cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Mahrus Ali
Contact Email
sengkomahrus@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
sengkomahrus@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Faculty of Law Merdeka University Surabaya Jl. Ketintang Madya VII/2 Surabaya
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains
Published by Universitas Merdeka Surabaya
ISSN : 20866852     EISSN : 25985892     DOI : -
Core Subject : Health, Social,
Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
The scope of the articles published in YURISDIKSI Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Civil Law, Criminal Law, International Law, Administrative Law, Islamic Law, Constitutional Law, Environmental Law, Procedural Law, Antropological Law, Medical Law, Law and Economic, Sociology of Law and another section related contemporary issues in Law. YURISDIKSI Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
Arjuna Subject : Seni dan Humaniora - Seni dan Humaniora (Lain-Lain)
Articles 14 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 21 No. 4 (2026): March In Progress" : 14 Documents clear
Legal and Criminological Analysis of Cryptocurrency Money Laundering in Supreme Court Cassation Decision Aria Perkasa Utama; Setiawan Noerdajasakti; Fachrizal Afandi
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 4 (2026): March In Progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i4.345

Abstract

The development of financial technology through blockchain-based crypto assets has given rise to new patterns of economic crime, particularly money laundering offenses. The decentralized, anonymous, and cross-jurisdictional characteristics of crypto assets make them an effective means of concealing the illicit origin of criminal proceeds. Within the national legal framework, the regulation of money laundering under Law Number 8 of 2010 has not explicitly accommodated crypto asset transactions, resulting in normative gaps and legal uncertainty. These issues are reflected in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Cassation Decision Number 2029 K/Pid.Sus/2023 concerning Indra Kesuma, also known as Indra Kenz. This study aims to analyze the legal reasoning underlying judicial decisions in money laundering cases involving crypto asset-based schemes and to formulate regulatory reform of money laundering laws based on a cyber criminology approach. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings indicate that judges adopted a progressive interpretation of Article 1 paragraph (1), Article 3, and Article 4 of the Anti-Money Laundering Law by qualifying crypto assets as proceeds of crime. The cyber criminology approach underscores the necessity of digital evidentiary systems and a comprehensive understanding of blockchain technology. Furthermore, existing regulations remain inadequate, necessitating normative reform that includes the definition of crypto assets, obligations for reporting suspicious transactions, and the integration of on-chain Know Your Customer (KYC) mechanisms to ensure legal certainty and effective law enforcement.
Physical And Sensory Disabilities: Legal Certainty And Justice In The Notary Profession Tiara Maharani; M. Hamidi Masykur; Arini Jauharoh
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 4 (2026): March In Progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i4.348

Abstract

This study examines the legal issues regarding the requirements for appointment as a Notary as regulated in Article 3 of the Notary Law (UUJN), with a focus on the regulation of physical and sensory disabilities. The background of this study is the incompleteness of norms in the UUJN which has the potential to cause legal uncertainty and discriminatory practices against persons with disabilities, both at the stage of appointing a Notary and against Notaries who experience life events that cause physical and/or sensory disabilities. The UUJN requires Notaries to be physically and mentally healthy, but does not provide explicit regulations regarding the limits and parameters of such health in relation to disabilities. This study aims to analyze the concept of physical and sensory disabilities in relation to the implementation of the Notary's authority and obligations and to formulate an ideal form of regulation to realize legal certainty and justice for all citizens. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The analysis is carried out systematically and grammatically against the UUJN, the Health Law, the Law on Persons with Disabilities, and the Human Rights Law, and is based on the theory of legal certainty and dignified justice. The research results indicate that the requirement for physical health must be interpreted functionally, focusing on a person's ability to perform the duties of a notary, rather than on absolute physical condition. An analysis of the notary's authority and obligations indicates that upper locomotor and sensory functions play an essential role, while lower locomotor functions are not decisive. Therefore, this study proposes amendments to Article 3 of the UUJN by adding norms that recognize the ability to perform the position with or without reasonable accommodation, including the use of assistive technology. Furthermore, it is necessary to regulate leave procedures, functional assessments, and evaluations for notaries who experience disabilities after being appointed.
The Impact of the KPK Law Revision on Prosecutorial Authority Moch Ridwan Affandi; Siti Marwiyah; Vieta Imelda Cornelis
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 4 (2026): March In Progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i4.350

Abstract

Corruption is an extraordinary crime that has far-reaching impacts on state finances, the legal system, and public trust. In combating corruption, the Corruption Eradication Commission (Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi/KPK) and the Public Prosecutor’s Office (Kejaksaan) play strategic roles, particularly in the prosecution of corruption cases. However, the amendment of Law Number 30 of 2002 into Law Number 19 of 2019 on the Corruption Eradication Commission has brought significant changes to the institutional position and authority of the KPK, affecting its relationship with the Prosecutor’s Office. This study aims to analyze the policies of the KPK and the Prosecutor’s Office in regulating prosecutorial authority and to examine the implications of the amendment to the KPK Law for the effectiveness of corruption law enforcement in Indonesia. This research employs an empirical legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and empirical approaches through interviews, observation, and literature review. The findings indicate that the amendment to the KPK Law has strengthened coordination and oversight mechanisms, but at the same time has posed challenges to the independence and speed of prosecution. Therefore, the effectiveness of corruption eradication after the amendment largely depends on strengthening institutional synergy, clarifying the division of authority, and ensuring consistency in prosecutorial policies between the KPK and the Prosecutor’s Office.
Presidential Authority to Grant Abolition under the 1945 Constitution of Indonesia Hendra Vranata; Siti Marwiyah; Fathul Hamdani
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 4 (2026): March In Progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i4.351

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the President’s authority to grant abolition as regulated under Article 14 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and to examine its implications for the rule of law and the principle of checks and balances within the Indonesian constitutional system. Abolition constitutes a distinctive form of state clemency because it terminates criminal prosecution prior to a final court judgment, thereby directly intersecting with judicial independence. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, with the granting of abolition to Tom Lembong serving as a case study. The results show that, normatively, the President’s authority to grant abolition is constitutionally valid; however, the absence of comprehensive statutory regulation creates legal uncertainty and weakens normative safeguards. Furthermore, the findings reveal that the supervisory role of the House of Representatives tends to function procedurally rather than substantively, thereby reducing the effectiveness of the checks and balances mechanism. Accordingly, this study concludes that strengthening the normative framework and oversight mechanisms is essential to ensure that the exercise of abolition remains consistent with the rule of law, substantive justice, and the independence of Indonesia’s criminal justice system.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 14

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2026 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 22 No. 1 (2026): June in progress Vol. 21 No. 4 (2026): March In Progress Vol. 21 No. 3 (2025): December Vol. 21 No. 2 (2025): September Vol. 21 No. 1 (2025): June Vol. 20 No. 4 (2025): March Vol. 20 No. 3 (2024): December Vol. 20 No. 2 (2024): September Vol. 20 No. 1 (2024): June Vol. 19 No. 4 (2024): March Vol. 19 No. 3 (2023): December Vol. 19 No. 2 (2023): September Vol. 19 No. 1 (2023): June Vol. 18 No. 4 (2023): March Vol. 18 No. 2 (2022): 30 September 2022 Vol. 18 No. 3 (2022): December Vol. 18 No. 1 (2022): June Vol. 17 No. 4 (2022): March Vol. 17 No. 3 (2021): December Vol. 17 No. 2 (2021): September Vol. 17 No. 1 (2021): Juni Vol. 16 No. 4 (2021): March Vol. 16 No. 3 (2020): Desember Vol. 16 No. 2 (2020): September Vol. 16 No. 1 (2020): Juni Vol. 15 No. 2 (2020): March Vol. 14 No. 1 (2019): September Vol. 13 No. 2 (2019): March Vol. 12 No. 1 (2018): September Vol. 11 No. 2 (2018): March Vol. 10 No. 1 (2017): September More Issue