cover
Contact Name
Mulyati Khorina
Contact Email
mulyati.khorina@polban.ac.id
Phone
+6282240010419
Journal Mail Official
jurnalaplikasibhsinggris@polban.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Gegerkalong Hilir Desa Ciwaruga, Bandung, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
Location
Kota bandung,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Bahasa Inggris Terapan
ISSN : 24773352     EISSN : 27212890     DOI : https://doi.org/10.35313/jbit
Core Subject : Education,
Jurnal Bahasa Inggris Terapan covers the research on Applied English in  English Language Teaching, English Specific Purposes (ESP), English for Academic Purposes (EAP), Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), Discourse Analysis (DA), Digital Literacy, Information Communication Technology (ICT), Forensic Linguistics, English in Media, and Translation.  JBIT is a peer blind reviewed, a bilingual, and a semesterly journal.  
Articles 10 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 6 No 2 (2020): Oktober 2020" : 10 Documents clear
Students’ perception on the Digital Storytelling implementation on Developing the Writing Skills Sektalonir Oscarini Wati Bhakti
Jurnal Bahasa Inggris Terapan Vol 6 No 2 (2020): Oktober 2020
Publisher : Jurusan Bahasa Inggris - Politeknik Negeri Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (879.271 KB) | DOI: 10.35313/jbit.v6i2.2046

Abstract

This research tried to explore Civil Engineering students’ perception on the impact of Digital Storytelling strategy on developing the students’ writing skills. There were 48 participants from two classes in Civil Engineering Department in Politeknik Negeri Samarinda filled out the adopted questionnaires. The questionnaire was asked divided into two sections. The sections were the students’ perspective regarding the digital storytelling and the students’ writing. The results showed that 85% of the students agreed that Digital Storytelling helped them in the process of learning in the class. They found out that this strategy made them enjoy the class. And, whilst 88% of the participants agreed that the digital storytelling helped them to write well since they know the elements of writing. The keyword: Perception, digital storytelling, writing skills
THE INFLUENCE OF RUNNING DICTATION METHOD ON STUDENTS’ DESCRIPTIVE TEXT WRITING ABILITY Ela Nurmala
Jurnal Bahasa Inggris Terapan Vol 6 No 2 (2020): Oktober 2020
Publisher : Jurusan Bahasa Inggris - Politeknik Negeri Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (577.762 KB) | DOI: 10.35313/jbit.v6i2.2281

Abstract

This research was intended to find out whether or not there was a significant influence of running dictation on students’ descriptive text writing ability and to find out students’ responses toward running dictation method used for improving students in writing descriptive text. The research methodology was a quasi-experimental design. The population of this research was the tenth-grade students during the first semester of SMA Negeri 1 Jalan Cagak. The data from pre-test and post-test were analyzed by using SPSS 22.00. The data from questionnaires were analyzed by using a Likert Scale. The computation results of Independent Sample t-test it was obtained that Sig = 0.006 and α = 0.05. It means Ha is accepted because Sig < α = 0.05. It can be concluded there is a significant influence of running dictation method on students’ descriptive text writing ability. Furthermore, the results of questionnaires showed that most of the students (80%) gave positive responses toward running dictation method in writing descriptive text. It can be put forward that Running Dictation is effectively used for teaching writing descriptive text, the students are motivated, enjoyable to learn and their interest through English learning especially writing is rising.
Grammatical Errors on EFL Students’ Final Project Writings Zewitra; Poppy Fauziah
Jurnal Bahasa Inggris Terapan Vol 6 No 2 (2020): Oktober 2020
Publisher : Jurusan Bahasa Inggris - Politeknik Negeri Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (804.26 KB) | DOI: 10.35313/jbit.v6i2.2287

Abstract

Making errors is an unavoidable part of learning a new language, especially for those who do not use that new language as their first medium of communication. Writing in a foreign language can be a considerably tough challenge for EFL learners, one of the problems is regarding the grammatical rules. This present study attempts to discover and analyze the grammatical errors found in EFL students’ final project writing. It employed a descriptive qualitative method using a textual analysis process by adopting the theory of Dulay et al regarding grammatical error analysis. (Dulay et al., 1982) classify grammatical errors into four; omission, addition, misformation, and misordering. Five students’ final projects with a total number of 2884 sentences became the object of this research. The final projects were taken from Politeknik Negeri Bandung (Polban) English Department graduates of 2018 and they were limited to the project of ‘Travel Writing’ only. Travel Writing was chosen due to the fact that it contains more various types of sentences, more complicated sentence structure, and higher level of language modification. The results of this study claim that all types of grammatical errors presented by Dulay et al are found in those five students’ final projects. Misformation is the most frequent error the students made in producing their travel writing products by 74% (380 out of 516 errors) while misordering is the least one by 1% (7 out of 516 errors). Theoretically, the findings can be a base for the next researchers to further analyze the cause of this error production. Meanwhile, practically the results can be used by curriculum makers as a guide to evaluate and develop new curriculum, syllabus, materials, and teaching methods which are more suitable for EFL students in order to communicate effectively and write skillfully. Keywords: error analysis, grammatical error, writing, travel writing
Gender Differences in the Use of Hedging devices in Students’ Conversations Ratna Trihartanti
Jurnal Bahasa Inggris Terapan Vol 6 No 2 (2020): Oktober 2020
Publisher : Jurusan Bahasa Inggris - Politeknik Negeri Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (746.823 KB) | DOI: 10.35313/jbit.v6i2.2303

Abstract

To minimize conflict that might happen during conversation, and one of the tools is hedging. In fact, there are some differences in using hedging between female and male students; therefore, this study is conducted with aims: first is to identify what types of hedging used by female and male students, and the second is to analyze gender differences in using hedging, and the third is to analyze the function of hedges used by students. This research uses a qualitative method and the data taken from 24 female students of the English department, and 24 students of Electrical engineering. Having been analyzed, it could be found out that hedges used by female English students are: plausibility shields (30%), rounders (15%), adaptors (7%) attribute (4%) including hedges taken from negative politeness strategy such as: question, hedge (10%), and the imposition, Rx is (7%). The last hedges often used as discourse markers are: ‘Hmm’ (10%), ‘Well’ (7%) and ‘Oh’ (6%). On contrast, male students mostly applied hedges: plausibility shields (12%), rounders (5%), adaptor (4%), attribute (4%). from negative politeness strategy, question, hedge to express politeness by using indirect question (7%), and the imposition, Rx to decrease the imposition of utterance (4%). Male students also apply some discourse markers as hedges such as: ‘well’ (12%), ‘Oh’ (6%) and ‘Hmm’ (5%). From the research it is also found that female students often show their hesitations, use long utterances while male students try to show their self-confidence, and they mostly utter to the point.
Modality in Donald Trump’s Speech on Iran’s Nuclear Deal Raden Rosyda Rosyda; Heriyanto; Elvi Citraresmana
Jurnal Bahasa Inggris Terapan Vol 6 No 2 (2020): Oktober 2020
Publisher : Jurusan Bahasa Inggris - Politeknik Negeri Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (570.899 KB) | DOI: 10.35313/jbit.v6i2.2489

Abstract

This paper reports the study of Donald Trump’s Speech on Iran’s Nuclear Deal which focuses on the types of modality. In analyzing, the data are taken from Donald Trump’s Speech on Iran’s Nuclear Deal. This study employed the framework of modality proposed by Halliday and Matthiessen (2004). The results showed 30 clauses containing modality which may be classified into modalization and modulation. Modalization consists of probability and usuality, while modulation has obligation and inclination. The findings give an insight how a politician, such as Donald Trump applies modality in his speech.
Students’ perception on the Digital Storytelling implementation on Developing the Writing Skills Sektalonir Oscarini Wati Bhakti
Jurnal Bahasa Inggris Terapan Vol 6 No 2 (2020): Oktober 2020
Publisher : Jurusan Bahasa Inggris - Politeknik Negeri Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35313/jbit.v6i2.2046

Abstract

This research tried to explore Civil Engineering students’ perception on the impact of Digital Storytelling strategy on developing the students’ writing skills. There were 48 participants from two classes in Civil Engineering Department in Politeknik Negeri Samarinda filled out the adopted questionnaires. The questionnaire was asked divided into two sections. The sections were the students’ perspective regarding the digital storytelling and the students’ writing. The results showed that 85% of the students agreed that Digital Storytelling helped them in the process of learning in the class. They found out that this strategy made them enjoy the class. And, whilst 88% of the participants agreed that the digital storytelling helped them to write well since they know the elements of writing. The keyword: Perception, digital storytelling, writing skills
THE INFLUENCE OF RUNNING DICTATION METHOD ON STUDENTS’ DESCRIPTIVE TEXT WRITING ABILITY Ela Nurmala
Jurnal Bahasa Inggris Terapan Vol 6 No 2 (2020): Oktober 2020
Publisher : Jurusan Bahasa Inggris - Politeknik Negeri Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35313/jbit.v6i2.2281

Abstract

This research was intended to find out whether or not there was a significant influence of running dictation on students’ descriptive text writing ability and to find out students’ responses toward running dictation method used for improving students in writing descriptive text. The research methodology was a quasi-experimental design. The population of this research was the tenth-grade students during the first semester of SMA Negeri 1 Jalan Cagak. The data from pre-test and post-test were analyzed by using SPSS 22.00. The data from questionnaires were analyzed by using a Likert Scale. The computation results of Independent Sample t-test it was obtained that Sig = 0.006 and α = 0.05. It means Ha is accepted because Sig < α = 0.05. It can be concluded there is a significant influence of running dictation method on students’ descriptive text writing ability. Furthermore, the results of questionnaires showed that most of the students (80%) gave positive responses toward running dictation method in writing descriptive text. It can be put forward that Running Dictation is effectively used for teaching writing descriptive text, the students are motivated, enjoyable to learn and their interest through English learning especially writing is rising.
Grammatical Errors on EFL Students’ Final Project Writings Zewitra; Poppy Fauziah
Jurnal Bahasa Inggris Terapan Vol 6 No 2 (2020): Oktober 2020
Publisher : Jurusan Bahasa Inggris - Politeknik Negeri Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35313/jbit.v6i2.2287

Abstract

Making errors is an unavoidable part of learning a new language, especially for those who do not use that new language as their first medium of communication. Writing in a foreign language can be a considerably tough challenge for EFL learners, one of the problems is regarding the grammatical rules. This present study attempts to discover and analyze the grammatical errors found in EFL students’ final project writing. It employed a descriptive qualitative method using a textual analysis process by adopting the theory of Dulay et al regarding grammatical error analysis. (Dulay et al., 1982) classify grammatical errors into four; omission, addition, misformation, and misordering. Five students’ final projects with a total number of 2884 sentences became the object of this research. The final projects were taken from Politeknik Negeri Bandung (Polban) English Department graduates of 2018 and they were limited to the project of ‘Travel Writing’ only. Travel Writing was chosen due to the fact that it contains more various types of sentences, more complicated sentence structure, and higher level of language modification. The results of this study claim that all types of grammatical errors presented by Dulay et al are found in those five students’ final projects. Misformation is the most frequent error the students made in producing their travel writing products by 74% (380 out of 516 errors) while misordering is the least one by 1% (7 out of 516 errors). Theoretically, the findings can be a base for the next researchers to further analyze the cause of this error production. Meanwhile, practically the results can be used by curriculum makers as a guide to evaluate and develop new curriculum, syllabus, materials, and teaching methods which are more suitable for EFL students in order to communicate effectively and write skillfully. Keywords: error analysis, grammatical error, writing, travel writing
Gender Differences in the Use of Hedging devices in Students’ Conversations Ratna Trihartanti
Jurnal Bahasa Inggris Terapan Vol 6 No 2 (2020): Oktober 2020
Publisher : Jurusan Bahasa Inggris - Politeknik Negeri Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35313/jbit.v6i2.2303

Abstract

To minimize conflict that might happen during conversation, and one of the tools is hedging. In fact, there are some differences in using hedging between female and male students; therefore, this study is conducted with aims: first is to identify what types of hedging used by female and male students, and the second is to analyze gender differences in using hedging, and the third is to analyze the function of hedges used by students. This research uses a qualitative method and the data taken from 24 female students of the English department, and 24 students of Electrical engineering. Having been analyzed, it could be found out that hedges used by female English students are: plausibility shields (30%), rounders (15%), adaptors (7%) attribute (4%) including hedges taken from negative politeness strategy such as: question, hedge (10%), and the imposition, Rx is (7%). The last hedges often used as discourse markers are: ‘Hmm’ (10%), ‘Well’ (7%) and ‘Oh’ (6%). On contrast, male students mostly applied hedges: plausibility shields (12%), rounders (5%), adaptor (4%), attribute (4%). from negative politeness strategy, question, hedge to express politeness by using indirect question (7%), and the imposition, Rx to decrease the imposition of utterance (4%). Male students also apply some discourse markers as hedges such as: ‘well’ (12%), ‘Oh’ (6%) and ‘Hmm’ (5%). From the research it is also found that female students often show their hesitations, use long utterances while male students try to show their self-confidence, and they mostly utter to the point.
Modality in Donald Trump’s Speech on Iran’s Nuclear Deal Raden Rosyda Rosyda; Heriyanto; Elvi Citraresmana
Jurnal Bahasa Inggris Terapan Vol 6 No 2 (2020): Oktober 2020
Publisher : Jurusan Bahasa Inggris - Politeknik Negeri Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35313/jbit.v6i2.2489

Abstract

This paper reports the study of Donald Trump’s Speech on Iran’s Nuclear Deal which focuses on the types of modality. In analyzing, the data are taken from Donald Trump’s Speech on Iran’s Nuclear Deal. This study employed the framework of modality proposed by Halliday and Matthiessen (2004). The results showed 30 clauses containing modality which may be classified into modalization and modulation. Modalization consists of probability and usuality, while modulation has obligation and inclination. The findings give an insight how a politician, such as Donald Trump applies modality in his speech.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 10