cover
Contact Name
Rachmat Hidayat
Contact Email
dr.rachmat.hidayat@gmail.com
Phone
+6281949581088
Journal Mail Official
editor.bioscmed@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Sirna Raga no 99, 8 Ilir, Ilir Timur 3, Palembang
Location
Kota palembang,
Sumatera selatan
INDONESIA
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research
Published by HM Publisher
ISSN : -     EISSN : 25980580     DOI : https://doi.org/10.37275/bsm
Core Subject : Health, Science,
This journal welcomes the submission of articles that offering a sensible transfer of basic research to applied clinical medicine. BioScientia Medicina covers the latest developments in various fields of biomedicine with special attention to : 1.Rhemumatology 2.Molecular aspect of Indonesia Traditional Herb 3.Cardiology and Cardiovascular diseases 4.Genetics 5.Immunology 6.Environmental health 7.Toxicology 8. Neurology 9. Pharmacology 10. Oncology 11. Other multidisciplinary studies related medicine. The views of experts on current advances in nanotechnology and molecular/cell biology will be also considered for publication as long as they have a direct clinical impact on human health.
Articles 1,165 Documents
Adaptive Radiotherapy (ART) versus Non-Adaptive IMRT for Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis of Dosimetric Advantages, Clinical Outcomes, and Organ-at-Risk Sparing Gina Amalia; Yan Wisnu Prajoko; Niken Puruhita
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i1.1488

Abstract

Background: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is the cornerstone of treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), offering high dose conformity. However, anatomical variations during the multi-week therapy course can compromise dosimetric accuracy. Adaptive radiotherapy (ART), which adjusts the treatment plan based on intra-treatment imaging, aims to mitigate these effects. This meta-analysis synthesized contemporary comparative evidence (2014–2025) on the efficacy and safety of ART versus non-adaptive IMRT in locoregionally advanced NPC. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies comparing ART with non-adaptive IMRT (cohorts or hybrid/phantom plan comparisons) in locoregionally advanced NPC. Primary outcomes were locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS); secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and dosimetric metrics for targets (D98, Conformity Index [CI]) and organs-at-risk (OARs: parotid Dmean, spinal cord Dmax, brainstem Dmax). Hazard Ratios (HR) and Mean Differences (MD) were pooled using random-effects models. Data estimation methods (Tierney, Wan, Cochrane) were employed where necessary. Heterogeneity was assessed using I². Results: Nine studies (2 cohort, 7 dosimetric/anatomical) involving 362 patients (clinical) and 215 datasets (dosimetric) were included. ART significantly improved LRFS compared to non-adaptive IMRT (pooled HR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.32–0.88; I²=0%). No significant differences were found for OS (HR=0.98, 95% CI 0.64–1.50), PFS (HR=0.70, 95% CI 0.45–1.07), or DMFS (HR=0.88, 95% CI 0.48–1.62). Compared to hybrid/phantom plans, ART significantly enhanced target coverage (pooled PTV D98 MD = 2.15 Gy, 95% CI 1.10–3.20 Gy; I²=78%) and conformity (pooled CI MD = 0.05, 95% CI 0.02–0.08; I²=85%). ART significantly reduced OAR doses: parotid Dmean (pooled MD = -3.50 Gy, 95% CI -4.95 to -2.05 Gy; I²=90%), spinal cord Dmax (pooled MD = -3.95 Gy, 95% CI -5.80 to -2.10 Gy; I²=93%), and brainstem Dmax (pooled MD = -2.75 Gy, 95% CI -4.40 to -1.10 Gy; I²=91%). Dosimetric analyses exhibited high heterogeneity. Conclusion: ART significantly improves LRFS in locoregionally advanced NPC compared to non-adaptive IMRT. It provides substantial dosimetric advantages, enhancing target coverage and conformity while critically reducing doses to parotid glands, spinal cord, and brainstem. Despite high dosimetric heterogeneity and no demonstrated OS benefit, the improvements in LRFS and dose delivery support the thoughtful implementation of ART.
Bridging the Therapeutic Gap: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy, Safety, and Pathophysiological Impact of Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate in Enabling Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Edy Nur Rachman; Ian Effendi; Zulkhair Ali; Novadian; Suprapti
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i1.1489

Abstract

Background: Hyperkalemia is a life-threatening complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and heart failure (HF), primarily impeding the use of life-saving renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi). This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the evidence for sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) in managing hyperkalemia and enabling RAASi therapy. Methods: This systematic review searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL to September 2025. Dual reviewers independently screened, extracted data, and assessed bias (Cochrane RoB 2, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale). We included RCTs and observational studies of SZC in adults with hyperkalemia. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed on RCTs reporting maintenance-phase efficacy and safety. Results: The search yielded 1,254 citations, with 6 pivotal studies included. The meta-analysis of 3 RCTs found that SZC (5-10g daily) was significantly more effective than placebo at maintaining normokalemia over 12-28 days. The pooled mean difference in serum K+ was -0.58 mEq/L (95% CI: -0.65 to -0.51; I2 = 0%). SZC did increase the risk of edema (pooled Risk Ratio: 2.95; 95% CI: 1.51 to 5.76; I2 = 0%). The narrative synthesis of observational data confirmed that SZC use was associated with a >2.5-fold increase in the likelihood of continuing RAASi therapy. Conclusion: Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate is a highly effective and rapidly acting agent for both acute correction and chronic management of hyperkalemia. Our meta-analysis provides a precise estimate of its high maintenance-phase efficacy. Its primary clinical benefit lies in providing a renal-independent pathway for potassium excretion, thereby "uncoupling" potassium levels from RAASi use and bridging a critical treatment gap.
Beyond Glycemia: Independent Hemodynamic and Metabolic Drivers of Incident Diabetic Kidney Disease in a 5-Year Prospective Indonesian Primary Care Cohort Juliana; Nelly
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i1.1490

Abstract

Background: The relative contributions of hyperglycemia, hypertension, and metabolic adiposity to the progression of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) are debated, particularly in Southeast Asian populations and in the context of modern polypharmacy. We aimed to prospectively quantify the independent impact of glycemic burden, hemodynamic stress, and central adiposity on the 5-year incidence of DKD in an Indonesian primary care cohort. Methods: We conducted a 5-year, multi-center, prospective cohort study at 25 primary care clinics in Indonesia. We randomly sampled and enrolled 1,250 T2DM patients without pre-existing DKD (eGFR > 60 mL/min/1.73m² and normoalbuminuria). The primary composite outcome was incident DKD, defined as persistent albuminuria (ACR ≥ 30 mg/g on 2 of 3 occasions) or a sustained eGFR decline of ≥ 30%. Baseline predictors included HbA1c, Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), and Waist-to-Height Ratio (WHtR). Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models were used to estimate Hazard Ratios (HRs), adjusting for demographics, baseline eGFR, and baseline use of RAAS inhibitors (RAASi) and SGLT2 inhibitors. Results: Of 1,250 participants, 980 (78.4%) completed the 5-year follow-up. Over a median 4.9 years, 215 participants (21.9%) developed the composite DKD outcome. In the fully-adjusted multivariable Cox model, all three pathways were strong, independent predictors of incident DKD. The standardized HR for SBP (per 1-SD increase) was 1.68 (95% CI: 1.40–2.01; p<0.001), for HbA1c (per 1-SD increase) was 1.45 (95% CI: 1.22–1.73; p<0.001), and for WHtR (per 1-SD increase) was 1.39 (95% CI: 1.18–1.65; p<0.001). Conclusion: In this prospective primary care cohort, hemodynamic stress (SBP), glycemic burden (HbA1c), and metabolic adiposity (WHtR) were all independent, potent drivers of incident DKD, even after controlling for the use of protective cardio-renal medications. These findings confirm that a multi-pillar strategy, aggressively targeting blood pressure, glucose, and weight/metabolic health simultaneously, is essential for DKD prevention.
Modulation of TGF-β/Smad and Nrf2 Signaling Pathways by Thymoquinone in the Attenuation of Renal Fibrosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pre-clinical Models Chairil Makky; Ian Effendi; Zulkhair Ali; Novadian; Suprapti
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i1.1491

Abstract

Background: Renal fibrosis is the irreversible, final common pathway for all progressive forms of chronic kidney disease (CKD), leading to end-stage renal disease. Its pathogenesis is characterized by the over-activation of pro-fibrotic signaling, chiefly the Transforming Growth Factor-beta (TGF-β)/Smad pathway, and the failure of endogenous cytoprotective mechanisms like the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) antioxidant response. Thymoquinone (TQ), the primary bioactive constituent of Nigella sativa, is a pleiotropic compound with known anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. This study was designed to systematically quantify its mechanistic efficacy in modulating the core Nrf2 and TGF-β pathways in established pre-clinical models of renal fibrosis and injury. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. We performed a comprehensive search of major databases (including PubMed and Scopus) for pre-clinical in vivo studies published between 2014 and 2025 that investigated TQ monotherapy or TQ-dominant combination therapy in rodent models of renal injury. The eight studies that met the inclusion criteria utilized diverse models: Unilateral Ureteral Obstruction (UUO), cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity, gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-induced acute kidney injury (AKI), lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammation, carfilzomib (CFZ)-induced renal impairment, and ischemia-reperfusion (IRI). Primary outcomes were the expression of renal Nrf2 and TGF-β1. Secondary outcomes included markers of fibrosis (collagen deposition, histology scores), renal function (BUN, creatinine), oxidative stress (MDA, SOD, GSH, CAT), and inflammation (TNF-α, NF-κB, IL-6, IL-1β). Data were pooled using a random-effects model, and primary analyses were stratified by injury model subgroup. Results: Thymoquinone treatment resulted in a profound and significant upregulation of the protective Nrf2 pathway (SMD: 2.38; 95% CI [1.05, 3.71]; p < 0.001; 3 studies) and its downstream target Heme Oxygenase-1 (HO-1). Concurrently, TQ treatment markedly suppressed the primary pro-fibrotic driver, TGF-β1 (SMD: -2.09; 95% CI [-2.99, -1.19]; p < 0.001; 2 studies). This pivotal dual modulation translated into significant functional and structural improvements. TQ robustly attenuated renal fibrosis scores (SMD: -1.89; 95% CI [-2.55, -1.23]; p < 0.001; 2 studies). Stratified subgroup analysis showed TQ significantly improved renal function in both chemotoxic AKI models (BUN SMD: -2.31; 95% CI [-3.22, -1.40]) and chronic obstructive/fibrosis models (BUN SMD: -1.17; 95% CI [-1.75, -0.59]). This functional protection was underpinned by potent, broad-spectrum reversal of oxidative stress and inflammation across all subgroups. Conclusion: Thymoquinone consistently ameliorates renal injury and fibrosis across a wide spectrum of pre-clinical models. Its mechanism of action is multifaceted, critically involving the dual modulation of opposing pro-fibrotic and protective pathways: it suppresses the TGF-β1 cascade while simultaneously activating and restoring the Nrf2 antioxidant response. This body of evidence strongly supports Thymoquinone as a high-potential candidate for translational research and development as a novel, network-targeting therapy for human renal fibrosis.
Beyond Phosphate Binding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of the Novel Paracellular Phosphate Inhibitor, Tenapanor, for Hyperphosphatemia in Dialysis Patients Eva Julita; Ian Effendi; Zulkhair Ali; Novadian; Suprapti
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i1.1492

Abstract

Background: Hyperphosphatemia is a critical driver of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing dialysis. Current management, reliant on phosphate binders, is hampered by high pill burden and poor adherence. Tenapanor, a first-in-class, minimally-absorbed sodium/hydrogen exchanger 3 (NHE3) inhibitor, reduces paracellular phosphate absorption. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all available Phase 3 trials to quantify its efficacy and safety. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL through October 2025 for Phase 3 clinical trials evaluating tenapanor for hyperphosphatemia in dialysis patients. Data were extracted from 6 eligible studies (N=1573). We conducted separate random-effects meta-analyses for different study designs: 1) parallel-group monotherapy vs. placebo, 2) withdrawal-design monotherapy vs. placebo, 3) parallel-group add-on therapy vs. placebo, and 4) safety (diarrhea incidence) vs. placebo. Efficacy was measured by Mean Difference (MD) in serum phosphate change; safety by Risk Ratio (RR). Results: Tenapanor demonstrated significant efficacy across all study designs. In parallel-group monotherapy (1 study, N=167), tenapanor was superior to placebo (MD: -1.89 mg/dL; 95% CI: -2.36 to -1.42). In withdrawal-design studies (2 RCTs, N=373), tenapanor maintained serum phosphate levels significantly better than placebo (Pooled MD: -0.75 mg/dL; 95% CI: -1.05 to -0.45; I2=0%). As an add-on therapy (1 RCT, N=235), tenapanor provided additional phosphate reduction versus binders alone (MD: -0.65 mg/dL; 95% CI: -0.96 to -0.35). Tenapanor significantly increased the risk of diarrhea versus placebo (3 RCTs, N=521; Pooled RR: 4.10; 95% CI: 2.50 to 6.72; I2=30%), which was the primary adverse event leading to discontinuation. Conclusion: Tenapanor represents a new mechanistic paradigm for hyperphosphatemia management. It is a highly effective phosphate-lowering agent, both as monotherapy and add-on therapy, but is associated with a significant, mechanism-based risk of gastrointestinal side effects.
Complete Clinical and Trichoscopic Remission of Refractory Patch Alopecia Areata with a Multi-Modal Microneedling and Vitamin D3 Protocol: A Case Report Stephanie Lukita; Ferra Olivia Mawu; Thigita Aga Pandaleke
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i1.1493

Abstract

Background: Refractory patch alopecia areata (AA) presents a significant therapeutic challenge, as many patients fail first-line treatments. This gap necessitates the exploration of novel, mechanistically-targeted therapeutic strategies. Case presentation: We present the case of a 44-year-old female with a 2.5 × 3.0 cm patch of AA, refractory to a 3-month compliant trial of topical 0.25% desoximetasone and 5% minoxidil. Baseline diagnostics included histopathology (peribulbar lymphocytic infiltrate), quantitative trichoscopy (yellow dots, black dots, exclamation mark hairs), and laboratory workup, which revealed a serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] insufficiency (18.2 ng/mL). A multi-modal protocol was initiated: (1) systemic 5,000 IU/day oral cholecalciferol, (2) 10 sessions of 1.5 mm microneedling at two-week intervals, and (3) immediate post-procedure application of topical 100,000 IU cholecalciferol. Significant regrowth of pigmented terminal hairs was observed by week 12. After 20 weeks (10 sessions), complete clinical regrowth was achieved. Final quantitative trichoscopy confirmed the full resolution of all pathological markers, with a healthy density of terminal hairs. The patient’s systemic 25(OH)D level was corrected to 41.5 ng/mL. The treatment was well-tolerated. Conclusion: This case report documents a complete remission associated with a multi-modal protocol. The contribution of the systemic vitamin D repletion is a major, unresolvable confounder, making attribution impossible. However, this hypothesis-generating case suggests a combined (systemic, physical, and topical) approach may represent a potential rescue strategy for refractory patch AA, warranting further controlled investigation.
Efficacy, Safety, and Metabolic Effects of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin versus Unfractionated Heparin in Chronic Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies Evelin Veronike; Harnavi Harun; Drajad Priyono; Deka Viotra
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i1.1494

Abstract

Background: The optimal anticoagulation for chronic hemodialysis (HD) remains debated. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is the historical standard but carries risks of metabolic complications and requires intensive monitoring. Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin (LMWH) offers pharmacological advantages, but concerns over bleeding risk in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have limited its use. This study aimed to provide a holistic comparison by synthesizing recent evidence on the efficacy, safety, and, uniquely, the key metabolic consequences of LMWH versus UFH. Methods: This systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL from January 2014 to March 2025 for clinical studies comparing LMWH and UFH in chronic HD patients. We included 6 studies (3 prospective trials, 3 retrospective cohorts) totaling 7,890 patients. The primary efficacy outcome was circuit thrombosis; the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Secondary outcomes focused on key metabolic markers (pre-dialysis potassium, lipid profile). Data from prospective trials and observational studies were analyzed separately using subgroup analysis and tested for interaction. Metabolic data were pooled using a random-effects model. Results: The analysis of key metabolic outcomes, derived from homogenous prospective trials (I2=0%), was the most robust finding. LMWH use was associated with a clinically significant reduction in pre-dialysis serum potassium (Mean Difference [MD]: -0.30 mEq/L; 95% CI: -0.50 to -0.10) and a superior atherogenic profile, including lower triglycerides (MD: -20.10 mg/dL) and higher HDL (MD: +4.50 mg/dL). For safety, no difference in major bleeding was found, a finding that was consistent across prospective trials (OR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.33-1.85) and large retrospective cohorts (OR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.69-1.09), with no subgroup interaction (p=0.75). Efficacy for preventing circuit thrombosis was also similar. Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides strong, high-quality evidence that LMWH confers significant and clinically relevant metabolic advantages over UFH, particularly in mitigating hyperkalemia and atherogenic dyslipidemia. Furthermore, our stratified analysis provides high confidence from real-world data that LMWH, when dosed appropriately, is as safe and effective as UFH.
Metastatic Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma Mimicking a Primary Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Shoulder: A Case Report Putri, Syifa Azizah; Kiki Akhmad Rizki; Rupita Endangena Sitanggang
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i1.1495

Abstract

Background: Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is a rare neuroendocrine malignancy accounting for 1-5% of thyroid cancers. While often presenting with cervical lymphadenopathy, distant metastasis to bone and soft tissue mimicking a primary sarcoma is exceptionally rare. This report details a case of MTC where the primary diagnostic challenge was a massive, destructive shoulder mass. Case presentation: A 58-year-old woman presented with a disabling, 20 cm mass in her left shoulder, progressively enlarging over two years. The patient also noted a 30-year history of a stable, asymptomatic neck lump. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) revealed a large, hypervascular, destructive mass obliterating the scapula and invading surrounding musculature, with a radiological differential diagnosis of a primary soft tissue sarcoma. Laboratory investigation, however, revealed a massively elevated serum calcitonin (>2000 pg/mL) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (180 ng/mL). A CT-guided core biopsy of the shoulder mass, initially suspected to be a sarcoma, was negative for all sarcoma markers. Instead, it was strongly positive for neuroendocrine (Synaptophysin, Chromogranin A) and thyroid-specific (TTF-1, PAX-8) markers, as well as definitive MTC markers (Calcitonin, CEA). This confirmed the diagnosis of metastatic MTC. Staging was completed as pT3a pN1b M1. The patient underwent total thyroidectomy with bilateral central and left modified radical neck dissection, followed by planned palliative resection of the shoulder metastasis and systemic therapy with a selective RET inhibitor. Conclusion: This case highlights a critical diagnostic pitfall. Metastatic MTC can present as a massive soft tissue neoplasm mimicking a primary sarcoma. In such cases, a systematic diagnostic approach combining serum biomarkers (Calcitonin, CEA) with a comprehensive immunohistochemical panel is essential to establish the correct diagnosis and initiate appropriate, life-extending targeted therapy.
Efficacy of the Full Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Secretome versus Purified Small Extracellular Vesicles in Preclinical Models of Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Parallel Meta-Analysis Victor Jeremia Syaropi Simanjuntak; Ishak Andreas Soritua Lumban Gaol; Erlangga Pradipta H; Dimas Sindhu Wibisono
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i1.1496

Abstract

Background: Acellular therapies from Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCs), including the full secretome (conditioned medium, CM) and purified small extracellular vesicles (sEVs), are promising restorative treatments for erectile dysfunction (ED). It remains unknown if the therapeutic benefit is driven by the complete secretome or if purified sEVs are the primary, sufficient component. This study aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze the preclinical evidence. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and parallel meta-analysis adhering to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from January 1st, 2014, to July 31st, 2025. Studies were eligible if they were preclinical ED models evaluating MSC-CM or purified sEVs against a control. Two parallel meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model. Primary outcomes were erectile function (Intracavernous Pressure / Mean Arterial Pressure ratio; ICP/MAP) and histopathology (Smooth Muscle / Collagen ratio; SM/Col). Results: Our search yielded 1,942 records, with 87 full-text articles assessed. After applying strict PICO criteria, 7 primary studies were eligible for the meta-analysis (3 secretome, 4 sEVs). The overall risk of bias was moderate to high (0% allocation concealment). No studies directly compared secretome versus sEVs. The first meta-analysis (Secretome vs. Control, 3 studies, 4 data points, n=70) demonstrated a large, significant improvement in ICP/MAP (Standardized Mean Difference [SMD]: 2.40; 95% CI [1.65, 3.15]; p-value < 0.001), with extreme heterogeneity (I-squared=85%). The second meta-analysis (sEVs vs. Control, 4 studies, n=68) also showed a large, significant improvement (SMD: 2.75; 95% CI [1.90, 3.60]; p-value < 0.001), also with extreme heterogeneity (I-squared=88%). Conclusion: Both the full MSC secretome and purified sEVs demonstrate large, significant therapeutic effects. However, this quantitative conclusion is severely limited by the exceptionally small number of studies and the profound biomolecular heterogeneity (in cell source and purification) that invalidates direct comparison. The primary finding remains the total lack of comparative data.
Inadequate Preoperative Assessment and Its Clinicopathological Correlates in Patients Referred for Completion Thyroidectomy: A Tertiary Referral Center Analysis Munawar; R Maman Abdurrahman
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i2.1497

Abstract

Background: Completion thyroidectomy (CT) for differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) is a high-risk procedure, frequently performed following an oncologically incomplete primary operation. This study characterizes the preoperative diagnostic assessment deficiencies in a cohort of DTC patients referred to a tertiary center for re-operation and identifies factors associated with residual disease. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center analysis of all patients who underwent CT for DTC at Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Indonesia, over a 30-month period (January 1st, 2023, to June 30th, 2025). Data on preoperative assessments at the referring hospitals (ultrasonography (US) quality, fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB), hormonal tests), primary surgical indications, and clinicopathological outcomes from both operations were extracted and analyzed using descriptive and bivariate statistics (Fisher's Exact Test). Results: A total of 27 patients met the inclusion criteria. Analysis of their initial workup revealed significant omissions: 14/27 (51.9%) lacked FNAB, and 5/27 (18.5%) lacked hormonal testing. While 24/27 (88.9%) underwent a primary US, only 20.8% of these reports (5/24) were ATA-compliant staging examinations. Only 5/27 patients (18.5%) received a complete trimodal assessment. Upon re-operation, 10/27 (37.0%) had residual carcinoma. This finding was significantly associated with the omission of primary FNAB (57.1% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.027). Conclusion: In this cohort of referred patients, incomplete preoperative assessment was nearly universal and strongly associated with adverse pathological findings. These data highlight the urgent need for standardized, evidence-based preoperative protocols and strengthened referral systems to ensure patients receive the correct primary operation.

Filter by Year

2017 2025


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 9 No. 12 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 11 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 10 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 9 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 8 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 7 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 6 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 5 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 4 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 3 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 12 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 11 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 10 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 9 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 8 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 7 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 6 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 5 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 4 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 3 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 12 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 11 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 10 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 18 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 17 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 9 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 8 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 7 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 6 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 5 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 4 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 3 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 16 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 15 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 14 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 13 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 12 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 11 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 10 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 9 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 8 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 7 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 6 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 5 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 4 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 3 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 12 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 11 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 10 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 9 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 8 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 7 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 6 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 5 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 4 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 3 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 2 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research Vol. 4 No. 4 (2020): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 4 No. 3 (2020): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 4 No. 2 (2020): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 4 No. 1 (2020): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 3 No. 4 (2019): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 3 No. 3 (2019): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 3 No. 2 (2019): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 3 No. 1 (2019): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 2 No. 4 (2018): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 2 No. 3 (2018): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 2 No. 2 (2018): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 2 No. 1 (2018): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 1 No. 1 (2017): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research More Issue