cover
Contact Name
Rachmat Hidayat
Contact Email
dr.rachmat.hidayat@gmail.com
Phone
+6281949581088
Journal Mail Official
editor.bioscmed@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Sirna Raga no 99, 8 Ilir, Ilir Timur 3, Palembang
Location
Kota palembang,
Sumatera selatan
INDONESIA
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research
Published by HM Publisher
ISSN : -     EISSN : 25980580     DOI : https://doi.org/10.37275/bsm
Core Subject : Health, Science,
This journal welcomes the submission of articles that offering a sensible transfer of basic research to applied clinical medicine. BioScientia Medicina covers the latest developments in various fields of biomedicine with special attention to : 1.Rhemumatology 2.Molecular aspect of Indonesia Traditional Herb 3.Cardiology and Cardiovascular diseases 4.Genetics 5.Immunology 6.Environmental health 7.Toxicology 8. Neurology 9. Pharmacology 10. Oncology 11. Other multidisciplinary studies related medicine. The views of experts on current advances in nanotechnology and molecular/cell biology will be also considered for publication as long as they have a direct clinical impact on human health.
Articles 1,165 Documents
Efficacy and Safety of Adjunctive Corticosteroids in Non-HIV Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia with Respiratory Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Observational Studies Reza Rahmadinata; Rohani Lasmaria
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i2.1508

Abstract

Background: Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in HIV-negative immunocompromised patients carries a mortality rate significantly higher than in the HIV-positive population. While adjunctive corticosteroids are the standard of care for HIV-associated pneumonia to prevent Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome, their efficacy in non-HIV patients remains controversial due to differing immunopathogenesis. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of adjunctive corticosteroids in non-HIV patients with respiratory failure, specifically addressing the discordance between historical observational data and recent randomized evidence. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, searching databases from January 2014 to July 2025. We included randomized controlled trials and observational studies of non-HIV adults with pneumonia receiving adjunctive corticosteroids. To address methodological heterogeneity, we performed stratified analyses separating randomized trial data from observational cohorts and conducted sensitivity analyses to account for outliers. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB-2 and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: Ten studies comprising 2,900 patients were analyzed. The randomized trial demonstrated no statistically significant reduction in 28-day mortality with corticosteroids (21.5% vs 32.4%, p=0.069). In the observational arm, initial pooled analysis suggested benefit, but sensitivity analysis removing a large administrative database study shifted the result to null. Crucially, higher cumulative steroid doses were associated with increased 90-day mortality (Hazard Ratio 1.01 per 100mg equivalent; p<0.05) and a significantly increased risk of secondary infections and hyperglycemia. Subgroup analysis revealed no benefit for pulse-dose regimens over standard dosing. Conclusion: Unlike in HIV, adjunctive corticosteroids do not confer a consistent survival benefit in non-HIV Pneumocystis pneumonia and are associated with dose-dependent toxicity. The routine use of corticosteroids should be abandoned in favor of a cautious approach restricted to severe, early hypoxemia using standard rather than pulse doses.
Impact of Co-existing Adenomyosis on Pain Recurrence Following Deep Endometriosis Excision: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Multivariate-Adjusted Observational Cohorts Ninda Frymonalitza
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i2.1509

Abstract

Background: Deep endometriosis (DE) represents a severe phenotype characterized by subperitoneal infiltration >5mm. While complete surgical excision is the gold standard, postoperative recurrence of pain and lesions remains clinically significant. Growing evidence implicates co-existing adenomyosis as a prognostic factor, yet its independent impact on DE surgery outcomes is debated. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies published between 2014 and 2025. Data were synthesized from seven high-quality studies involving 2,056 participants, focusing on those utilizing multivariate regression or propensity score matching. The primary outcomes were recurrence of pain (dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia), anatomical lesion recurrence, and surgical complications. Secondary outcomes included fertility. Results: The prevalence of adenomyosis in DE patients ranged from 35.6% to 49.05%. Patients with adenomyosis had significantly higher preoperative pain scores. Postoperatively, adenomyosis was an independent predictor of pain persistence and lesion recurrence. Extrinsic adenomyosis was associated with a 2.5-fold increased risk of early recurrence (OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.2–3.4). Survival analysis showed a 60% recurrence-free probability at 5 years for those with adenomyosis vs. 81% for those without. Surgical complications were significantly higher in the adenomyosis group (OR 4.56; 95% CI 1.90–11.30). Conclusion: Co-existing adenomyosis is a robust independent risk factor for failure of DE surgery, leading to persistent pain, lesion recurrence, and increased surgical morbidity. This supports the outside-in theory of pathogenesis. Preoperative screening for adenomyosis via TVS/MRI is mandatory for accurate counseling and surgical planning.
Fatal Disseminated Tuberculosis in Vaccinated Children with Failed BCG Scar Formation: A Clinical-Pathological Correlation and Immunological Review Delicia Rudy; Prisillia Brigitta; I Kadek Suarca
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i2.1510

Abstract

Background: The Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine remains the cornerstone of preventative strategies against severe pediatric tuberculosis (TB), specifically disseminated forms such as miliary TB and tuberculous meningitis (TBM). While the formation of a cutaneous scar is historically viewed as a surrogate marker for successful vaccine uptake and delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH), its absence is often clinically overlooked. This study investigates the correlation between the lack of BCG scarring, immunological anergy, and fatal disseminated disease outcomes. Case presentation: We report a clinical-pathological analysis of two pediatric patients admitted to a tertiary care center in Indonesia. Case 1, an 11-month-old male vaccinated at birth, presented with status epilepticus and was diagnosed with Probable TBM Stage III. Despite vaccination, he lacked a BCG scar and exhibited Tuberculin Skin Test (TST) anergy (0 mm). Case 2, a 2-year-8-month-old female vaccinated at birth, presented with Type 1 respiratory failure due to severe miliary TB. She demonstrated profound wasting and TST anergy (0 mm). Both patients succumbed to the disease (Day 9 and Day 14, respectively) despite aggressive management. Conclusion: The absence of a BCG scar in vaccinated children serves as a critical clinical indicator of "immunological silence." It correlates with a failure to mount the Th1-mediated granulomatous response necessary for containing lymphohematogenous spread. We recommend that scar failure be treated as a risk factor requiring enhanced surveillance and a lower threshold for preventative therapy.
Precipitation of Occult Lymphomatous Hemorrhage by Early Initiation of Factor Xa Inhibitors: A Pharmacovigilance Case Study and Critical Reappraisal of DOAC Safety Kadek Cahya Adwitya; I Putu Bayu Triguna
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i2.1511

Abstract

Background: The concurrent management of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) and active malignancy represents a precarious clinical equilibrium, particularly when the neoplasm involves occult extranodal gastrointestinal (GI) sites. While direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have largely supplanted low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) as the standard of care for CAT, emerging pharmacovigilance data suggest a specific vulnerability in patients with luminal GI malignancies. Case presentation: We report the case of a 76-year-old frail female presenting with extensive left iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Diagnostic evaluation identified a perfect storm of pathology: Stage IV diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with bulky retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy encasing the inferior vena cava (IVC) and a suspicious infiltrative mass in the proximal jejunum. Following standard guidelines, the patient was initiated on rivaroxaban. However, this intervention precipitated a catastrophic upper GI hemorrhage (hemoglobin drop to 6.5 g/dL) within 96 hours. A retrospective pharmacokinetic audit revealed critical predisposing factors: severe hypoalbuminemia (1.6 g/dL) increasing the free drug fraction, and an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min, suggesting the patient was effectively overdosed relative to her physiological clearance. Conclusion: The empiric use of rivaroxaban in elderly patients with uncharacterized abdominal masses, renal impairment, and cachexia carries unacceptable hemorrhagic risks. We advocate for a systematic bleed-risk stratification protocol, prioritizing LMWH or Apixaban, and the judicious use of IVC filters as bridging therapies in high-risk phenotypes.
Tear Reservoir Thickness and Vector-Resolved Refractive Outcomes in Indonesian Corneal Ectasia: A Scleral Lens Pilot Study Anak Agung Ayu Putri Prematura Sri Anasary; Ariesanti Tri Handayani
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i2.1512

Abstract

Background: Corneal ectasia is characterized by high-order aberrations and irregular astigmatism, presenting significant optical challenges. Scleral lenses neutralize these irregularities via a post-lens tear reservoir. However, the precise optical contribution of the tear reservoir thickness itself to residual refractive error remains under-characterized, particularly in Southeast Asian populations where aggressive ectasia phenotypes are common. This study aimed to determine if tear reservoir thickness correlates with residual refractive error using vector analysis. Methods: This retrospective pilot study analyzed 12 eyes of 8 patients with severe corneal ectasia fitted with scleral lenses in Indonesia. Refractive outcomes were converted to Thibos power vectors (M, J0, J45). To account for bilateral eye correlations, linear mixed models (LMM) were employed with Patient ID as a random effect. A theoretical thick-lens model compared predicted versus observed over-refraction. Results: The cohort (mean age 28 ± 10.2 years) achieved significant visual improvement (LogMAR 0.35 to 0.17; p = 0.005). The mean tear reservoir thickness was 263.33 ± 80.92 μm. LMM analysis revealed no statistically significant correlation between fluid thickness and Spherical Equivalent (M) (beta = -0.001, p = 0.72) or Blur Strength (p = 0.68). The theoretical model indicated that residual error was driven by uncorrected posterior corneal astigmatism rather than fluid depth. Conclusion: In this Indonesian cohort, optical efficacy was driven by refractive index matching at the corneal interface, not reservoir thickness. Clinical fitting should prioritize physiological clearance over refractive manipulation.

Filter by Year

2017 2025


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 9 No. 12 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 11 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 10 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 9 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 8 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 7 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 6 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 5 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 4 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 3 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 12 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 11 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 10 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 9 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 8 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 7 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 6 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 5 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 4 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 3 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 12 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 11 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 10 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 18 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 17 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 9 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 8 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 7 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 6 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 5 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 4 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 3 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 16 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 15 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 14 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 13 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 12 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 11 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 10 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 9 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 8 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 7 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 6 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 5 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 4 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 3 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 12 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 11 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 10 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 9 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 8 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 7 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 6 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 5 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 4 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 3 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 2 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 4 No. 4 (2020): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 4 No. 3 (2020): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 4 No. 2 (2020): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 4 No. 1 (2020): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 3 No. 4 (2019): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 3 No. 3 (2019): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 3 No. 2 (2019): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 3 No. 1 (2019): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 2 No. 4 (2018): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 2 No. 3 (2018): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 2 No. 2 (2018): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 2 No. 1 (2018): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 1 No. 1 (2017): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research More Issue