Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

All

Jurnal Konstitusi

jk
Website

Published by Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

ISSN : 18297706 EISSN : 25481657 DOI : https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1841

Core Subject : Humanities, Social,

Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Constitutional Law and another section related contemporary issues in law.

Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum

Articles 584 Documents

7 8 9 10 11

Pengaruh Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi di Bidang Pengujian Undang-Undang terhadap Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia dengan Perubahan KUHAP Muhammad Fatahillah Akbar
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 16, No 3 (2019)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Sistem peradilan pidana melingkupi wilayah formulasi, aplikasi, dan eksekusi. Proses aplikasi dipengaruhi besar oleh formulasi hukum acara pidana yang dikodifikasi ke dalam KUHAP. Sejak MK berdiri dengan kewenangan menguji Undang-Undang terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar, KUHAP telah diuji beberapa kali di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Artikel ini memiliki tujuan untuk menelusuri, mengkaji, dan menjelaskan berbagai putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi di bidang pengujian undang-undang yang berpengaruh terhadap perkembangan hukum pidana formil di Indonesia. Artikel ini disusun atas hasil penelitian hukum normatif yang menggunakan data sekunder berupa bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder dan bahan hukum tersier. Cara pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan penelitian kepustakaan, sedangkan alat pengumpulan data menggunakan studi dokumen. Analisis data dilakukan secara kualitatif dengan pemaparan secara deskriptif analitis. Artikel ini memberikan dua kesimpulan. Pertama, penelusuran Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang dilakukan sejak tahun 2003 sampai dengan 2018 menunjukkan bahwa terdapat 32 (tiga puluh dua) permohonan uji materi terhadap hukum pidana formil. Namun demikian, hanya terdapat 13 (tiga belas) permohonan uji materi terhadap hukum pidana formil yang dikabulkan oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi berkaitan dengan KUHAP. Kedua, terhadap beberapa putusan MK, Mahkamah Agung membuat Perma atau SEMA untuk menyimpangi putusan MK tersebut. The article aims to examine all relevant constitutional court decisions which have impacts on criminal laws, especially in substantive, procedural, and penitentiary law. The article is based on a legal normative research employing secondary data, including primary legal sources, secondary legal sources, and tertiary legal sources. The method in collecting the data is library research. The research tools are documentary studies. The analysis is qualitative which is strengthened by descriptive analysis. There are two conclusive statements of this research. Firstly, the finding on constitutional court decisions showed that 32 (thirty-two) decisions were made for procedural criminal law, but only 13 (thirteen) decisions were in line with the applicants’ objectives which are mainly related to Criminal Procedural Code (KUHAP). Secondly, Supreme Court produced Perma or SEMA which overruled the Constitutional Court decisions.

Konstitusionalitas dan Model Pendidikan Karakter Bangsa Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Bayu Dwi Anggono
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 11, No 3 (2014)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Constitutional Court Decision No. 100/PUU-XI/2013 stated that Pancasila as a basic state declared in the the 1945 preamble can not be equated with the 1945 Constitution, Unity in Diversity, and the Unitary State of Indonesia declared as the pillars of the nation and state as cited in the Article 34 paragraph (3b) letter a. Considering the benefits of the nation’s effort to build a character, the Constitutional Court declared constitutional effort of political parties and other state agencies that carry out political education through the dissemination of Pancasila, the 1945 Constitution, Unity in Diversity. The Court sets a model of character education necessary to be developed which is not limited in the for pillars but it includes some other aspects such as the state of law, sovereignty, an insight of archipelago, national defense, and so forth. The government basically hold the primary responsibility for implementing character education for its citizens. Thus, the government needs to consider of alternatives to establish a special agency to formulate and implement effective national character education.

Menggagas Pemilihan Presiden yang Demokratis dan Aspiratif Umbu Rauta
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 11, No 3 (2014)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Since the 2004, election of the president and vice president made directly by the people. Normatively, Indonesia has been striving for election of the president and vice president are more democratic, as reflected through the freedom and the involvement of a political party or coalition of political parties contesting the election to carry the presidential and vice presidential candidates meet all the requirements specified in the legislation. However, in practice the presidential election in 2004 and 2009, found several problems. This paper is intended to identify a number of election issues, once initiated the implementation of a formula for the realization of a more democratic election and aspirative.

Dilematika Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi vs Kekuatan Politik dalam Impeachment Presiden Nadir Nadir
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 9, No 2 (2012)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

The involvement of the constitutional court of RI in examining and ruling on the case of presidential impeachment is textually not the authority but obligation that whether or not presidential impeachment happen during president’s terms of office will be determined by the supporting political strength in the MPR session. The decision taken in the session should be based on the decision of Constitutional Court as the interpreter and the guardian of the constitution. This condition causes Constitutional Court decision becomes dillematic because it will be determined by the political strength in the session of the MPR. Besides,the fact that three of the nine judges are proposed by the President and three other are proposed by DPR is also dilemmatic.

Perlindungan Hak Atas Kebebasan Beragama dan Beribadah dalam Negara Hukum Indonesia Fatmawati Fatmawati
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 8, No 4 (2011)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

The first principle of Pancasila recognized God Almighty, which means the duty of every man in Indonesia to respect the religion and beliefs of others, because it is everyone’s right to choose, embrace, and practice the teachings of their religion freely without interference and without disturbing others. It means not only ban unethical proselytism, but also ban desecration and abuse of religion in the Republic of Indonesia to protect security and public order to avoid unrest in society. It is set in the first principle of Pancasila and was animated in articles of the Constitution (Article 28E Paragraph (1) and Article 29) regulating the right of religion and worship, which is then further regulated in some legislations, among other Law Number 39 Year 1999 on Human Rights and Law No. 1/PNPS/1965 on the Prevention of Abuse and / or Blasphemy. Restrictions on the freedom to perform and determine one’s religion or belief under article 18 paragraph (3) of the ICCPR can only be limited by provisions of law, and it is needed to protect public safety, order, health, or morals of the fundamental rights and freedoms of others; and the regulation in Article 11 of Law No. 1/ PNPS/1965 has met the criteria for the application of restrictions on the freedom to perform and determine one’s religion or beliefs, in the sense that the restriction is the conduct of the teaching and not in his belief, by law, and to protect security and public order to avoid unrest in society.

Politik Deliberatif dalam Musyawarah Perencanaan Pembangunan: Analisis Structures and Meanings Atas PP RI No. 28/2008 Fahrul Muzaqqi
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 10, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

The atmosphere of Indonesian democratic decentralization presents an interesting phenomenon about the strength of demand at the local level participation. Participation was on its way, legally enshrined in both the legal basis, namely PP RI No. 8 Year 2008 about stage, preparation procedures, control and evaluation of Regional Development Plan (in legal terminology known as Musrenbang). That's where the participation is so arranged that it gains the spirit of development planning in local areas level with the hope that it will combine top-down and bottom-up approaches. This study focuses on efforts to analyze the two legal basis from the perspective of theory and practice of deliberative democracy in which participation based on inter-subjective communication is at the heart of modern democratic state.In search of the analysis, the findings are somewhat surprising. Those are that in Musrenbang, the nuance was still top-down so that they are not worthy to be equated with the theory and practice of deliberative democracy. That top-down shade includes the initial planning, control and evaluation of which are still very elitist. In terms of the arrangement of initial planning for development either RPJPD, RPJMD or RKPD is conducted by the Regional Development Planning Agency. In terms of control, officials from the home affairs ministry level to regent/mayor including Bappeda are involved. In all the stages, the people are involved but only to give input. While in the case of the evaluation, the greatest authority remains in the hands of the relevant authorities at every level of government. People have the chance to evaluate only as far as they have accurate information. In other words, people will find it hard to participate and evaluate the planning that has been done since the standard of accuracy of the information is still determined by the government.As a result, using the structures and meanings analysis, this thesis research confirms that the standards of deliberative democracy need to thrust into the legal basis governing participation in development planning so that decisions resulting in better planning could reflect the aspirations of the people. However, democracy is essentially regierung der regierten (rule of those who governed).

Problematika Penyelesaian Sengketa Hasil Pemilukada oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Hamdan Zoelva
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 10, No 3 (2013)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

When local election is stated as a part of the regime of general election law based on Article 236C of Law No. 12 Year 2008 on Local Government, the authority to settle the dispute on it was transferred from the Supreme Court to Constitutional Court. In the course of its development, the authority of the Court to decide local election dispute does not lie on textual interpretation only which merely rules on the dispute concerning the result of the election but also on the violations which happened during the election process. It is the constitutional obligation of the Court which basically has the purpose to ensure that fair and just election can be held. In practice, lots of problems arose in the organization of the election either concerning regulation, organization or law enforcement. From the Court side, lots of challenges and obstacles are also faced in settling election dispute. However, that situation does not deter the Court from making legal breakthrough to mend and improve local election system. The steps taken by the Constitutional Court precisely become inevitable and show to a greater extent its character as a court for constitutional matters with the authority to enforce law and justice as stipulated by the Constitution.

Kedudukan Outsourcing Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi nomor 27/PUU-IX/2011 Khairani Khairani
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 11, No 4 (2014)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

The presence of the labor law is often challenged by the supporters of the interests primarily of the workers, particularly with regard to setting Outsourcing Employment Agreement in Indonesia. The reason the opponents are, among others, that the outsourcing arrangement only exploit and marginalize the humanity of those who have been guaranteed by the constitution. Various attempts have them do to rule as discriminatory was removed from employment practices in Indonesia, including the choice of law rules of the test material to the Constitutional Court. Finally, through Decision of The Constitutional Court No. 27/PUU-IX/2011, the Court granted the petition of workers by declaring unconstitutional some provisions of the Employment Agreement Outsourcing. In addressing the decision of the Court, the Government through the Ministry of Manpower publishes Permenakertrans No. 19, 2012. The problem is that the Constitutional Court’s decision should not be followed up with legislation level ministerial regulations. In addition, it violates the rules Permenakertrans the higher, the Manpower Act for doing addition and subtraction of the torso aforementioned law. Not only that, now, both the workers and the employers also feel is not in line with the employment agreement outsourcing arrangement within the meaning of the Permenakertrans.

Konstruksi Keyakinan Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Putusan Perselisihan Pemilukada Mariyadi Faqih
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 10, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

The fact is the basis of law for judges of the Constitutional Court in decisions. The fact is the law of another language of the evidence. The decision thus reflects the role of judges in unearthing, interpreting and discovering the laws (rechtsvinding) to resolve disputes elections of regional heads. The role of the judge is not out of conviction to assess the evidence. One of the tools of evidence that requires precision and accuracy in their assessments are witnesses, because witnesses can lie or correct the error and blamed the truth.

Hubungan Presiden dan DPR Saldi Isra
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 10, No 3 (2013)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Relation between executive and legislative tends to be intricate. Both parties often do not understand the functions and authorities of their respective institutions. At the end, disputes often emerge in playing their roles. This writing tries to discuss the problems concerning two state institutions: the President and the Parliament. The analysis will also address how both institutions manage themselves constitutionally in order not to solely immerse in political interests.

Page 9 of 59 | Total Record : 584

7 8 9 10 11

Filter by Year

2015 2024

Filter By Issues

All Issue Vol. 21 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 21 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 21 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 21 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 20 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 20 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 20 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 20 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 19 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 19 No. 3 (2022) Vol. 19 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 19 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 18 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 18 No. 3 (2021) Vol. 18 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 18 No. 1 (2021) Vol 17, No 4 (2020) Vol. 17 No. 4 (2020) Vol 17, No 3 (2020) Vol. 17 No. 2 (2020) Vol 17, No 2 (2020) Vol 17, No 1 (2020) Vol 16, No 4 (2019) Vol. 16 No. 4 (2019) Vol 16, No 3 (2019) Vol. 16 No. 3 (2019) Vol 16, No 2 (2019) Vol 16, No 1 (2019) Vol 15, No 4 (2018) Vol. 15 No. 4 (2018) Vol 15, No 3 (2018) Vol 15, No 2 (2018) Vol 15, No 1 (2018) Vol 14, No 4 (2017) Vol 14, No 3 (2017) Vol 14, No 2 (2017) Vol. 14 No. 1 (2017) Vol 14, No 1 (2017) Vol 13, No 4 (2016) Vol 13, No 3 (2016) Vol 13, No 2 (2016) Vol. 13 No. 2 (2016) Vol 13, No 1 (2016) Vol 11, No 4 (2014) Vol 11, No 3 (2014) Vol 11, No 2 (2014) Vol 11, No 1 (2014) Vol 10, No 4 (2013) Vol 10, No 3 (2013) Vol 10, No 2 (2013) Vol 10, No 1 (2013) Vol 9, No 4 (2012) Vol 9, No 3 (2012) Vol 9, No 2 (2012) Vol 9, No 1 (2012) Vol 8, No 6 (2011) Vol 8, No 5 (2011) Vol 8, No 4 (2011) Vol 8, No 3 (2011) Vol 8, No 2 (2011) Vol 8, No 1 (2011) Vol 7, No 6 (2010) Vol 7, No 5 (2010) Vol 7, No 4 (2010) Vol 7, No 3 (2010) Vol 7, No 2 (2010) Vol 7, No 1 (2010) Vol 12, No 4 (2015) Vol 12, No 3 (2015) Vol 12, No 2 (2015) Vol 12, No 1 (2015) More Issue

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name
Abdul Basid Fuadi

Contact Email
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Phone
+6281215312967

Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6, Jakarta 10110 Telp: (021) 23529000 Fax: (021) 3520177 E-mail: jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,

Dki jakarta

INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name Abdul Basid Fuadi

Contact Email jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Phone +6281215312967

Journal Mail Official jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6, Jakarta 10110 Telp: (021) 23529000 Fax: (021) 3520177 E-mail: jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Location Kota adm. jakarta pusat, Dki jakarta INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Contact Name
Abdul Basid Fuadi

Contact Email
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Phone
+6281215312967

Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6, Jakarta 10110 Telp: (021) 23529000 Fax: (021) 3520177 E-mail: jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,

Dki jakarta

INDONESIA