Jurnal Hukum Peratun
The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of articles published in this journal discusses various topics in the field of Administrative Law and other sections related to contemporary problems in administrative law such as: tax law, land law, environmental law, labor law, government law, Regional Government Law, Health Law, Agrarian Law, Public Policy Law, Natural Resources Law and Judicial Review.
Articles
67 Documents
<![CDATA[BEBERAPA KESALAHAN KONSEPTUAL PADA UU CIPTA KERJA MENURUT ILMU HUKUM ADMINISTRASI NEGARA ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Adiguna Bimasakti]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 4 No 1 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/peratun.412021.45-66
<![CDATA[The promulgation of Law Number 11 Year 2020 Regarding Job Creation Bill by the Indonesian Government that uses the omnibus law model has caused polemics both theoretically and pragmatically. The omnibus law model breaks through the paradigm of law-making that has been known in Indonesia for of its unusual method of regulating many themes in one single bill. In terms of substance, especially in this paper concerning administrative law, many concepts are mixed up so that many things which in theory stray far from the science of State administrative law adopted in Indonesia. Among those that will be discussed in this paper are four problems namely 1.) The constitutionality of omnibus law method in the Law No. 11 of 2020 regarding Job Creation, 2.) The concept of governmental authority in the context of regional and central government relations, 3.) The Tacit Authorization concept, and 4.) The concept of licensing in the broader sense. This paper uses the literature study method, in which the writer observes the problems based on related literatures and regulations. The conclusion that can be drawn in this paper is that this law which regulates those four problems is still had a lot of mistakes and needs to be reviewed by the legislators or by President of the Republic of Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[PERKEMBANGAN KEWENANGAN PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA MENGADILI SENGKETA KEPEGAWAIAN APARATUR SIPIL NEGARA ]]>
<![CDATA[Enrico Simanjuntak]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 4 No 1 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/peratun.412021.67-88
<![CDATA[The development of personnel law regarding litigation has experienced tremendous development, but some of the latest literature in the field of personnel law is still referring to the mechanism of litigation that is already irrelevant. As is known now after the enactment of the Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) No. 6 of 2018 concerning Government Administration Dispute Resolution Guidelines After Taking Administrative Review, the principle applies so long as it is not determined otherwise by certain sectoral regulations (lex specialis), submitting a claim to the State Administrative Court (PTUN) must first take administrative efforts internally or quasi-judicial institution (lex generalis). As the initial intention of the State Civil Apparatus Act (UU Aparatur Sipil Negara), now the resolution of personnel disputes must be preceded by internal administrative review before being submitted to the State Administrative Court.]]>
<![CDATA[URGENSI DAN MEKANISME VALIDASI BUKTI ELEKTRONIK DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PERADILAN ELEKTRONIK ]]>
<![CDATA[Endri]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 4 No 1 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/peratun.412021.89-104
<![CDATA[This research is trying to explain two legal issues in relation to the submission of electronic evidence in e- Litigation evidence system, those are about the urgency of electronic evidence validation in proving a case and how the ideal mechanism of electronic evidence validation at the e-Litigation proof stage is. The discourse of the trial by fully using E-Court which includes the proof stage in it has not yet been implemented due to various obstacles, including regulations, availability of supporting facilities and Human Resources (HR). It is important to study this legal issue in order to optimize E-Court so that judicial modernization with information technology approach can be quicklyimplemented, solely to realize the vision of the Supreme Court and ensure better access to justice in the future. The results of this research conclude that the electronic evidence validation process in E- Litigation is a vital stage that cannot be ruled out in order to determine the validity of an electronic evidence and how important digital forensic procedures in the electronic evidence validation process.]]>
<![CDATA[HUKUM DAN MORAL DALAM ADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAHAN DI INDONESIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Eka Sophia Fitri]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 4 No 2 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/peratun.422021.157-170
<![CDATA[Law and morals are often strictly separated from each other in the modern legal thought of the Kelsenian model. However, its development shows that law is not always separated from morality. Even morality can be used as the basis for the formation of law, although this is not always the case. The writing method used in this research is a normative juridical approach using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. This paper uses the legal-normative method, namely an approach based on legal materials by examining concepts, theories, legal principles, and legislation, as well as literature related to writing. This paper finds that even in the realm of public law, namely the law of government administration, good morality (goede zeden) is used as the legal basis for the legality of government actions which are positivised in laws and regulations and embodied in the form of general principles of good governance (AUPB).]]>
<![CDATA[PERMASALAHAN ASPEK FORMIL PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PEMBATALAN PENETAPAN CALON ANGGOTA DPR DAN DPRD KABUPATEN/KOTA/PROVINSI TERPILIH ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Adiguna Bimasakti]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 4 No 2 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/peratun.422021.105-122
<![CDATA[Law No. 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections (General Elections Act) stipulates that the General Election Commission (KPU) has the authority to determine the elected participants in the Election of Candidates of members of the House of Representative and/or the Regency/City/Provincial House of Representative. The General Elections Act also regulates how the process of resolving disputes over the election process and disputes over election results. However, in the event of cancellation or change in the Decision regarding the elected Candidates of members of the House of Representative and/or the Regency/City/Provincial House of Representative by KPU, in the event of a dispute, General Election Act doesn't regulate the dispute resolution process. Thus, this paper tries to explain this problem. The writing method used in this research is a legal-normative approach using statutory approach and conceptual approach. The results of the study indicate that KPU has the authority to resolve disputes over the cancellation or change in the Decision regarding the elected Candidates of members of the House of Representative and/or the Regency/City/Provincial House of Representative according to Law no. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration, namely through administrative proceedings in the form of administrative objection even though the General Election Act doesn't regulate it, then proceed to an administrative appeal to the KPU's superior. The Administrative Court is also authorized to adjudicate the dispute as an administrative dispute as regulated in the laws and regulations related to the procedural law of the administrative court.]]>
<![CDATA[TANTANGAN EKSEKUSI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN DALAM MEMPERKUAT KEWIBAWAAN PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA ]]>
<![CDATA[Dikdik Somantri]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 4 No 2 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/peratun.422021.123-140
<![CDATA[Law No. 51 of 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law no. 5 of 1986 concerning the Administrative Court (Administrative Court Act) stipulates that there are two types of execution of administrative court decisions, namely automatic execution, and hierarchical execution. In hierarchical execution, legal awareness is needed from the government to carry out court decisions. Often the government is unable or unwilling to implement these decisions for various reasons. This paper uses the Legal-normative method, which is an approach based on legal materials by examining concepts, theories, legal principles and legislation, as well as literatures related to the object of writing. In this paper, it is found that there are decisions of administrative courts that cannot be implemented/executed (non executable) because of the poor quality of the decisions, and because of changes of circumstances. The challenges faced in establishing the administrative court's power and charisma by implementing its decisions according to the legal system theory approach are: 1.) the existence of floating and counterproductive norms, as well as non-executable decisions (sub-system of legal substance); 2.) the absence of officials specifically authorized to enforce implementation of court's decisions (sub-system of legal structure), and 3.) low public trust for the courts (sub-system of legal culture).]]>
<![CDATA[TINJAUAN YURIDIS IMPLEMENTASI UANG PAKSA (DWANGSOM) DI PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA ]]>
<![CDATA[Bambang Heriyanto]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 4 No 2 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/peratun.422021.141-156
<![CDATA[The procedural law of the administrative court regulated in Law no. 5 of 1986 concerning the Administrative Court as the latest change in Law no. 51 of 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law no. 5 of 1986 concerning the State Administrative Court (Law on the State Administrative Court) stipulates that there is a forced effort to execute the decision of the state administrative court, one of which is in the form of forced money (dwangsom). However, the problem in its implementation is that there are no laws and regulations that regulate the procedure for imposing forced money and regarding the amount so that in practice there are still very few courts that apply forced money as an effort to force the implementation of state administrative court decisions. This paper attempts to provide an overview and solutions to these problems, including providing a comparative picture of the regulation of forced money in several countries. The writing method used is a legal-normative method, namely by using library data related to forced money in state administrative courts, and related laws and regulations.]]>
<![CDATA[OTONOMI PENGELOLAAN KEUANGAN PADA PERGURUAN TINGGI NEGERI BADAN HUKUM ]]>
<![CDATA[Ryan Surya Pradhana]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 4 No 2 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/peratun.422021.171-190
<![CDATA[After promulgation of The Law of Republic Indonesia No. 12 Year 2012 on Higher Education, State College with Legal Entity (PTN-BH) has an authority to conduct its own institutional management which is not only academic autonomy, but also non-academic autonomy too, where that financial management autonomy is included. For this reason, this paper was made in order to examine the extent of financial management autonomy in PTN-BH. The writing method used in this research is a normative juridical approach using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. This paper uses the legal-normative method, namely an approach based on legal materials by examining concepts, theories, legal principles, and legislation, as well as literature related to writing. It is found in this writing that the PTN-BH’s autonomy of financial management is distributed by delegation authority scheme based on PTN-BH statute. One of critical point from the regulation is the separation of PTN-BH’s wealth of the country’s wealth which is cause a genuine legal concequences on various aspect.]]>
<![CDATA[PENGARUH HOMOGENISASI PEMERINTAHAN DESA DI INDONESIA TERKAIT PERUBAHAN SOSIAL ]]>
<![CDATA[Vita Deliana]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 5 No 1 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/peratun.512022.1-18
<![CDATA[Perubahan hukum melalui modifikasi atau perubahan nilai yang ada di masyarakat melalui undang-undang dapat menyebabkan perubahan sosial. Dalam tulisan ini perubahan sosial yang dimaksud adalah seputar desa dan pemerintahan desa di Indonesia, sejak sebelum kemerdekaan sampai era reformasi saat ini. Metode penulisan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif menggunakan pendekatan statutory approach dan conceptual approach. Tulisan ini menggunakan metode yuridis-normatif yakni pendekatan berdasarkan bahan hukum dengan cara menelaah konsep-konsep, teori-teori, asas-asas hukum dan peraturan perundang-undangan, serta literatur yang terkait dengan tulisan. Dalam tulisan ini ditemukan bahwa perubahan terjadi sejak akhir era orde lama yang menyeragamkan atau menghomogenisasi struktur pemerintahan daerah. Akibatnya banyak desa-desa adat yang berdiri sendiri tanpa masuk ke dalam struktur pemerintahan menurut undang-undang, sehingga masyarakat menjadi semakin etnosentris karena dianggap pembangunan yang dilakukan adalah berdasarkan stereotip jawanisasi.]]>
<![CDATA[WACANA PERADILAN ELEKTRONIK DALAM PROSES EKSEKUSI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN DI LINGKUNGAN PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Adiguna Bimasakti]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 5 No 1 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/peratun.512022.19-38
<![CDATA[In the past, the litigation process in court was carried out manually from registration of cases to the reading of court’ decision. With the promulgation of Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2019 concerning the Administration of Cases and Hearing in Electronic Courts (PERMA No. 1 of 2019), the paradigm regarding judiciary process has shifted towards electronic justice. In the sense that from registration of cases, the adjudication stage (trial in court) and the reading of court decisions is carried out electronically with the e-court application. However, this regulation did not reach the post-adjudication administrative process, at the stage of execution of the decision. For this reason, this paper was made to look at the potential for the implementation of administration of the execution of court decisions, especially in the administrative court, through the hierarchical execution process using the e-court application. The results of the study indicate that the administrative process of the execution of administrative court decisions can be carried out through the e-court application by changing the e-litigation paradigm, namely the change in PERMA no. 1 of 2019. The e-litigation paradigm in this regulation must also be expanded into e-judiciary (holistic electronic judiciary) so that the execution stage can be carried out electronically.]]>
