and local government, private-sector actors, community representatives, and facilitation forums have proved effective in strengthening legitimacy and trust. Strategic recommendations include institutionalising facilitation forums, advancing digital transformation in land-acquisition governance, and reformulating compensation schemes to ensure equity and accountability. By embedding collaboration, transparency, and fairness, the study contributes to more inclusive and responsive public policy while supporting the sustainability of NSPs. It also aligns with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)—notably Goal 9 on resilient infrastructure, Goal 11 on sustainable cities and communities, and Goal 16 on strong institutions—offering practical pathways for inclusive and sustainable development.