Jurnal Hukum Peratun
The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of articles published in this journal discusses various topics in the field of Administrative Law and other sections related to contemporary problems in administrative law such as: tax law, land law, environmental law, labor law, government law, Regional Government Law, Health Law, Agrarian Law, Public Policy Law, Natural Resources Law and Judicial Review.
Articles
67 Documents
<![CDATA[PEMAKZULAN ANGGOTA MWA UI UNSUR MAHASISWA DARI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ADMINISTRASI NEGARA ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Adiguna Bimasakti]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 3 No 1 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/peratun.312020.51-70
<![CDATA[Law No. 12 of 2012 regarding Higher Education constitute that Higher Education Institution is required to have a Organizing Organization(s) of Higher Education. Universitas Indonesia (UI) as a State University which was regulated in Government Regulation No. 68 of 2013 regarding the Statute of the University of Indonesia (Statute of UI) has a Board of Trustees of the University of Indonesia (MWA UI) which is one of the Organizing Organizations of Higher Education in UI. One element in the MWA UI is the student representative element (MWA UI UM) which is elected once a year by all UI students in a democratic way, and is appointed and discharged based on recommendations from the Academic Senate of the University of Indonesia which is then determined through a Ministerial Decision (Ministry of education). But then the Intra-Campus Student Organizations in UI regulate the impeachment mechanism of MWA UI UM beside the election. Does the impeachment of the MWA UI UM by the Intra-Campus Student Organization of UI have a legal impact on the status of the MWA UI UM membership at the MWA UI? Then how is the mechanism of impeachment / dishonorably discharged for members of the MWA UI UM if the proposal for impeachment comes from Student Organizations in UI? These two questions will be discussed in this article. The method used in this paper is literature study about student organizations of UI, and related laws and regulations.]]>
<![CDATA[RASIO HUKUM DAN IMPLIKASI HUKUM PENGUJIAN PENYALAHGUNAAN WEWENANG MENURUT PASAL 21 UNDANG-UNDANG ADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAHAN ]]>
<![CDATA[M. Ikbar Andi Endang]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 3 No 1 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/peratun.312020.71-96
<![CDATA[In the context of government action as a center point relate to public law protection, state administration jurisdiction along with its function as “judicature” (justiele functie – judicial function) belongs to characteristic of and/or repressive function. However, norm of Article 21 in Act Number 30 in 2014 about State Administration provide authority to State Administration Court to conduct assessments, whether there is any abuse of authority in decision making and/or administrative action (discretion) requested by an institution and/or an official of government administration, brings legal implication in form of a change in legal politic direction related to law enforcement in corruption crime eradication in this country in forms of preventive efforts, which is similarly as important as the corruption crime eradication itself, because corruption crime prevention is a condition sine qua non in corruption crime eradication. Based on the condition of characteristic and/or functions of state administration judiciary which is not merely repressive (merely functioning as “judiciary”), this writing attempts to provide basic of understanding to the judicial development of state administration along with its preventive roles and functions which are related to law enforcement in corruption crime eradication in forms of or types of state financial lost as it is legally defined in law ratio of norm of Article 21 in Act of government administration.]]>
<![CDATA[MENJAWAB KENDALA PEMBUKTIAN DALAM PENERAPAN ALAT BUKTI ELEKTRONIK ]]>
<![CDATA[Dewi Asimah]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 3 No 2 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/peratun.322020.97-110
<![CDATA[The existence of electronic information and / or electronic documents has been recognized as valid evidence which is an extension of the evidence in the Procedure Law that applies in Indonesia provided that the electronic information and / or electronic documents use electronic systems in accordance with the provisions stipulated in Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions. However, despite the ITE Law as well as several other regulations, it cannot be said that the Indonesian Procedural Law has stipulated electronic evidence in evidence, because the regulation of electronic evidence is in the realm of material law. Proof using electronic evidence at the trial has debates such as the examination of witnesses using the teleconference in the case of BULOG and marriage /consent qobul conducted different countries. Besides there are several other obstacles such as 1. Authentication of electronic evidence 2. Procedures for showing the instrument electronic evidence and 3. Electronic signatures. Responding to these constraints, the renewal of the procedural law must be carried out immediately by including the electronic evidence and changing the evidence system from a closed proof system to an open proof system, in order to accommodate the development of evidence, especially electronic evidence.]]>
<![CDATA[PEMBARUAN UNDANG-UNDANG PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA PASCA-REFORMASI DI ERA PERADILAN ELEKTRONIK ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Adiguna Bimasakti]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 3 No 2 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/peratun.322020.111-126
<![CDATA[In the past decade there has been a massive reform in the Indonesian judiciary system, especially regarding State Administrative Court. As from the enactment of Law No. 14 of 2008 concerning Openness of Public Information, until the enactment of Law No. 9 of 2018 concerning Non-Tax State Revenues opened a tap that expands the competence/authority of the State Administrative Court so that not only the authority to adjudicate disputes regarding that of individual-concrete administrative decision (beschikking) but also the authority to adjudicate all types of administrative decisions as long as they are not statutory regulations, and also to adjudicate disputes regarding administrative factual-deed. Morover, within the enactment of Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2019 also opened a new paradigm about Electronic Litigation. This paper will discuss the urgency of renewing the State Administrative Court Law in terms of expanding absolute competence, the implementation of Electronic Litigation, and also about synchronization with other laws and regulations. The method used in this paper is library research that is research that takes resources from relevant literature. In this paper it can be concluded that it is deemed necessary to reform the substance in the obsolete State Administrative Court Law.]]>
<![CDATA[URGENSI PEMBENTUKAN POLISI KHUSUS PENGADILAN SEBAGAI UPAYA PEMENUHAN HAK JAMINAN KESELAMATAN HAKIM DI INDONESIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Aditya Permana Putra]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 3 No 2 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/peratun.322020.127-140
<![CDATA[Special police force is not something new in Indonesia. At least there are four special police force in Indonesia namely Prison Guard, Railway Police, Civil Service Police, and Forestry Special Police. Those police force are separated from, but hand in hand with Indonesian Police Force in securing civil society in Indonesia. In regards with the security of judges in Indonesia, this paper tries to argue that they need special police force to guard and secure them. In this paper, it is concluded that it is required to change the Law regarding Judicial Power especially in the part concerning judge’s safety and security. If it is not probable, then creating a special police force in court is a must.]]>
<![CDATA[PERTENTANGAN NORMA FIKTIF NEGATIF DAN FIKTIF POSITIF SERTA KONTEKSTUALISASINYA MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG ADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAHAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Azza Azka Norra]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 3 No 2 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/peratun.322020.141-154
<![CDATA[The silence of the Government Administration has two possibilities, Tacit Refusal and Tacit Authorization. Tacit Refusal means that if the government agencies/bodies ignored requests from citizens then it is considered to have rejected the request. Tacit Authorization means if the government agencies/bodies ignored requests from citizens then it is considered to have granted the request. In Indonesia, both the Tacit Refusal and Tacit Authorization have their own places in the laws and regulations. The Law No. 5 of 1986 concerning Administrative Judiciary, rules the Tacit Refusal, meanwhile Law No. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration, rules the Tacit Authorization. Both cannot be implemented simultaneously because both of them are negating each other. This paper tries to explain the implementation of Tacit Refusal and Tacit Authorization after the enactment of Law No. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration in the administrative court.]]>
<![CDATA[PENGELOLAAN KEARSIPAN PERKARA DI PENGADILAN DALAM RANGKA KEMUDAHAN AKSES INFORMASI PUBLIK DI PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA MAKASSAR ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Rizaldi Rahman]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 3 No 2 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/peratun.322020.155-170
<![CDATA[Since the birth of the reform era in Indonesia the administration of government refers to the principles of Good Governance and General Principles of Good Governance. In order to accommodate the realization of good governance, a Law on Public Information Disclosure was established which mandates that every Public Agency must develop a system of information and documentation to manage Public Information properly and efficiently so that it can be easily accessed. No exception with the Mahkamah Agung which is committed to providing the best service to the public by realizing openness of information in the Court. Administrative Court of Makassar as a judicial body is also inseparable from the obligation to realize information disclosure in the Court. The purpose of this paper is to find out the implementation of the information disclosure service regarding archives at the Administrative Court of Makassar. Data collection is done through field observations and interviews with several related parties.]]>
<![CDATA[ANGKANISASI SEBAGAI JAMINAN KEPASTIAN HUKUM DALAM KONTEKS UNDANG-UNDANG ADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAHAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Dani Elpah]]>;
<![CDATA[Disiplin F. Manao]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 2 No 1 (2019) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/peratun.212019.1-10
<![CDATA[Kepastian Hukum merupakan salah satu asas yang harus tercermin dalam materi muatan Peraturan Perundang-undangan, di antara tujuan diadakannya Undang Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan adalah untuk menciptakan kepastian hukum, Alternatif model yang di pergunakan untuk mengimplementasikan asas kepastian hukum dalam Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan adalah dengan metode angkanisasi.]]>
<![CDATA[IMPLIKASI HUKUM KETIDAKPATUHAN TERHADAP PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DITINJAU DARI PELAKSANAAN OTONOMI DAERAH DAN NEGARA KESATUAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Ari Wirya Dinata]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 4 No 1 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/peratun.412021.1-30
<![CDATA[Penerapan prinsip negara hukum di Indonesia memberikan konsekuensi lahirnya pengadilan tata usaha negara. Pengadilan tata usaha negara sebagai pranata hukum adalah wujud pelaksanaan prinsip saling mengimbangi dan saling mengawasi agar pemerintah tidak melakukan tindakan yang sewenang-wenang. Sebagai lembaga peradilan yang dihormati maka seharusnya putusan pengadilan tata usaha negara wajib dihormati dan dilaksanakan oleh masing-masing pihak. Namun dalam praktiknya terjadi ketidakpatuhan yang dilakukan oleh badan/pejabat tata usaha negara. Mereka menentang untuk melaksanakan putusan pengadilan tata usaha negara meskipun telah memiliki kekuatan hukum tetap dan mengikat. Oleh karena itu, tulisan ini membahas secara komprehensif mengenai penyebab ketidakpatuhan yang dilakukan oleh badan atau pejabat tata usaha negara. Berikutnya juga membahas mengenai implikasi hukum yang terjadi apabila badan/pejabat tata usaha negara tetap mengabaikan putusan pengadilan tersebut menurut peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Lebih lanjut tulisan ini mengulas mengenai hubungan pemerintah pusat dan pemerintah daerah dalam kerangka otonomi daerah dikaitkan dengan ketidakpatuhan yang terjadi. Diketahui bahwa Presiden sebagai kepala pemerintahan memegang kekuasaan penuh untuk menjalankan pemerintahan dan memastikan seluruh kebijakannya dilaksanakan oleh pemerintah daerah terlebih lagi dalam konsep negara kesatuan.]]>
<![CDATA[PERSIDANGAN ELEKTRONIK SEBAGAI UPAYA MODERNISASI PERADILAN DI ERA NEW NORMAL ]]>
<![CDATA[Dewi Asimah]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 4 No 1 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/peratun.412021.31-44
<![CDATA[Electronic Court (E-court) was arranged by the Supreme Court prior to the Covid-19 pandemic with the issuance of Supreme Court Regulation (hereby refered as “Perma”) No. 3 of 2018 and restrictions with Perma No. 1 of 2019. The application of Electronic Court (E-court) greatly helps the realization of the Vision of the Supreme Court to become a Supreme Indonesian Judiciary Body, which in point 10 is the realization of the Vision of the Supreme Court in the Blueprint is to create a Modern Judiciary Body based on integrated information technology. In the New Normal Era, conventional trials must switch to online trials to prevent Covid-19 based on SEMA No. 1 of 2020. In addition to the many benefits obtained from the implementation of electronic court (e-court), especially during The New Normal Era, there are several obstacle of conducting electronic hearings, such as Electronic proceedings have not yet been regulated in the procedural law because they have only been regulated in a Supreme Court Regulation. Limited facilities and infrastructure, lack of human resources and the trial that was felt to be closed because it was only attended by online parties were also obstacles in electronic litigation.]]>
