cover
Contact Name
Eko Nuriyatman
Contact Email
ekonuriyatman@unja.ac.id
Phone
+6282380245589
Journal Mail Official
mendapo@unja.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl.Raya Jambi-Ma.Bulian KM.15, Desa Mendalo Indah
Location
Kota jambi,
Jambi
INDONESIA
Mendapo: Journal of Administrative Law
Published by Universitas Jambi
Core Subject : Social,
Mendapo: Journal of Administrative Law published by the Special Program for State Administrative Law, Faculty of Law, Jambi University. This journal is a publication medium for academics, researchers, and practitioners in the field of law to publish research results or conceptual study articles. The scope of articles published in this journal covers various topics, including (but not limited to): Natural Resources Law; Environmental law; Employment Law; Governmental Law; Local Government Law; Health Law; Agrarian Law; Public Policy Law; Tax law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Juni 2025" : 5 Documents clear
Synergy of Administrative Law and Criminal Law in Combating Corruption in Indonesia: Sinergi Hukum Administrasi dan Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanggulangan Korupsi di Indonesia Saraya Nurhadi, Sitta; Winjaya Laksana, Andri; Lailiyah, Kusroh; Handayani, Yusrina
Mendapo: Journal of Administrative Law Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Juni 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/mendapo.v6i2.43016

Abstract

The importance of synergy between administrative law and criminal law in overcoming corruption is that administrative law has a preventive and corrective role through internal supervision mechanisms and administrative sanctions, while criminal law is present repressively to prosecute violations that have fulfilled the elements of a crime with the criminal justice system. The increasing number of corruption cases in Indonesia shows that the weaknesses in the administrative system are opening up loopholes for corruption to occur. The lack of integration between the two legal systems causes ineffectiveness in early detection and law enforcement in Indonesia. This article recommends regulatory updates, strengthening coordination between institutions, and building an integrated information system as strategic steps towards more effective and equitable corruption eradication. This article analyzes the synergy of state administrative law and criminal law in overcoming corruption in Indonesia, evaluates the synergy practices that have been running, and offers a more effective and efficient legal collaboration model through efforts to synergize state administrative law and criminal law in overcoming corruption in Indonesia. With a juridical-normative approach and case studies, it is hoped that this study can contribute to strengthening the national legal system that is oriented towards the principles of clean and authoritative governance.
A Comparative Study of Employment Policies for Persons with Disabilities in Three Countries: Studi Komparatif Kebijakan Ketenagakerjaan bagi Penyandang Disabilitas di Tiga Negara Denggan Trianita Lumban Raja, Eliana; Herry Herlambang, Pratama
Mendapo: Journal of Administrative Law Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Juni 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/mendapo.v6i2.43975

Abstract

This study explores the effectiveness of employment access policy models for persons with disabilities in Indonesia, Singapore, and Germany, with the objective of ensuring equal rights and opportunities comparable to those of other citizens. Employing a juridical-comparative methodology, the research examines each country's legal framework, implementation strategies, and practical challenges. Indonesia adopts a mandatory employment quota system as stipulated in Law Number 8 of 2016 on Persons with Disabilities; however, its application across various employment sectors remains limited and faces notable challenges. In contrast, Singapore employs a non-mandatory, inclusive approach supported by incentive-based programs, while Germany enforces a larger quota system complemented by stringent sanctions and comprehensive rehabilitation services. The findings indicate that the effectiveness of these policies is significantly influenced by state commitment, consistent legal enforcement, supervisory mechanisms, policy evaluation, and the development of an inclusive work environment. The study recommends that Indonesia strengthen its policy by imposing clear sanctions, enhancing oversight mechanisms, and integrating incentives to improve education and vocational skills for persons with disabilities, thereby contributing to the overall improvement of their quality of life.
The Harmonization of Administrative Regulatory Arrangements Toward Public Institutional Accountability in Handling Cybercrime in Indonesia: Harmonisasi Penataan Regulasi Administratif terhadap Akuntabilitas Lembaga Publik dalam Penanganan Cybercrime di Indonesia MS, Nuruzzaman; Fatimah, Siti
Mendapo: Journal of Administrative Law Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Juni 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/mendapo.v6i2.46550

Abstract

The rapid development of information technology has brought both positive impacts and significant challenges to public governance, particularly in addressing digital crimes (cybercrime). In Indonesia, the handling of cybercrime is not solely within the domain of criminal law but also requires the active involvement of state institutions within the framework of administrative law. Institutions such as the Ministry of Communication and Digital Affairs (Komdigi), the National Cyber and Crypto Agency (BSSN), as well as other agencies like the Indonesian National Police (Polri) and the Attorney General's Office, play strategic roles in maintaining the security and order of the national digital space. However, bureaucratic realities reveal persistent issues, including overlapping authorities, weak inter-agency coordination, and suboptimal implementation of administrative functions. Therefore, the harmonization and synchronization of administrative regulations have become urgent to ensure policy alignment, clear division of institutional responsibilities, and the reinforcement of transparency and accountability principles in digital governance. This article aims to analyze how the harmonization and synchronization of administrative regulations can enhance the accountability of public institutions in addressing digital crimes in Indonesia, using a normative juridical approach and descriptive-analytical methods.
Governance of Investment in Tangerang Region Review of State Administrative Law: Tata Kelola Investasi Daerah Tangerang Tinjauan Hukum Administrasi Negara Annisa, Reza; Putra Nugraha, Dwi; Widya Nirwana, Clara; Titania Aurelia Mulia, Clarissa; Atara, Irvin
Mendapo: Journal of Administrative Law Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Juni 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/mendapo.v6i2.43000

Abstract

This study examines investment governance in Tangerang City from the perspective of Administrative Law, focusing on the implementation of local government authority in attracting and managing investment based on the principles of good governance. Although Tangerang City demonstrates dynamic economic growth, there remains a significant disparity between well-developed areas such as BSD City and Alam Sutera and other regions that have not benefited equally from development. This situation raises administrative-legal issues regarding the effectiveness of local government authority in fulfilling the principles of equity and justice as mandated by Law No. 23 of 2014 on Regional Government and Law No. 30 of 2014 on Administrative Governance. The main problem addressed in this study concerns how the Tangerang City Government exercises its administrative and legal responsibilities in managing investment potential to ensure not only economic growth but also equitable distribution of economic benefits across regions. This research fills a gap in existing studies on Administrative Law, which have predominantly focused on investment licensing and bureaucracy, by emphasizing the dimension of equitable benefit distribution and the implementation of administrative authority at the regional level. The objective of this study is to analyze the position, implementation, and challenges of administrative authority in creating transparent, accountable, and equitable investment governance consistent with the General Principles of Good Governance. Using a normative juridical method, supported by an empirical approach, this research examines relevant laws and regulations governing regional administration, administrative governance, and investment management while analyzing the factual conditions in Tangerang City. The findings reveal that although the city government has adopted the Regional Investment Plan as a legal instrument of administrative authority, its implementation has yet to achieve equitable outcomes across all areas. Therefore, strengthening the administrative legal framework in investment planning, facilitation, and supervision is essential to establish inclusive, efficient, and socially just investment governance consistent with constitutional mandates.
Legal Study of Posita and Petitum Conflicts in Lawsuits Over Land Objects: Kajian Hukum Terhadap Pertentangan Posita dan Petitum Dalam Gugatan Atas Objek Tanah Arifina Alanis, Arselin; Ravani, Shakila; Nailul Muna, Intan; Alice Reyhanif, Alvieta; Suwandoko, Suwandoko
Mendapo: Journal of Administrative Law Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Juni 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/mendapo.v6i2.44382

Abstract

This study analyzes the legal implications arising from inconsistencies between posita and petitum in civil litigation, with reference to District Court Decision No. 47/Pdt.G/2024/PN Mkd concerning a land ownership dispute. The procedural defect emerged when the plaintiff’s factual assertions indicated a breach of contract (wanprestasi), whereas the relief sought in the petitum was premised upon an unlawful act (tort/PMH). Such inconsistency results in substantive and procedural ambiguity, rendering the claim potentially defective as an obscuur libel. The research aims to examine the legal reasoning adopted by the panel of judges and to assess the juridical consequences of the contradictory pleadings. Employing an empirical juridical method, the study incorporates courtroom observation, interviews with the presiding judge, and a case approach supported by statutory provisions, court decisions, and doctrinal legal literature. The findings demonstrate that the court concluded the claim failed to establish a coherent nexus between the asserted legal grounds and the relief requested, thereby warranting a ruling of inadmissibility (Niet Ontvankelijk Verklaard). This underscores the fundamental procedural rule requiring consistency and clarity between the elements of a pleading to uphold legal certainty and procedural order in civil proceedings. Accordingly, litigants must articulate legal arguments and requested remedies in a synchronized and legally grounded manner to avoid procedural dismissal and ensure substantive judicial examination.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5