Jurnal Hukum Peratun
The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of articles published in this journal discusses various topics in the field of Administrative Law and other sections related to contemporary problems in administrative law such as: tax law, land law, environmental law, labor law, government law, Regional Government Law, Health Law, Agrarian Law, Public Policy Law, Natural Resources Law and Judicial Review.
Articles
67 Documents
<![CDATA[ASAS-ASAS HUKUM UTAMA DALAM HUKUM ACARA PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA ]]>
<![CDATA[Spyendik Bernadus Blegur]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 5 No 1 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/peratun.512022.39-56
<![CDATA[Three decades since the promulgation of Law no. 5 of 1986 concerning Administrative Court, developments in the procedural law of administrative courts are numerous and occur rapidly. However, with the rapid and many developments, there are still misunderstandings about the main principles of procedural law that apply in administrative courts. Therefore, this paper tries to re-explain the principles of procedural law in administrative courts. The writing method used in this research is a legal-normative approach using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. This paper uses the legal-normative method, namely an approach based on legal materials by examining concepts, theories, legal principles and legislation, as well as literature related to the paper. It is found in this paper that the main legal principles in administrative court can be grouped into two, namely the principles related to formality and the principles related to the settlement of the dispute.]]>
<![CDATA[LANGKAH OPTIMALISASI PELAKSANAAN DISMISSAL PROSES DAN PEMERIKSAAN PERSIAPAN DI PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA MELALUI PERADILAN ELEKTRONIK ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Amin Putra]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 5 No 1 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/peratun.512022.57-74
<![CDATA[Since the promulgation of Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2019 concerning the Administration of Cases and Litigation in Electronic Court (PERMA No. 1 of 2019), the administrative processes of cases and hearing in courts are carried out electronically. However, the PERMA did not accommodate the need for dispute examination in the administrative court, especially regarding the existence of the dismissal process and preparatory examination. Therefore, this paper is made to examine what steps are needed so that the dismissal process and preparatory examination can be carried out using the e-court application. This paper uses a legal-normative method, namely an approach based on legal materials in the form of laws and regulations, as well as literature related to the theme of this paper. This paper demonstrates that the dismissal process and preparatory examination can be carried out through a revision of PERMA no. 1 of 2019. In addition, further studies are needed regarding the specifics of the procedural law of the administrative court in the implementation of this e-litigation, due to the fact that the dismissal process and preparatory examination are part of the litigation process in the administrative court.]]>
<![CDATA[TANTANGAN DALAM PENANGANAN PERKARA TINDAKAN ADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAHAN DI PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA ]]>
<![CDATA[Hidayat Pratama Putra]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 5 No 1 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/peratun.512022.75-94
<![CDATA[After the enactment of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning government administration, there are basic things that have impacts on the authority of the administrative court, one of which is governmental real acts. This paper tries to analyze the potential problems that become challenges at the level of implementation of the settlement of cases of “government administrative actions” in the Administrative Court including misunderstanding of the concept of government administrative actions, the accountability regarding administrative tort due to government administrative actions, as well as compensation mechanisms for losses caused by it. Problems were analyzed based on normative legal research methods which were analyzed descriptively. The main challenge in the examination of government administrative actions is that there are many misperceptions about the concept of government administrative actions. Government administration actions are basically real act (Feitelijke handeling) and cannot be interpreted as government actions in a broad sense or known as bestuurshandelingen. Then the concept of accountability for administrative tort in the form of government administrative actions and compensation mechanisms for losses needs to be clarified through laws and regulations because currently there is no standard benchmark regarding the concept of accountability for an administrative tort in the form of government administrative actions, and its compensation mechanisms adequate to the damages for the losses.]]>
<![CDATA[PENUNDAAN PELAKSANAAN (SCHORSING) KEPUTUSAN TATA USAHA NEGARA PADA PUTUSAN NOMOR 74/G/2014/PTUN-BDG ]]>
<![CDATA[Santi Hapsari Dewi Adikancana]]>;
<![CDATA[Ladyva Rizqina Dinissa]]>;
<![CDATA[Amanda Khoirunnisa S]]>;
<![CDATA[Fauziyah Rahmah Izzati]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 5 No 2 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/peratun.522022.137-158
<![CDATA[The Procedural Law of the State Administrative Court is a pure law which means that there is no obstacle in implementing the State Administrative Decision (KTUN) if the KTUN is sued. However, the Plaintiff can apply to postpone the disputed KTUN as compensation during the examination. The research method of this journal is normative juridical and qualitative descriptive with analytical theory. Since the issuance of the Judicial Administration Law, there have been several developments in delaying the implementation of a decision, especially in its mechanism. There are several factors that become the basis for the judge's consideration in granting a request for a postponement of the implementation of a decision, this is regulated in Article 67 of Law Number 5 of 1986, one of which is the very urgent interest of the Plaintiff. This is because the Plaintiff will suffer huge losses if the decision being sued is issued.]]>
<![CDATA[KOMPETENSI ABSOLUT PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DALAM SENGKETA TANAH TERHADAP SERTIFIKAT HAK ATAS TANAH ]]>
<![CDATA[Onma Ezra Rodi Aprilo]]>;
<![CDATA[Langgam Ihutan]]>;
<![CDATA[Eric Halomoan]]>;
<![CDATA[Anandersah Sinaga]]>;
<![CDATA[Santi Hapsari Dewi Adikancana]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 5 No 2 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/peratun.522022.159-174
<![CDATA[The purpose of this article is to knowing how the absolute competence of the State Administrative Court in Indonesia is and how the competence of the State Administrative Court is if there is a land dispute over land rights certificates. This article was compiled using 2 (two) types of approaches, namely the normative approach and the historical approach where this article is a normative research article. Based on the results of the discussion analysis, the absolute competence of the State Administrative Court is the authority to examine, decide, and resolve state administrative disputes where there are existing restrictions.]]>
<![CDATA[PENERAPAN CITIZEN LAWSUIT TERHADAP SKEMA GUGATAN OBJEK GUGATAN KEBIJAKAN KEMENTERIAN PANRB TERKAIT TENAGA HONORER DALAM LINGKUP PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA ]]>
<![CDATA[Adzra Arvianda]]>;
<![CDATA[Annastasya Divana P M]]>;
<![CDATA[Hanuun Zainum A]]>;
<![CDATA[Santi Hapsari Dewi Adikancana]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 5 No 2 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/peratun.522022.95-116
<![CDATA[Law No. 5 of 2014 regulates the legality of Honorary Personnel as non-ASN employees. In essence, there are provisions regarding the appointment of honorary personnel to become civil servants with conditions that must be met. Moreover, the problem continues when the number of Honorary Personnel in Government Agencies increases and disrupts the balance of the arrangement of human resources (HR) of the apparatus in each of these agencies. As a settlement effort, the PANRB Ministry issued the PANRB Ministerial Letter Number B/185/M.SM.02.03/202 which emphasized the provisions of PP. 49 of 2018. This becomes an interesting topic when it is associated with the issue of the rights of Honorary Personnel and the application of the Citizen Lawsuit lawsuit to the Administrative Court. This writing uses a normative research method with a literature study which is then analyzed qualitatively and conclusions are drawn using the inductive method. The conclusion that was found was that the Honorary Personnel had the right to file a lawsuit with the Administrative Court because the object of the disputed letter included the State Administrative Court. However, Citizen Lawsuit is not optimal enough as a scheme for filing a lawsuit and it is better to use ordinary legal practices. Keywords : citizen lawsuit, state administrative courts, honorary staff]]>
<![CDATA[ASAS IN DUBIO PRO NATURA DALAM SENGKETA TATA USAHA NEGARA LINGKUNGAN HIDUP: KONSEP DAN IMPLEMENTASINYA ]]>
<![CDATA[Endri]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 5 No 2 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/peratun.522022.117-136
<![CDATA[Besides the general principles of good governance (AAUPB) as a measuring instrument for adjudicating cases in the context of environmental administration disputes, there is also In Dubio Pro Natura principle. This study aims to describe the concept and the implementation of In Dubio Pro Natura principle as one of the particular principles known in environmental disputes. To analyze these legal issues, this study will explain the definition and scope of In Dubio Pro Natura principle and how it is applied in the environmental administration case process. This study is important considering that the largest part of environmental law is administrative law so that the Administrative Court plays a major role in the environmental law enforcement process. A complete understanding of the concept of In Dubio Pro Natura principle can influence the process of environmental administration law enforcement by the Administrative Court. The result of this study concludes that In Dubio Pro Natura principle is understood as a concept as well as a guide for judges in examining, deciding, and resolving environmental disputes. If there are judge's doubts whether in scientific uncertainty or legal uncertainty, then judges must side with the interests of the environment (pro natura). This principle also aims to maximize the existence of scientific evidence and competent environmentalists at the proof stage and make a legal invention by applying the principles of environmental policy.]]>
<![CDATA[WACANA PEMBERIAN KEWENANGAN FIAT EKSEKUSI KEPADA PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA ATAS HASIL PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA ADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAHAN DI LUAR PENGADILAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Adiguna Bimasakti]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 5 No 2 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/peratun.522022.175-206
<![CDATA[The existence of institutions outside the state administrative courts that have the authority to resolve government administrative disputes has in recent years caused several problems. Among them are regarding the implementation or execution of the results of dispute resolution which mechanism is not clear. Finally, some parties tried to evade law (Fraude la lois) on the process of implementing the results of the settlement of administrative disputes outside the court, for example by filing a lawsuit regarding government's real act in the administrative court, when in fact the object of the dispute was not a real act. This kind of legal evading practice, if left unchecked, can disrupt the legal system of administration, including the procedural law of the administrative court, so it must be accommodated in formal administrative law (procedural law) appropriately. Because in fact, if it is not properly regulated in formal law, this will become a continuous polemic. One of the solutions offered in this paper is to add the authority of the administrative court as the giver of fiat execution for the implementation of the results of the settlement of administrative disputes that have been settled out of court based on statutory regulations. Among them are the fiat execution of the results of administrative proceedings, the implementation of the Ombudsman's recommendations and the implementation of the Ombudsman's decision.]]>
<![CDATA[OPTIMALISASI KOMPETENSI PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM PEMERINTAH (ONRECHTMATIGE OVERHEIDSDAAD) ]]>
<![CDATA[Siagian, Abdhy]]>;
<![CDATA[Alify, Rozin Falih]]>;
<![CDATA[Siagian, Abdhy Walid]]>;
<![CDATA[Alghazali , Muhammad Syammakh Daffa]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 6 No 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan MA bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun MA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/peratun.612023.35-56
<![CDATA[Dalam konstitusi Indonesia pada Pasal 24 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 (UUD 1945) bahwa, kekuasaan kehakiman dilakukan oleh sebuah Mahkamah Agung dan badan peradilan yang berada di bawahnya dalam lingkungan peradilan umum, lingkungan peradilan agama, lingkungan peradilan militer, lingkungan peradilan tata usaha negara, dan oleh sebuah Mahkamah Konstitusi. Peradilan tata usaha negara (PTUN) merupakan salah satu pelaksana kekuasaan kehakiman yang memiliki tugas serta wewenang untuk memeriksa, memutus, dan menyelesaikan sengketa Tata Usaha Negara. Dalam hal menangani kasus mengenai perbuatan melawan hukum (PMH) yang dilakukan oleh Badan dan/oleh Pejabat Pemerintahan (Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad) selama ini diadili pada peradilan umum secara perdata. Namun terjadi pergeseran paradigma pada kompetensi absolut PTUN sejak hadirnya Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan yang mana pada tertuang pada Diktum E bagian Kamar Tata Usaha Negara butir 1 huruf b Surat Edaran MA RI No. 4 Tahun 2016 menyatakan bahwa PTUN berwenang mengadili perbuatan melanggar hukum oleh pemerintah, yaitu perbuatan melanggar hukum yang dilakukan oleh pemegang kekuasaan pemerintahan (Badan dan/atau Pejabat Pemerintahan) atau onrechtmatige overheidsdaad. Lebih lanjut melalui Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2019 kembali dipertegas mengenai kewenangan PTUN dalam menangani kasus Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad. Namun pada prakteknya masih ada beberapa perkara Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad yang diadili pada peradilan umum yang mana membuktikan bahwa peradilan umum masih menganggap mengadili perkara Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad masih merupakan kewenangannya.]]>
<![CDATA[Implementasi Prinsip Non-Retroaktif dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 tentang Hak Uji Materil ditinjau dari Aspek Keadilan, Kemanfaatan dan Kepastian Hukum ]]>
<![CDATA[Gusri, Ikhbal]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 6 No 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan MA bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun MA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/peratun.612023.1-34
<![CDATA[Mahkamah Agung merupakan salah satu lembaga pelaku kekuasaan kehakiman, bersanding dengan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Sebagai lembaga peradilan, MA memiliki kewenangan yang dimandatkan langsung oleh konstitusi. Salah satu kewenangan tersebut adalah menguji peraturan perundang-undangan di bawah undang-undang terhadap undang-undang yang diberikan oleh Pasal 24A UUD 1945. Hak uji materil merupakan nama lain dari kewenangan menguji peraturan MA yang dicantumkan dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung. Jika ditelisik, istilah Hak Uji Materil muncul pertama kali pada tahun 1993 melalui Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 1993 yang kemudian digantikan dengan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 1999, Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2004 dan terakhir Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2011. Pada dasarnya pengaturan dalam Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2004 dan 2011 tidak jauh berbeda. Satu-satunya perbedaan dapat ditemukan pada Bab II Tata Cara Pengajuan Pemohon Keberatan yaitu mengenai tenggang waktu mengajukan permohonan keberatan. Pasal 4 Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2004 menyatakan permohonan keberatan diajukan dalam tenggang waktu 180 (seratus delapan puluh) hari sejak ditetapkan peraturan perundang-undangan yang bersangkutan. Pada Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2011, ketentuan tersebut dihapuskan sehngga secara tekstual tidak ada lagi tenggang waktu untuk mengajukan permohonan hak uji materil atas suatu peraturan perundang-undangan. Penghapusan batas waktu pengujian peraturan perundang-undangan di bawah undang-undang dalam perkara hak uji materil menjadi angin segar. Dengan penghapusan batas waktu tersebut masyarakat yang dirugikan akibat pemberlakuan suatu peraturan perundang-undangan masih mempunyai ruang untuk memperjuangkan hak-haknya di lembaga peradilan. Dalam implementasinya, terdapat persoalan perbedaan sikap dalam putusan Mahkamah Agung terkait hukum acara yang digunakan dalam menguji peraturan perundang-undangan yang terbit sebelum Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 namun diuji setelah Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 ditetapkan. Tulisan ini dibuat untuk mengkaji putusan Mahkamah Agung dalam perkara hak uji materil ditinjau dari aspek tujuan hukum yaitu keadilan, kemanfaatan, dan kepastian hukum. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konsep, dan pendekatan kasus. Berkaitan dengan permasalahan tersebut dalam tulisan ini ditemukan bahwa terdapat 2 model putusan Mahkamah Agung dalam memutus perkara hak uji materil, yaitu putusan dengan 57 putusan menggunakan Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 dan 4 putusan lainnya menggunakan Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2004. Dari data tersebut, ditemukan fakta Mahkamah Agung bahwa Mahkamah Agung lebih dominan menggunakan Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 yang menghapus ketentuan tenggang waktu pengujian hak uji materil. Hal tersebut menunjukkan bahwa Mahkamah Agung mengedepankan tujuan keadilan dan kemanfaatan dalam memutus perkara.]]>
