cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Tri Imam Munandar
Contact Email
imamtri@unja.ac.id
Phone
+6285266101878
Journal Mail Official
pjc@unja.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Lintas Jambi - Ma. Bulian KM. 15, Mendalo Darat, Jambi Luar Kota, Muaro Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia 36122
Location
Kota jambi,
Jambi
INDONESIA
PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law
Published by Universitas Jambi
ISSN : 27217205     EISSN : 27218325     DOI : https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v3i1
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law (ISSN Print 2721-7205 ISSN Online 2721-8325) is a periodical scientific publication in the field of Criminal Law. The word Pampas comes from the Malay language which means Compensation, Pampas is a traditional Jambi sanction as a law to injure people. This journal is published by the Faculty of Law, Jambi University as a medium for discussing Criminal Law. First published in February 2020, PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law is published three times a year, namely in February, June and October. In each of its publications, PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law publishes 8-10 articles on the results of research or research on criminal law. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law publishes articles on the results of research or studies of criminal law, including: (1) criminal law (2) criminal procedural law (3) criminology (4) victimology (5) special crimes (6) criminal law enforcement (7) criminal law reform (8) penal policy (9) comparative criminal law (10) criminal law and punishment (11) international criminal law (12) criminal customary law (13) criminal justice system (14) Islamic Criminal Law (15) military crime and the study of Indonesian criminal law which is global in nature in accordance with the latest developments in the dynamics of criminal law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 162 Documents
 13   14   15   16   17 
From Administrative Irregularities to Criminal Acts: Uncovering Corruption in State Procurement Systems Adhi, Surya; Arifin, Ridwan; Sani, Tajudeen
PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/pampas.v6i2.43759

Abstract

The procurement of goods and services within the public sector is a crucial function that supports the operation of government institutions and the delivery of public services. However, this process is often vulnerable to corruption, including bribery, collusion, and abuse of authority. This paper examines the criminal law aspects related to government procurement by analyzing various cases of corruption in Indonesia. Through a review of legal frameworks, including the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) and Law No. 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law No. 20 of 2001 on the Eradication of Corruption, this study explores how these regulations are applied in practice. Case studies highlight recurring issues such as inflated project costs, fictitious procurement, and favoritism in awarding contracts. The paper also evaluates the role of law enforcement agencies, particularly the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), in investigating and prosecuting procurement-related offenses. While significant progress has been made in combating corruption, challenges remain in the consistent application of the law, limited resources, and political interference. This analysis emphasizes the need for stronger preventive mechanisms, greater transparency, and capacity-building among procurement officials to reduce legal violations. By examining real-world cases and their legal outcomes, this study aims to contribute to a better understanding of the intersection between criminal law and public procurement, and to support the development of more effective anti-corruption strategies within the public sector. ABSTRAK Pengadaan barang dan jasa di sektor publik merupakan fungsi penting yang mendukung operasional lembaga pemerintahan serta pelayanan kepada masyarakat. Namun, proses ini sering kali rentan terhadap praktik korupsi, seperti suap, kolusi, dan penyalahgunaan wewenang. Artikel ini membahas aspek hukum pidana yang terkait dengan pengadaan pemerintah melalui analisis berbagai kasus tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia. Dengan mengkaji kerangka hukum, termasuk Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) dan Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 junto Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, studi ini mengevaluasi penerapan hukum dalam praktik. Studi kasus menunjukkan berbagai permasalahan yang berulang, seperti penggelembungan anggaran, pengadaan fiktif, dan praktik nepotisme dalam pemberian kontrak. Artikel ini juga menyoroti peran lembaga penegak hukum, khususnya Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK), dalam mengusut dan menindak pelanggaran terkait pengadaan. Meskipun telah ada kemajuan dalam upaya pemberantasan korupsi, masih terdapat tantangan dalam konsistensi penegakan hukum, keterbatasan sumber daya, serta intervensi politik. Analisis ini menekankan pentingnya mekanisme pencegahan yang lebih kuat, transparansi yang lebih tinggi, serta peningkatan kapasitas aparatur pengadaan untuk meminimalisir pelanggaran hukum. Dengan menelaah kasus-kasus nyata dan hasil hukumnya, studi ini bertujuan memberikan pemahaman yang lebih dalam mengenai hubungan antara hukum pidana dan pengadaan publik, serta mendukung pengembangan strategi anti-korupsi yang lebih efektif di sektor pemerintahan.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Ransomware dalam Perspektif Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Wahyuning Robbi, Suci; Hafrida, Hafrida; Monita, Yulia
PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/pampas.v6i2.43967

Abstract

Criminal liability for perpetrators of ransomware crimes is to determine whether or not a person who commits the crime can be held accountable for his actions. Perpetrators of ransomware crimes must fulfill the elements of criminal liability. Regulations on criminal liability for perpetrators of ransomware crimes can be guided by Article 27B paragraph (1) of the ITE Law, Article 30 paragraph (2) of the ITE Law, Article 32 paragraph (1) of the ITE Law, Article 368 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, and Article 67 paragraph (1) of the Personal Data Protection Law by imposing criminal sanctions as a form of criminal liability for ransomware crimes, but in the regulation of these articles there is still a lack of norms, where there are elements of ransomware that have not been fulfilled in these articles so that there are no articles that clearly regulate ransomware crimes. So it is difficult for perpetrators of ransomware crimes to be held criminally accountable, and there is no affirmation in these regulations so that this case is difficult to prove. Therefore, the form of criminal liability for perpetrators of criminal acts from the perspective of statutory regulations has not been realized. So that in imposing criminal sanctions on perpetrators of ransomware crimes, there is no article that is used clearly, making it difficult for perpetrators to be subject to this article in criminal responsibility. Abstrak Pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap pelaku tindak pidana ransomware adalah untuk menentukan apakah seseorang yang melakukan perbuatan pidana tersebut dapat diminta pertanggungjawaban atau tidak atas tindakannya. Pelaku tindak pidana ransomware harus memenuhi unsur-unsur pertanggungjawaban pidana. Pengaturan tentang pertanggungjawaban pidana bagi pelaku tindak pidana ramsomware dapat berpedoman pada Pasal 27B ayat (1) UU ITE, Pasal 30 ayat (2) UU ITE, Pasal 32 ayat (1) UU ITE, Pasal 368 ayat (1) KUHP, dan Pasal 67 ayat (1) UU perlindungan data pribadi dengan menjatuhkan sanksi pidana sebagai bentuk pertanggungjawaban pidana atas tindak pidana ransomware, tetapi pada pengaturan pasal tersebut masih mengalami kekaburan norma , yang dimana terdapat unsur-unsur ransomware yang belum terpenuhi dalam pasal tersebutsehingga belum ada pasal yang mengatur secara jelas mengenai tindak pidana ransomware. Maka pelaku tindak pidana ransomware sulit untuk diminta pertanggungjawaban pidana, serta tidak ada penegasan dakam aturan tersebut sehingga kasus ini sulit di buktikan. Oleh karena itu, bentuk pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap pelaku tindak pidana dalam perspektif peraturan perundang- undangan belum terwujud.

Page 17 of 17 | Total Record : 162

 13   14   15   16   17 

Filter by Year

2020 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2022) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2021) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2020) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020) More Issue