cover
Contact Name
Him'mawan Adi Nugroho
Contact Email
himmwannugroho@unesa.ac.id
Phone
+6281334244887
Journal Mail Official
evarahmawati@unesa.ac.id
Editorial Address
English Department, Faculty of Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Surabaya Building T4, 2nd floor, Kampus Lidah Wetan, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Retain: Journal of Research in English Language Teaching
ISSN : 23562617     EISSN : 30322839     DOI : https://doi.org/10.26740/rt.v13i02
Core Subject : Education,
RETAIN publishes articles within the scope of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. RETAIN publishes articles within the scope of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics.
Articles 947 Documents
THE USE OF “TEACHER RACES GAME” IN TEACHING SPEAKING DESCRIPTIVE TEXTTO THE SEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OFSMP MUHAMMADIYAH 2 TAMAN
RETAIN Vol 1 No 3 (2013): Volume 1, nomor 3, September-Desember 2013
Publisher : RETAIN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

AbstrakBahasa Inggris merupakan salah satu ketrampilan yang harus bisa dikuasai oleh siswa, namun masihbanyak siswa yang malu dalam mengungkapkan idenya dalam berbicara bahasa inggris. Denganmemberikan kesempatan lebih untuk menyampaikan ide, para siswa diharapkan untuk bisa memotivasidiri untuk mampu berbicara dalam Bahasa Inggris. Salah satu usaha yang bisa dilakukan oleh guru adalahmenerapkan permainan di dalam kelas. Permainan merupakan salah satu tehnik yang dapat memotivasisiswa dalam proses pembelajaran di dalam kelas. Permainan Teacher races game merupakan sebuahpermainan yang dapat mengaktifkan kemampuan berbicara siswa. Item bahasa yang diaplikasikan dalampermainan ini menggunakan salah satu jenis teks yaitu teks deskriptif. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenispenelitian deskriptif kualitatif. Subyek dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VII A di SMPMuhammadiyah 2 Taman. Instrumen dalam penelitian ini adalah tabel observasi dan rubrik ketrampilanberbicara. Data dalam penelitian ini adalah hasil observasi dan deskripsi nilai ketrampilan berbicara siswayang dikumpulkan selama proses pembelajaran di dalam kelas. Setelah observasi dilakukan, penelitimendeskripsikan hasil observasi dan nilai ketrampilan berbicara siswa.Kata Kunci: Permainan Teacher Races, ketrampilan berbicara, teks deskriptifAbstractSpeaking is one of the skills that have to be mastered by student in learning English. But, there are manystudents that still afraid to make mistake and feel depressed in speaking activity. By giving moreopportunities to speak, students are asked to encourage themselves to speak in English. One of theteacher’s efforts is implementing the game since games can motivate students in learning process.Teacher races game is a kind of simulation game that can activate students’ speaking ability. Thelanguage applied in this game uses the descriptive text. This research is a descriptive qualitative research.The subject is VII-A class of SMP Muhammdiyah 2 Taman . The researcher uses observation checklistand students‟ performance score from rubric of speaking proficiency as the instrument. The data areobtained from the observation during the implementation of Teacher Races game and students ‟performance score. After being observed, the researcher described two findings. the observation resultfrom the implementation of Teacher Races game that the teacher had done and the students‟ speakingability are addressed.Keywords: Teacher Races game, speaking, descriptive textINTRODUCTIONBackground of the StudyEnglish has to be taught in all grades of junior highschool, senior high school and even in elementary school.(decree no. 060Fu/1993 in Dellyana, 2008:1). Besidesthat, based on the competency based curriculum (2006:2)the teaching of English is emphasized on the four languageskills: reading, listening, speaking, and writingSpeaking has an important role for EnglishForeign Learner (EFL) in the real language learning.Speaking is one of the skills that have to be mastered bystudent in learning English. Many experts definespeaking in different ways. Lado (1961: 240-241) statesthat speaking ability is someone‟s ability to transfer theirknowledge and to express their idea in realcommunication by selecting correct words andsystematized idea. It means that speaking ability is theability to express oneself in one live situation in preciseEjournal Unesa. Volume 01 Nomor 01 Tahun 2013, 1 - 11words, or the ability to converse, or to express a sequenceof ideas fluently.Teaching speaking in junior high schoolstudents is not easy as turning a hand, because Seventhgrade students include in teens or young adult that “anage of transition, confusion, self-consciousness,growing, and changing bodies and minds” (Brown2001:106), so it is between childhood and adulthood.The thing that should be considered is that children havetheir own characteristics. Some of the teachers feel thatthe students are reluctant and get difficulty in speaking.They feel that it is very difficult to arrange the class inthe good atmosphere. On the other hand there are manystudents that still afraid to make mistake and feeldepressed in speaking activity.Alongside those statements, English teachershould be able to encourage and facilitate the students inorder to speak English as much as possible. The one ofappropriate technique to build the students‟ motivationin learning speaking English is by using game whilethey are learning. Games can motivate the students inlearning the language. They will be encouraged in thelearning process if they are given the cheerful technique.In line with the benefit of game has beenstated, in this study, the game is used to teach speakingdescriptive text to the seventh graders. And it is calledteacher races game. Teacher races game is one of thegood ways to teach speaking and to improve thestudent‟s speaking ability. In the teacher‟s races game,the students have chance to deliver their idea to theirteacher. Smith (2008) states although in practicing thisgame the pupils will need extra energy to run more andmore to get the right answer. It means, at the same timewhile they do drilling they memorize the lesson bythemselves. So it is believed by doing this game, thestudents‟ speaking ability will be better that before. AsSmith (2008) teacher races game has several benefits.First by doing this game, it is also teaches the pupilshow to work cooperatively in a group is. They will learnabout time management, divide job and takeresponsibility in their own group. Second, in conductingthis game, the kinesthetic activity is very dominant. Sothey will not get bored while they are learning.The researcher formulates the researchquestion as follow: (1) How is the implementation ofTeacher Races game to teach speaking of descriptivetext to the seventh grade students of SMPMuhammadiyah 2 taman? (2) How is the students ‟speaking ability toward the implementation of TeacherRaces game?Literature ReviewSpeakingNunan (2003:48) point out that speaking is aproductive oral skill in which consisted of constructingsystematic verbal, utterances to convey meaning.Meanwhile, Chaney (1998:13) describes speaking as “theprocess of building and sharing meaning through the useof verbal and non verbal symbols in a variety ofcontexts”. So, speaking is an oral skill which uses verbaland non verbal systematic symbols .Speaking is one of the important aspects in theprocess of learning language. The teacher should beaware of their students‟ speaking ability because the mainpurpose of learning foreign language is to make thestudents able to communicate. According to Nunan(2001: 39) “speaking is the single most important aspectof learning foreign language“Lado (1961: 240-241) states that speakingability is someone‟s ability to transfer their knowledgeand to express their idea in real communication byselecting correct words and systematized idea. It meansthat speaking ability is the ability to express oneself inone live situation in precise words, or the ability toconverse, or to express a sequence of ideas fluently.Teaching SpeakingThe main purpose of teaching and learningforeign language is to make the students able tocommunicate using the target language. The opportunityto speak in a group should be given to the students asmuch as possible in order to facilitate the students inusing the target language. Nunan (2001: 51) states thatlearning to speak in a foreign language will be facilitatedwhen learners are actively engaged in attempting tocommunicate.Teaching speaking must be done based on thestudent‟s level. In the speaking there are three levels ofthe students such as beginning level learners,intermediate level learners, and advanced level learners.Actually the seventh grade students of SMPMuhammadiyah is still in the beginning level learners.There are some principles for teaching speaking tobeginning level based on Bailey and Nunan (2005: 36-40) :1. Provides something for learners to talk about.2. Create opportunities for students to interact byusing group work or pair work.3. Manipulate physical arrangements to promotespeaking practice.Classroom Speaking ActivitiesThere are many speaking activities that can bedone in the classroom during the teaching and learningprocess. According to Harmer that there are some of theThe Use of Teacher Races Game in Teaching Speaking Descriptive Text3speaking activities that widely-used in the classroom(2002: 271-275): Acting from a Script Communication games Discussion Prepared Talks Questionnaire Simulation and role play The roles of the teacherDescriptive TextDescriptive text ix one of the text-genres whichshould be taught in secondary school, they are junior andsenior high school. Depdiknas (2003:49) definedescriptive text as a text which is used to describe aparticular person, place or things. Descriptive text isdifferent from report text because it describes a specificsubject rather than a general class.Depdiknas has also classified the characteristicsmust have been different from other text-genres. Here,Depdiknas differ them into several points:1. Social FunctionBased on depdiknas (2003:49), descriptive text has asocial function describe a particular person, place,or things. It means that, by learning descriptive text,the students are supposed to be able to describe thephysical appearance and the personality of aparticular person, or even the physical appearance,the characteristics, and the quality of a certainplace.2. Generic StructureAccording to Depdiknas (2004:52), the schematicstructures in generic structure of descriptive textare: Identification : in this part, we describe thephenomenon that we have in mind. Description : after expressing the main point inidentification, we will explain it more in supportingdetail to give clearer description of particular parts,qualities, and characteristic. Since the study focuseson describing people, the identification will be onthe people, the identification will be on the peoplethat are going to described.3. Linguistic FeatureThe linguistic features of descriptive text are dividedinto several points as follows: certain nouns,detailed noun phrases, adjective, verb, figurativelanguage to describe something in more detail,simple present tense.GameGibbs (1978:60) states that a game is an activitycarried out by cooperating of competing decision makers,seeking, and active. Within a set of rules and theirobjectives, games are closed activities, in other words,they have a very clearly mastered.Game is an activity that could give enjoyment inteaching and learning process between the teacher andthe students. It is also such a great way to encourage thewhole students in the class to work together and toprovide an often-welcome change in working pattern.They are mostly applied to young learners.Teacher Races GameTeacher races game is one of the game which iscommonly used in some language courses. In this game,the students will work in group of five to six, but eachmember of the group have own task. Each member has toanswer the question that have been given before to theteacher. The teacher is waiting outside the classroom.While approaching to the teacher, the delegation is notallowed to bring out the paper. They must memorize theanswer. The teacher decide whether the students get thepoint or not based on the accuracy and fluency thestudents‟ answer. If the answer is not proper yet, theteacher will say “sorry, your answer is not proper yet, goback and repair your answer”. However if the answer isproper, the teacher will give a sign.To obtain the goal of the study, the teachershould decide to use the appropriate media in teachinglearning. There are many kinds of media, one of them ispicture. Pictures are appropriate media to be used inteaching learning process, especially in teachingspeaking. Individual picture also can be used as a mediain “Teacher Races” game. The students will not getdifficulties to describe a particular thing by usingindividual picture. According to Sadiman et,al, (1993:29)among teaching, pictures are commonly used as visualmedia. In this case, pictures can help students to visualizelanguage from abstract to concrete.Besides that, pictures can give stimulus for thestudents to be more creative and attract the students tospeak. On the other hand, pictures are the most availableteaching material (Yunus1981:50). Pictures that are usedas the media in teaching learning process can be obtainedeasily. Because pictures are simple, cheap, and everyonedoes not nedd much money to get it. The teachers can cutpictures from books, magazines, newspaper, and they cancopy it from flashdisk, etc. therefore, pictures are aninteresting media which can be used in the learningprocess.The Rules of Teacher Races game1. Ask the students to make a group of seven. Onegroup consist of six students. Then explain that eachmember have own task.Ejournal Unesa. Volume 01 Nomor 01 Tahun 2013, 1 - 112. Choose a proper picture which is suitable with thetopic. The picture must be clear enough.3. Give the different picture all of members.4. Explain that each member must send theirdescriptive monologue to the teacher.5. The teacher wait outside the classroom.6. After the students receive their picture. Then theyhave to deliver their description to their teacher oneby one.7. Teacher decide whether the answer proper or not.Proper means they can describe about the picture thathave been given.8. If the description is proper enough. teacher will givesign equal with one point.9. The winner group is the fastest group that have moresign.The Benefit of Teacher Races GameTeacher races game has many benefits for thestudents, by doing this game, the motoric aspect isexplored, by doing motoric activity, the students will notget bored. Smith (2008) states that teacher races game isnot difficult to prepare and not spending so much money.Smith (2008) also states that teacher races gamehas several benefits. First by doing this game, it is alsoteaches the pupils how to work cooperatively in a groupis. They will learn about time management, divide joband take responsibility in their own group. Second, inconducting this game, the kinesthetic activity is verydominant. So they will not get bored while they arelearning.The Implementation of Teacher Races Game inTeaching Speaking of descriptive text.The illustration below showed the steps of theteaching speaking descriptive text using teacher racesgame.Pre ActivityIn pre activity, the teacher told the students aboutthe objective of study that they will learn. The teacherexplains about a descriptive text included the genericstructure and the language features. The teacher teachesthe vocabulary about the parts of the person. Then theteacher ask one students to come in front of class as amodel as the example. The teacher asked to the studentswhat the friend is and ask the students to describe it.For example: The teacher ask Muhammad fikri to comein front of class, Then, the teacher let the studentsdescribes Muhammad fikri is. If the students getdifficulties in understanding the teacher‟s oral descriptivemonologue, they may open their dictionary to find out thevocabularies they don‟t understand its meaning. Afterthey successfully describe the person correctly, theteacher will give them appreciation by making applausetogether which indirectly aims to make the students moreattracted and interested to join the game.Whilst ActivityAfter the students really understand about theexplanation before, the next is the teacher has to prepareeverything that related to the material which is used toconduct the teacher races game. In this case, the teacherprepare the person picture. Then he asked the students tomake a group pf six. The number of the students in SMPMuhammadiyah is 42 students, means every group have7 members. After that, the teacher distribute a picture toevery member, then he explain about what the studentswill do in teacher races game, the goal, rules, and also thereward that they will get if become the winner, this is tomotivate the students to be more active in learningactivity.In this step, time to play teacher races game.This game can be played for 30 minutes. They work ingroup but their send their own task that is describing apicture to their teacher individually, the teacher waitoutside the class. He waits the description of eachmember of group who are ready to give description.Post ActivityThe students who already send their descriptionto the teacher will get sign, one sign equal one point. thissection will make some noisy since all ofmember/students are hurry to give their descriptivemonologue to the teacher. However, through this activity,most of students focus on the lesson more than if weteach them by conventional way. For the last doing thisgame. (in last meeting), the students had to send theirdescriptive monologue in front of class. To make themmore briefly to speak. Then The fastest group who havemore sign is the winner. So, teacher will give reward tomake them more active.Review of Previous StudyThe researcher found a previous study which hassimilarity with this study. The previous study is “TheEffectiveness of Using Teacher Races Game to TeachSimple Past Tense in Recount Text for Eight Graders ofSMP Negeri 13 Surabaya.” which was conducted byRatna Ayu Pawestri Kusuma Dewi (2012). It was anexperimental research that focused on the teaching ofsimple past tense in the recount text. she didn‟t used amedia in that game, she only gave some question to thestudents and the students had to answer the question.The study is conducted by the researcher withdifferent media from the one in the previous study, thisstudy use person pictures. The researcher applied picturesmedia in Teacher Races gameThe Use of Teacher Races Game in Teaching Speaking Descriptive Text5RESEARCH METHODOLOGYThis chapter describes the steps taken to conductthe study. The description involves research design,subject, setting, data of the study, data collectiontechnique, and data analysis.This study used a descriptive qualitative research.The subject of this study were the teacher and the aeventhgraders of SMP Muhammadiyah 2 Taman. The setting ofthe study was Muhammadiyah 2 Taman which is locatedon Wonocolo jl. Belakang pasar lama sepanjang. Theresearcher collected the data through some instruments.The instruments were observation checklist and students‟speaking rubric performance from Haris‟s rubric ofspeaking proficiency. The first data was observationresult which was taken from observation checklist. Thesecond data was the result of the students‟ speaking scorewhich was taken from students‟ speaking rubricperformance.RESULT AND DISCUSSIONThis chapter contains the description of the data obtained.The researcher will describe the data from the dailyobservation and assessment which show the condition ofthe class and the students‟ speaking ability during theimplementation of Teacher Races game. The dataobtained from the observation checklist and the students‟speech were analyzed based on the criteria of each aspectin the Hari‟s speaking proficiency measurement.ResultsThe research was conducted in three meetings.Here, the researcher described the results based on theobservation checklist and students‟ speaking score. Theresearcher divided the results into two chapters. The firstchapter described the implementation of Teacher Racesgame to teach speaking of descriptive text to the seventhgrade students of SMP Muhammadiyah 2 Taman. Thesecond chapter described the students‟ speaking abilitytoward the implementation of Teacher Races game.The Observation Results of Teacher Races Game ActivityDuring the research, the observation wasconducted by the researcher through data observationchecklist. The researcher observed directly while theteacher was implementing Teacher Races game. Theobservation was done in three meetings.1. The First MeetingThe first meeting was held on Monday, 6th 2013. Thetime was 2x40 minutes. Before starting the lesson, thefirst thing that the researcher did was greeted the studentsand introduced the researcher to his students.Then hechecked the attendance list before starting the lesson. Hecalled every name of class 7-A students and threestudents were absent today. Then the teacher explainedthe objectives of the study at that day. At that time theteacher reviewed the material of the descriptive textbecause he had taught the descriptive text last week.After that he gave vocabulary list related to thedescribing person to the teacher.Then the teacher continued the explanation about thelanguage feature about descriptive text. After that, theteacher let the students to made pairs. There were somestudent complaining about the teammates. She didn‟t getthe partner. Then the teacher divides students by theabsent number.The teacher introduced the rules, the topic, andlanguage features related to Teacher Races Game. Healso influenced and encouraged the students to becreative and free to speak. Before starting the game, shechecked students‟ understanding by giving theopportunity to ask some questions related to the game.First of all, the teacher asked one students to came infront of class as a model as the example, there wasMuhammad Fikri. The teacher asked to the students whatthe Muhammad fikri was and asked the students todescribe it. If the students got difficulties inunderstanding the teacher‟s oral descriptive monologue,they might opened their dictionary to find out thevocabularies they don‟t understood its meaning. Afterthey successfully describe the person correctly, theteacher gave them appreciation by making applausetogether which indirectly aims to made the students moreattracted and interested to joined the game.After gave the example, the teacher asked thestudents to make groups of seven. Each group consistedof six students. Then, the teacher distributed a picture toevery member of the group. There were famous person atthe first meeting. After getting the picture, all of themember of the groups had time to made description aboutthe picture which they had got. The group did not take along time. It seemed that the students in the class wereaccustomed to work in group.The teacher gave 15 minutes to the students todiscuss the picture and to gain the information about theperson. During the discussion, the teacher was goingaround the class to checked and to helped the studentswhether they had difficulties or not.After that, the teacher wait outside, then the studentshad to sent their description to the teacher individually.The students who already sent their descriptionmonologue to the teacher get a sign equal one point. Thesign was a smile emoticon. The fastest group and gotmore sign is the winner.The teacher listened and paid attention to thestudents‟ performance, the teacher corrected severalEjournal Unesa. Volume 01 Nomor 01 Tahun 2013, 1 - 11students‟ mistakes such as mispronunciations,grammatical errors, wrong choice vocabularies, improperfluency and comprehension.In the end of the game, group C was the winner.After conducting the game, the teacher appreciated thestudents by giving applause. Though there were manymistakes done during the speaking activity, it did notmake students gave up. Then, the teacher correctedpronunciation errors, sentence constructions, and the useof the language, after that the teacher asked the studentsto brought a picture of their father/mother for the nextmeeting.The students were enthusiastic with the game, Whilethe teacher was teaching implementing teacher racesgame, the observer observed all activities that happenedwhether it harmonized with all aspects stated in the fieldnote well or not. The observation process included thepreparation, the presentation, the technique or method andthe students- teacher interaction2. The Second MeetingThe second observation was held on May, 7th, 2013,at that time, the class began at 07.00 a.m. and ended at08.30 a.m. the teacher entered the class and greeted thestudentsBefore the teacher began the learning activities, hechecked the attendance list. There were thirty eightstudents who joined the class. There were three studentswho was absent. Then the teacher began the learningactivity and started with the objective of the study at thatday that was implementing of teacher races game inspeaking of descriptive text.As a warming up activity, the teacher gave theexample by described about his father. In the mainactivity, the teacher introduced the game that would beplayed. The game and its rules were the same but useddifferent object. The object had to described was thepicture that have been brought by the students. There wasthe picture of the students‟ parents.The teacher gave 15 minutes to the students todiscussed the picture and to gain the information aboutthe person. During the discussion, the teacher was goingaround the class to check and to help the studentswhether they had difficulties or not.After that, the teacher wait outside, then the studentshad to send their description to the teacher individually.The students who already sent their descriptionmonologue to the teacher get a sign equal one point. Thesign was a smile emoticon. The fastest group and gotmore sign is the winner.The teacher listened and paid attention to thestudents‟ performance, the teacher corrected severalstudents‟ mistakes such as. In this second observation,the students‟ performance was better than in the firstobservation.Based on the observation, it could be said that theteaching learning process was successfully done. Theteacher felt happy with the improvement made by thestudents in this meeting. The class became very activeand alive. All students tried to speak up and some ofthem asked some questions to the teacher. The topic andalso the technique of the teacher was able to motivate thestudents. The students‟ speaking ability was getting betterthan in the previous day.After that the teacher gave the conclusion of thelesson today. The last the teacher said goodbye and leftthe class.The Third ObservationThe third observation was conducted on May 13th,2013. This was the last day of the implementing TeacherRaces Game. There were only 38 students because 2students were absent. The teacher started to begin thelesson with opening session. The teacher greeted andasked the students the previous lesson that they hadstudied. It was meant to know whether or not they stillremember about the previous lesson. Then she checkedthe attendance list. Then he began the activities/the game.In the third meeting, the game was different. In thatmeeting, the teacher asked the students to make presentthe descriptive monologue about their best friends infront of class without any preparation. The teacher onlygave 5 minutes to the students to prepare their descriptivemonologue. Then the students had to describe their bestfriend in front of class. The student who had already senttheir description got a sign equal one point. The fastestgroup and had more sign is the winnerWhile the students were working their task, theteacher controlled the class by monitoring the students‟behavior. He walked around the class and helped thestudents who got difficulties in working their task. After15 minutes was over, the students have to came to theteacher and send their description. The fastest group whohad more sign is the winner.In the end of the game, group C was the winneragain. Because that was the last conducting this game.The researcher gave a reward to the winner group andalso to all of students in that class. And also, the teacherappreciated the students by giving applause. Thoughthere were many mistakes done during the speakingactivity, it did not make students gave up. Then theteacher corrected mispronunciations, grammatical errors,wrong choice vocabularies, improper fluency andcomprehension.The Use of Teacher Races Game in Teaching Speaking Descriptive Text7The Result of the Students’ Speaking Ability ofDescriptive Text by Using Teacher Races Game.To answer the second question of the researchquestions, the researcher scored the students‟performance by using rubric from Haris (see appendix).There were five components that were measured such asthe students‟ They are pronunciation, grammar,vocabulary, fluency, and comprehension. Everycomponent has been analyzed based on the criteria in therubric for descriptive text.The First MeetingThe first meeting was on May 7th 2013. Based on thestudents‟ performance, mostly they were able to speakEnglish.The first descriptive speaking task was given to thestudents at the first meeting. The students were asked tomake a group, then they have to describe about certainperson individually.The following description are the result of students‟speaking ability in the first meeting. The researcher took4 students as the examples of the progress in the speakingability. Those 4 students were student A, student B,student C, and student D. Here is the result of descriptivemonologue by student A,B,C, and D1. Student A : Varin (student number 37 in 7A)“Hallo, my name is Varin. I want describeObama. He is the president of United State ofAmerica. He Is handsome, he has sharp nose, curlyhair, but he has brown skin. Obama was live inIndonesia.At the first meeting, Varin was in the second level ofpronunciation. She always repeat her words and not clearin pronounced the words. For the grammar aspect shefrequent errors of grammar which didn‟t obscuremeaning. She used limited vocabulary to describe theperson. Then, in fluency aspect, her speech was veryslow and uneven except for short or routine sentence. Inthe comprehension aspect, she was in the second level,she understand only slow and requires constantrepetition, in explaining the language feature and genericstructure of descriptive text.2. Student B : Syailendra (student number 21 in 7-A)“Hai..my name is Rico. I want describe Lunamaya. His nose is sharp, skin is white, he is tall,and beautiful. He has many friends because heis beautiful girl. His favorit hobby is singing.”In the first meeting, Student B‟s pronunciation wasin the second level, her pronunciation was very hard tounderstand. Then, in the grammatical aspect, hisgrammar was in the first level, because he used the wronggrammatical aspect. In the vocabulary aspect, his wordchoices were inadequate for even the simplestdescription. In the fluency aspect, his speech was oftenstop because of his anxiety to speak. In thecomprehension aspect, he had low understanding. Heunderstood for only the simplest description.3. Student C : Nindita (student number 24 in 7-A)“Hii… my name is Nanda. I will describe NikitaWilly. She is famous artist in Indonesia. she iscute, she has white skin, strong hair and curlyhair, she also has sharp nose, but she is not tall.She is kind girl.”In the fisrt meeting, student C was in the third levelof pronunciation, She gave the detail description aboutthe person. She used many variety vocabularies todescribe the person. Her fluency and grammar level werein third level because she spoke in speed and fluency wasrather strongly affected by language problem and . In thecomprehension aspect, she was in the Third level, sheunderstand most of what is said at slower-than-normalspeed with repetitions.4. Student D : Reina (student number 29 in 7-A)“Hallo, my name is Reina. I want to describeabout Robert Pattinson. He is the actor ofTwilight movie. He Is handsome, he has sharpnose, straight hair, and he has white skin.Every girl in this world love him. Because he ishandsome.”In the first meeting, Student D was in the second level ofpronunciation. Her pronounced was very hard tounderstand, but she gave the detail description about acertain person. Her fluency and grammar level were inthe third level because she spoke in speed and fluencywhich was rather strongly affected by language problemand she could apply the rules of simple present tenseappropriately although she made a few mistakes. In thecomprehension aspect, she was in the second level, sheunderstand only slow and requires constant repetition, inexplaining the language feature and generic structure ofdescriptive text.The Second MeetingThe second meeting was on April 11th 2013. Theresult in the second meeting was almost the same as thefirst meeting. Based on the students‟ performance, mostlythey were able to make description monologue related tothe picture. The picture on the second meeting was thepicture of their mother/father. There was animprovement. Their confidence was getting better.There was an improvement in the second meeting.The students‟ speaking ability had risen. Here, theEjournal Unesa. Volume 01 Nomor 01 Tahun 2013, 1 - 11researcher described the increasing score of student A,student B, student C, and student D, as the examples.1. Student A : Varin (student number 37 in 7A)“Hi.. Today I want to describe about my mother, thename is Mahmudah. She is 40 years old. She ishousewife. She is beautiful, she has sharp nose,she has white skin, the hair is long and straight.But she wear jilbab. I love my mother.”In the second meeting, the student A showed herprogress. she is in the third level of pronunciation, shegave clear description. Because she have good motivationin speaking English. She used rich variety ofvocabularies. Their speech was effortless and smooth. Heappeared to understand everything without difficulty. Butshe still made word-order error which did not obscuremeaning. In the comprehension aspect, she was in theThird level, she understand most of what is said atslower-than-normal speed with repetitions.2. Student B : Syailendra (student number 21 in 7-A)“Hi.. I am Syailendra, I want to describe about mymother. Name is Bu Wanda. She has straighthair, her nose is snub nose, she has whitesetengah brown skin. She is tall. Because mymother dulunya model. My mother is beautifulwoman. Thank you.”In the second meeting, Student B‟s pronunciationwas the same in the first meeting. His pronunciation washard to understand. Then, in the grammatical aspect hadraisen. In the first meeting he in the first level. But in thesecond meeting, he is the second level, he use correctgrammatical order. He use correct pronoun. In thevocabulary aspect, he use limited vocabulary. In thefluency aspect, his speech was frequently hesitant, oftenforced into silence by language problem. In thecomprehension aspect, he had low understanding. Heunderstood for only the simplest description.3. Student C : Nindita (student number 24 in 7-A)“Hi,,, Meet again with me ya sir..heheehe… Iam Nindita, I want to describe about my father.He is 40 years old. He is tall, he has beard andmustache, but no like pak raden. Hehe.. myfather has brown skin. He hobby is singing. Hehas good voice. Oke that’s all.”Student C‟s pronunciation in the second meeting wasstill the same as in the first meeting. Then, her ability inthe grammatical rules had risen. She spoke withoccasional errors that showed imperfect control of somepatterns but no weakness that caused misunderstanding.In the vocabulary aspect, she already had better choicesof word. In the fluency aspect, her speech wasoccasionally hesitant. She started to be confident whileshe were speaking. In the comprehension aspect, shequite well understood more complex speech directed toher.4. Student D : Reina (student number 29 in 7-A)“Hi.. I want to describe about my mother. Shehas straight hair, she has snub nose, she hasbrown skin, she is not tall. She is thin. She weara veil. My mother is Muslim woman. Her hobbyIs planting flower. So I have so many flower inmy house.”Student D‟s speaking ability in the second meetingshowed the same result as the first meeting. There was noimprovement in his speaking. His pronunciation wasfrequently be asked to repeat. It was hard to understand.Then, in grammatical aspect, his grammar was almostentirely inaccurate except in typical or usual phrases. Inthe vocabulary aspect, his choices of word wereinadequate for even the simplest conversation. In thefluency aspect, his speech was often left uncompletedbecause he was worried to speak. In the comprehensionaspect, he had low understanding. He understood for onlythe simplest type of description.Third meetingThe third meeting was on May 13th 2013. In thirdmeeting, students‟ speaking ability was significant better.All students mostly had better improvement than before.The following descriptions are the improving ability fromstudent A, student B, student C, and student D.1. Student A : Varin (student number 37 in 7A)“Hi.. let me introduce myself.. my name isVarin, I have best friend, the name is Tasya .She is my friend in this class. Tasya has shortand straight hair, she has sharp nose, her skin iswhite, she is not tall not short. and she is thin.her favorite food is pizza.In the third meeting, the student A showed herprogress. She was in the third level in pronunciation. Shegave enough detail description about the person. She usedan adequate variety of words and most of them werecorrectly used. Her grammar level was in third level,there were a few errors in the use of verb. Her fluencywas in the fourth level because her speed or speechseemed to be slightly affected by language problem. Inthe comprehension aspect, she was in the Third level, sheunderstand most of what is said at slower-than-normalspeed with repetitions.2. Student B : Syailendra (student number 21 in 7-A)“Assalamualaikum wr wb. My name isSyailendra. I will introduce about my bestfriend. He is Doni. He is my family. Sepupu.Hehe. He is handsome, he is tall and slim. HeThe Use of Teacher Races Game in Teaching Speaking Descriptive Text9has sharp nose, curly hair, and her skin is agakwhite. His hobby is play computer. He is smartwith computer”The pronunciation of the student number 3 was inthe second level. His pronunciation frequently asked torepeat. But he made good word-order and did not obscurethe meaning at all. he also used variety vocabularies.From the fluency aspect, her speed or speech seemed tobe slightly affected by language problems. She could giveenough clear description about the person even though hemade a few mistakes. In the comprehension aspect, shewas in the Third level, she understand most of what issaid at slower-than-normal speed with repetitions.3. Student C: Nindita (student number 24 in 7-A)“Assalamualaikum wr wb. My name is Nindita. I willintroduce about my best friend, her name isYasmin. She is beautiful, because she has sharpnose, theher hair is strong and curly hair, herhobby is eating, but she is not fat. She istalkative girl, but she is cute. That’s all Thankyou.”The pronunciation of the student C was intelligible,conscious a definite accent. She made good word-orderand did not obscure the meaning at all. She also usedvariety vocabularies. From the fluency aspect, her speedor speech seemed to be slightly affected by languageproblems. She could give enough clear description aboutthe person4. Student D: Reina (student number 29 in 7-A)Assalamualaikum wr wb.. hallo my name isReina. I want to describe about my best friend.She is my friend in this class. Her name isnabila. She has beautiful face. She has sharpnose, strong hair, and white skin.The pronunciation of the student number 3 wasintelligible, conscious a definite accent. She made goodword-order and did not obscure the meaning at all. Shealso used variety vocabularies. From the fluency aspect,her speed or speech seemed to be slightly affected bylanguage problems. She could give enough cleardescription about the person. In the comprehensionaspect, she quite understood in simple descriptionfollowed by some repetitions.DISCUSSIONIn this section, the researcher discussed two aspects.Firstly. The researcher would discuss the suitability of theimplementation Teacher Races game with the theory.Secondly, the researcher would discuss the result ofstudents‟ speaking abilityThe first thing that should be noted was thesuitability of the implementation Teacher Races gamewith the theory. Based on the observations, what theteacher had done followed the theory. Teacher Racesgame which was introduced by Smith (2002) inpracticing this game the pupils will need extra energy torun more and more to get the right answer. The activity inteacher races game and how to send their description totheir teacher can motivate the students to speak more andincrease their speaking ability. On the other hand, inconducting this game, the kinesthetic activity is verydominant. So they will not get bored while they arelearning.Teacher Races game which teacher had implementedalso followed the theory of game. A game, as it is definedby Hadfield (1984) as quoted in Ninaber (2004:10), is anactivity with rules, a goal, and element of fun. There weresome reasons why Teacher Races game was appropriate.First, From the observation, the researcher can say thatthe topics were appropriate with the students‟ interest.Moreover, the topics dealt with the local curriculumstated in the topics of the seventh grade students in thesecond semester. They were describing about person,place, noun, and others. It means that the topics stated inthe first to the third meeting were appropriate with thelocal curriculum. As a result, the study gave somecontributions for the students‟ competence.At the first meeting, it can be seen that there weremany things that should be evaluated. Some students stillgot confused with the technique. Even though thestudents found some difficulties during the lesson, thestudents felt difficult in describing person. In addition,the media were suitable with the topic. The topic couldmotivate the students because it was familiar with theirdaily life. But in the second and third performance, theylooked more confident in expressing their ideas becausethe teacher gave them support to be more confident inperformed their idea.In the first meeting, The teacher explained aboutdescriptive text, then he asked the students to madegroups and introduced about teacher races game. In thefirst meeting, the teacher asked the students to make adescriptive monologue based on the picture that havebeen given by the teacher. The students sent theirdescription to their teacher individually. In the secondmeeting, the students produced descriptive monologuebased on the picture of their own parents. The teachermade it different because it could make them not to bebored because of the same topic as the last meeting. Inthis activity, the teacher asked the students to performedspontaneously. In the third meeting, the teacher asked thestudents to make a descriptive monologue about theirbest friend. Because this is the last meeting, the studentsdid not permitted to bring a picture. From thisperformance, the students did better than before. BecauseEjournal Unesa. Volume 01 Nomor 01 Tahun 2013, 1 - 11from this performance, who got better performance, got areward.The second was the results of students‟ speakingability. The students‟ speaking ability was getting betterfrom the first meeting until the third meeting. Thestudents had practiced speaking more than before.There were five components; pronunciation,grammar, vocabulary, fluency, and comprehension hadbeen analyzed. Most of them made a progress in eachcomponent. Based on the observation of the studentsperformance, at the first meeting of using Teacher Racesgame in the teaching learning process of speaking, mostof students only could performed simplest describingperson . They were reluctant to deliver their idea. Thepronunciation frequently was hard to understand. Thecomprehension was quite good with the occasional errorson grammar. In the second meeting, there was a littlesignificant improvement to their speaking ability. Theycould relax in performing their idea. The pronunciationhad been corrected. There were still errors on grammarbut not as much as in the first meeting. The students‟understanding was also good. In the third meeting, therewere some changes in the students' speaking ability. Inthis meeting, most students could speak confidentlythough there were still errors on grammar. Thepronunciation was better than the previous day. Thefluency and the comprehension were better than thesecond day. The students were more familiar withEnglish better than two previous days.From the above explanation, it could be concludedthat there was an increase in the students' speaking abilitytaught by Teacher Races games in the process ofteaching-learning. The students‟ speaking ability wasgetting better in every meeting and it can be seen fromthe scores of the students' speaking descriptive task. Thetable showed that the scores of the students were gettingbetter. Some students got bad marks in the first and twomeeting, and finally achieved better in the last meeting.By looking at the result of students speaking descriptivetask, the researcher concluded that the technique couldhelp the students in their understanding.From the observation, the researcher can say thatTeacher Races games helped to motivate the students andreduced their boredom in the learning process. TeacherRaces Game became better technique that fulfilled thestudents' interest in the learning process. Thus, it could beconcluded that Teacher Races game has manycontributions to the teaching of Speaking of Descriptivetext.ConclusionTeacher Races game can be applied as a technique toteach speaking because this technique is able to increasethe students‟ interest to speak up in the speaking class. Atthe beginning of the lesson, the teacher explain aboutdescriptive text, then did a game. In addition, theapplication of Teacher Races game helped the students tomemorize the vocabulary easily and it could reduce thestudents‟ boredom so they could participate actively inthe learning process.Suggestion1. Teacher Races game can be applied to teachspeaking of Descriptive Text to the seventhgraders of junior high school in order to buildstudents‟ willingness to speak up and to makestudents interest in English language.2. The teacher should prepare an interesting mediato reach the goal of teaching learning process,because an interesting media will lead thestudents to be more enthusiastic to3. The material should not too easy or too difficult.It must be in accordance with the students‟ability.REFERENCESAllen, D.E and Vallete, RM. 1997. ClasroomTechniques: Foreign Languagesand English as Second Language. New york:Horcourt Grace Jovanovich, Inc.Byrne, Donn. 1976. Teaching oral English. Hongkong:LongmanBrown. 2001. Teaching by Principles. San FransiscoState University .LongmanBrown, H Douglas. 2004. Language AssessmentPrinciples and ClassroomPractice. USA: Pearson Education, Inc.Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2006. Standar Isi danStandar KompetensiKelulusan: Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris.Jakarta: Depdiknas.Delliyana, N. 2008. The Teaching of Grammar in AnInternationalStandardized School. Unpublished S-1 Thesis.Surabaya: SurabayaState University.Dewi, Ratna Ayu. 2008. The effectiveness of TeacherRaces Game to TeachThe Use of Teacher Races Game in Teaching Speaking Descriptive Text11Simple Past Tense in Recount Text for EightGraders of SMP Negeri 13Surabaya. Unpublished S-1 Thesis. Surabaya:Surabaya State UniversityHalfield,J. 2005. Intermediate Writing CommunicationGames. England:LongmanHarmer, Jeremy. 2001. The practice of English languageTeaching. England:Longman.Harmer, Jeremy. 2002. The practice of English languageteaching. New york:LongmanHarmer, Jeremy. 2003. The Practice of English LanguageTeaching. England:Longman.Harris, David P. 1969. Testing English as a secondlanguage. New York: MCGraw HillIskandar. 2009. Psikologi Pendidikan Sebuah OrrientasiBaru. Ciputat: GaungPersada PressLado, Robert. 1964. Language teaching: A scientificapproach. Bombay: MCgraw-Hill publishing.Nunan, david. 2001. Language teaching methodology.London: Prentice hallinternational.Nunan, David ed. 2003. Pratical English LanguageTeaching, First editionSingapore: Mc Graw Hill.Nunan, david. 2005. Practicing English languageteaching grammar.New york: Mc Graw-Hill ESLPyles, Thomas and john, Algeo.1968.English anIntroduction to language.USA:Harcourt Brave Jovanovich, Inc.Sadiman, Arief S, R. Raharjo, Anung H aryono, andRahardjo, 1993. MediaPendidikan: Pengertian, Pengembangan, dan,Pemanfaatannya,Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Perkasa.Smith, Helen. 2008. British Council „Running Dictation‟.It is Retrieved from(http://www.Britishcouncil.org/flashonlinelessons-all-ages-running-dictation.doc)
AN ANALYSIS ON THE LEARNERS’ NEEDS OF ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES AT SMK TRI GUNA BHAKTI SURABAYA
RETAIN Vol 1 No 3 (2013): Volume 1, nomor 3, September-Desember 2013
Publisher : RETAIN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan kebutuhan siswa akuntansi SMK Tri Guna Bhakti Surabaya dalam belajar bahasa Inggris serta materi pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris untuk mereka. Penelitian ini dirancang sebagai penelitian deskriptif qualitataive dengan kuisioner dan cek list observasi sebagai instrumen dalam pengumpulan data. Hasil dri penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa siswa akuntansi SMK Tri Guna Bhakti Surabaya membutuhkan materi belajar Bahasa Inggris yang lebih spesifik khususnya yang sesuai dengan jurusan akuntansi. Namun, materi pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris yang diperuntukkan bagi mereka masih materi Bahasa Inggris umum. Kata Kunci: kebutuhan, siswa akuntansi, Bahasa Inggris untuk tujuan spesifik. Abstract This study is conducted to describe the accounting students’ of SMK Tri Guna Bhakti needs in learning English and the English teaching and learning materials for them. This study was designed as descriptive qualitative research with questionnaire and observation checklist as the instruments in obtaining the data. The results of the study showed that the needs of the accounting students of SMK Tri Guna Bhakti Surabaya is the more specific English teaching and learning materials for accounting study program but unfortunately, those students are still provided with general English teaching and learning materials. Keywords: needs, accounting students, English for Specific Purposes. Introduction Learners’ needs analysis is often described as the first step that the curriculum or course planners should do to determine the learners’ skills, competences, knowledge, needs and purposes in learning. This step helps the curriculum planners or learning provider know whether the content of the courses is relevant with the learners’ needs or not. Furthermore, according to Richards (2001:33), learners’ needs in English for Specific Purposes (ESP) are described in terms of performance, that is, in terms of what the learner will be able to do with the language at the end of a course of study. In many cases, learners’ needs may be relatively easy to determine, particularly if learners need to learn a language for very specific purposes, for example, employment in fields such as tourism, nursing, engineering or the hotel industry (Richards, 2001:53-54). Richards (2001:52) further says that needs analysis in language teaching may be used for a number of different purposes. For example, to find out what language skills a learner needs in order to perform a particular role, such as sales manager, or tour guide; to identify a gap between what students are able to do and what they need to be able to do; to collect information about a particular problem learners experience; to determine which students from a group are most in need of training in particular language skills, and to identify a change of direction that people in reference group feel is important. Needs itself, are often described in terms of a linguistic deficiency, that is, as describing the difference between what the learners can presently do in a language and what the learners should be able to do. What are identified as needs depends on a judgement and reflects the interest and values of those making such a judgement. Teachers, learners, employers, parents, and other stakeholders may thus have different views as to what needs are. Conelly and Clandinin (1988:24) define a stakeholder as a person or people with a right to comment on, and have input into, the curriculum process offered in schools. Different stakeholders may want different things from the curriculum. In addition, Brindley (1984) says, “The term need is not as straightforward as it might appear, and hence the term is sometimes used to refer to wants, desires, demands, expectation, motivations, lacks, constraints, and requirements”. In an educational setting, a learners’ needs analysis helps students identify where they are in terms of their knowledge, skills and competences, versus where they wish to be and their learning goals. It is related to the statement that adults learn better when they can see a reason why they are following a program of study and find the relevance between their purpose in learning and the content of the study that they must learn. Based on the researcher’s experience in teaching English to engineering students of SMKN 12 Surabaya, students have less motivation to learn English. Some of the students said that they do not see any relevance between their needs in learning English as engineering students and what they must learn from the textbook. The content of the textbooks for the all study programs in this school are mostly the same. Meanwhile, the students’ needs of each study program in learning Eglish are significantly different. Accounting students for example, they have to learn the process of summarizing, analyzing, and also reporting financial transactions. Here, the accounting students need to learn English as a part of those accounting activities. As an example, they find many vocabularies of finance in English and they have to know the meaning of all those words in order to understand or present a financial report. In this case, English becomes a means of those students activities in the subject area of finance so they have to learn English in more specific area, that is, accounting. This reality has inspired a variety of ESP course designs to address them. A basic ESP philosophy is to cater to specific needs of learners as much as possible (Robinson, 1991). It might be appropriate to say that no ESP courses should be conducted without needs analysis (Kaewpet, 2009). Based on those explanations above, the researcher is interested in conducting a learners’ needs analysis of ESP at SMK Tri Guna Bhakti Surabaya. As stated by Linse (1993), “It is the school’s responsibility to take into account the cultural, political, and personal characteristics of students as the curriculum is developed in order to plan activities and objectives that are realistic and purposeful.” Here, the researcher wants to know whether the English teaching and learning materials for the accounting students in this school are relevant with the needs of those students in learning English or not. The results of this study will be reported to the English teachers of SMK Tri Guna Bhakti Surabaya as suggestions to design specific materials for the accounting students. Based on the background of the study above, the research questions are formulated as follows. What are the needs of the accounting students at SMK Tri Guna Bhakti Surabaya in learning English? How are the English teaching and learning materials for the accounting students at SMK Tri Guna Bhakti Surabaya? In line with the research questions, objectives of this research are to describe the needs of the accounting students at SMK Tri Guna Bhakti Surabaya in learning English and English teaching and learning materials for the accounting students at SMK Tri Guna Bhakti Surabaya. This study will give contributions to SMK Tri Guna Bhakti Surabaya and the students. By knowing the students’ needs in learning English as accounting students, the English teachers of SMK Tri Guna Bhakti Surabaya can identify what programs are needed. They can ensure whether the English materials which are delivered, content of the textbooks, schedules etc., are in line with the needs of the students or not. For students, a learning needs analysis helps students identify where they are in terms of their knowledge, skills and competences, where and what they wish to be and ensure what their goals in learning English as accounting students. By knowing those aspects, the students can increase their motivation in learning English to reach their learning goals. This study focuses on analyzing the needs of the accounting students at SMK Tri Guna Bhakti Surabaya in learning English and English teaching and learning materials for them. This study is limited only to the eleventh grade of accounting students at SMK Tri Guna Bhakti Surabaya. So, the result of this study is only applicable to accounting students of SMK and not applicable to the students of SMA or other programs of SMK. METHODS Based on the research questions and objectives of the study, this research was designed as a descriptive qualitative research. According to Surachmad (2004), “Descriptive research is a kind of research method using the techniques of searching, collecting, classifying and analyzing the data, and the objective is to describe phenomenon” and a qualitative research is a type of research which does not include any calculation or enumeration (Moleong, 1989). This research was designed as a descriptive qualitative research because this study investigated the accounting students’ purposes in learning English and their opinions toward English teaching and learning process in the classroom. Hence, the results were reported descriptively as suggestions to English teachers of SMK Tri Guna Bhakti Surabaya in designing specific materials for the accounting students. In this research, accounting students of SMK Tri Guna Bhakti Surabaya were chosen as the subjects of the study. Those students are eleventh graders. There are about 35 students. Those students were chosen as the subjects of the study because the English teacher and also the researcher consider that those students are active and they are considered that they can represent all the accounting students of SMK Tri Guna Bhakti. Research instrument in this research is the researcher herself. To assist her, she used 2 tools, they are questionnaire and observation checklist. Questionnaire was used to get the accounting students’ opinions toward English teaching and learning process in the classroom and their purposes in learning English as accounting students. This questionnaire was given to the eleventh graders of accounting students at SMK Tri Guna Bhakti Surabaya. There are 20 questions. The classification of the questionnaire can be elaborated as the following: The questionnaire consists of 20 multiple choice questions, each of which has four options. The questionnaire is divided into six parts, those are: 1) Part I (questions number 1 – 5) deals with the students’ opinion about teaching-learning process in the class. 2) Part II (questions number 6 – 10) deals with the teaching materials. 3) Part III (questions number 11 – 13) deals with the teacher’s technique in teaching. 4) Part IV (question number 14) deals with the students’ purpose in learning English. 5) Part V (questions number 15-16) deals with the students’ opinions toward the relationship between the learning materials and their purposes in learning English. 6) Part VI (questions number 17-20) deals with the students’ opinions toward school’s plan in designing an ESP course for accounting students. Meanwhile, the observation checklist is in the form of “yes” and “no” answer. The observation checklist comprises the materials, the students’ responses toward English teaching and learning process in the classroom, the teaching techniques that the teacher used, and the English teaching and learning process. Data are the facts and numbers which become the resources to arrange the information. Meanwhile, the sources of data explain the subject from which the data are obtained (Arikunto, 2002). In this research, the data for the first research question are accounting students’ answers on their purposes in learning English. These data were taken from the result of questionnaire that was given by the reseacher to the students. Meanwhile, the data for the second research question are students’ answers or responses on their opinions toward English teaching and learning process in the classroom. These data were taken from the result of questionnaire and observation checklist. The data of the study were collected through observation checklist and questionnaire. In this case the researcher is an observer. As an observer, she used an observation checklist to observe the English teaching and learning process. The researcher observed the English teaching and learning process from the beginning until the end of the class. Here, the researcher observed a classroom, that is XI Ak-1. The data which were gained from questionnaire were used for finding out the students’ purposes in learning English as accounting students and their.opinions toward English teaching and learning process in the classroom. This questionnaire was given to each student at the end of the teaching-learning process. The students were asked to choose an appropriate answer from the options provided based on their own opinion. The data from the observation checklist are in the form of “yes” and “no” answer. The indicators in the checklist comprise the materials, the students’ responses toward the English teaching and learning process, the teaching techniques that the teacher used, and the English teaching and learning process. The result of the observation checklist will be explained descriptively. Meanwhile, in analyzing the students’ opinions toward English teaching and learning materials and their needs in learning English as accounting students, the researcher used the result of questionnaire. The result of questionnaire was analyzed using percentage. RESULT AND DISCUSSION The Result of Study In this part, the researcher reported the results of questionnaire and observation. Those results are explained as follow. 4.1.1 The Needs of the Accounting Students of SMK Tri Guna Bhakti in Learning English This part focuses on the data collected from questionnaire. The questionnaire was given to the accounting students of XI Ak-1 SMK Tri Guna Bhakti Surabaya. Time allocated in collecting data by using questionnaire was thirty minutes in the classroom. Firstly, before giving each student a questionnaire, the researcher tried to take the students’ attention by asking about their needs in learning English. R: “First of all, I want to ask, what are your needs in learning English as accounting students?” S: “Can communicate in English, miss.. Bisa presentasi pakai Bahasa Inggris.” R:“Okay. So, have you learned to present something in English?” S: “Never.. Biasanya disuruh ngerjain soal-soal aja miss.” After that, the researcher explained about English for Specific Purposes. Students listened enthusiastically. R: “Do you know ESP?” S: “No.....” R: “ESP is English for Specific Purposes. ESP ini ditujukan untuk orang-orang yang ingin belajar Bahasa Inggris sesuai dengan kebutuhan mereka. For example, English for engineering students, secretary, hotel industry, nursing, doctor, and also accounting. So, all of you, as accounting students may learn English in the subject area of accounting. You can learn how to present a paper of finance in an office, how to spell numbers, and anything else about accounting.” S: “Oh... so we learn English about accounting only ya miss..?” R: “Yes, that’s right.” S: “Kalau pelajaran Bahasa Inggris yang sekarang berarti bukan ESP ya miss?” R: “I can not say so, I think the curriculum planners of this school should evaluate the English teaching and learning materials deeply.” Then the researcher asked the students opinions if their school has an ESP courses for them. R: “Do you agree if this school open an ESP course for accounting students?” S: “Agree miss... Jadi enak belajarnya nggak bosen.” Finally, the researcher gave each student a questionnaire and asked them to answer the twenty questions included. The students are asked to choose the best answer, from the four options provided, for each question based on their own opinion. There are four questions from twenty questions in the questionnaire that the researcher used to know the accounting students’ needs in learning English. The results are described as follow: a) The Students’ Needs in Learning English From the total thirty five students, thirteen students or 37.1% stated that they are learning English because they want to be able to communicate in English better. Most of them argued that English is important in this globalization era. Meanwhile, the rest of students or twenty two students or 62.8% stated that they are learning English for very specific purpose, that is, they want to be able to communicate in English well in the subject area of accounting activities. b) English Skills that the Students want to Improve From the total thirty five students, twenty nine students or 80% stated that they want to improve their speaking ability. Meanwhile, seven students or 20% stated that they want to improve their writing skill. Most of the students argued that those skills are very important in accounting. c) The Students’ Difficulties in Learning English From the total thirty five students, fifteen students stated that the difficulty they often faced is they easily get bored in participating English learning in the classroom. Nine students stated that they hardly understand the English materials. Eight students stated that they are not learning English enthusiastically and there were three students who stated that they cannot understand the teacher’s explanation easily. d) The Students’ Opinions toward Teaching Techniques Used by The Teacher The students opinions are vary toward teaching techniques used by their English teacher. Twenty students said that their teacher’s technique in teaching is good. The teaching is not really interesting but still understandable. Fifteen students said that the teaching technique is not really good. The teacher’s explanations are often hard to be understood. In the future, all of the students hope their English teacher will give them more speaking exercises. Especially for speaking materials related to accounting activities. They argued that they want to improve their English speaking skill. e) The Students’ Opinions toward School’s Plan in Opening ESP Courses for Each Study Program All students of XI Ak-1 stated that the school really needs to design an ESP course for accounting students. If the school really provides them an ESP course for each study program, they will really appreciate it. All of those students stated that they do agree with that plan. They argued that the ESP course for accounting students should be scheduled as the regular English class. They also stated that they are sure the ESP course will increase their motivation in learning English and it will help them to reach their learning goal, that is, being able to communicate in English in the subject area of accounting. 4.1.2 English Teaching and Learning Materials for the Accounting Students at SMK Tri Guna Bhakti Surabaya This section presents the data collected from classroom observation which had been done by the researcher and questionnaire which was answered by the thirty five students of XI Ak-1. The results were reported as follow: a) The Students’ Opinions toward English Teaching Materials Used by the Teacher All the students of XI Ak-1 stated that the English teaching materials are from a textbook. That English textbook for accounting students is the same as the English textbook for the other study programs in this school. Moreover, twenty five students said that the English teaching materials are not really related to the accounting study program. Meanwhile, ten students said that all of the materials are not related to the accounting study program. Most of the students said that the English teaching materials are not really good for them as accounting students. Only eight students who stated that they could master the English materials delivered by the teacher. Unfortunately, the rest of the students stated that they can not master the English materials. Furthermore, when they were asked about the relationship between the English materials that they must learn in class and their purposes in learning English as accounting students, twenty students stated that the English materials are totally not related to their purposes in learning English as accounting students. Ten students stated that the English materials are related to their purposes and five students stated that the English materials have a little relationship with their purposes in learning English as accounting students. b) The Students’ Responses toward English Learning Process in the Classroom Eleven students stated that they are not really enjoying the English learning process in the classroom. Fifteen students stated that they rarely enjoy learning English in the classroom. Five students stated that they really love learning English in the classroom. Meanwhile, there are four students who stated that they never enjoy the English learning process in the classroom. From thirty five students, eighteen students argued that the English learning process in the classroom is less effective. Fifteen students said the learning process is effective. Meanwhile the rest of students or two students stated that the learning process is very effective. c) The Students’ Opinions toward School’s Plan in Opening ESP Courses for Each Study Program All students of XI Ak-1 stated that the school really needs to design an ESP course for accounting students. If the school really provides them an ESP course for each study program, they will really appreciate it. All of those students stated that they do agree with that plan. They argued that the ESP course for accounting students should be scheduled as the regular English class. They also stated that they are sure the ESP course will increase their motivation in learning English and it will help them to reach their learning goal, that is, being able to communicate in English in the subject area of accounting. 4.1.2.1 Classroom Observation This part presents the result of classroom observation in XI Ak-1. The researcher did this observation to know the English teaching and learning process in the classroom. The observation was held on Wednesday, 5th June 2013. Time allocated for this observation was 2 x 45 minutes. The class began at 06.40 a.m. The teacher entered the class and the students put their English textbook on the desk. The teacher prepared her teaching materials, laptop, LCD, and projector. Some students tried to help the teacher. There were no students absent on that day. There were 35 students in the class and they were in natural condition. Some students were still talking with their friends and some others were ready to learn. After completing preparation of the materials and media, the teacher began to greet the students and then showed the materials which will be discussed that day by LCD. The teacher created PowerPoint slides about the use of simple past tense. The teacher asked about simple past tense to the students. T: “Do you remember about simple past tense?” S: “Yes... buat menyatakan kejadian masa lalu.” T: “Okay. Very good.” Here, the teacher used English and Bahasa Indonesia in teaching. She tried to get her students attention by giving some questions during her explanation. Her explanation was easy to be understood. She spoke loudly but not too fast. She stopped explaining every a few minutes to give her students opportunities to ask. During the teaching learning process, some students seemed like they were sleepy and began to get bored. They laid their head on the table. Some others asked questions actively. The teacher tried to get the students attention by explaining materials with louder voice. After explaining simple past tense, the teacher gave the students time for asking questions. There was nobody ask her about the materials. She then asked her students to make a note about simple past tense on their book. T: ”Silahkan dicatat dulu. If I give you the copy of the slides, maybe you will not read it at home.” S: “Hehehe.... Iya bu.” T: “If you have finished, I will provide you some exercises.” S:”Lhoalahh.... buat PR aja lho bu.” When the students have finished writing their note, the teacher then provided the students some exercises about the use of simple past tense. Some students did it enthusiastically but the rest of students seemed like they were not really wanted to finish the exercises. Twenty minutes left. The teacher walked around the classroom and helped the students in doing the exercises. Then the bell rang. The teacher asked the students to finish the exercises at home and submit it on the next meeting and finally, the class was ended. Discussion This section discusses all the facts which were found by the researcher and their relationship with several related literature provided in Chapter II and the experts’ opinions and suggestions. 4.1.3 The Needs of Accounting Students in Learning English According to the result of questionnaire, most of the accounting students of XI Ak-1 stated that their need in learning English as accounting students is being able to communicate in English, especially English for accounting. In addition, the accounting students stated that they want to improve their English speaking and writing skills in the subject area of accounting. For example, they want to master English vocabularies of accounting, such as credit memo, credits, current assets, cost of goods sold, etc,. They argued that their motivation in learning English will increase when their English materials are related to their study program. If so, they have not to learn all the things which are too general and they do not need even want it. It is in line with the statement that adults learn better when they can see a reason why they are following a program of study and find the relevance between their needs in learning and the content of the study that they must learn. Moreover, as stated by Brindley (1984), “The term need is not as straightforward as it might appear, and hence the term is sometimes used to refer to wants, desires, demands, expectation, motivations, lacks, constraints, and requirements”. In this case, the researcher can conclude that the needs of the accounting students of SMK Tri Guna Bhakti are the more specific English teaching and learning materials and also the more English speaking and writing materials and exercises which are related to their study program, that is accounting. 4.1.4 The English Teaching and Learning Materials for the Accounting Students at SMK Tri Guna Bhakti Surabaya The opinions of the accounting students are vary toward the English teaching and learning process. More than a half of those students stated that the English teaching and learning process is not really effective. The students further argued that it is because the materials provided in the English class are not relevant with their study program and especially with their learning goals. Furthermore, from the result of classroom observation, the researcher found that English textbook used is the same for all study programs in this school. In this school there are two study programs, accounting and office administration. Those students have to learn the same English materials even though they are following different study programs. It is contrast with the fact that learners’ needs are significantly different. Each student has different knowledge, learning style, and also needs. Teachers must know deeply about their students’ characteristics and try to design an appropriate teaching and learning process for them. Here, the English teachers, actually, should prepare or write their teaching and learning materials themselves or in a team based on their learners needs and as the learning provider, the curriculum planners of SMK Tri Guna Bhakti Surabaya have to analyze what the students’ needs in terms of English learning carefully and deeply so that they can address those needs in an appropriate and relevant English teaching and learning materials. Moreover, according to Hutchinson (1987), “Materials writing is one of the most characteristic features of ESP in practice”. In contrast with general English teaching, a large amount of the ESP teachers’ time may be taken in writing materials. Here, in writing and providing appropriate English teaching and learning materials for accounting students, Jones (2012) provides a suggestion for ESP teachers of accounting students. He suggested the instructors in the accounting department of the institution should become close working partners with the ESP instructor to share information about the students’ needs for English and the ways students will use the English when they are learning accounting. The ESP teacher may ask the instructors for samples of English language materials used in accounting teaching: textbooks, research articles, and, if possible, class handouts and sample exercises. It may be useful for the ESP teacher to look at copies of old exams and materials which students used in secondary schools, if they are available. These can be adapted and used in the ESP class to reinforce what is taught in the content area classes. Jones further suggests, “Ask the subject-matter teacher to show you any equipment and laboratory facilities used by the students. Spend some time in the laboratory to determine first-hand the kinds of interactions that are important to the students in their acquisition of English” Based on those explanations above, it is clear that accounting students of SMK Tri Guna Bhakti Surabaya do not find any relevance between the English teaching and learning materials provided to them and their needs in learning English as accounting students. Those students need a more specific English material and class, that is, English for Specific Purposes course for accounting students. According to the answers of those students in questionnaire, they will fully appreciate and support the plan of the curriculum planners of their school in designing English for Specific Purposes course for each study program, especially for accounting students. CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION Conclusion According to the results of this study, the researcher can conclude that the accounting students of SMK Tri Guna Bhakti Surabaya do not find any relevance between the English maerials that they have to learn in the class and their needs in learning English as accounting students. Their need in learning English is being able to communicate in English well in the subject area of accounting but unfortunately, their English learning materials are not related to the accounting study program. It means that they are still provided with general English learning materials. Suggestion After considering the results and the conclusion of this needs analysis, the suggestion is given to: The English Teachers of SMK Tri Guna Bhakti Surabaya The English teachers of this school have to provide their students with relevant English learning materials. They should know whether their English materials which are provided to the students are related to the study program and their students’ needs in learning English or not. REFERENCES Arikunto, and Suharsimi. 2002. Prosedur Penelitian, Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Brindley, G. 1984. Needs Analysis an Objective Setting in the Adult Migrant Education Program. Sydney: N.S.W Adult Migrant Service. Burnett, L. 1998. Issues in Immigrant Settlement in Australia. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research. Conelly, E.M and D.J Clandinin. 1988. Teachers as Curriculum Planners. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University. Elley,W. 1984. Tailoring the Evaluation to Fit the Context. The Second Language Curriculum. New York: Cambridge University Press. Gilleard, J., & Gilleard, J.D. 2002. Developing Cross-Cultural Communication Skills. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 128, 187–200. Hutchinson, T., and A. Waters. 1987. English for Specific Purposes. New York: Cambridge University Press. Jones. 2012. English for Accounting Students (http://collections.infocollections.org/ukedu/en/d/Jm0031e/4.2.html) Kaewpet, C. 2009. A Framework for Investigating Learner Needs: Needs Analysis Extended to Curriculum Development. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 2009, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 209–220. Linse, C.T. 1993. Assessing Student Needs. In Richards, J.C. 2001. Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press. Moleong, Lexy. J. 1980. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. Richards, J.C. 2001. Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press. Robinson, P.C. 1991. ESP Today: A Practitioner’s Guide. New York: Prentice Hall International. Rodgers, C. 1969. Freedom to Learn. In Hutchinson, T., and A. Waters. 1987. English for Specific Purposes. New York: Cambridge University Press. Shaw, J., and G. Dowsett. 1986. The Evaluation Process in the Adult Migrant Education Program. Adelaide: Adult Migrant Education Program. Surakhmad, Winarno. 2004. Pengantar Penelitian Ilmiah Dasar Metode dan Teknik. Bandung: CV. Trasilo.
PROBLEM-BASED INSTRUCTION IN THE TEACHING OF SPEAKING
RETAIN Vol 2 No 1 (2014): Volume 2, Nomor1, Januari - April 2014
Publisher : RETAIN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Problem-Based Instruction in The Teaching of Speaking1PROBLEM-BASED INSTRUCTION IN THE TEACHING OF SPEAKINGAnggia Oktavianti A. dan SusantoS1- English Education, Language and Art Faculty, Surabaya State UniversityAbstractProblem-Based Instruction (PBI) is a learner-centered educational method in which students work in groups to solve the problem. Teacher’s role and responsibilities in Problem-based instruction method are different. The teacher acts as resource, facilitator and evaluator of students’ accomplishment. The teacher does not simply present information or directly control the progression of work. Instead, the teacher provides students with appropriate problems to work on, assists them in identifying and accessing the materials and equipment necessary to solve the problems, gives necessary feedback and support during the problem solving process, and evaluates students’ participation and products, with the goal of helping them develop their problem-solving as well as their language and literacy skills. This research aims to describe the teacher activities when she acts as a resource of students’ accomplishment, the teacher activities when she acts as a facilitator of students’ accomplishment. It is also aims to describe the teacher activities when she acts as an evaluator of students’ accomplishment. The researcher chose descriptive qualitative as the research design because the subject of this study is to describe the activities of the teacher during the implementation of Problem-based instruction and there is no treatment in this study. The researcher concentrated on one of English teacher who teach in a high school in countryside. The data in this study are the result of observation field note and interview. The data are analyzed descriptively to answer the research questions. The writer wrote all information about everything happen during the teaching-learning process in the form of long note. The writer also combined the observation method with the interview to avoid bias and subjectivity in collecting the data. The result of observation showed that the teacher activities were in line with theories about the activities of the teacher in the Problem-based instruction method. Based on the finding of data analysis and discussion, the researcher drew a conclusion: First, the teacher did her role as a resource of students’ accomplishment, second, the teacher did her role as a facilitator of students accomplishment and the third she also did her role as an evaluator of students accomplishment.Keywords: Problem-based instruction, speaking, narrative textINTRODUCTIONProblem-Based Instruction (PBI) is a learner-centered educational method. Problem-based instruction was described as learning approach that students do an authentic problem to arrange their own knowledge, to develope inquiry and the higher thinking process, and to develope self confidence independently (Arends in Triyanto, 1997). There are five stages in implementation of Problem-Based Instruction, the stages are: pre-teaching, introduce problem and vocabulary, grouping students and provide resource, observe and support, follow up and assess progress.In pre-teaching stage, the teacher explains the learning goal and make sure that the students already understand the goal and benefits of a Problem-based instruction. In the second step that is introduce problem and vocabulary, the teacher should introduce students to the problem and vocabulary related to the problem. In the third stage, the teacher divided the students in group and allowed the student to assess some resources. In the observe and support stages, teacher observe and provide support as needed, provide feedback on student participation in the activity also required in this stage. In the last stage, the teacher provides students with opportunities to present the results of their work, assessing student’s participation also required in this stage.In Kumalasari study (2011), which was conducted to know the implementation of the Problem-based instruction (PBI) to teach writing analytical exposition in eleventh graders, the result of the study showed that the content of the students’ composition were knowledgeable toward the issue or topic. The generic structure of the composition were logical sequencing. And in applying the language use, most of composition only made a few errors of agreement, tense, nouns, relating verb.Speaking is an essential skill for English learner as a foreign language alongside listening, reading, and writing in the process of learning. Despite its importance, applying an interactive teaching method is necessary. So that, teacher keep applying and developing method in teaching-learning process. However, most of student still think that speaking is difficult. According toProblem-Based Instruction in The Teaching of Speaking2Rivers (1968:192) there are some factors why the students prefer to keep silent in the class. First, they are afraid of making mistakes and the second is student are usually bored with the classroom activity. That’s why the teacher has to find a good approach, method, or technique to teach their students. With an appropriate method, teacher will teach the student successfully. One of the methods that can be used to overcome this problem is using Problem Based Instruction method (PBI).Several teachers in Indonesia has implemented this method. One of them is an English teacher in one of public Sunior High School in Jombang. She has implemented the method to teach speaking to her students. She has been successful in implementing Problem-Based Instruction method for the teaching speaking to her students. By using this method, the students encounter a problem and try to solve it with information they already possess allowing them to appreciate what they already know. They also identify what they need to learn to better understand the problem and how to resolve it.From the information above, the researcher decides to conduct same research like previous researcher did but different in skill, text and problem. She will analyze about the implementation Problem-based instruction in teaching speaking at senior high school. She also concern to know more about what are the teacher role during Problem-Based Instruction method in speaking class. It is to know the teacher’s activities when she acts as a resources,a facilitator, and an evaluator of students accomplisment.METHODOLOGYResearch DesignThe study was designed as a descriptive qualitative research. According to Susanto (2002: 36) descriptive research is a research in which the researcher has to describe and interpret the events happened in detail. It means that descriptive qualitative research describes what exist in reality, which involves the description, recording, analysis and interpretation of the condition of that exist.Subject of the StudyThe subject of the study were an English teacher who teach in a high school of a countryside. The researcher chose the subject because one of the teacher had implemented Problem Based Instruction (PBI) in the teaching speaking in her class.Data and source of the dataData are certain information used as the basis material of the analysis to get the answer of the research questions. There were two kinds of qualitative data to answer the research questions of this study. The first data were the description of teacher’ expressions, comments and behaviors which show her activities as a resource in Problem based instruction method. These data were used to answer the first research question “what are the teacher’s activities when she acts as a resource of students accomplishment during the implementation of PBI method?”.The second data were the description of teacher’ expressions, comments and behaviors which show her activities as a facilitator in Problem-based instruction method. These data were used to answer the second research question “what are the teacher’s activities when she acts as a facilitator of students’ accomplishment during the implementation of PBI method?”The third data were the description of teacher’ expressions, comments and behaviors whether it is verbal or non-verbal during the teaching learning process (1). These showed her activities as an evaluator of students accomplishment in Problem based instruction method. These data were used to answer the third research question “what are the teacher’s activities when she acts as an evaluator of students accomplishment during the implementation of PBI method?” The researcher also took the teacher’ responses by giving interview. The questions of the interview related to the teaching and learning process. The result of the interview will be used to support the main data. The sources of data for this study were the students who followed the teaching and learning process.Data Collection TechniqueIn this study the writer collected the data through observation since this study is categorized as a qualitative research. Observation is the process of gathering open-ended first-hand information by observing people and places to record information as it occurs and to study actual behavior at a research site (craswell:210). The writer used field note observation. Bogdan and Biklen (in Moleong 2005: 209) stated field note is written note about what was heard, seen, thought and had been around in order to collect as well as reflect the data in qualitative research. The writer wrote all information about everything happen during the teaching-learning process in the form of long note. The writer also combined the observation method with the interview to the teacher to avoid bias and subjectivity in collecting the data.Problem-Based Instruction in The Teaching of Speaking3Data Analysis TechniqueThe result of the data was analyzed descriptively. The researcher tend to write all information that she saw and heard. According to Susanto (2008:56) there are four steps to analyze the observation data, they are as followed:1. Classifying the dataIn observation field notes, the data are teachers’ answer in the form of utterances, and expressions spoken/given by the teachers during interview sessions which are transcribed into written form. These data should be classified into some titles which are represented the data classification in order to make it easier to be read and understood.2. Separating the dataAfter the data were classified into some titles, the researcher separates the relevant and irrelevant data with the research problems. The relevant data will be analyzed to the next steps. In this step the researcher should have mind mapping to organize and to compose chapter IV based on research problem.3. Synthesizing the dataIn this study the data was collected by one observer with different methods, observation and interview. There will not appear any significant different in both data because the use of second method is to find the correct data of the first method. Both of the data are synthesized to find out the similarity and the different.4. Reporting the dataIn the previous steps are the steps where the researcher starts to compose the report. All the findings, discussion and conclusion are inductively composed as the answers of the research problems of chapter one.RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONThe implementation of Problem-based instruction in the teaching speakingThe data were obtained through the observation that was focused in the teachers’ activities during the implementation of Problem-Based Instruction. The implementation of Problem-Based Instruction method was divided into five stages, they are pre teaching, introducing problem and vocabulary, group students and provide resource, observe and support, and the last was follow up and assess progress. Before the teacher implemented the problem-based instruction method, she explained the material about narrative text. In the beginning of the class, the teacher greeted the students, asked about their condition and checked the attendance list. The teacher explained to the students about what they were going to do for the lesson that day. She read the basic competence and the learning objective for them. It was purposed to ensure that all the students knew what they needed to achieve at the end of the study. After giving explanation about the basic competence, and the learning objectives the teacher gave apperception for the students related to the goal they wanted to achieve. Teacher started the lesson by reviewing about narrative text that students have learned in the first grade. She also gave some explained about the Problem-based instruction method before she apply in the class activity. This was done by the teacher to make her students understand about the method that the teacher will apply. Therefore, they will easier in the next activity.The teacher activities as a resource of students’ accomplishmentThe results of the observation show that the teacher did some activities; they were guidance as to where students can go to look for information, encourage students to use resource material for themselves and to become more independent in the learning generally. When the students asked about something they didn’t understand. The teacher explained it clearly therefore, the student know what is that exactly. And the teacher took part by giving the correct pronunciation to the students, therefore, the students became understood how to pronounce those words.The teacher also help the student to know where they can find the information that they want to know. There was a student asked about difficult words and she let the student to take a look on the dictionary first and then she also let the student find it in the teacher dictionary. She didn’t give the answer directly because she knew exactly that her job here was guiding the students. Harmer (2007: 110) states that when we are acting as a resource, we will want to be helpful and available, but at the same time we have to resist the urge of spoonfeed our students so that they become over reliant on us. As a resource does not mean that the teacher should give all the answer without any recommendation, teacher should guide them so that they can find the answer by themselves.Teacher activities as a facilitator of students’ accomplishmentProblem-Based Instruction in The Teaching of Speaking4Based on results which are gained from the analysis data, the researcher concluded that the teacher did some activities began from made sure students understand the goals and benefits of a problem based approach for language learning. The teacher introduced the problem using text eventhough she did not introduce vocabulary related to the problem since the problem different, she also group students and give students access to resources, and while the students are working in their group, she walked around the class and visited each group. She gave feedback helpful and meaningful on students. According to Gentry (2000:11) “teacher have a huge responsibility because they are the first point of contact with their students and have a tremendous influence over the way they learn.” The giving up of support and observe the class are the part of problem-based instruction thatthe teacher usually struggle with the most. However, support by the teacher made the learning better in the activity. At last, the teacher also provided the students opportunities to perform their result and gave some critics and suggestion to the groups’ performance.Teacher activities as an evaluator of students accomplishmentThe results of observation which show that the teacher did her role as an evaluator. The teacher gave some critics and also provides suggestion to each groups’ performance. As an evaluator the teacher should assess the students’ performance. As Zeiger (2000) in chapter two stated that teacher also play the role of evaluators, constantly assessing students’ abilities through formal and informal assessments, providing suggestions for improvement and assigning grades. After the groups’ performance, she always gave her critics and also suggestion.CONCLUSIONThe major problem of this study is the teachers’ activity during the Problem-instruction method. The main problem that is developed based on the teacher activity during the problem instruction divided into three, they are: (1) the teacher activities as a resource of students’ accomplishment, (2) the teacher activities as a facilitator of students’ accomplishment, (3) the teacher activities as an evaluator of students’ accomplishment.Based on the findings of data analysis and discussion in the previous chapter, the researcher drew a conclusion: first, the teacher did her role as a resource of students’ accomplishment. The teacher guidance as to where students can go look for that information and encourage students to use resource material for themselves and to become more independent in their learning generally. Second, the teacher did her role as a facilitator of students’ accomplishment. Her activities as a facilitator began from pre-teaching, introduced problem and vocabulary, group students and provided resource, observed and support the groups’ working, follow up and asses progress. And the third was the teacher did her role as an evaluator of students’ accomplishment. The teacher gave students critics after each groups’ performance about their pronunciation, action, she also provide suggestion for each group performance for improvement and finally, she developed rubric in evaluating students’ performance.SUGGESTIONAt the end of this study, some suggestions are offered related to the result of the study. The result of this study was that the teacher did her role as a resource of students’ accomplishment, facilitator and evaluator of students’ accomplishment, but to become a professional teacher she also must have the other aspect, having a good teaching skill. Therefore first, the researcher suggest to the teacher to design more authentic problem with the propose of promotes meaningful interaction in the classroom. Second, the researcher suggest to the teacher to consider about language use that she choose. Third, the researcher suggests to other researchers to conduct a similar study, but they can view from the other aspects such as the grade levels of education, and various type of genre.REFERENCESAnderson & Anderson. (2003). Text Types in English. South Yarra: Macmillan.Barrows, H (1985). How to design a Problem-Based Curriculum for the Pre Clinical Yaers. NY: Springer.Boothe, Diane. 2007. The Future of Education: Innovative English Language Acquisition Through Problem-Based Learning.Brown, H. Douglas. 2007. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Third Edition. New York: Longman Inc.Chaney, A.L., and T.L. Burk. 1998. Teaching Oral Communication in Grades K-8. Boston: Allyn&Bacon.Disick ,Renee S and M. Valette,Rebecca. 1972. Modern Language Performance Objectives and Individialization a Handbook. New York: Harcout Brace Jovanonich, Inc.Problem-Based Instruction in The Teaching of Speaking5Engel, C E (1991) Not just a method but a way of learning; pp 23-33 in Boud, D & Feletti, G (eds) The Challenge of Problem-Based Learning. London: Kogan page.Gentry, F (2000) Creating Student Centered , Problem-based classroom. In (Ed), (p). Huntsville: University of Alabama in Huntsville Retrieved August 10, 2013, from http://aspire.cs.uah.edu/Harmer, Jeremy. 2007. The Practice of English Language Teaching. Fourth Edition. Harlow : UK: Pearson Education Limited.Kumalasari, vivi shantya. 2011. Problem Based Instruction (PBI) IN Teaching Writing Analytical Exposition Text for Eleventh GradeStudents. Unpublished Thesis. Universitas Negeri Surabaya.Mathews-Aydinli, J. (2007). Problem-Based Learning and Adult English Language Learners. In Center of Adult English Language Acquisition (CAELA). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistic.McDonald, D & Isaacs, G (2001) Developing a professional identity through problem-based learning. Teaching Education. 12 315-333.Moleong, J. Lexy. 2005. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.Rivers, M. Wilga. 1983. Speaking in many Tongues: Essays in Foreign Language Teaching Third Edition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Susanto. 2002. Develpoing a research proposal (a Practical Guideline). Universitas Negeri Surabaya.Trianto (2007), Model-model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi Konstruktivistik: Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.
THE USE OF ADJUSTED READING MATERIALS IN THE TEACHING OF READINGCOMPREHENSION
RETAIN Vol 2 No 1 (2014): Volume 2, Nomor1, Januari - April 2014
Publisher : RETAIN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Adjusted Reading Materials for Reading Comprehension1THE USE OF ADJUSTED READING MATERIALS IN THE TEACHING OF READINGCOMPREHENSIONRestu Santyarini092084013English Education, Faculty of Language and Art, State University of Surabayarestubelle.santya@gmail.comDosen Pembimbing:Prof. Dr. Susanto, M. Pd.English Department, Faculty of Language and Art, State University of SurabayaAbstrakPenggunaan materi yang terlalu sulit oleh guru ketika mengajar reading menjadi alasan kenapa siswatidak dapat memahami teks dengan baik. Mereka menemukan banyak kesulitan ketika membaca teksnaratif yang diberikan. Guru harus merivisi RPP sebelumnya dengan memilih materi yang disesuaikanyang sejalan dengan kemampuan, kebutuhan dan ketertarikan siswa. Riset ini merupakan penelitiantindakan kelas yang hanya terdiri dari satu siklus. Ini disebabkan karena hasil pembelajaran menunjukkanbahwa tujuan pembelajaran telah dicapai. Riset ini diadakan di kelas VIII di salah satu SMP di Ngawi.Peneliti melakukan kolaborasi dengan guru dalam melaksanakan proses belajar mengajar. Penelitimenggunakan catatan lapangan tidak terstruktur untuk mengumpulkan data. Data harus dipilah dandiklasifikasikan menjadi data yang relevan dan tidak relevan. Kemudian data yang relevan akandiklasifikasikan dan dianalisis berdasarkan rumusan masalah. Hasil pengamatan menunjukkan bahwapenggunaan materi membaca yang sesuai membantu siswa untuk mengkategorisasikan teks naratifberdasarkan strukturnya, mengidentifikasi pesan moral dari teks naratif, menjawab pertanyaan seputarteks naratif dan menyimpulkan teks naratif.Kata Kunci: Penggunaan, Materi Membaca yang Sesuai, Pemahaman MembacaAbstractThe use of difficult narrative materials by the teacher in the teaching reading seems to be the reason whythe students cannot comprehend the text well. They found many difficulties in reading the narrative textgiven. The teacher should revise the previous lesson plan by choosing the adjusted reading materials whichin accordance with the students’ ability, need and interest. This research is a classroom action research withone cycle only. It was because the result of the study indicated that the goals of the study have beenaccomplished. This research was conducted at class VIII in one of junior high school in Ngawi. Theresearcher made collaboration with the teacher in conducting the teaching and learning process. Theresearcher used unstructured field notes to collect the data. The data had to be sorted and classified tochoose the relevant data and un-relevant data. Then the relevant data will be classified and analyzed basedon the research questions. The result of the observation indicated that the use of adjusted reading materialin the revised lesson plan helped the students in categorizing the narrative text based on its genericstructure, identifying the moral value of the narrative text, answering the question of the narrative text aswell as inferring the narrative text.Keywords: The use, Adjusted Reading Material, Reading Comprehension.INTRODUCTIONBackground of StudyStudents’ comprehension is the ultimate goal for thestudents when they do learn reading skill. It is the processof the readers to construct the meaning of the text theyread. Iwai (2010) states reading comprehension is basedon using the appropriate meaning-making processes fromthe printed messages. From Iwai’s statement it could beindicated that reading comprehension involves thepassage, the reader, and the context. The readersconstruct meanings of the passage using their backgroundknowledge, analyzing words, inferring the text, andidentifying key vocabulary or information. From thoseexplanations it could be concluded that readingcomprehension needs readers’ thinking and reasoning inorder to does it well. Since they must activate what theyhave known to build the meaning of the passage withoutknowing the meaning of each word. They relate theirknowledge and the context of the passage to build themeaning of whole.Ejournal Unesa. Volume 01 Nomor 01 Tahun 2013, 0 - 216In one of small towns in East Java, there is a juniorhigh school which locates in the edge of big road ofSurabaya-Solo. Because of its location, this school isvery crowded. The teaching of English lesson in thisschool is conducted two times a week. One of the classesin this school is the eighth grade of C which consists of25 students, 14 females and 11 males. The class is largeenough for teaching and learning process. This class isnot completed with an AC, a LCD projector, as well as aspeaker. The students have arranged the chairs and tableswell in order to make them study easily. They mix theirseats so that the clever students will spread with the lowand medium students. When the teacher taught the basiccompetence 11.3 which about responding the meaningand rhetorical action of a short simple essay accurately,fluently and in the context of everyday life in the form ofrecount and narrative, she gave a narrative text to them,then she asked them to comprehend the text. The teacherused clear and loud voice during teaching learningprocess; however it was not enough to make the studentsunderstand the text well. Besides the fact indicates that inthe process of the teacher guiding them to comprehendthe text, there were several students who felt difficult tounderstand the text. Although there were some studentswho actively guessed the meaning of the text, there weremore students who were silent or talking to their friends.It made them cannot complete the task well. The teacherused three-phase technique, speech, questions-answersand task gift to teach reading. It seemed to be boringactivities for the students because they had lessopportunity to take part in the learning process.At that time, the teacher explained about narrativetext. However the narrative texts given to the studentswere very difficult for them. It was very confusing thestudents. The text used by the teacher was out of theircapability. They had to depend on the dictionary to knowthe meaning of words. It seemed to be boring for them.As the result, they stopped finding the meaning in thedictionary and started talking to others. It was one of thereasons why the students found difficulties duringreading class. They spent most of their time to find themeaning of the words than understand what the text talkabout. In other cases, there were some parts of the lessonplan that needed to be revised. It included the indicatorsand learning objectives. The indicators in the lesson planwere not specific enough. She only stated the studentscould identify the information, the aim and the languagefeatures of the functional text. How the students wouldidentify this kind of text without knowing what the textis. Besides, the objectives of study she designed were notbased on the indicators. It seemed that they were fromdifferent part. It was important for her to design theobjectives of the study from the indicators. So she couldmeasure whether the indicators have been reached by thestudents or not by looking to the objectives of the study.Furthermore, learning activities of the lesson plan wereonly teacher activities. There had to be students’activities too since in the teaching learning process themain actors are the students. The teacher is only theassistant who will help them when they find difficulties.Whereas the assessment in the lesson plan was onlyproduct assessment, there was no process assessment. Inthe teaching and learning activities, the most importantthing was in the process. It was not only the students’result that could be used as the measurement of thesuccessful learning. It also could be seen from theprocess. It was the reason why process assessment wasvery needed to be stated in the lesson plan.The revised lesson plan was given to the teacher asthe solution to the problem faced by her. Choosing theadjusted reading material for the students was theimportant thing to do. It should be easier material thatcould help them to understand what narrative actually is.It should be familiar to them so that they couldcomprehend it well. It also included formulating morespecific indicators based on the basic competence,adjusting the learning objectives to the indicators,designing the learning activities which will encouragestudents to participate as well as doing the processassessment correctly. The new learning activities weredivided into 2 tasks. The first task was applying pairwork. The students were asked to work in pair, then theygot a narrative from the teacher and their job was tocomprehend the text given. The second was applyingQuiz. To do quiz, the teacher divided the class into twobig groups. Every group got a text. Then the member ofeach group made a question to be asked to the oppositeteam. The team that could get biggest was the winner.During the quiz was running, the teacher was being themoderator of the two groups.The students can be called as successful readerswhen they can comprehend all the component of the text.They know what the text about. They are capable toanswer the questions related to the text (the explicitmeaning) as well as differentiate connotation and implicitmeaning of the text. From the rational above, it wasnecessary to conduct a research of the used of theappropriate material in teaching reading comprehension.How do the students respond toward the use ofappropriate material in the teaching of readingcomprehension? This study focused on how the studentscategorize the narrative text based on its genericstructure, how the students identify the moral value of thenarrative text, how the students answer when they getquestions from the teacher and how the students makeinferences while reading the narrative text.Review LiteratureThe ultimate goal of learning a language is to beable to comprehend and produce it in unrehearsedsituation, which demands both receptive and productivecreativity (Brown: 2000). Based on that statement, weknow that someone can be said learning a language ifhe/she can use it in every situation. However in thereading process, they do not only extract the meaning ofevery word but also connect the information they havegot from the text with their own prior knowledge. Pang,Muaka, Bernhardt, & Kamil (2003) state reading is acomplex activity that involves both perception andthought. From their statement we know that the readers’knowledge also play a role to help them understand thetext more. They have had prior knowledge in the form ofAdjusted Reading Materials for Reading Comprehension3perception. It is about what they have known. It may berelated to the new information stated in the text. Thenthey will start to think in order to get the meaning fromwritten text they read. It may make them understand thetext easier. Based on those explanations, the writerconcludes that reading is an active activity of seeking theinformation stated on the text and relating to their ownprior knowledge.Reading comprehension is the ability to understanda written passage of text. It allows readers to interact withthe text in a meaningful way. It is the bridge from passivereading to active reading. Active readers will not readfrom letters and words but from characters and contexts.For many, it also unlocks the door to a lifetime of readingrecreation and enjoyment. Supporting to that, Pardo(2004) says that comprehension is a process in whichreaders construct meaning by interacting with the textthrough the combination of prior knowledge and previousexperience, information in the text, and the stance thereader takes in relationship to the text. Before reading atext, readers have their own knowledge. In the process ofcomprehending, this knowledge will be very useful forthem. The combination of readers’ prior knowledge andtext’s information will be a great factor to build meaningof the text. The goal of teaching reading comprehensionstrategies is to give readers the tools which they need tobe effective readers and independent learners (Moreillon:2007). Reading itself is not an activity of getting fixedmeaning from written texts. The readers may use theirprior knowledge to support them in understanding thetext. In the process of reading, sometimes readers do notonly get a text with familiar words but also a text withunfamiliar words. They is not necessarily to read andunderstand the meaning of every word. They only need tofind the main idea of the text so that they can make asummarize about it.The material that should be taught in reading lessonmust be in accordance with the students’ interests andbackgrounds. In spite of it all, the teacher should alsoconsider the applicable curriculum. According to theprevailing curriculum, the material to be taught is anarrative text. So here the teacher should present thenarrative text that can attract students as well as notcontrary to the background of the students. This willmake the students more interested in reading activities.Iwai (2007) states the teacher needs to be aware in howthe students relate their prior knowledge and interact witha text critically, so that it guides them to have deeperunderstanding of texts and to become more powerfulreaders in other types of reading materials. Basically themore the students know about the material they are goingto read, the more successful readers they will be. It isbecause they do not need to struggle to comprehend thetexts. Only by reading the title, they will know what willhappen next. It is the way where their prior knowledgetakes role most.There are some studies which are conducted in theimplementation of fun reading comprehension teaching.The recent study was done by Akgün (1997) whichconcludes that the teacher must try to use fun activities inthe classes before she makes the necessary changesaccording to the specific needs and attitudes of your ownstudents. Other study was done by Raman (2004). Itconcludes that using reading quiz in the reading class isone way of motivating students to read and sustainingtheir interest in reading.The followings are the steps of teaching readingcomprehension adapted from Valette & Disick (1972)and Brown (2000). They can be done in the teachingreading comprehension using adjusted reading materials.The first step to do is pre-reading activities. Here, theteacher finds an interesting passage, which may appeal tomost of your students. By doing that, the teacher tries toactivate the students’ prior knowledge. Besides, theteacher needs to introduce the topic of the passage,encourage skimming, scanning, and predicting. Thestudents can bring the best of their knowledge and skillsto a passage when they can relieve to it. They will feelless unpleasant to the reading activities because they havealready been familiar with the passage which is usingtheir daily topics. The ultimate goal of reading iscomprehension, so in the second stage the teacher needsto direct the students to that goal. It can be adapted fromRaman (2004) who used quiz for his teaching of readingcomprehension. It can present fun while-readingactivities.METHODOLOGYResearch DesignThe design of this research is classroom actionresearch. According to Susanto (2007) classroom actionresearch is a research about the implementation ofteaching and learning process in the classroom. It isconducted to improve the quality of education byevaluating the previous unsuccessful study. It must be aproblem why the study is unsuccessful. It means that theproblem of the research comes from the classroom itself.Wallace (1998) also explains that action research isdifferent with other researchs in that it nearly alwaysarises from some spesific problem or issue arissing out ofusual practice. Therefore it focuses in the problem in itsapproach and practices in its intended outcomes. Thoseexplanantions give clear descriptions why in doing thisresearch the researcher needs to collaborate with theteacher of the class. They become partners for this study.It is because the teacher is someone who knows thestudents’ ability and behavior in the class.Setting of the StudyThe setting of the study was class VIII of SMPNegeri 2 Geneng. The researcher chose this class becausebased on the teacher’s information this class had problemsin the teaching and learning process. This class consists of25 students, 14 females and 11 males. It is large enoughfor teaching and learning process. It is not completed withan AC, a LCD projector, as well as a speaker. Thestudents have arranged the chairs and tables well in orderEjournal Unesa. Volume 01 Nomor 01 Tahun 2013, 0 - 216to make them study easily. They mix their seats so that theclever students will spread with the low and mediumstudents. It is purposed to make the class go smoothly. Itseems not to work because several students feel difficultto comprehend the narrative text given by the teacher.Although there are some students who actively guess themeaning of the text, there are more students who are silentor talking to their friends. It make them cannot completethe task well and the class be crowded.Research ProceduresThis classroom action research has some steps.According to Susanto (2007), those steps are planning,implementation, observation and reflection in the field andreflection stage.1. Planning StageIn this stage, the researcher looked for someonewho could be a partner of this research. This partnerhad to be a teacher. She is needed as the requirementof Classroom Action Research that is collaborativeand classroom-based. The teacher explained herproblem during the learning process. This problemwas identified and evaluated by the researcher andthe teacher. Then they formulated the researchproblem in order to be solved by using classroomaction research. They prepared all the things whichwere used during the learning process. It consisted ofreformulating the new lesson plan. It concerned withthe learning materials which were used by theteacher.After making the revised lesson plan, theresearcher and the teacher set the criteria of thestudy. These criteria were in line with researchquestions of the study. They were used to measurethe students’ comprehension. The following are thecriteria of the study1. The first criterion was based on the firstresearch question, “1.2.1. To what extent arethe students able to categorize the narrativetext based on its generic structure?”. It meansthat the ultimate goal of the students learningwas the students were able to categorize thenarrative text based on its generic structures.The text used for the first criterion was SnowWhite. Students were required to categorizethe text of Snow White given by the teacher.The students were considered to be able tomeet the target of the first research question if75% of the number of students (22 students)was able to categorize narrative text based onits generic structure correctly; that isorientation, complication and resolution.2. The second criterion was according to thesecond research question, “1.2.2. To whatextent are the students able to identify themoral value of the narrative text?”. The goalof the study was the students could identify themoral value of the narrative text. Here, theresearcher used two different texts, Mantu’sLittle Elephant and The Goose That LaidGolden Eggs. The reason why the researcherused two texts was because in the process oflearning, the teacher asked the students tomake two big groups. Each group got a text.The students were considered to be able tomeet the target of the second research questionif 75% of the number of students (22 students)was able to identify the moral value of thenarrative text correctly.3. The third criterion was based on the thirdresearch question, “1.2.3. To what extent arethe students able to answer the questions aboutthe narrative text given by the teacher?”. Theresult to be achieved was the students wereable to answer the questions about the giventext. Here, the researcher used the same text asthe text used in the second criterion becausethe second and third criteria would be achievedby students in the same task, which wasplaying quiz. But in this third criterion,students were stated being successful not onlyfrom their ability to answer questions, but alsoon their ability to ask questions. Students wereconsidered to meet the target of the thirdresearch question if 75% of the number ofmembers of each group (11 students in eachgroup) was able to ask questions and alsoanswer questions about the two texts properly.4. The fourth criterion was according to thefourth research question, “1.2.4. To whatextent are the students able to make inferenceswhile reading the narrative text given by theteacher?”. For the fourth criterion, theresearcher used the same text as the firstcriterion that was Snow White. This wasbecause the first and the fourth criteria weredone in the same task. Teacher asked studentsto work in pairs. Then they had to infer whatthey read as a single group. The students wereconsidered to be able to fulfill the fourthresearch question if 75% of the number of thestudents (22 students) was able to infer thenarrative text given by the teacher.In the revised lesson plan, the researcherdesigned the meeting into two. In the first meeting,the teacher gave two narrative texts to the studentsthat were Malin Kundang and Snow White. MalinKundang was used to explain the concept ofnarrative text to the students. After explaining, theteacher asked the students to work in pair to discussthe text of Snow White. While in the secondmeeting, the teacher gave two other texts to thestudents, Mantu’s Little Elephant and The GooseThat Laid Golden Eggs. They were asked to make aclass work then they had to make questions aboutAdjusted Reading Materials for Reading Comprehension5the text and asked them to their opposite group. Inconclusion the researcher set the revised lesson planwith two tasks of four different narrative texts intwo meetings. The researcher and the teacher alsoprepared field notes to write all information andeverything happened during teaching learningprocess. So it could be concluded that this stage wasthe stage where they made a new scenario of theteaching process.2. Implementation StageIt was the stage where the new scenario of theteaching process was implemented. Here, theteacher taught as she did regularly. She taught basedon the revised lesson plan which was formulated inthe planning stage. This stage was held in twomeeting. The first meeting was used by the teacherto explain about the concept of narrative.Example 1. Descriptive NoteCatatan Deskriptif:Guru kemudian menunjukkan slide yangsudah disiapkan, Didalam slide dijelaskanapa itu teks naratif, generic structure,tujuan komunikatif dan strukturkebahasaan dari teks naratif sekaligussebuah contoh teks naratif. Contoh yangdiberikan adalah cerita Malin Kundang.Selama menampilkan slide, guru jugamemberikan pertanyaan kepada siswanyamengenai apa yang ada di dalam slide.Guru : “Okay students, pay attention tothese slides please. Here, you can see thatnarrative text is the text for …Siswa : “Entertaining the readers”(serentak)Guru : “Good students. So if you want tobe entertained, you can read narrative text.What about its generic structure? Let’s goto the next slide. It consists of the first,orientation. It is about the openingparagraph where the characters of the storyare introduced. The second is complication.It is the part where the problems in thestory developed. The third or the last isresolution. What is resolution? Anyoneknows what is it?…….Here, the teacher ensured that all the studentshave good understanding of narrative text beforethey went to the next activity. The second meetingwas used to employ quiz.Example 2. Descriptive NoteCatatan Deskriptif:Guru menjelaskan apa yang akan dilakukanhari ini. Mereka akan mengadakan kuis.kemudian guru menjelaskan caramemainkannya. Siswa mendengarkandengan seksama penjelasan yang diberikanoleh guru. Salah satu siswa mengajukanpertanyaan ketika tidak mengertipenjelasan yang diberikan.Guru : “Okay class, we are going to have aquiz for today. I have divided youinto two groups. Then I will giveyou two texts. The first text willbelong to group one and the secondwill belong to group two. Then yourjob is to read the text and makequestions based on it. The questionsmust include comprehensionquestions, vocabulary items andgrammar items. The questions canbe in the form of true/false, yes/no,matching to synonyms, antonymsand so on. You may use dictionarywhile making questions. Eachmember of the group has tocontribute at least two questions.After having prepared the questions,you have to read the other half ofthe passage as you will have toanswer questions based on it. Anyquestions so far?”………..It was to reduce students’ boredom duringreading process. It also showed how the studentsunderstanding of narrative text delivered in the firstmeeting.3. Observation and Reflection in the Field StageThis stage was coincided with the implementationstage. It was done by the researcher. The researcherobserved the teaching learning process done by theteacher. She used field notes to take note about whathappened in the class during the teaching learningprocess.Example 4. Descriptive NoteCatatan Deskriptif:Guru melakukan apersepsi, ia menanyakanpada siswanya hal-hal seputar teks naratif.Guru : “Okay class, who knows what thenarrative text is?”Siswa : “The text for entertaining thereaders ma’am” (menjawab serentak)Guru : “That’s right. It is the text forentertaining its readers. What aboutthe generic structure?”Siswa : “Orientation, complication,resolution ma’am”. (beberapa siswa)Hanya beberapa siswa yang mampunenjawab pertanyaan dari guru mengenaigeneric structure dari teks naratif.Besides writing all the things happened, theresearcher also reflected the data which they havegotten from the implementation stage. The result ofthe reflection was realized in the form of reflectivedata.Example 4. Reflective NoteCatatan Reflektif:Guru melakukan apersepsi untukEjournal Unesa. Volume 01 Nomor 01 Tahun 2013, 0 - 216mengetahui sejauh mana siswnya telahmemahami teks naratif. Hal inidimaksudkan agar tidak terjadipengulangan materi yang akan membuatsiswa bosan.4. ReflectionIt was the stage where the researcher and theteacher made a review of the data. They gaveexplanation of the data collected in the field notes.Then they analyzed the students’ feedback duringthe teaching learning process using appropriatematerial. This feedback was as the measurement ofhow the students’ comprehension.To measure the students’ comprehension, theresearcher and the teacher had to make the criteria.They were set from the research questions of thestudy. If the students could accomplish all thecriteria stated in the research questions, the cycle ofthe study was successful. From the first task, theresearcher indicated that 75% of the numbers of thestudents have been able to categorize the text ofSnow White based on its generic structure and makeinferences while reading the text. The second taskindicated that 75% of the numbers of the studentshave been able to identify the moral value of thetexts, Mantu’s Little Elephants and The Goose ThatLaid Golden Eggs, ask questions of the texts as wellas answer the questions. Those result indicated thatthe goals of the study have been accomplished. Sothe next cycle was not needed.Data Collection TechniqueThe researcher was the key instrument of the studywhile data collection technique for this study was byusing observation which was done in form of qualitativedata. Wallace (1998) states qualitative is used to describedata which are amenable to be counted or measured in anobjective war and are therefore “subjective”. Data will bepresented in the form of words, phrases or sentences.Meanwhile,The aimed of qualitative approaches is to offerdescriptions, interpretations and clarification ofnaturalistic social context. Qualitative research drawson the data collected by the researcher to make senseof the human behavior within the research context(Burns: 1999).The researcher used unstructured field notes to writeall the information and also everything happened duringthe teaching and learning process. Still according toWallace (1998) making field notes can prevent theresearcher from trouble and confusion in presenting datacaused by continuing to the next things. It helped her toorganize the data before the data was being analized. Thefield notes organized into descriptive and reflective notes.Descriptive note contains of the description of whathappens during the teaching and learning process (seeExample 3), while reflective note was used to write whatthe researcher’s opinions and comments about all theactivity in the teaching and learning process (seeExample 4).Data AnalysisAs Susanto (2007) states in his book that data whichthe researcher gets from the observation usingunstructured format is very plentiful, but not all the dataare relevant with the requirement, they need to beclassified and proceed systematically. The relevant datawould be classified based on the research question of thestudy. After reducing un-relevant data, the researcherclassified relevant data based on the research questions ofthe study. There were four research questions. The firstwas about students’ ability in categorizing a narrative textbased on its generic structure.The second data was about the students’ ability inidentifying the moral value of the narrative text. The thirdwas about the students’ ability in answering the questionsof the narrative text. The last was about the students’ability in inferring the narrative text.RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONThe Teaching Process of a Reading ClassBefore conducting classroom observations, theresearcher discussed with the teacher about the problemsencountered during the previous learning process. Afterthat the teacher gave the lesson plan used in the previousstudy. The researcher then examined all the data obtainedfrom the description of the teacher and the previouslesson plan. After that she could conclude that the reasonwhy students have difficulty in reading comprehensionwas due to materials using by the teacher too difficult.The text used was beyond the ability of her students. Thisresulted in many more students who were silent duringthe learning process. Moreover, some students spoke withtheir friends. They surrendered to read as bored and notinterested in the text provided by the teacher. Even ifthere were students who were reading, they weredependent on a dictionary to find the meaning of difficultwords. This was very time-consuming. As a result, thepurpose of reading that was comprehension was notachieved properly.Based on the previous lesson, the researcher madethe revised lesson plan. In her revised lesson plan theresearcher chose the appropriate material based on theteacher’s description of her students ability. This wasdone to make the students did not feel difficult tocomprehend the texts given. The researcher alsoreformulated more specific indicators based on the basiccompetence, adjusted the learning objectives to theindicators, and designed the learning activities whichwould encourage students to participate as well as do theprocess assessment correctly. Students’ activities focusedon making the students to comprehend the text. In thisstudy, the researcher made collaborative research withthe teacher. The teacher was the one who taught in thereading class. The researcher observed the teachinglearning process followed by the students and took fieldnotes based on it.Adjusted Reading Materials for Reading Comprehension7According to the observation done by the researcherand data in the field notes, the researcher could say thatthe students were very interested in doing readingactivities. They also had discussion with their couplefriend as well as their classmate in a big group. Thelearning process generally was running concussively.Although there were some students who founddifficulties, it did not disrupt the learning process inreading class. By doing group discussion, they couldlearn to work together with their friends. The smartstudents would help their friends who found difficulties.The role of teacher was also evident in the learningprocess. Although the students could learn independently,but the teacher kept her eyes on them when they haddiscussions. The questions that were not answered bygroup discussion then it will be answered by the teacher.The use of appropriate materials that were in the revisedlesson plan greatly helped students in reading class.The Students’ Ability in Categorizing the NarrativeText Based on Its Generic StructureThe reading activities which was followed by thestudents were based on the revised lesson plan (Appendix2) made by the researcher. When preparing revised lessonplan, the researcher should consider the appropriateindicators to make students understood the text properly.This indicator would be used to replace the indicatorsused by the teacher in the previous lesson plan. Based onthe basic competence the students would learn thenarrative text, the important thing to do was to introducethe narrative text itself to the students. It made them ableto know the generic structure of narrative text andcategorize text given by its generic structure. The data ofstudents' ability to categorize the narrative text based onits generic structure when they had discussion would bethe answer for the first research question.In the beginning of the class, the students were busywith themselves. It was because they used the languagelaboratory for today’s lesson. They needed few time to gothere and prepare themselves to get the lesson. Afterawhile they could pay attention to the teacher. Then thestudents were greeted by the teacher. (1)(1) TeacherStudentsTeacherChoirulTeacherStudentsTeacherStudentsAntokTeacher::::::::::“Assalamu’alaikum Wr. Wb.”.“Wa’alaikummusalam Wr.Wb.” (In choir)“Ayo Choirul silahkandipimpin untuk berdoa”“Before we start our lessontoday, let’s pray together. Praybegin. (Praying together)Finish.”“Good morning students, howare you today?”“Good morning ma’am, I’mfine, thank you.”“Do you fasting?”“Yeees Ma’am”“Ma’am fasting?”“Of course Antok, I do.This greeting purposed to warn the students that thelesson would be started. The teacher also asked thestudents to pray first before starting the lesson. Theteachers wanted to familiarize her students with goodhabits so that this habit would be instilled in students.After greeting, the teacher the students’ attendance listwas checked by the teacher. Then they got theexplanation about what they were going to do for thelesson that day. The teacher read the basic competenceand the learning objective for them. It was purposed toensure that all the students knew what they needed toachieve at the end of the study. However some studentscomplained to the teacher because they got many thingsto study. (2)(2) TMegaDiniT::::“Okay class, this is our basiccompetence for the lesson today.Merespon makna dan langkahretorika dalam esai pendeksederhana secara akurat, lancardan berterima yang berkaitandengan lingkungan sekitardalam teks berbentuk recountdan narrative. For today, we willlearn about narrative text. Afterstudying, you are expected to beable to recognize what narrativetext is, identify thecommunicative purpose ofnarrative text, identify thegeneric structure of narrativetext, identify the languagefeatures of narrative text and findall the information stated in thenarrative text.”“Waduh ma’am, kok banyakbanget yang harus dipelajari.”“Iya ma’am.”“Don’t worry students, we’ll doit slowly. You can ask questionif you don’t understand. Andremember, it is not as difficult asyou think.”Brown (2000) stated that teachers should subdividetheir techniques into pre-reading, during-reading, andafter-reading phases. It could be seen in dialogue (2) thatthe teacher had divided her technique into pre-readingphase. In this phase, she tried to tell the students aboutwhat they were going to do. Then she introduced thetopic for the lesson to the students that was aboutnarrative text. There were so many indicators that had tobe mastered by the students for the day. Some studentscomplained. But teachers could calm them well. Theteacher convinced the students that all these materialswould not be a big problem because they would learnslowly. This made the students feel comfortable with thelearning atmosphere in the classroom.After giving explanation about the basiccompetence and the learning objectives, the teacher gaveapperception for the students related to the goal theywanted to achieve. (3)Ejournal Unesa. Volume 01 Nomor 01 Tahun 2013, 0 - 216(3) TSTS::::“Okay class, who knows what thenarrative text is?”“The text for entertaining thereaders ma’am” (In choir)“That’s right. It is the text forentertaining its readers. What aboutthe generic structure?”“Orientation, complication,resolution ma’am”. (Some students)Dialogue (3) indicated that not all the studentsanswered her question. It meant that not all the studentsknew about the generic structure of narrative text. Theyneeded more explanation from the teacher about narrativetext. Then the teacher showed the slides of narrative text.The slides explained about what the narrative text is, thegeneric structure of narrative text, the communicativepurpose of narrative text, language features of narrativetext as well as an example of narrative text. The examplegiven was the story Malin Kundang. During the slide wasshowed, the teacher also gave questions to the studentsabout what on the slide. (4)(4) TSTMegaTDiniTSTST:::::::::::“Okay students, pay attentionto these slides please. Here,you can see that narrative textis the text for … ““Entertaining the readers” (Inchoir)“Good students. So if you wantto be entertained, you can readnarrative text. What about itsgeneric structure? Let’s go tothe next slide. It consists of thefirst, orientation. It is about theopening paragraph where thecharacters of the story areintroduced. The second iscomplication. It is the partwhere the problems in the storydeveloped. The third or the lastis resolution. What isresolution? Anyone knowswhat is it?”“Problemnya diselesaikanma’am.”“Good Mega, Here inresolution, the problem of thestory is solved.”“Kalo sad ending gimanama’am?”“Good question Dini.Resolution of narrative text canbe better or worse. If it isbetter, it will be happy ending.If it is worse, … ““It will be sad ending ma’am.”(In choir)“Great students. Any questionsso far?”“No Ma’am”“The next is about theGaluhMegaTSTHoniYayankTAntokT::::::::::communicative purpose ofnarrative text. It is used toamuse, entertain and to dealwith an actual or vicariousexperience in different ways.Now I have question for youstudents, how are the languagefeatures of narrative text?”“Pake ed ed Ma’am”“Was were Ma’am”“Is it right? Let’s check in thisnext slide. The languagefeatures of narrative text areusing past tense. So Mega andGaluh are right. Yang pake edsama was atau were. It isbecause the story happened inthe past time. Another languagefeature is using pronoun. Whatis pronoun?”(Silent)“Kata ganti orang, such as I,we, she, he and it. Who canmention the example ofnarrative text?”“Cinderella Ma’am”“Malin Kundang”“Good, students. Okay, haveyou ever read the story ofMalin Kundang?”“Pernah ma’am, yang anakdurhaka itu kan ma’am?”“Yes, you’re right Antok.Malin Kundang is one of theexamples of narrative text. Youcan see in the slide.”To make them more understand about narrative text,the teacher used the story which is common for them.According to Brown (2000), the teacher had to balanceauthenticity and readability in choosing texts. The teachershould adjust the text given to the abilities and needs ofher students. By doing this, the students would be moreinterested to read a given text. The story used by theteacher is Malin Kundang. The students were interestedto this story because they could use their knowledge tocomprehend the text. Then each student accepted a copyof narrative text from the teacher. The teacher explainedthe generic structure of the narrative text based on thetext given. It made the students can understand each partof generic structure of narrative text easily. The teachertried to make her students reach the learning indicators.(5)(5) TDellaTUntari::::“It is the text of Malin Kundang.I’ll give you the copies. Pleasespread it out, Della.”(Spreading to her friends)“Okay class, now look at thetext you have got. Which one isthe orientation?”“Paragraf one Ma’am”Adjusted Reading Materials for Reading Comprehension9TUntariTJatraTJatraTSTClaraTS::::::::::::“Good Untari. How can you saylike that?”“Ehm anu Ma’am. Tokohnyamuncul di situ. Perkenalan”“Great Untari. So in the firstparagraph, the writer introducesthe characters of the story, thesetting and we can say it isintroduction. What about theconflict? Who knows?”(Raising hand)“Yes Jatra”“Paragraf dua sampe yangsebelumnya paragraph terakhirMa’am”“Good answer Jatra. And theresolution? Who knows?”(Raising hand)“Wow, many students raise theirhands. Good. Okay Clara, whatis the answer?”“Last paragraph Ma’am”“You are right Clara. I think allof you have understood aboutnarrative text well. Giveapplause for us”(Clapping hands)The students were asked to make pair group. Theygot another narrative text. This time the text was SnowWhite. They were asked to categorize narrative text theygot based on its generic structure. (6)(6) TSTChoirulTST:::::::“Okay students, please make acouple group. You may chooseit by yourself. Do it now!”(Making a couple group)“Help me to spread it out,Choirul. A text for eachgroup.”(Spreading the texts)“It is Snow White story. Yourjob is to categorize it based onthe generic structure. You canwork with your group. Anyquestions?”“No Ma’am”“Good, you can work it now”Dialogue (5) and (6) indicated that the teacher hastaught her students using “SQ3R” sequence. Accordingto Brown (2000) teacher should follow the “SQ3R”sequence in their teaching. It could be seen from theactivities she used for teaching reading. Firstly theteacher explained about the generic structure of narrativetext. She also gave several texts that were used to sharpenthe students’ understanding of narrative text. The step ofquestion was also used by the teacher. It was becausefrom the question that the students asked and answered,the teacher could measure how far the students haveunderstood the lesson.To make the students did not feel bored, the teacherasked students to create a group. In addition to that, thiswas done to make students able to work well together.Some students seemed to easily categorize the narrativetext based on its generic structure, but some students stillseemed difficult to do so. For this reason was why theteacher made the students work in groups. It wasintended that the students could help each other. Thestudents who already understood about narrative textcould help their friends who still did not understand aboutit. (7)(7) GaluhClaraGaluhClaraGaluhClara:::::::Paragraf yang “She fled to thedungeon beneath the castle.There the Queen mixed a potionthat would change her into anold hag. Then she took an appleand slowly dipped it into anotherpotion sampai habis itu masukcomplication ya?”“Iya, itu complicationnya.”“Bawahnya itu masa jugacomplication lagi Ra?”“Iyalah, kan dalam satu teksnarrative bisa punya lebih darisatu complication.”“Ada 4 complication ya berarti?““Nah itu bener. Bisa lohsebenarnya kamu.”The dialogue (7) showed that a student tried to helpanother. They discussed what they did not know. Brown(2000) explained teachers should use techniques that areintrinsically motivating. Divided the students to work ingroups was one of the ways in which the teacher couldmotivate her students. The students who were not able tocomprehend the text well would be motivated by a friendwho was able to comprehend the text well. This wouldimpact on the learning outcomes of students which thestudents were able to understand the reading text properly.In the discussion, there were several groups that bothmembers found difficulties in categorizing the genericstructure of the text. It was because they have not reallyunderstood what has been explained by the teacher. Thestudents who had difficulties ask the teacher for moreexplanation (8)(8) YossiaTYossiaT:::::“Ma’am, kalo dari orientationke complication itu adajedanya atau enggak”“What do you mean by Jeda?”“Itu loh Ma’am, kayaperalihan”“Orientation is the paragraphwhere the writer introduces thecharacter, the setting etc.While complication is theparagraph where the conflictEjournal Unesa. Volume 01 Nomor 01 Tahun 2013, 0 - 216YossiaT::appears. So when you find aconflict in the paragraph youread, it means that it iscomplication. Is it clear?”“Oalaah gitu Ma’am. OkeMa’am, understand”“Good”After all students were finished with theirdiscussion, the teacher asked the students to discuss ittogether. What they have discussed with their groups.This was done in order that the students really understoodabout narrative text. Students seemed eager to discusswith the teacher. They wanted to show that they havemastered the material taught. (9)(9) TSTDodiTST:::::::“Okay students, have youfinished?”“Yes Ma’am”Great students. Now, we aregoing to discuss it. Okay Dodi,which one is the orientation?”Itu Ma’am, yang paragrafpertama. Yang long ago sampewas very cruel”“ Is it right students?“Yes, Ma’am“Okay class, go on to the next……” (Continuing to the nextdiscussion)At the end of the discussion session, the studentsseemed to understand about the generic structure ofnarrative text. It could be seen from the many studentswho had been able to categorize narrative texts providedby the teacher based on its generic structure. It wassupported by dialogue (7), dialogue (8) and dialogue (9).The teacher did not have trouble when asking herstudents to discuss the generic structure of narrative text.When they still did not find the answer of theirdiscussion, then the student might ask the teacher. It waswhich made the students able to properly categorize thenarrative text. Then the teacher could continue to the nextactivities.The Students’ Ability in Identifying the Moral Valueof the Narrative TextThe second research question to be answered by theresearcher was the ability of students in identifying themoral value of the narrative text. Based on the descriptionof teachers when teaching reading using previous lessonplan, many students did not comprehend the narrative textdelivered by the teacher, especially to identify the moralvalue of the narrative text itself. Then the researcherchanged the narrative text given to students in the revisedlesson plan. This was done to make students were able tocomprehend the text better as well as able to identify themoral value of narrative text. Brown (2000) stated in hisbook that it needs the follow-up of the activities of readingthey did. The teacher had to make a follow up activitiesafter the students did reading activities. It will help her toknow her students’ reading understanding of the text.What they have got of the text.Then the teacher re-explained the last material toassure that all students have understood the concept ofnarrative text well. Later, she went on to the nextactivities. Akgün (1997) did a study which concluded thatthe teacher must try to use fun activities in the classesbefore she makes the necessary changes according to thespecific needs and attitudes of your own students. The funactivity which was used by the teacher was Quiz. The useof “Quiz” was adapted from Raman (2004). He said thatthe used of Quiz Game could motivate students to readand sustain their interest in reading. When reading becamea game it took away the monotony that they appeared toassociate with the act of engaging with the printedpage. Then the teacher divided the students into twogroups. It was a big group. The students then gatheredwith their group. It took a rather long time because somestudents did not get along with the group. There weresome who did not join the group, but it could be overcomeafter the teacher warned them. (10)(10) TChoirulTJatraTJatraApriantiTJatraTSTHoniTYuli:::::::::::::::“Okay students, I will divideyou into two group”(Demonstrating with hands)“Ma’am kelompoknya pilihsendiri atau dipilihkan?”“I’ve chosen the group for thisquiz. The first group consistsof the students who were ineven numbers. The secondgroup consists of the studentswho were in odd number… “(Raising hand) “Ma’am”“Yes Jatra”“Even number itu apaMa’am?”“Nomer genap ya Ma’am”“Yes, you’re right Aprianti.Even number means nomergenap, while odd numbermeans nomer ganjil. Get it?”“Oalah. Ngobrol dong Ma’amkalo gitu maksudnya”“Now, all of you please gatherwith your group”(Noisy)“Ssssst, hayo Honi where isyour group? Go go, get yourgroup.”“Yes yes Ma’am”“Yuli, what are you doing?Stop talking get your groupright now”“Yes Ma’am” (Walking to hergroup)Then the teacher explained how to do quiz to thestudents. (11)(11) T : “Okay class, we are going tohave a quiz for today. I haveAdjusted Reading Materials for Reading Comprehension11LauraTLauraT::::divided you into two groups.Then I will give you two texts.The first text will belong togroup one and the second willbelong to group two. Then yourjob is to read the text and makequestions based on it. Thequestions must includecomprehension questions,vocabulary items and grammaritems. The questions can be inthe form of true/false, yes/no,matching to synonyms,antonyms and so on. You mayuse dictionary while makingquestions. Each member of thegroup has to contribute at leasttwo questions. After havingprepared the questions, youhave to read the other half ofthe passage as you will have toanswer questions based on it.Any questions so far?”“Ma’am, what iscomprehension question? ““Comprehension question is aquestion which is related to thetext. It can be explicit meaningwhich is written clearly in thepassage such as characters inthe story, or implicit meaningwhich is not written clearly inthe passage such as main idea,moral value and so on.”“Oh, pelajaran yang bisadiambil dari cerita gitu yaMa’am?”“You’re right Laura. Your timefor reading and preparing thequestions are only 15 minuteswhile for the next second textyou have only 5 minutes. Soyour time is only 20 minutes forall” (Demonstrating with hands)Dialogue (10) and dialogue (11) indicated that theteacher played the role as a leader of the class. She wascontrolling her students before letting them worked withthe group. Valette & Disick (1972) explained that readinginvolved internal behaviors. One of them was perceptionwhere the teacher introduced the language. In thedialogue 10, the teacher read the instruction for playingquiz. It was the teacher’s way to introduce to her studentsabout the quiz. How they could play the quiz. In addition,the teacher also used a simple instruction that was easilyunderstood by students. According to Brown (2000)teaching reading skill should be in an interactivecurriculum, in which the teacher used quiz to teachreading. Besides, she always remembered to use simpleinstructions for her quiz. It was because she knew that herstudents were lack of vocabularies. If she used thecomplicated instruction, her students would notunderstand what she said. It meant nothing.The students then got a text of narrative. They readit carefully. Each team also seemed keen to makequestions based on the text they read. They were quicklyable to make the question of the text. This was becausethey have already known about the concept of narrativetext. (12.1) & (12.2)Group 1(12.1) AntokOktaAntokFitri::::“Heh, kamu bikin pertanyaanapa?” (Looking at Okta’squestion)“Ealah Tok, baca dong. Bikinapa kek”“Fit, tanya apa dong?”“Siapa tokohnya aja Tok,nggak papa”(Other members of group one werediscussing)Group 2(12.2) WahyuMega::“Udah Meg?”“Udah. Heh kalian udahbelum bikin pertanyaannya?Buruan, mau abis waktunya”(Other members of group two werediscussing)After finished making question, they got anothertext from their opposite team. They read it more carefullybecause they would have questions about the text and hadto answer it correctly. Then the teacher explained therules of the game. The students could easily understandthe teacher’s explanation because she used simpleinstructions. After knowing the rules, they looked moreenthusiastic to play the quiz.During the quiz was held, many questions arose.Some questions could be easily answered, but there weresome questions that needed more understanding. (13.1) &(13.2)Group 1(13.1) DinaDodiTDinaTGroup2::::::“Why did the elephantscreech?”“Because they heard the wordsnack”“Is it correct Dina the answerfrom Dodi?”“Correct Ma’am”“So, group 2 gets 1 point”“Yeeeeee” (In choir)Group 2(13.2) MegaOktaTMega::::“What is moral value of thestory of the Goose that LaidGolden Eggs?”“Mmm, We should not begreedy”“Is it correct Mega theanswer from Okta?”“Correct Ma’am”Ejournal Unesa. Volume 01 Nomor 01 Tahun 2013, 0 - 216TGroup1::“So, group 1 gets 1 point”“Yeeeeee” (In choir)The dialogue above (13) showed that some studentshave been able to reach an understanding of the explicitmessage conveyed by the author. Taking from the resultsof the quiz, the teacher discussed with the studentswhether they still had difficulties or not. It was based onBrown (2000) statement, since reading was unobservableskill; the researcher indicated the students’comprehension from how the students gave responses totheir teacher. At first only a student who asked to theteacher, then another asked either. The students whoasked showed that he had understood what was beingtaught by the teacher. Then the teacher gave explanationclearly about the questions. (14)(14) DodiTMegaTOktaTChoirulTUntariTMegaTT + S:::::::::::::“Moral value itu apa?”“Good question Dodi. Moralvalue is the point of what wecan take from the story. Soyou explain about what youget after you read that story. Isthere any other questions?”Loh Ma’am kalo gitu tujuanpenulisan itu apa Ma’am?Beda ya sama moral value?”“The purpose of writing issomething which is conveyedby the writer to the reader.Whereas moral value is whatthe readers gain after reading /
THE KNOWLEDGE OF GENRES OF PRIVATE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TEACHERS IN MOJOKERTO
RETAIN Vol 2 No 1 (2014): Volume 2, Nomor1, Januari - April 2014
Publisher : RETAIN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

THE KNOWLEDGE OF GENRES OF PRIVATE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TEACHERS IN MOJOKERTO Yeviana Prameswari English Education Department, Language and Arts Faculty, Surabaya State University. Email: yeviana.prameswari@gmail.com Prof. Dr. Susanto, M.Pd. English Education Department, Language and Arts Faculty, Surabaya State University. Abstrak Berdasarkan Standar Isi untuk mata pelajaran Bahasa Inggris (BSNP,2010), ada 5 genres yang diajarkan di SMP, yang terdiri dari teks naratif, recount, deskriptif, report dan prosedure. Dalam tingkat ini, siswa harus mampu memahami berbagai macam genre. Tapi kenyataannya bahwa masih banyak siswa yang kesulitan untuk memahaminya. Untuk mengatasi masalah ini, guru menjadi orang yang paling bertanggungjawab yang mempunyai peran penting dalam proses pembelajaran. Baik guru yang menagajar di sekolah negeri dan swasta diharuskan untuk menguasai materi termasuk tentang genre. Jika guru mampu menguasai materi dengan baik, tentu itu akan membuatnya bisa mengajar dengan baik. Jadi guru harus menguasai materi pembelajaran dan keahlian mengajar dengan baik, karena kedua hal tersebut selalu berhubungan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan tentang kemampuan guru SMP swasta di Mojokerto tentang genre. Peneliti menggunakan metode penelitian deskriptif kualitatif. Peneliti menggunakan semi structured interview untuk mendapatkan data penelitian. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kedua guru mampu memahami genre dengan baik. Tentunya, hasil daripenelitian ini tidak dapat mewakili seluruh guru SMP swasta di Mojokerto karena mereka mempunyai perbedaan dalam latar belakang pendidikannya. Dengan mengetahui hasil dari penelitian ini, dapat membuktikan bahwa tidak semua SMP swasta mempunyai kualitas yang buruk. Kata Kunci: Pengetahuan tentang genre, guru SMP swasta Abstract According to Standar Isi for English (BSNP, 2010), there are five genres for teaching in junior high school, they are narrative, recount, descriptive, report and procedure texts. At this level, the students have to master in comprehending various kinds of genres. But the fact is that there are some students get difficulties in comprehending genres. To overcome that kind of problem, teachers become the most responsible people who have a big duty in teaching process. Both teachers who taught in state and private junior high schools are absolutely expected to master genre in order to have deep understanding in comprehending genre. If teachers have deep understanding in comprehending genre, of course, it will make teachers become easy to teach genres to the students. So, teachers have to master teaching material and teaching skill also since both of them always interrelated. This research aims to describe the knowledge of genres of private junior high school teachers in Mojokerto. The researcher chose descriptive qualitative as the research design. The researcher conducted semi structured interview to get and complete the data. The result shows both teachers were knowledgeable in terms of understanding genres. Of course, the result of this study could not present the knowledge of genres of all private junior high school teachers in Mojokerto since they are different in background of their education. By knowing the result of this study, it proved that not all private junior high school in Mojokerto have bad quality in education. Keywords: The knowledge of genres, private junior high school teachers INTRODUCTION Text becomes a basic part in language teaching and learning, both written and spoken. According to Standar Isi for English (BSNP, 2010), there are three materials about text types for Junior high school, which are genres, speech acts, and short functional texts. Furthermore, text is considered as teaching material which cannot be separated in language teaching and learning. As Pardiyono (2007:1) states that students have to involved in the use of text types, both in the form of written and spoken text. Based on Standar Isi (BSNP, 2010), there are five genres for teaching in Junior high school, they are narrative, recount, descriptive, report and procedure texts. Besides, Pardiyono (2007: 2) states that genre as the type of text that used as the basic structure of reference so a text can be written effectively from the right purpose or grammatical pattern use. Furthermore, texts can be classified into genre according to the characteristic which includes the purpose of communication or social function, the rhetorical structure of the text or generic structure and the language features. According to what stated in Standar Isi (BSNP, 2010), genres is a teaching material which is firstly taught in Junior high school level. At this level, the students have to master in comprehending various kinds of genres. So when they graduate from Junior high school, they have good knowledge and ability in comprehending various kinds of genres and of course, it will be useful for them when they continue their study to Senior high school. As Helena (2004 : 3) states in her article that Junior high school graduates are expected to be able in comprehending the genres or participating in the creation of textwhich serves their daily needs to entertain themeselves, to carry out transactional exchanges and to write simple narratives, descriptions, reports and recounts. However the fact in school is not like what is expected. In some schools, there are many students get difficulties in comprehending genres. Not only that, they also get confused in understanding various kinds of genres. They also get confused in differentiate the various kinds of genres since each genre has its own characteristic. Besides, genres become difficult for them since they have never learned it before in Elementary school. As a result, some students got low score in their reading test which the materials are related to genres. They also got low score in writing and speaking test when their teacher asked them to write simple narratives, descriptions, reports and recounts, then presented it to the class. To overcome that kind of problem, teachers become the most responsible people who have a big duty in teaching process since they always involve in every teaching and learning process in the classroom. As Finocchiaro (1989 : 22) states that teachers are considered as one of the important key to a successful learning. To reach a successful learning, teachers must have some characteristics of a professional language teacher. Brown (2001: 430) has divided four characteristics of a professional language teacher. He states that a professional language teacher is someone who has good technical knowledge, good interpersonal skills, good pedagogical skills and good personal qualities. According to his classification, it can be concluded that a teacher who has good technical knowledge always has good understanding about teaching material. While a teacher who has good pedagogical skills, interpersonal skills and personal qualities always has better teaching skill than teacher who has not pedagogical skills, interpersonal skills and personal qualities. Furthermore, both teaching skills and teaching materials are always interrelated. To be qualified teachers they should be able to understand both of them. The teaching materials involve ‘what’ will teacher gives to the students in teaching and learning process in the classroom. While the teaching skills mean ‘how’ teacher explains the materials to the students. The previous studies about the knowledge of genres of junior and senior high school teachers conducted by Dwirasari (2011) and Rachel (2010). However, both of them have described about the knowledge of genres of state junior and senior high school teachers. Both of them chose the teacher in favourite schools which has good quality in education and almost all of the graduates have passed the national examination with good scores. In fact, some private junior high schools are underestimated by the society. In Mojokerto, some private junior high schools are selected by the students who got bad score in national examination. For the students who got good score, they never chose private junior high school. Since genres are considered as teaching material, both teachers who taught in state and private junior high schools are absolutely expected to have deep understanding in comprehending genres, they also expected to have good teaching skill to teach genres to the students. So they can explain the material about genre to the students as well as possible, then the students understand well about genre. Based on the condition, the researcher is interested to describe about the knowledge of genres of private junior high school teachers in Mojokerto. She chose two teachers who are different in gender and background of their education because of two reasons. The first reason, she found the reality in society that some of them always think that female teacher is better than male teacher. They think female teacher is more diligent, cleverer, and more attractive , so she can explain the material well. The second reason, she found the reality in society that some of them always underestimate the graduation from private university. They think that all graduation from state university are definitely have good quality and good teaching skill in education. Therefore, the researcher wanted to conduct a research which intends to describe this phenomenon, the knowledge of genres of private junior high school teachers in Mojokerto. By conducting this study, the researcher has purpose to find out the reality about the quality of the teachers who are taught in a private junior high school in Mojokerto, however they are different in gender and background of their education. By knowing the fact or the result of the study, the researcher hoped it will give meaningful contribution for junior high school teacher since it is important to measure their knowledge in order to increase their competency on mastering the teaching material includes genres. It is also expected to give meaningful contribution for school. It is important to know about teacher’s knowledge in order to guarantee that their teachers are competent in mastering the teaching material. This phenomenon makes the researcher puts her interest to conduct research about it. The researcher questions: (1) How is the ability of private junior high school teachers in Mojokerto to define genre? (2) How is the ability of private junior high school teachers in Mojokerto to mention kinds of genre? (3) How is the ability of private junior high school teachers in Mojokerto to identify each genre? (4) How is the ability of private junior high school teachers in Mojokerto to differentiate genre? METHOD Based on the research question and the objective of the study, the researcher used descriptive qualitative. Susanto (2002: 36) explained that descriptive research is a research in which the researcher has to describe and interpret the events happened in detail. In this study, the researcher described the knowledge of genres of private junior high school teachers in Mojokerto. She concentrated on two English teachers who taught in a private junior high school in Mojokerto who different in gender and background of their education. In this research, the researcher chose descriptive qualitative as the research design based on two reasons, which are the objective of this study is to describe the knowledge of private junior high school teachers about genre and there is no treatment in this study. The subjects of this study were two English teachers who are different in gender and background of their education, however they have been teaching English for the same time (7 years) in a private junior high school in Mojokerto which is underestimated by the society since this school always be the final destination for the students who got bad score in final exam and the society always think that this private junior high school has low quality in education. She chose two teachers who are different in gender and background of their education because of two reasons. The first reason, she found the reality in society that some of them always think that female teacher is better than male teacher. They think female teacher is more diligent, cleverer, and more attractive , so she can explain the material well. The second reason, she found the reality in society that some of them always underestimate the graduation from private university. They think that all graduation from state university are definitely have good quality and good teaching skill in education, however it doesn’t always guarantee. In this case, teacher A is a male who is graduated from the state university in Malang, while teacher B is a female who is graduated from private university in Jombang. Therefore, the researcher wanted to find out the knowledge of genres from both teachers. This study is taken place in the teachers’ home and office. The office is the school where the teachers work. Then the researcher conducted the first interview (related to the teachers’ knowledge to define, mention, identify and differentiate each genre) when both teacher A and B finished their duty to teach the students in the classroom, so the situation of the office was really quiet since some teachers have left the school. After conducting the first interview, both teacher A and B asked the researcher to continue the next interview in their home at Sunday morning, so the researcher came to teacher A’s home, then continued to teacher B’s home to conduct the second interview which is related to the teachers’ knowledge to differentiate five different texts given by the researcher. The consideration was made because the researcher conducted an informal interview which can be done either at school or home. The data of this study is teachers’ answer in the form of utterances and expressions given by the teachers during interview sessions which are transcribed into written form. The sources of the data are two private junior high school teachers in Mojokerto who have been teaching English in the same school for the same time (7 years), however they are different in gender and background of their education. Teacher A is a male who graduated from the state university in Malang, while teacher B is a female who graduated from private university in Jombang. The researcher interviewed the English Teacher to get the data related to their knowledge of genres. According to Susanto (2002: 22), interview is a data collection technique that uses oral questions to elicit respondents’ answer. In this study, the researcher used semi-structured interview, she set few questions as guidelines which can be added more if it is necessary. The researcher conducted the interview twice of each teacher. In the first interview, she set formal questions as the interview guideline which is related to the teachers’ knowledge to define, mention, identify and differentiate each genre, but it can be added more questions if it is necessary. Then in the second interview, She wanted to make sure about the teachers’ ability to differentiate each genre. Therefore, the researcher gave five different texts, she gave both teachers some times to read and study the texts and finally she asked them to differentiate the texts. It was done in order to complete the data and answer the last research question. In the implementation, the researcher conducted the interview informally. It was done in order to explore teachers’ knowledge and give a sense that the questions don’t sound like testing the teacher. To keep and save the data, the researcher recorded the teachers’ utterance during the interview. In this research, all the data obtained through interview were analyzed inductively in order to answer research questions stated in chapter one. The first step was accumulating the data recorded from both teachers through interview given. The first interview is related to the teachers’ knowledge to define, mention, identify and differentiate each genre, while the second interview is related to to the teachers’ knowledge to differentiate five different texts given by the researcher. After all of data accumulated, the researcher studied the data well, she described them by classifying into the finding based on the research question. In addition, all the data were collected thoroughly as happened in the reality. RESULT AND DISCUSSION This chapter presents the result and discussion of the study as the answers for the research questions: (1) How is the ability of private junior high school teachers in Mojokerto to define genre? (2) How is the ability of private junior high school teachers in Mojokerto to mention kinds of genre? (3) How is the ability of private junior high school teachers in Mojokerto to identify each genre? (4) How is the ability of private junior high school teachers in Mojokerto to differentiate genre? The Teaching of Genres in Junior High School Based on Standar Isi (BSNP, 2010), there are five genres for teaching in junior high school, they are narrative text, recount text, descriptive text, report text, and procedure text. It is a teaching material which is firstly taught in junior high school level. At this level, the students have to master in comprehending various kinds of genres. So when they graduate from junior high school, they have good knowledge and ability in comprehending various kinds of genres and of course, it will be useful for them when they continue their study to senior high school. However the fact in school is not like what is expected. In some schools, there are many students get difficulties in comprehending genres. Not only that, they also get confused in understanding various kinds of genres. They also get confused in differentiate the various kinds of genres since each genre has its own characteristic. Besides, genres become difficult for them since they have never learned it before in elementary school. As a result, some students got low score in their reading test which the materials are related to genres. They also got low score in writing and speaking test when their teacher asked them to write simple narratives, descriptions, reports and recounts, then presented it to the class. To overcome that kind of problem, teachers become the most responsible people who have a big duty in teaching process since they always involve in every teaching and learning process in the classroom. Both teachers who taught in state and private junior high schools are absolutely expected to master and have great knowledge of genres in order to have deep understanding in comprehending genres. So they can explain the material about genre to the students as well as possible and create a successful learning in the classroom. Especially for the teachers who taught in some private junior high schools which are underestimated by the society who always think that private junior high schools have bad quality in education. As teachers, they must prove to the society that it is not true. Not all private junior high schools have bad quality in education. To prove it, teachers have to master teaching material and have good teaching skill, so they can create successful learning both in state and private junior high schools. The researcher made an interview guideline to interview two English teachers who taught in a private junior high school in Mojokerto. Both of the teachers have been teaching English in the same school for the same time (7 years), however they are different in gender and background of their study. Teacher A is a male who graduated from the state university in Malang, while teacher B is a female who graduated from private university in Jombang. According to the interview done by the researcher, she could say that both teachers are knowledgeable in terms of understanding genres. So, both teachers have mastered the teaching material well to teach genres in private junior high school in Mojokerto. By knowing the fact, the teachers can prove to the society that not all private junior high schools in Mojokerto have bad quality in education. The Ability of Private Junior High School Teachers in Mojokerto to Define Genre The first research question is related to the private junior high school teachers’ ability to define genre. There were three questions based on interview guideline: (1) Based on what clearly stated in standar isi, the materials for English is about text types. Can you mention those text types? (2) Genre is one of text type. In your opinion, what is genre? (3) In English, there are four skills, which are listening, speaking, reading, and writing. In which skill do you usually teach genre? Those three questions have purpose to find out whether those teachers are able to define genre or not by knowing the position of genre as one of the text types, the definition of genre, and the skill where genre is taught. Based on the interview trancript, teacher A mentioned 3 text types which consist of genre, short functional texts and speech act. Besides, he also could mention the examples of those three text types. He said recount, procedure, narrative, descriptive, and report text are the examples of genre. While brochure and notice are the examples of short functional text. Then he said transactional and interpersonal conversation are the examples of speech act. Based on what is stated in chapter 2, genre is one of the text types which is considered as teaching material like what is stated in standar isi. In Standar Isi BSNP, there are thirteen genres considered as teaching material: narrative text, recount text, descriptive text, report text, procedure text, anecdote text, spoof text, hortatory exposition text, analytical exposition text, news item text, discussion text, review text and explanation text. Based on the interview result, the researcher concluded that teacher A knew the position of genre as one of the text types. He also mentioned the examples of genre correctly. Not only teacher A, but also teacher B could answer the question from the researcher correctly. Teacher B also mentioned that genre is considered as one of the text types. She mentioned two examples of genre correctly, which consist of recount and descriptive text. Finally, the researcher concluded that teacher B also knew the position of genre as one of the text types. For the next question, the researcher wanted to know whether the private junior high school teachers in Mojokerto could explain the definition of genre or not by giving them the second question: Genre is one of text type. In your opinion, what is genre? Based on the interview transcript, teacher A stated genre as one of the text types which has purpose. For examples, narrative text has purpose to entertain the reader, while procedure text has purpose to explain how to make or use something. He also stated that each genre has different language feature and generic structure. As written in chapter 2, genre is one of the text types which has own characters includes the social function, generic structures, and language features. Swales (1990: 58) identified a genre as a class of communicative events, the members of which share some set of communicative purposes. He also shared an essential viewpoint that all genres control a set of communicative purposes within certain social situations and that each genre has its own structural quality according to those communicative purposes. Therefore, the communicative purposes and the structural features should be identified when genres are used in writing classes. Based on the interview result, the researcher concluded teacher A knew well about the definition of genre since he gave the right definition of genre correctly by using his own words. Not only teacher A, but also teacher B could answer the question from the researcher correctly. Teacher B stated genre is a text which has general purpose. For example, recount text has purpose to retell past event in a chronological order. She also stated each of genre has each language feature and generic structure. Finally, the researcher concluded teacher B also knew well about the definition of genre since she gave the right definition of genre correctly by using her own words. It means both of them know well about the definition of genre. For the last question, the researcher wanted to know in which skill those private junior high school teachers usually teach genre by giving them the third question: In English, there are four skills, which are listening, speaking, reading, and writing. In which skill do you usually teach genre? Based on the interview transcript, teacher A stated he has taught in that school for seven years and he has taught genre in all skills. While teacher B stated genre can be taught in productive and receptive skills, so she always try to teach genre in all skills. As written in chapter 2, genre can be taught both in productive skills (speaking and writing) and receptive skills (listening and reading). Based on the interview result, the researcher concluded both teacher A and B have done the right decision by teaching genre in all skills. It is true based on what is stated in standar isi that genre can be taught both in productive and receptive skills. It means both of them knew in which skill genre can be taught. In conclusion, based on the data that the researcher gained from the interview transcript, both teacher A and B were able to define genre since they can answer those three questions correctly. They have known the position of genre as the teaching material based on what stated in standar isi, they could explain the definition of genre correctly, and they have taught genre in all skills based on what stated in standar isi that genre can be taught both in productive and receptive skills. The Ability of Private Junior High School Teachers in Mojokerto to Mention Genre The second research question is related to the private junior high school teachers’ ability to mention genre. There was a question based on the interview guideline: As you know that there are many genres. Can you mention all genres like stated in standar isi? This question has purpose to find out whether those two teachers are able to mention genre or not. In this case, the researcher wanted to know whether those two teachers are able to mention genre or not. Based on the interview transcript, teacher A stated there are thirteen genres as teaching materials. He stated recount text, narrative text, procedure text, descriptive text, report text, analytical exposition, discussion, hortatory exposition, explanation, anecdote, spoof, news item, and review are genres which are taught in senior high school. While in junior high school only five which are recount text, narrative text, procedure text, descriptive text, and report text. As stated in chapter 2 that In Standar Isi BSNP, there are thirteen genres considered as teaching material which are narrative text, recount text, descriptive text, report text, procedure text, anecdote text, spoof text, hortatory exposition text, analytical exposition text, news item text, discussion text, review text and explanation text. However there are only five genres must be taught for junior high school students which are narrative text, recount text, descriptive text, report text and procedure text. According to the data from the interview transcript above, teacher A could mention all 13 genres correctly (narrative text, recount text, descriptive text, report text, procedure text, anecdote text, spoof text, hortatory exposition text, analytical exposition text, news item text, discussion text, review text and explanation text). Furthermore he also could mention five genres for junior high school students correctly which consist of narrative text, recount text, descriptive text, report text, procedure text. Not only teacher A, but also teacher B could mention all 13 genres correctly. She stated genres which are taught in junior high school are fewer than in senior high school. In junior high school only 5 which are recount text, narrative text, report text, descriptive text and procedure text. While in senior high school are recount text, narrative text, procedure text, descriptive text, report text, analytical exposition, discussion, hortatory exposition, explanation, anecdote, spoof, news item, and review. In conclusion, based on the data that the researcher gained from the interview transcript, both teacher A and B were able to mention genre since they could answer the question correctly. The Ability of Private Junior High School Teachers in Mojokerto to Identify Genre The third research question is related to the private junior high school teachers’ knowledge of genre to identify each genre. The researcher wanted to know whether those teachers know about the communication purpose, the generic structure, and the language feature of genre or not. There are five genres for teaching in junior high school. Firstly, the researcher wanted to discuss about narrative text. She wanted to know whether those two teachers know about the communicative purpose of narrative text or not. Based on the interview transcript, teacher A stated narrative text has purpose to amuse the readers and it has conflict, however will find resolution in the end of the story. As written in chapter 2, narrative text is a kind of text which tell past story or event which shows complication and resolution. Its communicative purpose is for amusing the readers or listeners. Based on the interview result, the researcher concluded that teacher A knew well about the communicative purpose of narrative text since he could explain it by using his own words correctly. Not only teacher A, but also teacher B also knew well about the communicative purpose of narrative text. She stated that narrative text has purpose to entertain the readers, however there is conflict there. Her explanation is correct. It means both of them know about the communicative purpose of narrative text. For the next question, the researcher wanted to know whether those two teachers know about the generic structure and language feature of narrative text or not. Based on the interview transcript, teacher stated that the generic structure of narrative text consist of orientation which introduces the subject and setting, complication which tells the conflict, resolution which tells how to resolve the problem, and re-orientation which is in the form of moral value from the story. He also stated that one of the language feature of narrative text is using simple past tense. As explained in chapter 2, the generic structure of narrative text are orientation (introduces the subject and setting), complication (when the conflict is happened), resolution (resolve the problem), re-orientation (moral value from the story). While one of the language features of narrative text is Simple Past Tense. Based on the interview result, the researcher concluded that teacher A knew about the generic structure and language feature of narrative text since he could mention it correctly. Not only teacher A, but also teacher B knew about the generic structure and language feature of narrative text since she stated that the generic structure of narrative text are orientation, complication, resolution, and re-orientation. She could explain all of them by using her own words. She also stated that the language feature is simple past tense. It means both teachers A and B could mention and explain the generic structure and language feature of narrative text correctly. In conclusion, based from the result that the researcher gained from the interview transcript, the researcher can conclude that both teacher A and B were able to identify narrative text. Those can be seen from their answers when the researcher addressed some questions to them, then they could explain the communicative purpose, the generic structures and the language features of narrative text correctly. After discussing about narrative text, the researcher wanted to discuss about recount text. In this case, the researcher wanted to know whether those two teachers know about the communicative purpose of recount text or not. Based on the interview transcript, teacher A stated that recount text has purpose to retell past events and there is no complication there. As written in chapter 2, Pardiyono (2007: 94) stated that recount text is a text which retell past event chronologically and has no conflict or complication. Based on the definition of recount text above, it can be concluded that the communicative purpose or social function of recount text is to inform or to give the reader the description of what occurred and when it occurred. An example of recount text is when someone provides a chronological account of what happens in his/ her day. Based on the interview result, the researcher concluded that teacher A knew well about the communicative purpose of recount text since he could explain it correctly by using his own words. Not only teacher A, but also teacher B knew well about the communicative purpose of recount text. Based on interview transcript above, she stated that recount text has purpose to tell someone’s experience which happened in the past time. It showed us that she knew well about the communicative purpose of recount text. Finally the researcher concluded that both teacher A and B could explain about the communicative purpose of recount text correctly. Next, the researcher wanted to know whether those two teachers know about the generic structures and language features of recount text or not. Based on the interview transcript, teacher A stated that the generic structures of recount text are orientation, series of events and re-orientation. He also stated that language feature of recount text is simple past tense. Based on the interview result, the researcher concluded that teacher A knew well about the generic structure and language feature of recount text. His explanation matched with the theory in chapter 2 that the generic structures of recount text are orientation, sequence of events, and re-orientation. While one of the language features in recount text is Past Tense. Not only teacher A, but also teacher B knew about the generic structure and language feature of recount text. She also stated that the generic structure of recount text include orientation, series of events and re-orientation. She also stated that the language feature of recount text is simple past tense. Finally the researcher concluded that both teacher A and B could mention the generic structures and language features correctly, although both of them only mentioned one of the language features of recount text. In conclusion, the researcher concluded that both teacher A and B could answer all the questions correctly by explaining and mentioning the communicative purpose, generic structure, and language feature of recount text, so it means both teachers were able to identify recount text. After discussing about recount text, the researcher wanted to discuss about descriptive text. In this case, the researcher wanted to know whether those two teachers know the communicative purpose of descriptive text or not. Based on the interview transcript, teacher A stated that descriptive text has purpose to describe something, it can be thing, place or person in spesific. As written in chapter 2, the social function of descriptive text is to give description about person, place or certain thing. Depdiknas (2004: 39) states that the main purpose of descriptive text is to give information, mainly about person, place or certain thing. Based on the interview result, the researcher concluded that teacher A knew well about the communicative purpose of descriptive text since he could explain it correctly by using his own words. Not only teacher A, but also teacher B knew well about the communicative purpose of descriptive text. Based on interview transcript above, she stated that descriptive text has purpose todescribe thing, person, or place in spesific. It showed us that she knew well about the communicative purpose of descriptive text. Finally the researcher concluded that both teacher A and B could explain about the communicative purpose of descriptive text correctly. Next, the researcher wanted to know whether those two teachers know about the generic structures and language features of descriptive text or not. Based on the interview transcript, teacher A stated that the generic structures of descriptive text are identification and description. He also stated that language feature of descriptive text is present tense. From the result of interview, the researcher concluded that teacher A knew well about the generic structure and language feature of descriptive text. His explanation matched with the theory in chapter 2. According to Depdiknas (2004: 52), the generic structures of descriptive text are identification and description. Identification describes the phenomenon that we have in mind, while in description we will explain more in supporting detail in order to give clearer description, for examples about particular parts, qualities and characteristic. While one of the language features of descriptive text is present tense. Not only teacher A, but also teacher B knew about the generic structure and language feature of descriptive text. She also stated that the generic structure of descriptive text starts with identification which is for explaining something which will be described in the next paragraph, then continued with description which explain something in identification in detail. She also stated that the language feature of descriptive text is present tense. Finally the researcher concluded that both teacher A and B could mention the generic structures and language features of descriptive text correctly, although both of them only mentioned one of the language features of descriptive text. In conclusion the researcher concluded that both teacher A and B could answer all the questions correctly. It means both teachers were able to identify descriptive text since they could mention and explain the communicative purpose, generic structure and language featureof descriptive text correctly. After discussing about descriptive text, the researcher wanted to discuss about report text. In this case, the researcher wanted to know whether those two teachers know the communicative purpose of report text or not. Based on the interview transcript, teacher A stated that report text has purpose to describe something in general, it can be thing, place or person. Agustien (2004) stated that report text has function to give information about something or fact in reality as a result of research or analysis. The description in report text is in the form of general conclusion. Based on the interview result, the researcher concluded that teacher A knew well about the communicative purpose of report text since he could explain it correctly by using his own words. Not only teacher A, but also teacher B knew well about the communicative purpose of report text. Based on interview transcript above, she stated that report text has purpose to describe thing, person, or place in general. It showed us that she knew well about the communicative purpose of report text. Finally the researcher concluded that both teacher A and B could explain about the communicative purpose of report text correctly. Next the researcher wanted to know whether those two teachers know about the generic structure and language feature of report text or not. Based on the interview transcript, teacher A stated that the generic structures of report text are general classification and description. He also stated that language feature of report text is present tense. Based on the interview result, the researcher concluded that teacher A knew well about the generic structure and language feature of report text. His explanation matched with the theory in chapter 2. Anderson and Anderson (2003) explain about the generic structure of Report Text, those are: a general opening statement, a series of paragraph about the subject, and a concluding paragraph. While one of the language features of report text is present tense. Not only teacher A, but also teacher B knew about the generic structure and language feature of report text. She also stated that the generic structure of report text starts with general description and then description. While the language feature use present tense. Finally the researcher concluded that both teacher A and B could mention the generic structures and language features of report text correctly, although both of them only mentioned one of the language features of report text. In conclusion, the researcher concluded that both teacher A and B could answer all the questions correctly. It means those two teachers were able to identify report text since they could mention and explain the communicative purpose, generic structure and language feature of report text correctly. After discussing about report text, the researcher wanted to discuss about procedure text. In this case, the researcher wanted to know whether those two teachers know the communicative purpose of procedure text or not. Based on the interview transcript, teacher A stated that procedure text has purpose to explain how to use or make something. As stated in chapter 2, a procedure text is a piece of text that tells people to do something. It is aimed to provide instructions for making something, doing something or getting somewhere (Anderson and Anderson, 2003: 50). In this case, procedure text can be in many kinds of forms, such as instructions, guidance, rules, recipes, etc. Based on the interview result, the researcher concluded that teacher A knew well about the communicative purpose of procedure text since he could explain it correctly by using his own words. Not only teacher A, but also teacher B knew well about the communicative purpose of procedure text. Based on interview transcript above, she stated that procedure text has purpose to explain the steps or gives information to the readers how to make or use something. It showed us that she knew well about the communicative purpose of procedure text. Finally the researcher concluded that both teacher A and B could explain about the communicative purpose of procedure text correctly. Next the researcher also wanted to know whether those two teachers know about the generic structure and language feature of procedure text or not. Based on the interview transcript, teacher A stated that the generic structures of procedure text are goal, materials, and steps. He also stated that language feature of procedure text uses imperative sentences. Based on the interview result, the researcher concluded that teacher A knew well about the generic structure and language feature of procedure text. His explanation matched with the theory in chapter 2. Anderson and Anderson (2003) explain the generic structure of procedure text, those are an introductory statement giving the aim or goal, materials needed for completing the procedure, and a sequence of steps in the correct order. Not only teacher A, but also teacher B knew about the generic structure and language feature of procedure text. She also stated that the generic structure of procedure text starts with goal, then materials, then the steps. While the language feature uses command and imperative sentences. Finally the researcher concluded that both teacher A and B could mention the generic structures and language features of procedure text correctly, although teacher A only mentioned one of the language features of procedure text. In conclusion, the researcher concluded that both teacher A and B could answer all the questions correctly. It means both teachers were able to identify procedure text since they could explain the communicative purpose, generic structure and language feature of procedure text correctly. The Ability of Private Junior High School Teachers in Mojokerto to Differentiate Genre The last research question is related to the teachers’ knowledge to differentiate genre. In this case, the researcher wanted to know whether those two teachers are able to differentiate genre or not by conducting interview twice. In the first interview, the researcher gave a question : Based on the characteristic of the text, there are some genres have almost the same characteristic, for example narrative and recount text, report and descriptive text. How do you usually differentiate them? Then in the second interview, the researcher wanted to make sure about the teachers’ ability to differentiate each genre. Therefore, she gave five different texts to both teacher A and B. After she gave five different texts, then she gave both teachers some times to read and study the texts and finally she asked them to differentiate the texts. It was done in order to complete the data and answer the last research question. From the interview transcript, both teacher A and B explained the way they differentiate genre clearly by using their own examples. Teacher A stated there are five genres which are taught in junior high school. He also stated there are some genres which have the similar communicative purpose, they are narrative and recount text, then descriptive and report text. He explained that narrative and recount text tell about the past events and use simple past tense, however there is a conflict in narrative text and there is no conflict in recount text and only tell the sequence of events. He also stated that descriptive and report text have purpose to describe something, it can be person, place or thing. However descriptive text is a text which describes something in spesific, but report text describes something in general. He explained more his answer by giving examples : if the student wants to describe “Pet” , that is report text since there are many kinds of pet that can be described. But if the student wants to describe “My Pet”, that is descriptive text since the description is spesific, it is limited with only the student’s pet. Based on the interview result, the researcher concluded that teacher A could explain the point which made each genre different from another, although some of them have similar communicative purpose. His explanation matched with the theory in chapter 2 that there is a conflict in narrative and there is no conflict in recount text. Besides, descriptive text and report text have purpose to describe something, however descriptive text describes something in spesific, while report text describes something in general. Not only teacher A, but also teacher B could explain the point which made each genre different from another, although some of them have similar communicative purpose. She stated that the genres which have the similar communicative purpose and generic structure are descriptive and report text, then narrative and recount text. She stated that descriptive text describes something in spesific, so it is limited with the writer’s hobby. However report text is more general. Then narrative text is similar with recount text which tell past events, however there is conflict in narrative text. Finally, the researcher concluded that both teachers have already known the point which differentiate each genre. Next the researcher conducted the second interview by giving five different texts, then asked both teachers to differentiate them and explained the reason. From the interview transcript, teacher A stated that text 5 is narrative text since there is complication in paragraph 2, while text 2 is recount text since it is no complication and it just tells the series of events. Then text 4 is descriptive text since the writer describes the animal in spesific. Text 1 is report text since the writer gives information in general. And for the last, text 3 is procedure text since there are goal, materials, and steps. From the result of second interview, the researcher concluded that teacher A answered correctly based on the key answer that made by the researcher. Not only teacher A, but also teacher B also answered correctly based on the key answer that made by the researcher. Teacher B stated text 5 is narrative text since there is complication. Then text 2 is recount text since there is no conflict. Text 4 is descriptive text since it describes something in spesific. Text 1 is report text since it describes something in general. Text 3 is procedure text since it gives information how to make something Finally, the researcher knew that both teacher A and B stated that text 1 is report text, text 2 is recount text, text 3 is procedure text, text 4 is descriptive text, and text 5 is narrative text. They also could explain the reason correctly. It means both teachers could differentiate all texts given into the right genre. In conclusion, the researcher concluded that both teacher A and B were able to differentiate genre since they have already known the points which differentiate each genre and could differentiate all texts given into the right genre. CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION Conclusion The main problem of this study is the private junior high school teachers’ knowledge about genres. The main problem that is developed based on the teachers’ knowledge of genres divided into four, they are: (1) The ability of private junior high school teachers in Mojokerto to define genre, (2) The ability of private junior high school teachers in Mojokerto to mention kinds of genres, (3) The ability of private junior high school teachers in Mojokerto to identify each genre, (4) The ability of private junior high school teachers in Mojokerto to differentiate genre. Based on the finding of data analysis and discussion in previous chapter, the researcher drew a conclusion: First, both teacher A and B were able to define genre since they could answer those three questions correctly. They have known the position of genre as the teaching material based on what stated in standar isi, they could explain the definition of genre correctly, and they have taught genre in all skills based on what stated in standar isi that genre can be taught both in productive and receptive skills. Second, both teacher A and B were able to mention genre since they could answer the question correctly. Third, both teacher A and B were able to identify each genre (narrative, recount, descriptive, report and procedure text). They could explain the right communicative purpose of each genre, besides they knew exactly the generic structure of each genre and they also could mention the language feature of each genre correctly. Fourth, both teacher A and B were able to differentiate genre since they have already known the points which differentiate each genre and could differentiate all texts given into the right genre. In conclusion, both teacher A and B were knowledgeable in terms of understanding genres. So, both teachers have mastered the teaching material well to teach genres in private junior high school in Mojokerto. By knowing the fact, the teachers can prove to the society that not all private junior high schools in Mojokerto have bad quality in education. Suggestions The result of this study was that the teachers were knowledgeable in terms of understanding genres as teaching material. In this case, the researcher suggests to teachers to improve their teaching skill also since the teaching skill and teaching material are interrelated. Besides, the researcher suggests to other researchers to conduct a similar study, but they can view from other subject, for example teachers who have low and high GPA. REFERENCES Anderson, Mark and Kathy Anderson. 2003. Text Types in English 1. Sidney: Mac Millan Education Australia Pty Ltd. Anderson, Mark and Kathy Anderson. 2003. Text Types in English 2. Sidney: Mac Millan Education Australia Pty Ltd. Anderson, Mark and Kathy Anderson. 2003. Text Types in English 3. Sidney: Mac Millan Education Australia Pty Ltd. Agustien, Helena I. R. 2004. The English Curriculum in a Nutshell (paper) Presented at National Seminar. The Teaching of ESL in Indonesia; A Reflection. 2 Oktober 2004, Malang. Brown, H. Douglas. 2001. Teaching by principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Bsnp_Indonesia. 2010. Standar Isi. Retrieved from http: // www.bsnp_indonesia.org.id retrieved at March 21st 2011 Darewianka, Baverly. 1995. Exploring How Texts Work. Newton: Primary English Teaching Association. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2004. Standar Kompetensi Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris SMP dan MTs. Jakarta: Depdiknas. Emilia, Hermawan, B. and Tati, D. 2008. Pendekatan Genre Based dalam kurikulum Bahasa Inggris Tahun 2006: Penelitian Tindakan Kelas di sebuah SMP Negeri di Bandung. Retrieved from http:// www.inggris.sps.upi.edu at March 21st 2011. Finocchiaro, Mary. 1989. Some facts about language teaching in the elementary school: teaching children foreign language. New York: Mc Graw- Hill book company. Nunan, David. 1992. Research Method in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. O’ Conner, J. 2005. Literacy in context for GCSE. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pardiyono. 2007. Pasti Bisa!! Teaching Genre- Based Writing. Yogyakarta: CV. Andi offset. Susanto. 2002. Develpoing a research proposal (a Practical Guideline). Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Susarno, Lamijan H., et al. 2007. Refleksi Pendidikan Masa Kini. Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya Swales, J.M. 1990.Genre analysis: English in academic and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Suggestopedia Method in the Teaching and Learning Process
RETAIN Vol 2 No 1 (2014): Volume 2, Nomor1, Januari - April 2014
Publisher : RETAIN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Suggestopedia Method in the Teaching and Learning ProcessRagil KharismawatiEnglish Education Department, Language Art Faculty, State University of SurabayaEmail: ragil.kharismawati@yahoo.comProf. Dr. Susanto, M.Pd.English Education Department, Language Art Faculty, State University of SurabayaAbstrakAda empat tahap utama kegiatan dalam metode Sugestopedia. Mereka adalah presentasi, sesi konser (aktif dan pasif), elaborasi, dan praktek. Pada tahap presentasi, para siswa dibantu untuk mendapatkan pikiran positif bahwa belajar itu mudah dan menyenangkan. Dalam tahap ini, guru membuat lingkungan kelas menjadi nyaman dan ceria. Dalam konser aktif, guru membaca teks dan diulang oleh siswa. Setelah itu, dalam konser pasif, guru memainkan beberapa musik barok di latar belakang dan guru membaca teks lagi dan siswa mendengarkan dengan seksama. Dalam elaborasi, guru memberitahu siswa bahwa mereka akan melakukan sesuatu seperti membuat film, game, dll setelah sesi konser. Pada tahap prakteknya, guru menggunakan games, teka-teki, dll untuk meninjau pemahaman siswa. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menggambarkan kegiatan guru dalam tahap presentasi, sesi konser, panggung elaborasi, dan dalam tahap praktek.Peneliti memilih deskriptif kualitatif sebagai desain penelitian karena tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menggambarkan kegiatan guru selama pelaksanaan Metode Sugestopedia dan tidak ada treatment dalam penelitian ini. Peneliti berkonsentrasi pada salah satu guru bahasa Inggris yang mengajar di sekolah dasar di salah satu kota kecil di Jawa Timur. Data dalam penelitian ini diperoleh dari hasil observasi. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif untuk menjawab pertanyaan penelitian. Penulis menulis semua informasi tentang segala sesuatu yang terjadi selama proses belajar mengajar dalam bentuk catatan yang panjang.Hasil dan pembahasan adalah, pertama tahap presentasi metode Sugestopedia dilakukan untuk membuat siswa merasa bahwa belajar bahasa Inggris menyenangkan dan tidak memberatkan. Guru mengatur tempat duduk siswa menjadi setengah lingkaran untuk membuat siswa lebih nyaman dan dapat melihat papan tulis dengan baik. Kedua , dalam sesi konser , guru meminta siswa untuk mendengarkan dan mengulangi guru membaca teks di konser pertama ( konser aktif ) dan di konser kedua , guru meminta para siswa untuk merasa rileks , menutup buku mereka , dan mendengarkan guru membaca materi. Ketiga , dalam tahap elaborasi , guru mengingatkan siswa untuk pertama kalinya bahwa mereka akan melakukan permainan dan drama . Dan keempat , tahap akhir atau disebut tahap praktik , guru menggunakan permainan dan drama untuk memberikan latihan kepada siswa . Dari hasil tersebut , penulis dapat menarik kesimpulan kegiatan-kegiatan dari metode Suggestopedia dalam proses belajar mengajar dilakukan untuk membuat siswa merasa senang dan tertarik dalam proses belajar mengajar . Saran bagi guru agar menggunakan bahasa Inggris lebih sering dan bagi peneliti lain dapat melakukan penelitian serupa dalam aspek-aspek lain dari metode Sugestopedia .Kata Kunci: Suggestopedia, Metode, Proses Belajar Mengajar.AbstractThere are four main stages of the activities in suggestopedia method. They are presentation, concert session (active and passive), elaboration, and practice. In the presentation stage, the students are helped to get positive mind that learning is easy and fun. In this stage, the teacher sets the environment of the class as comfortable and cheerful as it could be for the students. In the active concert, the teacher reads a text and is repeated by the students. After that, in the passive concert, the teacher plays some baroque music in the background and she/he reads the text again and the students listen carefully. In the elaboration, the teacher tells the students that they will do something like making film, gaming, etc. after the concert session. In the practice stage, the teacher uses games, puzzles, etc. to review the studentsunderstanding. This research aims to describe the teacher activities in the presentation stage, concert session, elaboration stage, and in practice stage.The researcher chose descriptive qualitative as the research design because the aim of this study is to describe the activities of the teacher during the implementation of Suggestopedia Method and there was no treatment in this study. The researcher concentrated on one of English teacher who teach in elementary school in one of small cities in East Java. The data in this study was the result of observation field note. The data were analyzed descriptively to answer the research questions. The writer wrote all information about everything happened during the teaching-learning process in the form of long note.The results and discussion are first, the presentation stage of the suggestopedia method was done to make the students feel that learning English is fun and not stressing. The teacher arranged the students&rsquo; seats into semicircle to make the students more comfortable and can see the blackboard well. Second, in the concert session, the teacher asked the students to listen and repeat after her in the first concert (active concert) and in the second concert, asked the students to feel relax, close their book, and listen to the teacher reading the material. Third, in the elaboration stage, the teacher reminded the students for the first time that they are going to do game and drama. And fourth, the final stage or called practice stage, the teacher used games and drama to give practice to the students. From those results, the writer can draw a concusion that many activities of suggestopedia method in the teaching and learning process were done to make the students feel fun and interested in the teaching and learning process. The suggestion are to use English more often and for other researcher can do similar research in other aspects of suggestopedia method.Keywords: Suggestopedia, Method, Teaching and Learning ProcessINTRODUCTIONSuggestopedia is a teaching method that was introduced by Georgi Lozanov in 1970s. Lozanov (2005) states that suggestopedia is a teaching system which makes use of all the possibilities tender suggestion can offer. The suggestion here is about something that can make students feel enjoy in teaching and learning process. Lozanov created this method in the hope that students would enjoy in learning, especially learning foreign language. Suggestopedia was originally applied mainly in foreign language teaching, and it is often claimed that it can teach languages approximately three times as quickly as conventional methods. In that reason, the researcher is trying to conduct a research about suggestopedia.Lozanov (1978) states that there are four main stages of the activities in suggestopedia method. They are presentation, concert session (active and passive), elaboration, and practice. In the presentation stage, the students are helped to get positive mind that learning is easy and fun. In this stage, the teacher sets the environment of the class as comfortable and cheerful as it could be for the students. In the active concert, the teacher reads a text and is repeated by the students. After that, in the passive concert, the teacher plays some baroque music in the background and she/he reads the text again and the students listen carefully. In the elaboration, the teacher tells the students that they will do something like making film, gaming, etc. after the concert session. In the practice stage, the teacher uses games, puzzles, etc. to review the students understanding. The activities in suggestopedia method seem fun for the students. By applying this method in the class teacher hopes that the students will enjoy learning English.Many students in EFL classes think that learning foreign language is difficult. Gold, the founder of the National Council of Suggestopedia, said in his speech that suggestopedia was created to make easier learning for students because suggestopedia make the students feel fun and interested in the teaching and learning process. Lozanov (2005) also states that &ldquo;if you want to learn more, more easily, more pleasantly, in a stable way and with a better impact on health &ndash; then accept Suggestopedia, desuggestive learning, because it is learning with love&rdquo;. By applying the suggestopedia method, the students will feel that learning foreign language is not as difficult as they think. If the students feel that learning is easy and fun, they will be able to learn foreign language maximally.Lozanov (1978) argued that learners have difficulties in acquiring English as the second language because of the fear of the students to make mistakes. When the learners are in this condition, their heart and blood pressure raise. He believes that there is a mental block in the learners&rsquo; brain (affective filter). This filter blocks the input, so the learners have difficulties toacquire language caused by their fear. The aim of suggestopedia is to lower the affective filter and motivate students&rsquo; mental potential to learn, aiming to accelerate the process by which they learn to understand and use the target language for communication to achieve superlearning. It is the final goal of suggestopediaPriyatmojo (2009) found in his thesis that suggestopedia is useful in the teaching vocabulary to young learners. Suggestopedia helped the students to memorize well in vocabulary. It was good thing to use suggestopedia in the teaching and learning process. Djuhariah et.al. (2012) found that suggestopedia was also a good method in the teaching of reading to the twelfth grade students. They found that the students&rsquo; reading ability is improved by the applying the suggestopedia method in the teaching of reading. Meanwhile, Nopiyanti (2012) also found that suggestopedia is useful in the teaching of speaking to young learners. She found that the suggestopedia method can improve the speaking ability of young learners. From those researches, the suggestopedia method can be known as a method that useful in the teaching and learning process. That is why the researcher is trying to conduct a research about suggestopedia in the teaching and learning process of English class.Since the suggestopedia is a good method in the teaching and learning process of foreign language especially English, the researcher is trying to conduct a research about it. She is trying to do research in one of the class in one of schools in a small city of east Java. The researcher found that one of the teachers in that school is using suggestopedia in the English teaching and learning process. When the researcher was asking to that teacher, the teacher said that the students were very enthusiast in learning English when she applied suggestopedia method in the teaching and learning process. The way the teacher teaches English using suggestopedia makes the students feel fun and excited in learning English. The teacher uses music in class and makes the atmosphere in the class fun and the students feel that learning English is fun and interesting.There are many activities in suggestopedia method that can make students feel fun in the teaching and learning process. Therefore, there is no teacher who always uses suggestopedia method in the whole teaching and learning process in whole semester, the researcher is going to analyze the activities during the teaching and learning process that according to suggestopedia method. According to that reason, the researcher is going to do a research according to this research problem: What are the teacher&rsquo;s activities in suggestopedia method in the teaching and learning process?Suggestopedia method is diferent from other method. Brown, cited in Nopiyanti (2012), stated that there are four main stages in suggestopedia. There are presentation, concert session, elaboration, and practice. These stages are important in the application of suggestopedia method. There are activities in every stage. The researcher was trying to analyze the activities during the teaching and learning process that using suggestopedia method according to those four stages. According to that reason, the researcher did a research according to the following research questions:a. What were the teacher&rsquo;s activities in the presentation stage of suggestopedia method in the teaching and learning process?b. What were the teacher&rsquo;s activities in the concert session of suggestopedia method in the teaching and learning process?c. What were the teacher&rsquo;s activities in the elaboration stage of suggestopedia method in the teaching and learning process?d. What were the teacher&rsquo;s activities in the practice stage of suggestopedia method in the teaching and learning process?The suggestopedia method has six key features that are important in the teaching and learning process using this method. According to Nosrati et. Al. (2013) the six key features of suggestopedia are:1. Comfortable environment2. The use of music3. Peripheral Learning4. Free Errors5. Homework is limited6. Music, drama and art are integrated in the learning processThe suggestion here is about the activities that can make students feel that learning is easy and fun. It is also believed that it can teach three times as quickly as a conventional method. This method has four stages, they are presentation stage, concert session (active concert and passive concert), elaboration, and practice stage (performance of the students).Lozanov (2005) stated that there are four stages in suggestopedia method, those are:a. Presentation StageThe main aim in this stage is to help students relaxed and move into a positive frame of mind, with the feeling that the learning is going to be easy and fun. In this stage, to make the students relax, teacher arranges the students&rsquo; seats in a comfortable way.At the teacher&rsquo;s very first contact with the students, he or she introduces a spirit of easiness and delicacy into his or her attitude towards the group as a whole and towards each student as an individual. Instead of continuously playing in front of the students as if on a stage and before taking the decision to gradually involve them in the communication, the teacher now stimulates the students to join immediately and willingly in a common game project. The game project frees them from the boredom, demotivation, and fear of learning.b. Concert SessionsIn this concert session, Lozanov divided it into two parts. Those are active session and passive sessionThe first concert (active concert) involves the active presentation of the material to be learnt. For example, the teacher will read the text being studied and the students actively following the teacher&rsquo;s reading. Here the teacher use some classical music and he or she reads the text in the harmony with the musical phrases. The musical compositions for the active session are emotional, with a wealth of melody and harmony in them.In this session, the students get the translation and are informed that, while the teacher is reading, they are looking at the text and the translation and only listen to the music &ndash; not to try to memorize. The teacher&rsquo;s behavior is solemn, as it should be when the concert is about to begin.In reading, the teacher&rsquo;s voice should be harmonized with the nuances of the musical phrase. The diction should be pure and distinct, every word clear-cut and phonetically well molded. The voice should be well taken up in the resonance box. The reading should be slow, and rhythmical, the breathing regular. The active session normally should not last more than 45-50 minutes.In the second concert (passive concert), the students are now invited to relax, close their book, and listen to some Baroque music, with the text being read very quietly in the background. The music is specially selected to bring the students into the optimum mental state for the effortless acquisition of the material. Brown (2007:27) stated that &ldquo;during the soft playing of baroque music, one can take in tremendous quantities of material due to an increase in alpha brain waves and a decrease in blood pressure and pulse rate&rdquo;. It can be said that by listening to baroque music, students can feel relax and it can make them smarter because it increase alpha brain waves.c. ElaborationElaboration of the material taught has actually begun at the first meeting of the teacher and the students. The first word the teacher says already open up a dialogue. For example, the teacher reminds the students in between that he or she and they are going together to prepare the material necessary for the film they plan to make. This is the systematic elaboration. The elaboration process should focus on the freedom and creativity of the students are encouraged even more than previously, all the stages of desuggestive pedagogy are unified during the elaboration through the use of reminding intonations, songs, the play, etc., the teacher continues to keep the students on the border of their linguistic knowledge. As well as facilitating spontaneous laughter and songs, the teacher purposefully puts jokes and songs into the lesson plan to help the students with the most difficult parts of the lesson.d. Practice StageThe practice stage is given the day after the second concert. Lozanov stated in Brown (2007: 28) stated that after the second concert the students will leave the class silently. They are not told to do any homework on the lesson they have just had except for reading it cursorily once before going to bed and again before getting up in the morning. In this stage teacher will not do something stressful for students practice. The teacher uses a range of games, puzzles, etc. to review and consolidate the learning.METHODSBased on the research problems and the objective of the study, the researcher used descriptive qualitative as the research design. The aim of descriptive qualitative is to describe a real situation or phenomenon,and the researcher took place as an observer only. The researcher did not take a part in teaching learning process. She only observed the teacher&rsquo;s activities in the class and reported the activities from beginning up to the end of the class. This research took place in a natural setting, without any attempts to manipulate the situation under the study.Bogdan and Biklen (1982) in Sugiyono (2011) say that the characteristic of qualitative research are; has natural setting as the direct source of data, the data collected is in the form of words or picture rather than number, it is concerned with process rather than simply with outcomes or products, it tends to analyze the data inductively. Those mean the researcher should give a real phenomenon, not manipulated data. In the qualitative research, the researcher reports the data in descriptive way.So, here the researcher conducted a research and described all of the data she needed. She came to the class and she sat on the back seat. She was an observer, which meant she only observed the classroom activities and she did not disturb the class by whatever she did. She observed the class and described the teacher&rsquo;s activities.The study was set in one of an Elementary school in one of small cities in East Java. There are six classes and one English teacher in that school. The English lesson was taught from the second until sixth grade. So that, there are only five classes which are taught English lesson. The researcher chose fourth grade because this class was in the middle among the other classes.The subject of this study was an English teacher in one of elementary schools in a small city in East Java Indonesia. The researcher did a research about the teacher&rsquo;s activities during teaching and learning process. These activities included the activities in the suggestopedia method.The Data of the study were the activities in the teaching and learning process that were according to suggestopedia method. To get the data, the researcher wrote field notes to observe the teacher&rsquo;s activities in the teaching and learning process. The data were classified into four data to answer the research questions of this thesis.The first data were about the teacher&rsquo;s activities in the presentation stage of suggestopedia method in the teaching and learning process. These data were to answer the first question &ldquo;what were the teacher&rsquo;s activities in the presentation stage of the suggestopedia method in the teaching and learning process?&rdquo;The second data were about the teacher&rsquo;s activities in the concert session of the suggestopedia method in the teaching and learning process. These data were to answer the second question &ldquo;what were the teacher&rsquo;s activities in the concert session of the suggestopedia method in the teaching and learning process?&rdquo; The concert session of the suggestopedia method were divided into two. Those were the first concert or active concert and the second concert or passive concert.The third data were about the teacher&rsquo;s activities in the elaboration session of the suggestopedia method in the teaching and learning process. These data were to answer the third research question &ldquo;what were the teacher&rsquo;s activities in the elaboration stage of the suggestopedia method in the teaching and learning process?&rdquo;The fourth data were about the teacher&rsquo;s activities in the practice stage of the suggestopedia method in the teaching and learning process. These data were to answer the fourth research question &ldquo;what were the teacher&rsquo;s activities in the practice stage of the suggestopedia method in the teaching and learning process?&rdquo;To collect the data, the researcher used observation technique as a qualitative one. Here, the researcher did no-participant observation. It means she did not participate directly and influence in the teaching and learning process. In this research, the researcher used observation field notes. She used this observation because she wanted to find out the activities done by the teacher while she was applying the suggestopedia method. The researcher did this observation by writing all the activities of the teacher while the teaching learning process was held.The data of this study was analyzed qualitatively using descriptive analysis. From the field note the researcher analyzed them descriptively. There were some steps to describe and analyze the data. They are: The researcher collected all the data from field notes, the researcher organized the data during the observation, and then decided what have to be reported, after analyzing the data, the researcher described the data by classifying them into parts based on the problems of the study, the researcher tried to make conclusion.RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONSThe results and discussions is the answer of the problems in introductions. The data were taken through the observation and only focused on teacher activities during the implementation of suggestopedia method in the teaching and learning process.1. The Implementation of Suggestopedia Method in the Teaching and Learning ProcessThe data were obtained through the observation that was focused in the teachers&rsquo; activities during the implementation of Suggestopedia method in the teaching and learning process. There are six key features of suggestopedia method. They are comfortable environment, the use of music, peripheral learning, free errors, homework is limited, and music, drama, and art are integrated in the teaching and learning process.The teaching and learning process of suggestopedia method had a comfortable environment. The chairs were arranged into semicircle facing the blackboard so that the students can pay more attention to the teacher and would be more relaxed. The teacher also always asks for the students&rsquo; condition whether they were comfortable enough or not in the day they study English. There are many pictures on the wall that can support their teaching and learning process. Those pictures are there in the hope that when the students forget about something they can get it from the wall immediately.Nosrati et. al. (2013) state that in this kind of teaching method, suggestopedia method, the classroom is very different from common classrooms. In the classroom, the chairs are arranged semicircle and faced the black or white board in order to make the students pay more attention and get more relaxed. The teacher arranged the students&rsquo; chair into semicircle to make the students feel more relax.The teacher used baroque music in the suggestopedia teaching and learning process. Baroque music is a classic music. In the suggestopedia method baroque music is used to make the students more relax. If the students are relaxed, their feeling of fear will be decreased and it can make the students easier to understand while studying English. The teacher asked the students to listen to the music and feel more relax.One of the most uniqueness of this method is the use of Baroque music during the learning process (Nosrati et. al., 2013). Ostrander and Schroeder cited in Harmer (1998) said that Baroque music, with its 60 beats per minute and its specific rhythm, created the kind of relaxed states of mind for maximum retention of material. It is believed that Baroque music creates a level of relaxed concentration that facilitates the intake and retention of huge quantities of materials.In the suggestopedia method, students were in a peripheral learning. The students acquire English not only from direct instruction but also from indirect instruction. It is encouraged through the presence in the learning environment of posters and decoration featuring the target language and various grammatical information (picture 1).Picture 1: There are many pictures on the wallWhen the students got something confusing, they can take a look at the wall and see whether they can get the information they need on the wall directly so that their confusion can be answered quickly. Nosrati et. al. (2013) stated that by doing this, putting many pictures on the wall, the students can learn many things undirectly in the classroom.The teacher tolerated the students if they made some errors while teaching and learning process. By doing this, the students did not feel afraid of doing something in the class like saying something they wanted to say.(1)TSTSTST::::::::&ldquo;Touch your foot&rdquo;(They touch their foot)&ldquo;Touch your shoulders&rdquo;(some of them touch their shoulders and some of them touch their ears)&ldquo;Ayoo kok ada yang pegang kuping? Shoulders tu apa cah? Pun&hellip;.Pundak. &ldquo;&ldquo;O iya bu.. pundak..&rdquo; (They touch their shoulders)&ldquo;ok Good. Gak papa masih adayang salah dikit-dikit.In dialog one (1) some of the students made mistakes when the teacher asked them to touch their shoulders but the teacher said that it&rsquo;s ok to make mistakes. When the students were allowed to make mistakes, they would not afraid of trying something that they were not sure about. If they were trying something, it means that they were trying to studying something new. If the teacher just stops them when they make a mistake, it will make them afraid of trying something new. In other words, the learning process will end when the students stop trying something new. Nosrati et. al. (2013) stated that in the teaching learning process, students who make mistakes are tolerated. The emphasis is on the content not the structure. Grammar and vocabularies are presented and given treatment from the teachers, but not dwelt on.In the suggestopedia method teacher also did not give too much homework to the students. It was not because she did not want the students to study at home but it was because the teacher wanted the students to study their last material once they want to go to bed and once they get up in the morning.(2)TST:::&ldquo;anak-anak, sekarang sudah saatnya pulang, sebelum kita pulang saya mau kalian nanti dirumah membaca materi yang telah kita pelajari hari ini sebelum tidur dan besuk pagi waktu kalian bangun tidur ya..&rsquo;&ldquo;iya bu..&rdquo;&ldquo;baiklah, ketua kelas silakan memimpin berdoa&rdquo;.In the dialog two (2), the teacher did not forget to remind the students to read their last material once they want to go bed and once they get up in the morning. It is also stated in Nosrati et. al. (2013) that Students reread materials given in the classroom once before they go to sleep at night and once in the morning before they get up. This assignment was more appropriate than giving the students much homework to do at home. If the teacher gives much homework to do at home, the students will think that English is frustrating lesson with much homework.The use of music, drama, and art were integrated in the teaching and learning process of suggestopedia method. The teacher asked the students to sing together in the class. This was done to make the students feel fun and to make the students easier to study English if they were in a fun condition. The teacher also used drama in the teaching and learning process and this also made the students felt fun in the teaching and learning process.2. The teacher&rsquo;s Activities in the Presentation Stage of Suggestopedia Method in the Teaching and Learning ProcessThe first problem of the implementation of suggestopedia method in the teaching and learning process was the teacher&rsquo;s activities in the presentation stage of suggestopedia method in the teaching and learning process. Lozanov (2005) stated that the main aim of this stage is to help students relaxed and move into a positive frame of mind, with the feeling that the learning is going to be easy and fun. The teacher began with the seats of the students. She arranged the students&rsquo; seats into semicircle facing the blackboard (picture 2).Picture 2: The chairs were arranged semicircleLozanov (2005) stated in this stage, to make the students relax, teacher arranges the students&rsquo; seats in a comfortable way. In this condition, the students felt more relax and could clearly see the teacher and the blackboard. The teacher also could clearly see the students.In this stage, the teacher used music or song to make the students feel fun and happy before having the material. The song also one of the activities for listening and speaking comprehension because they first listen to the teacher singing the song, then they sang it together with the teacher. In the dialog three (3) stated that the teacher asked the students to sing and the students were very happy to be asked to sing together with the teacher. The song they sang was related to the material they were studying that day. The material that day was about parts of body and the song was &ldquo;Head Shoulders Knees and Toes&rdquo;. In other words, by singing the song, the students could also memorize the parts of body.Teachers also paid attention to the students' ability to receive a singing material given by the teacher because the teacher did not want the students to feel uncomfortable if the song was too difficult for students. If the song was too difficult then the students would not feel happy but they would feel stressed.(3)TSPutriT::::&ldquo;susah gak lagunya?&rdquo;&ldquo;ndak bu..&rdquo;&ldquo;itu lagu kepala pundak lutut kaki ta bu?&rdquo;&ldquo;yes, you&rsquo;re right putri, bener banget, tapi ini yang versi inggrisnya&rdquo;&ldquo;ok, sekarang kita dengarkan sekali lagi terus kita nyanyi bareng-bareng ya..&rdquo;In dialog three (3) the teacher made sure that the students did not find difficulties in singing the song. She did not want that the students would feel that learning English is difficult if she gave a difficult material in the English class. As stated in Lozanov (2005) at the teacher&rsquo;s very first contact with the students, he or she introduces a spirit of easiness and delicacy into his or her attitude towards the group as a whole and towards each student as an individual.3. The teacher&rsquo;s Activities in the Concert Session of Suggestopedia Method in the Teaching and Learning ProcessThe second problem of the implementation of suggestopedia method in the teaching and learning process was about the teacher&rsquo;s activities in the concert session of suggestopedia method. After the presentation stage, the teacher directly moved into the concert sessions. There were two kinds of concert sessions, the first was the active concert and the second was passive concert.a. First Concert (Active concert)The first concert or called active concert involved the active presentation of the material to be learnt. This meant that the students were active in the teaching and learning process. Here the teacher used some classical music and he or she read the text in the harmony with the musical phrases. In the research the researcher did before, the students were actively following the teacher&rsquo;s reading the material. This activity was one of the speaking comprehension activities because the students actively following the teacher&rsquo;s reading that means they are reading aloud the text. The reading aloud was according to speaking activities.Lozanov (2005) stated that in this session, the students get the translation and are informed that, while the teacher is reading, they are looking at the text and the translation and only listen to the music &ndash; not to try to memorize. The teacher wanted the students to recognize the text well before going to go to comprehend the text.After the first reading without any translation, the teacher then began to read the text and translate the text together with the students. The teacher used gesture and sometimes song to remind the students about the translation of some words. This meant that the students also actively translating the text being studied with the teacher.b. Second Concert (Passive Concert)The second concert is called passive concert. Lozanov (2005) stated the students are now invited to relax, close their book, and listen to some Baroque music, with the text being read very quietly in the background. This activity refers to listening comprehension. The music is specially selected to bring the students into the optimum mental state for the effortless acquisition of the material.In dialog eight (8) the teacher asked to the students to close their book and listen to her reading the dialog. In this concert session, the baroque music was still played as background music. The baroque music was still used because it made the students more relax and could think better when they were relaxed as stated in Brown(5)TST:::&ldquo;ok students, sekarang saya akan membacakan dialog yang ada di halaman 37 between Rendra and Reza. Please listen and repeat ya.&rdquo;&ldquo;iya bu&rdquo;&ldquo;nanti kalian harus maju berdua satu bangku untuk memperagakan dialognya, jadi dengarkan dan tirukan baik-baik&rdquo;(4)T:&ldquo;Ok students, now it&rsquo;s time to close your book and listen to me. Tutup buku dan dengarkan saya baik-baik ya. Saya akan membacakan dialognya sekali lagi sebelum kalian nanti maju membacakan dialognya di depan kelas. Ok?&rdquo;(2007:27) &ldquo;during the soft playing of baroque music, one can take in tremendous quantities of material due to an increase in alpha brain waves and a decrease in blood pressure and pulse rate&rdquo;. It can be said that by listening to baroque music, students can feel relax and it can make them smarter because it increase alpha brain waves.4. The teacher&rsquo;s Activities in the Elaboration of Suggestopedia Method in the Teaching and Learning ProcessElaboration of the material taught has actually begun at the first meeting of the teacher and the students. The first word the teacher says already open up a dialogue. For example, the teacher reminds the students in between that he or she and they are going together to prepare the material necessary for the film they plan to make.In the research the researcher did at school, the teacher did the elaboration stage in the first time she arrived at the first concert session.In dialog five (5) the teacher would read the dialog on the book between Rendra and Reza. But before she read, she reminded the students that they would come forward to perform the dialog with their seat mate. This was an elaboration stage activity. This elaboration had a purpose to make the students more aware or ready for something they do in the future. In that case, the students would listen and repeat seriously because they do not want to get a bad score if they come forward.Besides reminding the students that they would come forward to perform a dialog, the teacher also did the elaboration when she&rsquo;s explaining about the material the students did not know.In dialog 6 the teacher also did the elaboration. She sang a song to remind the students about the question &ldquo;how many&rdquo;. She did not immediately tell the students the meaning of the question &ldquo;how many&rdquo; because she wanted the students to think about it themselves in the helped of her song. Besides singing the song, the teacher also remind the students about the meaning of &ldquo;fingers&rdquo; by saying &ldquo;I have ten fingers&rdquo; and showing her fingers to the students and finally the students knew the meaning of fingers. Lozanov (2005) states that the elaboration process should focus on the freedom and creativity of the students are encouraged even more than previously, all the stages of desuggestive pedagogy are unified during the elaboration through the use of reminding intonations, songs, the play, etc., the teacher continues to keep the students on the border of their linguistic knowledge.5. The teacher&rsquo;s Activities in the Practice Stage of Suggestopedia Method in the Teaching and Learning ProcessThe practice stage is the last stage of suggestopedia method. In this stage the teacher can measure the students&rsquo; comprehension of the material they had learned before. According to Lozanov in Brown (2007), practice stage is given to the students the day after the concert session. Otherwise, the teacher in the research the researcher did before gave the practice stage on the same day with the concert session. It was due to the teacher still had much time to do the practice stage. It was also good to give the students the practice stage on the same day with the concert session as long as the practice stage did not stress the students.The teacher did games, drama, and writing a video clip lyric during the practice stage of her suggestopedia class. The first game was named &ldquo;Simon Says&rdquo;. In this game, the teacher checked the vocabulary of the students about parts of body. The teacher also could check the listening comprehension of the students.The second game was given by the teacher for the students named &ldquo;Parts of body game&rdquo; This game was a power point game. Before starting the game, the teacher explained about the rule of the game and how to play the game. After the students had understood about the rule of the game, the teacher began to start the game.(6)TSTSTSTSTST:::::::::::&ldquo;Bagus, saya akan memberikanmu beberapa pertanyaan. How many fingers do you have? How many menanyakan apa?&rdquo;(they are confused and talk to each other discussing)&ldquo;masa lupa?&rdquo; (then singing) &ldquo;What apa, who siapa, how bagaimana&hellip;.&rdquo;&ldquo;bagaimana bu..&rdquo;&ldquo;alright, how itu bagaimana, tapi kalo ditambah sama many jadi how many artinya berapa..jadi how many fingers do you have? Fingers apa?&rdquo;(thinking)&ldquo;I have ten fingers&rdquo; (showing her ten fingers to the students)&ldquo;Jari bu&rdquo;&ldquo;Good, jadi artinya how many fingers do you have?&rdquo;&ldquo;berapa jari yang kamu punya?&rdquo;&ldquo;Good&rdquo;There were several questions in the game. They were related to the text. By doing this game, the teacher could measure the reading comprehension of the students.The other practice stage did by the teacher was drama. For the fourth grade students, it was difficult for them to memorize the script of the dialog. So that, the teacher asked the students to bring the dialog script in front of the class. In other words the students read the dialog in front of the class. It was a kind of drama.The teacher also did a writing practice to the students to know the writing ability of the students. The teacher showed the students a video clip. The title of the song was &ldquo;If you&rsquo;re happy&rdquo;. The video had the lyric on it so that the students could read the lyric of the song. Then the teacher asked the students to write the lyric of the song on their book.In practice stage, the teacher did fun activities to review the students understanding. Lozanov (2005) states that in this stage teacher will not do something stressful for students practice. The teacher uses a range of games, puzzles, etc. to review and consolidate the learning.CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONSConclusionThe major problem of this study is the teachers&rsquo; activity during the implementation of Suggestopedia method in the teaching and learning process. The main problem that is developed based on the teacher activity during the suggestopedia method in the teaching and learning process devided into four, they are: (1) The teacher&rsquo;s activities in the presentation stage of suggestopedia method in the teaching and learning process, (2) The teacher&rsquo;s activities in the concert session of suggestopedia method in the teaching and learning process, (3) The teacher&rsquo;s activities in the elaboration stage of suggestopedia method in the teaching and learning process, (4) The teacher&rsquo;s activities in the practice stage of the suggestopedia method in the teaching and learning process.Based on the findings of data analysis and discussion in the previous chapter, the researcher drew a conclusion: first, the teacher&rsquo;s activities in the presentation stage of suggestopedia method in the teaching and learning process was going well. The presentation stage of the suggestopedia method was done to make the students feel that learning English is fun and not stressing. The teacher arranged the students&rsquo; seats into semicircle to make the students more comfortable and can see the blackboard well. The teacher also asked the students to sing together to make the students happy. Second, in the concert session, the teacher asked the students to listen and repeat after her in the first concert (active concert) and asked the students to feel relax, close their book, and listen to the teacher reading the material. Third, in the elaboration stage, the teacher reminded the students for the first time that they are going to do game and drama. This stage was to make the students more concentrated to the lesson. And fourth, the final stage or called practice stage, the teacher used games and drama to give practice to the students. In the practice stage the teacher used games and drama to make the students think that practice is not something stressful.SuggestionsAt the end of this study, some suggestions are offered related to the result of the study. The result of this study was the teacher did well in the presentation stage, concert session, elaboration stage, and practice stage of suggestopedia method in the teaching and learning process, but to become a profesional teacher she also must have the other aspect, having a good teaching skill. Therefore first, the researcher suggest to the teacher to consider about language use that she choose. Second, the researcher suggests to other researchers to conduct a similar study, but they can view from the other aspects such as the grade levels of education, and various type of genre.ReferencesBrown, H.,D. 2007. Teaching by Principles &ndash; An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Pearson Education, Inc.Djuhariah, et.al. 2012. Improving Students&rsquo; Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text Through Suggestopedia Method. Unpublished Research: Tanjungpura University Pontianak.Gold, Lonny. The Speech of Suggestopedia &ndash; Activating the Students Reserve Capacities. 17 June 2013 < www.youtube.com/watch?v=yX4JFEUgqlg>.Halliwell, Susan. 1992. Teaching English in the Primary Classroom. Longman: New York.Harmer, Jeremy. 1998. How to Teach English. Malaysia: LongmanLica, Gabriela Mihaila. 2008. Suggestopedia: A Wonder Approach to Learning Foreign Languages. Assian EFL Journal: English Language Teaching and Research Article. 17 June 20013 http://www.jalt-publications.org/tlt/files/97/feb/suggest.html.Lozanov, G. 2005. Suggestopaedia-Desuggestive Teaching Communicative Method on The Level of The Hidden Reserves of the Human Mind. International Centre for Desuggestology: Austria.Lozanov, G. 1978. Suggestology and Suggestopedia &ndash; Theory and Practice. Bulgaria: United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization.Nopiyanti, M.,S. 2012. Teaching English Speaking Using Suggestopedia Method at the Fourth Grade Students of SD Mutiara Nusantara parongpong. Unpablished Thesis: STKIP Siliwangi Bandung.Nosrati, et.al. 2013. Investigation of Language Teaching Methodologies in Second Language Learning. International Journal of Economy, Management and Social Sciences.Nunan, David (Ed). 2003. Practical English Language Teaching. Singapore: Mc Graw Hill.Priyatmojo, A.S. 2009. Suggestopedia as a Method for Teaching Speaking for Young Learners in a Second Language Classroom. Semarang State University: Unpublished Thesis.Radle, Paul. 2008. Suggestopedia. 17 Nov.2013 http://www.vtrain.net/lang-sugg.htm.Sugiyono. 2011. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, cv.Zainuddin et.al. 2011. Methods/Approaches of Teaching ESOL: A Historical Overview. Kendall Hunt Publishing Co.
IMPLEMENTING INTERACTIVE READING MODEL TO TEACH HORTATORY EXPOSITION TEXT TOTHE ELEVENTH GRADERS OF SMAN 1 SOOKO MOJOKERTO
RETAIN Vol 2 No 1 (2014): Volume 2, Nomor1, Januari - April 2014
Publisher : RETAIN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

IMPLEMENTING INTERACTIVE READING MODEL TO TEACH HORTATORY EXPOSITION TEXT TO THE ELEVENTH GRADERS OF SMAN 1 SOOKO MOJOKERTO Arista Nurhayati English Department, Languages and Arts Faculty, State University of Surabaya, noorhayati16@yahoo.co.id Aswandi, Drs., M. Pd. English Department, Languages and Arts Faculty, State University of Surabaya, aswandi20@yahoo.com Abstrak Penelitian ini merupakan sebuah penelitian deskriptif kualitatif yang menggambarkan bagaimana guru menggunakan model membaca interaktif dalam pengajaran teks hortatory exposition pada siswa kelas XI di SMAN 1 Sooko Mojokerto dan bagaimana respon siswa pada saat mereka diajarkan membaca teks hortatory exposition menggunakan model membaca interaktif. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di kelas XI IPA 6 di SMAN 1 Sooko Mojokerto pada semester kedua. Data penelitian diperoleh dari observasi kelas, kuesioner siswa, dan wawancara dengan guru yang bersangkutan. Kemudian, data tersebut dianalisis menggunakan tiga langkah, yaitu data reduksi, penyajian data, dan verifikasi. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa guru menggunakan model membaca interaktif dalam pengajaran teks hortatory exposition dengan langkah-langkah berikut: mengenalkan judul, membekali siswa dengan struktur bahasa dan pengetahuan linguistic terkait, berkonsentrasi pada pelafalan dan pengenalan kata, mengajak siswa memprediksi arti kata baru nenggunakan kamus dan konteks, meminta siswa mentransfer informasi tersurat dan tersirat ke dalam bentuk tabel, bertanya pada siswa tentang opini dan perasaan mereka mengenai isi teks, dan melaksanakan latihan tambahan. Sedangkan respon siswa pada saat mereka diajarkan teks hortatory exposition dengan menggunakan model membaca interaktif menunjukkan hasil yang bagus dari sisi pengembangan kosakata, latihan pelafalan kata, dan kesempatan untuk berkomunikasi. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, guru disarankan untuk memakai teks yang memenuhi kriteria kesesuaian isi dengan topic bahasan, mudah untuk dieksplorasi, dan layak sebagai bahan bacaan. Di samping itu, peneliti selanjutnya harus fokus pada penggunaan model membaca interakrif untuk mengajarkan genre teks yang berbeda dan pada level siswa yang berbeda pula. Kata Kunci: model membaca interaktif, teks hortatory exposition, respon siswa Abstract This study is a descriptive qualitative research which describes how the teacher implements interactive reading model to teach hortatory exposition text to the eleventh graders of SMAN 1 Sooko Mojokerto and how are the students&rsquo; responses when they are taught reading hortatory exposition text by using that model. This study was conducted on the second semester of XI science 6 in SMAN 1 Sooko Mojokerto. The data was collected from classroom observations, students&rsquo; questonnaires, and an interview with the teacher. Later, the data were analized in three steps: data reduction, data display, and verification. The result showed that the teacher implemented the interactive reading model to teach hortatory exposition in these steps: introducing the title/headline; preparing the students&rsquo; structure and linguistic feature; focusing on the students&rsquo; pronunciation and word recognition; asking the students to find out unknown words by using context and dictionary; requiring the students to transfer the message from the text into a table; asking the students&rsquo; opinion and feeling toward the text; and conducting follow-up activities. Meanwhile, the students&rsquo; responses toward the implementation of interactive reading model were good in terms of vocabulary improvement, pronunciation practice, and opportunity for communication. Based on the result of this study, the researcher suggests to the teacher to use the text which fulfils the criteria of suitability of content, exploitability, and readability. Besides, the next researchers should be concern to use the interactive reading model to teach the different kinds of text and the other levels of the student. Keywords: interactive reading model, hortatory exposition text, students&rsquo; responses INTRODUCTION Reading is the source of meaningful and comprehensible linguistic input that helps unconscious language acquisition. Anderson (2003:68) states that reading is a process of combining information from a text and the reader&rsquo;s background knowledge to get meaning. In addition, Krashen (1981) in Lyutaya (2011:27) argues that effective reading skills are essential in the English as Foreign Language situation because of limited exposure to spoken English. Therefore, reading becomes one alternative which encourages students with more language exposure to written English. However, there are many reasons why getting students to read English texts is an important part of teacher&rsquo;s job. Firstly, it is simply because students want to be able to read texts in English for some purposes, such as for careers, study purposes, or simply for entertainment. Besides, Harmer (1998:68) believes that reading texts also provide good models for English writing and opportunities to study language components such as vocabulary, grammar, punctuation, etc. Secondly, it is the objective of the Indonesian curriculum that students are expected to be able to communicate in English, in which &ldquo;to communicate&rdquo; means &ldquo;to produce spoken and written English texts&rdquo;. Thus, anything that teachers can do to help them speak and write English texts easily must be a good idea. Furthermore, the approach adopted by the Indonesian curriculum is literacy approach. This approach defines reading and writing to achieve social purposes in context of use. Therefore, the teaching of English to senior high school students addresses informative text in contexts of use on some kinds of texts, such as discussion and exposition. An exposition text is a kind of factual text that should be mastered by the eleventh graders of senior high school as they come in contact with maps, menus, guides, brochures, newspapers, magazines, and the internet in the daily life. Exposition texts being taught at school are divided into two: hortatory exposition and analytical exposition. In this occasion, the writer concerns only at the teaching of hortatory exposition. According to Street (2002:34), students often come to high school with limited experience with content area texts on the textbook such as exposition and explanation. Further, the writer discovers that students have been engaged in reading a narrative text. They are excited in reading an adolescent novel, connecting their prior knowledge to the new one, and clarifying misconceptions. But they do not know the strategic reading skills to learn more about their textbook. They become passive, with simply skimming over the foreign words and pictures, making no real connections between the exposition text and their own experience. To make students engaged in reading an exposition text, teachers need to step in and offer support for them. In this case, the teacher can use interactive reading model to teach reading hortatory exposition. Interactive reading is another type of reading model which combines the elements of both bottom-up and top-down models. Furthermore, Stanovich in Nunan (1998:67) claims that interactive reading model is superior because it deals with the lack of the other models, and allows for the deficiencies at one level to be exchanged for at another. This model also suggests that a reader processes a text by using information from several different sources in the same time. These sources can be phonological, lexical, syntactic, semantic, and discourse knowledge. In short, interactive reading model is accepted as the most comprehensible description of reading process. As a matter of fact, interactive reading model is still rarely used in the teaching of reading. The teacher is usually focuses on exploring the grammatical structure and language features of the text without considering the student&rsquo;s prior knowledge of the topic. Often, the teacher leads the reading discussion by reading the following questions first. Then, skimming or scanning the information to answer the questions and seeing dictionary to find vocabulary meaning. But later, the teacher does not relate the topic with the students&rsquo; experiences or arguments. Consequently, the students understand how to find out the information to answer the questions but often find difficulties in guessing word meaning from the context or the knowledge they already know. Therefore, the teacher needs to emphasize not only bottom-up but also top-down reading process to help students activate their background knowledge. Eventually, the students will be able to develop their thinking in higher level of comprehension. Finally, the interactive reading model is appropriate to be applied in teaching reading hortatory exposition. First, it is simply because a hortatory exposition text contains vocabulary with a particular content area, so that the terms are usually different with the vocabulary in a narrative. Second, it gives students an opportunity to explore vocabularies related to the content area and make connection between their prior knowledge and those vocabularies. In addition, Brown (2001:299) states that recent studies on teaching reading have shown that a combination of top-down and bottom-up or interactive reading model is an important part in successful teaching methodology because both processes are essential. Thus, this study is conducted to answer these following questions: (1) how is the implementation of interactive reading model to teach reading hortatory exposition to the eleventh graders of SMAN 1 Sooko Mojokerto? and (2) how are students&rsquo; responses when they are taught reading hortatory exposition by implementing interactive reading model?. Based on the problem questions, the aims of this study was to describe the implementation of interactive reading model to teach reading hortatory exposition to the eleventh graders of SMAN 1 Sooko Mojokerto and to know the students&rsquo; responses when they are taught reading hortatory exposition by implementing interactive reading model. Types of Reading According to Brown (2001:312), classroom reading performance is defined into two: oral and silent reading. Oral reading is the act of reading aloud. It is often used to develop pronunciation practice because the reader&rsquo;s mistakes can be corrected by another reader at once. It also helps students to develop skills of speech and communication. On the other hand, silent reading is an individual activity in which communication is not between one reader and another, but between an author and a reader. Furthermore, silent reading in the classroom performance is divided into two: intensive and extensive reading. The main aim of intensive reading is developing students&rsquo; ability to decode message by drawing on syntactic and lexical cues and emphasizing skill for recognition. Moreover, Anderson (2003:71) adds that intensive reading includes a short text added by textbook activities to develop comprehension or particular reading skills in which the textbooks mostly use intensive reading approach. Therefore, the activities deal with the reading materials and the teacher&rsquo;s guidance. On the other hand, extensive reading purposes to achieve general understanding of longer text such as book, essays, long articles, novels, etc. It can be an alternative to make reading more interesting and joyful. Lyutaya (2011:26) and Ono, et.al. (2004:12) agree that in extensive reading, students read for information and pleasure, with primary purpose of obtaining a general understanding of literary ideas, learn reading strategies, acquire new vocabulary, and increase their English proficiency as they read a large quantity of material both inside and outside of the classroom. Finally, it can be said that in intensive reading activities, students are in the main exposed to short texts which are used to give typical example of text genres, or to provide the method for targeted reading strategy practice. While the goal of extensive reading, on the other hand, is to enrich students reading ability with large quantities of targeted language input with few or possibly no specific tasks. In short, the combination of both reading strategies will be a helpful strategy in reading comprehension. Level of Reading Comprehension Reading comprehension is an active process that must be developed if a learner wants to be a proficient reader. Comprehension is understand what is being said or read and understand what someone reads can be viewed according to the level of thinking. According to Berry (2005:1-2), when reading, the reader&rsquo;s level of thinking usually related to understanding at three kinds of information. They are literal level which involves what the author is actually saying, interpretive level which deals with what the author means by what is said, and applied level which concerns with why the author says what he or she says. These levels of comprehension are what make a reader skilled. With that thought in mind, it has been shown that strong readers make good writers. Furthermore, the integration of good level of reading comprehension and continued exposure to the English language enables readers to be writers which are better in expressing themselves. The Stages of Teaching Reading Abbott (1981:95) and Brown (1994) in Correia (2006:17) agree that there should be three stages to the teaching of reading. The first phase is pre-reading discussion, which involves introducing the topic and preparing students for the text (Papalia, 1987:75). In addition, Abbott (1981:95) describes pre-reading activities like asking the students to read only the headings or the title to anticipate content, showing a picture or video to recall students&rsquo; description about the text they are going to read, and explaining generic structure, language features, and some vocabularies as keywords which the meaning is needed to understand the text. The second phase includes while-reading tasks, in which students are provided with a set of instructions to give them a purpose for reading and to serve as a guide for them as they read. Abbott (1981:96) describes the activities which sharp the students&rsquo; cognitive just like identifying the main idea, finding details, following a sequence, inferring opinion, accepting the author&rsquo;s purpose and opinion, and knowing the generic structure and language features. The third phase includes post-reading exercises, in which students are given short comprehension questions, vocabulary work, opportunity for discussion of the topic and the author&rsquo;s reasoning, and/or a summary writing assignment. Reading Processes: bottom &ndash;up or top-down? One side consists of experts who claim that the process of reading begins with letters and their sounds (phonics). They support bottom-up model to explain the reading process. Additionally, Harmer (2007:270) describes that in bottom-up processing, the reader focuses on individual words, phrases, cohesive devices, and understands the text by combining those detail parts to make a complete understanding. In other side, other experts who subscribe top-down model of the reading process believe reading as mainly "externally guided". In addition, Goodman (1976), a top-down model supporter, in Anderson (2003:71) criticizes bottom-up model because the reader becomes &ldquo;word callers&rdquo; who can read words on the text but do not understand what they have read. Moreover, Goodman (1976) believes that by breaking whole text into little pieces of words, the teacher will make reading difficult. However, neither bottom-up nor top-down model of the reading process totally accounts for what occurs during the reading process. So, there should be an interactive model which is viewed as incorporation. The word &ldquo;interactive&rdquo; in this model refers to the interaction between bottom-up and top-down processing skills. Interactive model According to de Debat (2006:13), &ldquo;the interactive model acknowledges that lower level processing skills are essential for fluent and accurate reading; it also emphasizes that as bottom-up processing becomes more automatic, higher-level skills will become more engaged&rdquo;. In spite of the fact that the field of teaching of reading today is strongly influenced by top-down processing perspectives, efficient and effective reading involves both processes interacting simultaneously. Moreover, Anderson (2003:72) agrees that interactive model combines the elements of both bottom-up and top-down models. Stanovich (1980) and Murtagh (1989) in Anderson (2003:72) do stress that proficient readers are readers who can combine both bottom-up and top-down processes as a way to get information from many sources of knowledge. In short, interactive model is the most comprehensive description of reading process. In the classroom, an interactive model is the best description of what happens when the students read. For example, the bottom-up model is used when the students deal with the text component such as words, grammar, and the like. While the top-down model is used when the students predict difficult word&rsquo;s meaning by using their background knowledge. Griffiths, et.al. (2010:6) argues that reading is an interactive and iterative process which represents either bottom-up or top-down. Therefore, to teach interactive reading, the teacher should promote interaction between individuals (the teacher and students) and the text. This interaction should involve both top-down and bottom-up reading and cognitive processes. The Interactive Approach Anderson (2003:72) argues that an interactive approach to reading includes aspects of both intensive and extensive reading. Applying this approach, the teacher needs to provide the students with a short text to teach specific reading skills and strategies clearly. Besides, the teacher needs to make them more likely to read longer texts without an emphasis on reading test. However, the teacher should be aware that the use of a textbook in the classroom will not meet the teaching reading of both intensive and extensive reading. Therefore, the teacher&rsquo;s creativity in selecting reading supplement beyond textbook is also necessary. According to Nuttall (1996) in Brown (2001:314), there are three criteria for reading text selection: Suitability of content: material in which students will find interesting, enjoyable, challenging, and appropriate for their purposes in learning English; Exploitability: a text which facilitates the achievement of a particular language and content aims, that is exploitable for instructional assignments and techniques, and that is integratable with other skills Readability: a text with lexical and structural difficulty that will challenge students without forcing them. In addition, Papalia (1987:77) argues that when the teacher uses interactive approach in teaching reading, the students should be given the opportunity to relate their own lives, activities, and interests concerning to what is being read in the second language. To provide greater interaction between the text and the students, the teacher should stimulate work in groups, where the students have the opportunity to work together and learn from each other. However, small-group and pair work are considered suitable because both provide greater student-student interaction than large-group. The students who participate in a small group obtain knowledge not only from what they have read, but also through working with other students. Thus, through the checks and other&rsquo;s contribution, they learn to relate the knowledge meaningfully and to develop new and richer interpretations of the text they read. The Principles of Teaching Reading According to Harmer (1998:70) there are some principles to teach reading. These six principles could be consideration for teacher to teach reading effectively. They are: &uuml; Reading is not a passive skill &uuml; Students need to be engaged with what they are reading &uuml; Students should be encouraged to respond to the content of a reading text not just to the language. &uuml; Prediction is a major factor in reading &uuml; Match the task to the topic &uuml; Good teacher exploit reading text to the full Taking into account those points, the use of interactive reading model is suitable with the teaching reading principles. Because interactive reading model provide opportunity for students to be active in reading process and recommend various methods for the teacher to engage students to read comprehensively. The Elements of Hortatory Exposition A hortatory exposition text is a type of written (or spoken) text which explains to the readers (or listeners) that an issue should or should not happen by presenting one side of an issue with one-side argument to persuade them. It contains facts, opinions, reasons, and ideas. The positive of negative arguments related to an issue are presented to persuade the readers. This text may be presented in scientific books, school textbooks, journals, magazines, articles on newspaper, academic speech, research report, and so on. Therefore, it is popular among academic community. According to Priyana (2008:132), the generic structure of hortatory exposition text are thesis as the general statement of topic discussed, arguments which are arranged according to the writer&rsquo;s choice, and recommendation which contains what should or should not happen. The Interactive Reading Model in Teaching Reading Hortatory Exposition Text The following are some typical activities of interactive reading model which combine bottom-up and top-down processes during a reading section: Pre-reading: Informing the students about the topic of a text will be read (i.e. by asking the students to read only the headings or the title to anticipate content, showing a picture or video to recall students&rsquo; description about the text). Giving task to invite comparison between the culture of students&rsquo; native language and target language learned. Explaining generic structure, language features, and some key concepts which likely to encounter during reading. Inviting students&rsquo; participation. While reading: Focusing on students&rsquo; pronunciation or intonation. Identifying the main idea and explicit or implicit information in detail. Asking the students to infer their opinion toward the topic. Interrupting reading process to explain grammatical structure and to predict what happen next. Asking students to look for unknown word meaning on dictionary and to predict unknown word meaning from context. Requiring students to transfer information into a table or chart. Post-reading: Giving exercises in order to enhance comprehension (i.e. fill in blank, true/false or multiple choices). Giving tasks which require students to recognize grammatical units (i.e. verb inflections or derivations). Asking students to memorize new words and expressions and to state their own opinion toward the topic. Teaching students to use reading strategies. Conducting follow up activities (i.e. writing summary, topic discussion). RESEARCH METHODOLOGY The purpose of this study was to give description and interpretation about the implementation of interactive reading model to teach reading hortatory exposition text and the students&rsquo; responses toward the interactive reading model. Therefore, the writer used descriptive qualitative research which was designed to obtain information concerning in the implementation of interactive reading model to teach reading hortatory exposition texts. This design focused on understanding events through verbal narratives and observations, exploring not only what appeared during the observation but also the participant&rsquo;s feeling and opinion. The study was conducted in SMAN 1 Sooko Mojokerto. The subject of this study was the English teacher and the 28 students of XI IPA 6. The subjects were selected purposively from the population of eight classes of eleventh graders in SMAN 1 Sooko Mojokerto. In this occasion, the students of XI IPA 6 were chosen because according to the teacher, they were less enthusiastic and had low motivation in learning English. Meanwhile, the main instrument in a qualitative study was the researcher itself because he or she was personally involved in the research. However, a researcher needed the other instruments to avoid observer bias. In this occasion, there were three instruments used to collect data: Observation checklist and field note According to Ary (2010:216), in qualitative research, observations are made in order to get a comprehensive picture of a situation and the product of the observations is notes or narratives. The observation checklist was adapted from Brown (2001:432-434). It presented a list of the behaviors that were to be observed as follows: Teacher&rsquo;s behaviors; including preparation, presentation, teacher-students interaction, and personal characteristics. Teaching methods; including pre-, while-, and post-reading activities during the implementation of interactive reading model. Students&rsquo; behaviors; including students&rsquo; acts and responses during the implementation of interactive reading model. While field note was used to record anything the researcher found, saw, heard, and thought during the observation which was not written in the checklist. This was the blueprint of the observation checklist: Questionnaire Questionnaire was used to find out the students&rsquo; responses toward the implementation of interactive reading model to teach reading hortatory exposition texts. The questionnaire was contained of questions dealt with the students&rsquo; opinion toward English subject, the reading model used by teacher to teach reading, and the reading materials. Interview An interview was used to help understand the subjects&rsquo; experiences and the meaning they made of them. Ary (2010:438) adds that interviews may provide information that cannot be noted through observation, or they can be used to verify observation. For example, observing a teacher in a classroom told us something about the behavior, but interviewing helped us to put the behavior in context and helped us understand actions and choices. In this case, the researcher used unstructured interview which was a conversational type of interview in which the questions arise from the situation. It was conducted by the researcher to find out the teacher&rsquo;s perspective about the implementation of interactive reading model in order to reflect on his or hers to avoid observer effect. Thus, the result would be used to answer the first research question regarding the implementation of interactive reading model to teach hortatory exposition text. Furthermore, the instruments were used to collect data about the participants&rsquo; experiences and perspectives. Firstly, the researcher observed the activities happened by doing two days classroom observation. During the observation, the researcher used non-participant observation in which the researcher did not directly involved in the activities but he or she sat on the back side and observed. Secondly, the researcher held an interview with the subject teacher to match perfectives. Finally, the researcher gave the students questionnaire to get information about their responses toward the implementation of the interactive reading model. The next step conducted after collecting data was data analysis. &ldquo;Analysis involves reducing and organizing the data, synthesizing, searching for significant patterns, and discovering what is important&rdquo; (Ary, 2010:481). The researcher must organize what he or she has seen, heard, and read and tried to make sense of it in order to create explanations, developed theories, or posed new questions. There were 3 steps conducted to analyze and interpret the data. They were: Data reduction Firstly, the researcher analyzed the activities conducted by the teacher and students when the interactive reading model was applied. She got more additional information from the field note such as the students&rsquo; scores from the post-reading activities. Then she made a transcript from the recording. Secondly, the researcher collected the students&rsquo; questionnaire and teacher&rsquo;s interview. Then, she transformed the answers into essay to make it easier to understood. Data display The researcher organized the information transformed in the previous step into a draw conclusion. Firstly, the researcher synthesized the information and ordered them in several sections. Secondly, the researcher explained about how and why the relationships between phenomena existed by connecting the new knowledge with what is already known. Then, the researcher arranged the results chronologically. Verification The researcher wrote the draw conclusion as the project progresses. Finally, the final conclusion would be appeared when the data analysis was over. RESULT AND DISCUSSION The researcher arranged the result of the study separately based on the problem questions. The data collected from the interview were used to answer the first question regarding the implementation of interactive reading model to teach hortatory exposition text and the data from the questionnaire was used to answer the second question regarding the students&rsquo; responses towards the implementation of interactive reading model. While the data collected from classroom observation was used to answer both questions. The Implementation of Interactive Reading Model in Teaching Reading Hortatory Exposition Texts The researcher did the classroom observation twice, on May 23rd and 27th, 2013. The time that was allocated for each meeting was 2 x 45 minutes containing three stages; pre-activity, while-activity and post-activity. Both meetings were scheduled at afternoon time. In the pre-reading stage, at the first meeting, the teacher reviewed the previous lesson. She explained the elements of hortatory exposition text. She presented a power point slide containing two texts with the same topic. Then, she asked the students to determine which one is hortatory exposition text. Finally, she invited the students to identify its generic structure and language feature. The students could follow the explanation quietly and firm. Even some students raised their hands quickly to answer the teacher&rsquo;s questions. While the activities in the second meeting were almost the same as in the first meeting. The difference was, in the second meeting, the teacher only explained briefly and did not take much time as the first meeting due to the limited time. And there was no question from the students. Those activities during the pre-reading stage were in line with Papalia (1987:75) who states that during the pre-reading, the situation which generates expectations that will be help the students to predict the content of the passage that will be read should be introduced. In addition, it was appropriate with one of pre-reading activities described by Abbott (1981:95); asking the students to read only the headings or the title to anticipate content. For instance, the teacher asked the students to read two different texts then determined which one was hortatory exposition text. She also explained the elements of hortatory exposition such as generic structure and language feature. Meanwhile, while-reading activities at the first meeting were started by the teacher by telling the lesson objective. Then, she played a three-minute clip entitled &lsquo;Dove&rsquo; before delivered the material. The students watched the clip attentively. After that, she delivered questions related to the clip and asked them to predict the idea. Next, the teacher grouped the students and distributed the copy of material to each group. Before small group work started, there was a read-aloud session. In turn, the students raised their hands and the teacher pointed out one of them to read the text partly. She listened to the student&rsquo;s reading attentively. She also gave direct correction when the student made pronunciation mistake. After that, they discussed the unknown words. On that occasion, the teacher chose to use the video entitled &lsquo;Dove&rsquo; in order to relate the students background knowledge and the text entitled &ldquo;Cosmetic Dangers: Is Make-up Killing You?&rdquo;. The video showed a process in which an ordinary woman became very beautiful after wore a set of makeup. A professional photographer took her picture, edited it, then made the picture of her face became an icon of a famous beauty product. The teacher aimed to describe how cosmetics were popular among people without consideration of its danger. However, she asked the students whether they wear cosmetics, why they wear it, and whether they realize its danger or not. After that, she gave the text and discussed the unknown words with the students. She asked them to find out the word meaning by using context and their knowledge first before using dictionary. The teacher also contributed her opinion in order to build interaction between the teacher, the students, and the text. While the while- reading activities at the second meeting were almost the same with the first one. But, the teacher did not present any video. Firstly, she told the students that they would learn about another hortatory exposition text again. Secondly, she gave the reading material entitled &ldquo;Fifty Shades of Nuclear Energy&rdquo;. Next, she asked them to read it at glance in order to guess the main idea and unknown words. They used both context and dictionary to find out the word meaning. According to the researcher, the activity of showing video should be done in pre-reading stage. As Abbott (1981:95) explained that pre-reading activities includes asking the students to read only the title to anticipate content, showing a picture or video to recall students&rsquo; description, and explaining generic structure, language features, and some vocabularies. In addition, Daniels and Zemelman (2004:108) argued that the discussion of the video content is called &ldquo;anticipation guide&rdquo; which provides a structured forum for students to think carefully about a text&rsquo;s concepts before they actually read the text. But, the teacher personally supposed that the video was used as an introduction to the coming text. It aimed to focus the reading process on purpose to clarify content. It has no connection with the texts used previously in the pre-reading stage. Thus, she put it in the while-reading stage. Another thing observed was the use of &ldquo;leading questions&rdquo; after showing the video. These questions were used to recall students&rsquo; existing knowledge. Moreover, Wahjudi (2010:3) agreed that &ldquo;leading questions provide the students with the right direction to comprehend the text, so these questions should not ask for detailed answers&rdquo;. In fact, when the teacher delivered the questions (i.e. whether the students wear cosmetics and whether they realize its danger or not), she waited for some time then repeated the questions with higher voice to get the students answer. Regarding to this, it would be better for the teacher to let the students keep their answer in mind. Then, in post-reading stage at each meeting, the teacher explained about what the students had to do with the assignments. Students worked in small groups at the first meeting whereas in the second meeting they worked individually. The students did the assignments seriously while the teacher walked around from one bench to another to monitor the students&rsquo; work. At the post-reading stage, students were supposed to apply what they possessed at pre- and while- reading stages. Furthermore, good post-reading activities should be able to get the students to recycle some aspects from their while-reading activities, to share opinions, ideas, feelings, and to give reasons to communicate. Therefore, the teacher made different assignments for each meeting. For the first meeting, the assignment was in the form of group discussion. Each group had to transfer the messages on the text into a table. They also required giving opinion about the writer&rsquo;s point of view and the problem solution. Those assignments aimed to allow the students to respond to the text creatively. Additionally, the students&rsquo; assignment for the second meeting was making 100 words summary. As &ldquo;reading comprehension should not be alienated from the other skills&rdquo; (Harmer, 2007:267), the teacher chose summarizing activity to link reading and writing skills. Based on the class observation, the researcher concluded that the teacher did the activities according to her lesson plan in a good sequence. She implemented the interactive reading model mostly during the reading lesson. They are informing the students about the topic, preparing their structure and linguistic feature, focusing on the students&rsquo; pronunciation and word recognition, and conducting follow up activities. But, in some occasion, the teacher has different consideration with Abbott (1981) in positioning the activities of teaching stages. However, there were some missed activities such as giving assignment which require the students to memorize new words and expression and relate the students&rsquo; knowledge about their native and the target language. Furthermore, the teacher has a good personality and appearance. She was patient in eliciting the students&rsquo; response. She maintained eye contact with the students and talked some humors to avoid students&rsquo; anxiety. Her speaking was very fluent. She was relaxed in voice but she explained the material with clarity and intonation. Moreover, she was neat and tidy. The Students&rsquo; Responses When They Are Taught Reading Hortatory Exposition by Using Interactive Reading Model For the second research question, &ldquo;How are students&rsquo; responses when they are taught reading hortatory exposition by implementing interactive reading model?&rdquo;, the researcher gathered the data from observation checklist which deal with the students&rsquo; behaviors. Another data was gathered from the questionnaires deal with the students&rsquo; feeling and opinion during the observation. From the observation conducted, it could be said that the students&rsquo; response to the use of interactive reading model was good in terms of pronunciation or speaking practice. Based on the teaching and learning process, the students raised their hands enthusiastically to get chance in read-aloud session. Besides, the students asked and exchanged opinion in English during group discussion. Students&rsquo; own words were widely used in transferring the idea from text to a table and responding the questions. Then, the researcher concluded that the students&rsquo; response toward the use of small group discussion was good in terms of opportunity for communication. Based on the questionnaire, there were a couple of students who were not interested in the reading material because they felt less of vocabulary size. But in fact, the students could guess the meaning of difficult words by using dictionary and their background knowledge with the teacher&rsquo;s help. Therefore, they could understand the text easier. However, that situation happened because the text was taken from the internet website. Therefore, the texts with the same topic probably contained lots of advanced vocabulary different from the reading texts in the textbook. In this case, students&rsquo; response toward the implementation of interactive reading model was good in terms of vocabulary improvement. Conclusion The aim of this study was to describe the implementation of interactive reading model to teach hortatory exposition text anf the students&rsquo; responses when they are taught by using that reading model. Firstly, regarding the implementation of the interactive reading model to teach hortatory exposition texts, the researcher concludes that it was conducted by the teacher in these steps: introducing the title/headline; preparing the students&rsquo; structure and linguistic feature; focusing on the students&rsquo; pronunciation and word recognition; asking the students to find out unknown words by using context and dictionary; requiring the students to transfer the message from the text into a table; asking the students&rsquo; opinion and feeling toward the text; and conducting follow-up activities. Secondly, the students&rsquo; responses toward the implementation of interactive reading model were good in terms of vocabulary improvement, pronunciation practice, and opportunity for communication. Suggestion Taking into account the results of the study, two suggestions for futher research can be made. First, the teacher should use the text which fulfils the criteria of suitability of content, exploitability, and readability. Second, the next researchers can be concern to use the interactive reading model to teach the different kinds of text and the other levels of the student. REFERENCES Abbott, G., et.al. 1981. The Teaching of English as an International Language. Glasgow: William Collins Sons and Co. Ltd. Anderson, Neil. 2003. Reading. In David Nunan (ed.). Practical English Language Teaching. Singapore: Mc Graw Hill. Ary, Donald. 2010. Introduction to Research in Education 8th Edition. USA: Wadsworth. Berry, James H. 2005. Levels of Reading Comprehension. Retrieved from: www.sc4.com on April 27th. Brown, Douglas H. 2001. Teaching by Principles. An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy Second Edition. London: Longman. Correia, Rosane. 2006. Encouraging Critical Reading in the EFL Classroom. English Teaching Forum 44 (1), 16-27. Daniels, Harvey and Steven Zemelman. 2004. Subjects Matter: Every Teacher&rsquo;s Guide to Content-Area Reading. Portsmouth: Heinemann. De Debat, Elba Villanueva. 2006. Applying Current Approaches to the Teaching of Reading. English Teaching Forum 44 (1), 8-15. Griffiths,G., Sohlberg, M. M., and Biancarosa, G. 2010. A Review of Models of Reading Comprehension with Implications for Adults with mTBI and the Campus Reader. Retrieved from: www.campusreader.org. Harmer, Jeremy. 1998. How to Teach English. Pearson: Longman. Harmer, Jeremy. 2007. The Practice of English Language Teaching fourth edition. Pearson: Longman. Lyutaya, Tatiana. 2011. Reading Logs: Integrating Extensive Reading with Writing Tasks. English Teaching Forum 49 (1), 26-34. Nunan, David. 1998. Language Teaching Methodology. A texbook for teachers. New York: Prentice Hall. Ono, L., Richard Day and Kenton Harsch. 2004. Tips for Reading Extensively. English Teaching Forum 42 (4), 12-18. Papalia. 1987. Interaction of reader and text. In Wilga M Rivers (ed.). Interactive Language Teaching. London: Cambridge University Press. Priyana, Joko. 2008. INTERLANGUAGE: English for Senior High School Students XI Science and Social Study. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Street, Chris. 2002. Expository Text and Middle School Students: Some Lessons Learned. Voices from the Middle 9 (4), 33-38. Wahjudi, Arjiwati. 2010. Interactive Post-Reading Activities That Work. BAHASA DAN SENI Universitas Negeri Malang Tahun 38 (1),84-92.
The Implementation of Brain-Based Learningto TeachReading Descriptive Text to the Tenth Graders of SMA Khadijah Surabaya
RETAIN Vol 2 No 1 (2014): Volume 2, Nomor1, Januari - April 2014
Publisher : RETAIN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Implementation of Brain-Based Learningto TeachReading Descriptive Text to the Tenth Graders of SMA Khadijah Surabaya Muna Fitria Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni, Universitas Negeri Surabaya munafitria.hidayat@gmail.com Drs. H. Aswandi, M.Pd. Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni, Universitas Negeri Surabaya Abstrak MembacaadalahsalahsatukemampuanberbahasaInggris yang mempunyaitanggungjawabbesar,karenapengalamanmembacaparasiswaakanberdampakpadapengayaandiri, kelangsunganekonomi, dankemungkinanberkarir, hubungansosial, kegiatan di waktuluang, danidentitasbudaya.Membacajugamemberikontribusikhususpadaperkembanganberbahasa.Adalahotak,yang menghasilkankemampuan yang dibutuhkanuntukmemenuhifungsimembacasepertitersebutdi atas.Otakadalahaspekutamadalammengolahinformasisaatmanusiabelajar, baikdalamkonteks informal atau formal.Sayangnya, banyakkegiatanbelajarmengajar di kelas yang tidakharmonisdengancarakerjaotak. Makadariitu, sebuahmodel mengajarterbaru yang menyelaraskancara guru mengajardengancarasiswabelajarsangatdiperlukan,danBrain-Based Learning(BBL) adalahjawabannya. Pertanyaan-pertanyaan yang diajukansebagaidasarpenelitianadalah: (1) bagaimanapenerapan BBL dalammengajarmembacapadasiswakelas 10 di SMA Khadijah Surabaya?, (2)bagaimanakemampuanmembacamerekasetelahpenerapantersebut?, dan (3) bagaimanatanggapanmerekaterhadappenerapantersebut?Hasilpenelitianmenunjukkanbahwapenerapan BBL berjalanmemuaskan, meskipunbukantanpacela.Pengajaranmengikuti Model Mengajar Brain-Based Jensen denganmelewatitahappre-, whilst-, danpost-reading.Ditambahlagi, proses belajar-mengajardiamatitelahmemasukkanmayoritasdarifaktor-faktor Brain-Based yang dikemukakanErlauer.Siswamenanggapipenerapan BBL denganbaik, merasabahwa BBL membantumerekadalammengatasisebagianmasalah yang merekahadapidalammemahamiteksdeskripsi. Kata Kunci: teaching, reading, descriptive text, SMA, Brain-Based. Abstract Reading is one of the English skills which carries splendid responsibility; for students&rsquo; experience in reading will impact on &ldquo;personal enrichment; economic viability and employment prospects; social relationships; leisure activities and cultural identity&rdquo;. Reading also gives special contribution to language development. Responsible for all the abilities required in performing the function of reading is brain. It is the main aspect in processing information when people learn &ndash; either in informal or formal context. Unfortunately, many activities in most classes are not &ldquo;brain-compatible&rdquo;. Therefore, a recent teaching model which harmonizes how teachers teach with how pupils&rsquo; brains work is needed and Brain-Based Learning is the answer. Three questions were stated as bases for this study; (1) how is the implementation of BBL in teaching reading descriptive text to the tenth graders of SMA Khadijah Surabaya?, (2) how is their reading ability after the implementation?, and (3) how are their responses towards the implementation? The result showed that the implementation of BBL followed Jensen&rsquo;s Teaching Model and had gone through pre-, whilst, and post-reading stages. In addition, the teaching-learning process was observed had brought in Erlauer&rsquo;s Brain-Based Key Factors. Students&rsquo; responses toward the implementation were good. Most of them considered BBL sufficiently assisting them in comprehending descriptive text. Although not all of their complications in comprehending text were unraveled, some of them were. Keywords:teaching, reading, descriptive text, SMA, Brain-Based. INTRODUCTION Reading is one of the English skills that carries splendid responsibility; for it shapes pupils&rsquo; characteristics in personal and social life. It can be used to lead pupils to be critical about the world and their environment&rsquo;s culture. Pupils&rsquo; experience in reading will also impact on &ldquo;personal enrichment; economic viability and employment prospects; social relationships; leisure activities and cultural identity&rdquo;. In other words, it is a potential core to create &ldquo;concepts of citizenship, civilization, and national identity&rdquo;. Reading also gives special contribution to language development. Reading requires ability to interpret, comprehend, and respond critically to what meanings authors try to convey through texts. Pupils can also discover certain patterns and ways used by authors to communicate those meanings (Davison, 2002: 98 &ndash; 99). This pattern activates pupils&rsquo; schema or &ndash; as Cook (1998 in Harmer, 2001: 199) referred it &ndash; &ldquo;pre-existent knowledge of the world&rdquo;. This ability is crucial when pupils encounter certain text with certain pattern, including its genre, topic, the use of particular language features and words, discourse patterning, or contexts; they will be able to immediately recognize what they are reading (Harmer, 2001: 199 &ndash; 200). This is the reason of the emergence of text genres. Indonesia&rsquo;s Curriculum Based Competence (CBC) classifies text genres used in junior high school (Sekolah Menengah Atas/SMA) into descriptive, procedure, recount, narrative, and report. Whereas the ones which is used as materials in senior high school (Sekolah Menengah Atas/SMA) level are recount, narrative, procedure, descriptive, news item, reports, analytical exposition, spoof, and hortatory exposition. The special functions that reading carries as described in the previous paragraph, however, will seemingly not work if pupils do not consider the text they are reading means something. This opinion concurs with Davison&rsquo;s (2002) which states that &ldquo;an unsatisfactory text can be switched off, left unfinished or replaced by readily available alternatives&rdquo; (pg. 102). Hence, pupils&rsquo; choice of what they read holds not less important place than the text readability and appropriateness. Responsible for all those abilities required in reading is human brain. It is the main aspect in processing information when people learn &ndash; either in informal or formal context of learning. Thus, a teaching model which optimizes the brain&rsquo;s work and is able to improve students&rsquo; reading ability is needed. Brain-Based Learning (which later will be referred to as BBL)isa recent one which essence is to harmonize how teachers teach with how pupils&rsquo; brains work. The research findings about how it actually reacts when performing a task is great insight news for educators. &ldquo;The aim of the brain based instructions is to pass from memorizing trough meaningful learning&rdquo; (Caine and Caine, 1990 in Duman, 2007: 2). Erlauer (2003) highlights seven key factors of BBL as aspects that need to be given notice in designing teaching instructions. Not only for designing teaching instructions, those key factors reveal the significant effect of learning environment and pupils&rsquo; physical and mental states towards the way human brain works. They are sequenced in points below: Emotional Wellness and Safe Environment Jensen (2005: 69) believes that emotions &ldquo;have their own memory pathways&rdquo;. It means that emotions have strong connections with memory. As a proof, when people are asked to recall any memory of their past, the one that comes in mind is always an event which involved strong emotional, either negative or positive feeling. That is why teachers have to reckon students&rsquo; emotions in learning. BBL suggests the creation of safe environment in classrooms. To develop a safe environment, the following factors need to be maintained: sense of community, free of fear, and teacher&rsquo;s behaviors. The Body and Movement Teachers always demand their students&rsquo; attention and expect them engaged in teaching-learning activity. Engaged means, conservatively, sit and quietly pay attention to what the teacher is explaining. Yet, paying attention is not easy to do; moreover in a still position. (See Jensen: 34-35 to explain how difficult the process of paying attention in the brain) &ldquo;Just standing up can increase the blood flow in the human body, bringing more oxygen to the brain&rdquo;, which means energizing the brain, reducing stress, and enhancing the growth and connections between the brain cells (Erlauer, 2003). Thus, BBL suggests infusing more movement into everyday lessons. A number of factors that can delay attention considerably are vegetables, water, sleep, and oxygen (Herson, 2006:15). Those factors affect glucose levels that deal with proper fuel for thinking. Students with low glucose level are possible to be tired and inattentive. Thus, teachers are better to make sure their students get enough (1) oxygen by opening windows whenever possible and bring plants inside the class, (2) water by allowing them to drink only water in the class, because water is the brain&rsquo;s best fuel, right after oxygen. Relevant Content and Student Choices Brain research told us that emotional, specific, and novel content is more likely to get our attention. Additionally, it concluded that content is more likely to become meaningful if people can relate it to familiar information and learn it in context (Jensen, 2005:44-5). Students do not really understand the concept meaningfully and deeply before they can explain what they have learned (observed or experienced) and generalize it into a concept or contrast it to other ideas. Konecki (2003:9) recommended teachers to have students explain their observation or experience to the groups and represent it in a graphic form and written explanation. Timing Human brain has a cycle known as ultradian rhythms, which is the high-and-low rhythm of brain and body. They last about 90 to 110 minutes, so there are about 12 to 16 cycles over a 24-hour period (Jensen, 2005:48-9). As Caine (2002:66) stated that &ldquo;learning is influenced by natural development of the body and the brain&rdquo;, these ultradian rhythms affect moods, energy levels, and brain&rsquo;s cognitive abilities. Enrichment According to Erlauer (2003: 97-99), classroom enrichment can be in the form of (1) challenging, problem-solving tasks that involve high-level thinking skills such as reasoning and critical thinking. Duman (2007) believes that enrichment is important for brain-based instruction. It encourages students to think in more complex ways, find appropriate strategies for themselves, and improves &ldquo;their meta-cognitive skills&rdquo;; (2) music, either in upbeat or downbeat. The choice of music depends on what functions the teachers expected from: as an arousal, as a carrier, or as primer. The guideline is that the more upbeat the music or rhythm, the more heartbeat increased, and vice versa; (3) physical environment, such as visual enrichment (attach posters, bulletin board, class contract, or decorate walls), bright lighting, pleasant fragrance, or others. Assessment and Feedback One of brain-compatible forms of assessment is self-assessment, because it &ldquo;can address learner uniqueness and diversity&rdquo; (Christison, 2002: 6). Students should be given chances to assess and evaluate their learning. Another form is the one with questions required high-level thinking skill because &ldquo;the better the quality of questions asked, the more the brain is challenged to think&rdquo; (Redfield and Rousseau, 1981 in Christison: 6). Instead of posing yes/no questions, questions which involves reasoning and critical thinking should be raised more often. Jensen (2005: 51-52) suggests that the oscillation in brain activity will result in some students getting lower scores if were tested at the wrong time. Therefore BBL advises an assessment form that is able to record students&rsquo; high and low performances that is portfolios. When there is an assessment, there should be a feedback too. Feedback in class can happen both naturally &ndash; as in oral feedback, and in &ldquo;a planned, purposeful manner&rdquo; &ndash; as in written notes on students&rsquo; assignments. Students can make a correction and go on with the certainty that what they have learned is correct. Feedback needs to be prompt because the brain can hardly redo the learning process when the knowledge or skills have been embedded (Erlauer, 2003: 123 & 126). Moreover, it has to be specific. Positive reinforcements like &ldquo;good job&rdquo; or &ldquo;nice work&rdquo; are fine, but they do not give any clue of what to maintain and what to fix. Recommended by Marzano, Pickering, & Pollock (2001) in Classroom Instruction That Works, &ldquo;The best form of feedback, with the highest effect on further achievement, is providing the student with a full explanation of accurate and inaccurate answers&rdquo; (Erlauer, 2003: 129). Collaboration The fact that &ldquo;the human brain is a social brain&rdquo; (Sousa, 1995 in Erlauer, 2003: 135) underlies the idea of collaborative learning. Through communication and collaboration, students can gain knowledge and at the same time solidify their knowledge by teaching it to others. Collaboration establishes teamwork towards the same goal and results in well function of the brain since &ldquo;the brain tends to function well with the challenge of a goal&rdquo; (pg. 136). Stronger emotional responses are produced when working in a problem-solving situation with others and that does well to brain. As explained earlier in point 1: Emotional Wellness and Safe Environment, information tends to be lasted in the brain when it is rich in emotion. The brain&rsquo;s natural function to search for meaning is carried out as well when students work collaboratively to explore new information. Collaborative learning can be done in either pair or group work. To form a pair work only takes two people. It may be done for working on a project, to have students tutor another, or simply to have them share information, discuss their opinion, or ask questions to each other. Johnson and Johnson&rsquo;s Cooperative Learning model (1999, in Erlauer, 2003: 138) suggests group work is formed in small groups of four to six members. They should work in a teamwork, assistance, and encouragement toward a same goal. The next explanation will be about to integrate those principles into a series of instructions in teaching-leaning activities. As in the usual ways of teaching, there also be pre-, whilst, and post phases in the Brain-Based teaching activities. The first phase relates to what to do before the class begins and the preparation time. The second phase is concentrated on the learning process. Finally, the last phase helps ensure the learning has paced the best it canbe and be memorable as long as possible. Jensen (2005: 146-149) have sequenced the whole information of BBL into a model of teaching with the brain in mind: Pre-exposure and preparation Pre-exposure helps build better conceptual map in students&rsquo; brain. This activity focuses on preparing the class &ldquo;mentally, academically, and emotionally&rdquo; to help either teachers or students, or both of them. The teachers are better come in the class in good emotional state. The students can detect this positive aura and it makes they experience better learning. Days and weeks ahead can be used optimally for repairing the students brains with the materials which they are going to learn. This step requires teachers to influence content areas in pictures or mind-map so that students can become familiar with them. Engagement &ldquo;This step is about engaging the mind and body&rdquo; (Jensen, 2005: 147). It is the setup activity for learning in the first few minutes of the class to positively influence students&rsquo; states. Framing 10% PREPARE your learners. CREATE an optimal environment. Before During ENGAGE learners by getting them vested emotionally with an attentional bias. FRAME learning to make it relevant, important, and compelling. ACQUIRE knowledge, skills, values, and experiences. ELABORATE and deepen the learning through trial-and-error time, with feed-back and active processing. MEMORY STRENGHTENING 80% 10% After SETTLE the learning with time for passive processing. REHEARSE AND INCORPORATEby revising learning and using it. Framing means to &ldquo;frame&rdquo; students&rsquo; emotional states. Jensen (2005: 147) illustrates this framing step as the frame of a picture that set up the background of an activity. Students who have been framed emotionally in a learning activity will less wander out of the frame; or when they do, teachers can draw them back inside the border through this framing step. Teachers can use &ldquo;a word, an activity, an assignment&rdquo; (Jensen, 2005:147) as the framing. Nurhadyani (2012) in her undergraduate thesis research used sheets of learning target and evaluation, or which she used the term &ldquo;Lembar Target danEvaluasi&rdquo;, as the tools in framing step. The sheets contained table. She distributed the sheets to each of her students and had them to fill in. Therefore, anytime the students fell unmotivated, framing is always the best way to engage them mentally and emotionally. Teachers can do this step by setting up the learning objectives for the day, week, or semester. Sheets of target and evaluation are distributed to the students to be filled in. Through this way, teachers can remind them on the purpose of their learning and motivate them to fulfill it. Acquisition Jensen (2005: 147 &ndash; 148) defines this step as &ldquo;the part of your instructional day that focuses on input&rdquo;. It is the step where connections between neurons are created and where neurons are &ldquo;communicating&rdquo; to each other. Elaboration This step gives chance to the brain to sort, investigate, analyze, examine, and deepen learning through integration and error correction (Jensen, 2005: 148). Memory Strengthening This step emphasizes that providing time for recalling what have been learned is an important thing. &ldquo;At this point, students&rsquo; knowledge should be accurate. Now is the time to take a few moments to ensure that the right content will be recalled&rdquo; (Jensen, 2005: 148). Settling Time and Rest This step is used to give students a way to let the knowledge settle. Taking time for breaks or scheming the learning just before the end of the class is included (Jensen, 2005: 148 &ndash; 149). Review and Revision This is a follow-up step where some revision time should be incorporated into every meeting to not let the knowledge that has been settled to change (Jensen, 2005: 149). A study needed to be conducted to describe the implementation of BBL to teach reading descriptive text could be described, as well as the students&rsquo; reading ability after the implementation, and their responses towards the implementation. As a result of this research, the writer intends to find a harmony in teaching English as a foreign language in Indonesia and the way pupils&rsquo; brain works. When a teacher knows how their pupils&rsquo; brain work optimally and learn best, s/he must be eager to take advantage of this knowledge to help their pupils learn as quickly and efficiently as possible. METHODS This study tried to picture the implementation of BBL to teach reading descriptive text to the tenth graders of SMA Khadijah Surabaya, how it impacts on their performance in class and how their responses towards it. The writer looked at this interaction in teaching-learning process as one complex phenomenon which carries deep meaning. Sugiyono (2008: 1) refers this view as post-positivism paradigm that led to the emergence of qualitative research method. Another belief from Postlethwaite (2005) also been the basic of the selection of this research design which says that &ldquo;descriptive research provides information about conditions, situations, and events that occur in the present&rdquo; (pg. 3). Hence, the writer was ensured that this study should be carried out by developing descriptive qualitative research methodology. Sugiyono (2008: 50) explains that there is no such thing as population in qualitative research &ndash; Spadley (1980, in Sugiyono, 2008: 49) uses the term &ldquo;social situation&rdquo; instead. It consists of three elements, which are place, actors, and activity, which interact in synergy. As the object of the research, the activity done by the actors in that place are observed in-depth. The social situation was chosen due to the genre text taught in the grade. Based on the Standar Isi SMA/MA, narrative, descriptive, and news item text are expected to be comprehended in the tenth grade. The place targeted in this study was SMA Khadijah Surabaya, located on JalanJenderal Ahmad Yani no. 2 &ndash; 4, Wonokromo, Surabaya. It has six classes of tenth graders, from X-1 to X-6. Class X-4 was chosen out of the six with reasons. It consists of less numbers of students than the other classes, has the physical condition that was considered to be brain-compatible. The room gets more light than the others, feels homey with many its personal belongings stuffed in, is using scent, and is provided with a gallon of water for students to refill their bottles. Because the main purpose of conducting a study is to collect data, the stage of data collection in research has to be strategic. Absent knowledge of the techniques, the data could not be gathered as expected to answer research problems. Techniques employed in this study to collect data were observation, test, and questionnaire. The writer conducted observation in two meetings regarding the limited time the students have before final term examination, from Wednesday to Thursday, May 22-23, 2013.While observing, she utilized observation checklist as an instrument to examine the implementation of BBL in the class, whether or not it brought in Erlauer&rsquo;s key factors and followed Jensen&rsquo;s teaching model. The observation checklist was divided into five sections, numbered from A to E, represented these categories: teacher&rsquo;s behavior, classroom environment, lesson topic and learning material, teaching and learning process, and students&rsquo; behavior. Each indicator was observed and graded by its existence in the teaching-learning process. The indicator was graded &ldquo;Yes&rdquo; if the writer became aware of its application or its existence, and &ldquo;No&rdquo; if the writer noticed no application or existence of it. The writer then added further notes of it in the &ldquo;Comment&rdquo; column. As an addition, she captured some activities did during teaching-learning process in still photos and recorded few parts of conversations between teacher and students in field notes. The writer chose to be an &ldquo;observer as participant&rdquo;, which means that she observed participants&rsquo; activities with minimal interaction with them. This minimal interaction included brief informal contacts happened when she sat observing at the back of the room. She also did not to participate in the class&rsquo; activities. The writer observed reading comprehension of the students from the results of the informal product assessments done on Day 1 and 2. One of them was in the form of short-answer test items. It then was observed using the rubric adopted from iRubric: Short Answer Test Assessment Rubric (2012) to find out the value of their answers, whether their answers contained exceptional or satisfactory content, had met expectations, or still need improvement. In addition, the writer observed the result of students&rsquo; mind map, considering mind map is a great tool &ldquo;to gauge the knowledge they have absorbed&rdquo;. It allows them &ldquo;to interpret and express idea metaphorically&hellip;and to display their contextual knowledge and requires deeper insight&rdquo; (Mind Maps for Pre and Post Assessment, 2013). They were examined using rubric adapted from Bennett&rsquo;s Beyond Monet (2001) taken from http://myclass.peelschools.org to see how far their comprehension cover the information delivered in the text. The respondents of the questionnaire were thethirty students in X-4. They had to answer the questions by choosing the most corresponding answer provided in the questionnaire. The questionnaire was divided into five sections: the first and second section had respondents to choose whether they like, are okay with, or do not like certain teaching-learning activity and learning material. The questions in section three asked them whether or not they encounter certain problem in reading. The last one made them to choose which activity and material in section one and two helped them much in reading and which problem been overcame. After that, the questionnaires were observed to see the students&rsquo; tendency in learning materials and activities, their major problem in reading, and which materials and activities assistedthem bestin overcoming it; as well as their comment on BBL implemented by the teacher and how it affected their learning. Data analysis technique in qualitative research uses inductive reasoning.The writer organized the massive collection of data into several categories derived from the research problems, which are: the implementation of BBL to teach reading descriptive text; students&rsquo; reading ability; and students&rsquo; responses. Afterward, each category was explained further and thickly. Eventually, the writer discovered the red line which integrated the categories or the aspects in the phenomenon with the theory. RESULT AND DISCUSSION This part presents the result of analysis and discussion of the observation in this study. The writer tries to answer the research questions, which are stated earlier in the Introduction. The Implementation of BBLin Teaching Reading Descriptive Text to the Tenth Graders The writer analyzed the teaching-learning activity done to the students of X-4 in SMA Khadijah Surabaya with the teaching model explained by Jensen (2005: 145). Table 1. Analysis of the observation Meeting 1 Time Allocated Activities The Jensen&rsquo;s Teaching Model 2 min. Settling the class 10% (12 min.) for1) preparing learners, and 2) creating optimal environment. 5 min. Giving instructions for the game 5 min. Preparing the preliminary game 15 min. Preliminary game: describing things and people. Engagement 80% (96 minutes) for engagement, framing, acquisition, elaboration, and memory strengthening. 5 min. &lsquo;Awarding&rsquo; the group with the most points &lsquo;stars&rsquo; and extra scores. 20 min. Brief explanation of descriptive text: prompt feedback on students&rsquo; deficiency in describing a subject earlier. Elaboration & Acquisition 15 min. Preparing and giving instructions for the next activity. Memory strengthening 25 min. Reading and answering comprehension questions. 15 min. Extra time for main activity. 10 min. Brief review of previous activities: confirm students&rsquo; comprehension. 10% (12 min.) for settling time and rest, and review and revision. 2 min. Informing of tomorrow&rsquo;s activities. Preparation had been started days ahead. The class had been told that a guest they knew will come to visit and join them (the writer was once an internship teacher in SMA Khadijah Surabaya). Therefore, the teacher decided to carry out the lesson pleasurable. This kind of mental and emotional preparation brings excitement to students and makes them experience better learning. Daily preparation involved the teacher smiling as she entered classroom which brought positive aura to them. Students had enthusiasm, interest and effort toward learning when students detect the positive energy in teacher. Pre-exposure to content areas was not intense though. Instead of priming students&rsquo; brain with specific upcoming content, plan for activities until mid-semester was shared. Therefore, they have prepared for the lesson topics and tasks they will deal with. The teacher paid a great attention in the importance of engaging her students before the lesson starts. Hence, she always does a preliminary activity. This setup activity for learning can positively influence students&rsquo; states. On this occasion, she set up a game which functioned as an introduction to the content of descriptive text. The framing stage was not gone through daily but rather every beginning of a semester. The teacher shared series of activities she had planned for the half of the semester and had students to brainstorm any suggestion, change, or addition to the plan she had made. By that, the class could set up their goals during the next half-semester. A feedback was given as a stage of elaboration after the students performed their ability in describing things and person in the preliminary activity. Before the synapse is fixed, the teacher made sure that what they had learned was correct by promptly correcting error. She made use of this error correction to deliver her next stage that is acquisition. An explanation of how to describe a person was given. Activities in the first meeting did not proceed smoothly as planned. Students had to spend time in the memory strengthening stage more than their brain could bear. There were a disproportionate number of questions to the given time. Therefore, the teacher was compelled to provide extra time for those who have not yet finished and that caused a little disorder. When the class was outdoors, they began wandering off. In that case, the teacher guided them back to class and let the group with unfinished job completed their task and the others could take their break time to settle the knowledge. She then closed the lesson of the day by reviewing how to describe a person. Table 2. Analysis of the observation Meeting 2 Time Allocated Activities The Jensen&rsquo;s Teaching Model 2 min. Settling the class 10% (12 min.) for 1) preparing learners, and 2) creating optimal environment. 5 min. Giving instructions for the game 5 min. Preparing the preliminary game 10 min. Preliminary game: &ldquo;Pronunciation Journey&rdquo;. Engagement 80% (96 minutes) for engagement, framing, acquisition, elaboration, and memory strengthening. 15 min. Brief explanation of descriptive text. Acquisition 5 min. Preparing the next activity. Memory Strengthening 5 min. Giving instructions for the next activity. 20 min. Reading and answering comprehension questions. 5 min. Explaining how to construct a mind-map Acquisition 15 min. Drawing mind-map. Memory Strengthening 15 min. Presenting the mind-map. 5 min. Detailing each mind-map with its strong point and flaw. Elaboration 5 min. Brief review of previous activities. 10% (12 min.) for settling time and rest, and review and revision. In this second day of observation, the students had had quite enough exposure to the content of descriptive text from the previous meeting. In the other word, they had been prepared academically, mentally, and emotionally. Differed from the preceding preliminary activity, the teacher simply activated students&rsquo; focus on and attention to the lesson. With employing minimal pair as the subject matter, she had them focus on the task. She then awarded &lsquo;star&rsquo; and extra score to those who were the fastest to reach the destination. When the teacher was certain that they were in a good state to learn, she shifted the teaching instruction onto an acquisition stage. She delivered a lecture on how to find main as well as supporting ideas in descriptive text. Shortly afterward, she made the students recall what they had gotten earlier at the acquisition stage by having them to scan and skim a text and find either main or supporting ideas/details needed to answer the questions. The teacher had the students to use once more their knowledge in order to make it lasts in their brain. A task to encapsulate a text in a mind-map was given with taking into consideration that that assignment required them to organize main/key ideas and supporting ideas/details into a diagram so that it is easier to understand. However earlier she provided short guidance in composing a mind-map. Feedback on student-made mind-map was provided swiftly after they had presented their mind-map before class. The teacher pointed out the strength and weakness of each so that they could take their cue for either maintenance of or improvement in their works. The Students&rsquo; Reading Ability after the Implementation of BBLto Teach Reading Descriptive Text The implementation of BBL in teaching reading descriptive text to tenth graders in SMA Khadijah Surabaya brought positive outcome to them. From the result of short-answer test items, almost all the contents of the answers were exceptional: they were comprehensive, accurate, and complete. Key ideas were clearly stated, explained, and well supported. Almost all answers scored perfect 12 &ndash; with exceptional content, organization, and writing conventions. Otherwise, they lacked only of organization and writing conventions &ndash; with inadequate organization or development, structure which is not easy to follow, and three to five errors in spelling, punctuation, grammar, and sentence structure. A few students sometimes did not answer one or two questions though. Concerning students&rsquo; depth of content coverage, they were either at satisfactory or good level of coverage. Satisfactory level of coverage means a basic level of coverage of key ideas only and still attempt extension of a few ideas. Good level of coverage means a solid grasp of most of the content and extensions of most key ideas. Their comprehensions towards the texts were not excellent and were not poor. The same result occurred in their mind-map organization. Seven students have applied good mind-map organization &ndash; ideas clearly connect to central image and ideas and generally move from most to least complex &ndash; and a four-fifths majority of students organized mind-map satisfactorily; all ideas radiated out from the centre and but there were still some confusion in moving from most to least complex. The Students&rsquo; Responses towards the Implementation of BBL to Teach Reading Descriptive Text There were always a number of students who admitted to not like doing certain activities. The number varied from one to four, except for teacher&rsquo;s explanation, doing pair/group work and preliminary activity (e.g. short game). None of them unlike to perform those activities. From the result, it could be assumed that the whole students in the class were fond of or were OK paying attention to those three teaching instructions. Nevertheless, just the latter which they assumed have helped them much in reading. Other two former activities were thought to assist only less than a third of the class in reading. Most of students believed that learning grammar was the key to comprehend a descriptive text, followed by pair/group work as stated before, learning vocabulary and generic structure. The survey result was unexpected at first, but then the writer realized a fact: fundamental activities for reading, such as learning generic structure, grammatical features, and vocabulary were still the most significant elements in students&rsquo; learning. They realized it somehow; hence most of them chose those activities as the answers of which activity assists them in reading. To my surprise, the brain-based material such as student-choice and authentic material held meaning to assist in reading descriptive text for the least students that is for only four students. Majority of answer was teacher&rsquo;s note on whiteboard, followed by worksheet and teacher-choice material. Although, greater part of the class admitted that BBL approach had helped them in overcoming some of their difficulties in comprehending descriptive text, mainly the problem in comprehending the text wholly. CONCLUSION There are three points the writer could conclude by drawing on the research problems as the point of view. The first point is that the implementation of BBL to teach reading descriptive text to the tenth graders in SMA Khadijah Surabaya was conducted in these steps; as the pre-activity, teacher created an optimal environment for learning by settling the class and began giving instructions of the next activity for students to anticipate. In whilst-activity, she went through several stages: engagement, acquisition, memory strengthening, and elaboration. To begin with, a preliminary game was played to interest students in the lesson and to initiate their focuses on it. After their focuses engaged to the lessons, they entered the acquisition stage to acquire knowledge from teacher giving explanation of the lesson&rsquo;s content. The next phase was strengthening memory where their knowledge should be accurate. Afterward, they entered the elaboration stage to deepen learning through error correction and integration. This could be done by assessing them, either formally or informally. Teacher made prompt feedback when she found inaccurate knowledge revealed through the memory strengthening phase, considering the fact that mistakes are easier to correct earlier than later. By doing so, students know whether they have learned something correctly or not. Finally, the post-activity was settling time for review and revision. The second point is that their reading comprehension after being taught reading descriptive text by implementing BBL was averagely good. From the result of short-answer test items, almost all the contents of the answers were exceptional: they were comprehensive, accurate, and complete. Key ideas were clearly stated, explained, and well supported. Almost all answers contained exceptional content, organization, and writing conventions. Otherwise, they lacked only of organization and writing conventions &ndash; with inadequate organization or development, structure which is not easy to follow, and three to five errors in spelling, punctuation, grammar, and sentence structure. A few students sometimes did not answer one or two questions though. Concerning students&rsquo; depth of content coverage, they were either at satisfactory or good level of coverage. Satisfactory level of coverage means a basic level of coverage of key ideas only and still attempt extension of a few ideas. Good level of coverage means a solid grasp of most of the content and extensions of most key ideas. Their comprehensions towards the texts were not excellent and were not poor. The same result occurred in their mind-map organization. Seven students have applied good mind-map organization &ndash; ideas clearly connect to central image and ideas and generally move from most to least complex &ndash; and a four-fifths majority of students organized mind-map satisfactorily; all ideas radiated out from the centre and but there were still some confusion in moving from most to least complex. The third point is that their responses toward the implementation of BBL in teaching reading were good. Most of them considered BBL sufficiently assisting them in comprehending descriptive text. Although most of them admitted that not all of their complications in comprehending text were unraveled, some of them were. To the writer&rsquo;s surprise, brain-compatible activities such as changing location, doing pair/group work, and having a preliminary activity did not be the most successful problem-solving technique in comprehending a text. Basic and conventional activity like learning grammar was the activity they experienced helping them in comprehending a descriptive text. After all, it was the way teacher delivers the content areas that matters. SUGGESTIONS Some practical suggestions the writer may suggest for those who are willing to bring BBL into their classrooms are: - In teaching reading, learning grammar, generic structure, and vocabulary are essential and irreplaceable. Thus, the way teachers deliver them that should be brain-compatible. - Students&rsquo; physical condition is essential as well. Teachers should make sure that they are well fed, well hydrated, and well rested. - Students&rsquo; mental condition affects their performance in class. Teachers should make them feel safe emotionally and as the result they will likely to explore their abilities without fear of making mistakes. - Enrichment in physical environment is essential in optimizing the brain&rsquo;s work. Therefore, teachers should not neglect the condition of classroom or other locations for learning. REFERENCES Before, During, After Reading Strategies. (n.d.). Retrieved December 27, 2013, from www.smoran.ednet.ns.ca/Reader&rsquo;sworkshop/before_during_after_reading.htm. Mind Maps for Pre and Post Assessment. (2013). Retrieved November 2013, from ThinkBuzan: http://thinkbuzan.com/articles/view/mind-maps-for-pre-and-post-assessment/ Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (2nd ed.). New York: Pearson Education Ltd. Christinson, M. (2002). BB Research & Language Teaching. English Teaching Forum, 2-7. Cole, R. W. (Ed.). (2008). Educating Everybody's Children (2nd ed.). Virginia: Association for Supervision Curriculum Development (ASCD). Crilly, Ruth. (2002). Three Stages of Reading. Retrieved December 27, 2013 from MyRead: www.myread.org/guide_stages.htm Davison, J. (2002). Learning to Teach English in Secondary School. New York: Taylor & Francis e-Library. Ary, Donald, et. al. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education (8th ed.). CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. Duffy, G. G. (2009). Explaining Reading: A Resource for Teaching Concepts, Skills, and Strategies (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press. Erlauer, L. (2003). The Brain-Compatible Classroom: Using What We Know About Learning to Improve Teaching. Virginia: ASCD. Harmer, Jeremy. (2004). Just Reading and Writing: Intermediate. London: Marshall Cavendish Ltd. Herson, Laurie A., (2006) Brain-compatible research: using brain-based techniques to positively impact student learning. Graduate School Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2557. Retrieved May 25, 2012, from Scholar Commons: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/2557 Jensen, E. (2005). Teaching with the Brain in Mind (2nd ed.). Virginia: ASCD. Konecki, L. R. Brain-based Learning and Standard-based Elementary Science. Grand Valley State University. Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED472624. Lodico, M. G. (2010). Methods in Educational Research, From Theory to Practice (2nd ed.). CA: Jossey-Bass. Nuhadyani, D. (2012). Penerapan Brain Based Learning Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Dan Kemampuan Koneksi Matematis Siswa.Unpublished Undergraduate School Theses. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Nunan, D. (1991). Language Teaching Methodology: A Textbook for Teachers. New York: Prentice Hall. Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English Language Teaching. Singapore: McGraw Hill. Papalia, A. (1987). Interaction of Reader and Text. In W. M. Rivers, Interactive Language Teaching (pp. 70 - 82). USA: Cambridge University Press. Pinnell, G. S. (2008). How Does Literacy Collaborative Emphasize the Five Essential Elements in Reading Instruction?. Retrieved April 14, 2013, from Literacy Collaborative: http://literacycollaborative.org/docs/fiveEssentialElements.pdf Postlethwaite, T. N. (2005). Educational Research: Some Basic Concepts and Terminology. (K. N. Ross, Ed.) Paris: UNESCO EEIP. Sugiyono. (2008). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.
THE COHESION OF READING TEXT “ ENGLISH IN FOCUS” FOR THE YEAR SEVEN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL PUBLISHED BY DEPARTEMEN PENDIDIKAN NASIONAL
RETAIN Vol 2 No 1 (2014): Volume 2, Nomor1, Januari - April 2014
Publisher : RETAIN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

THE COHESION OF READING TEXT &ldquo; ENGLISH IN FOCUS&rdquo; FOR THE YEAR SEVEN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL PUBLISHED BY DEPARTEMEN PENDIDIKAN NASIONAL Marshalita Siri Valentine S1- English Education, Language and Art Faculty, Surabaya State University dan samiraval@gmail.com Drs. Aswandi, M.Pd S1- English Education, Language and Art Faculty, Surabaya State University Abstrak Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan kohesi yang ada di materi reading dalam buku pelajaran English in Focus untuk kelas VII Sekolah Menengah Pertama, baik grammatical cohesion maupun lexical cohesion. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian deskriptif kualitatif dimana hasil penelitian dideskripsikan dalam bentuk kata atau kalimat Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa materi reading di buku English in Focus telah mengaplikasikan semua kohesi termasuk grammatical dan lexical cohesion. Grammatical cohesion yang dominan muncul adalah reference. Sementara itu lexical cohesion yang dominan adalah repetition. Berdasarkan degree of cohesiveness buku ini telah memenuhi grammatical device dengan sangat baik namun secara lexical masih perlu diperbaiki lagi. Kata kunci: kohesi, grammatical cohesion, lexical cohesion, materi reading, buku pelajaran. Abstract The objective of the study is to describe the cohesion that written in the reading materials in English in Focus textbook for grade VII Junior High School both of grammatical and lexical cohesion. This study was designed as a documentary analysis in the form of descriptive qualitative research, in which the result would be described in the form of words. The result show that the reading materials in English in Focus textbook are already applied all grammatical and lexical devices. The dominant device of grammatical cohesion is reference. Meanwhile the dominant device of lexical cohesion is repetition. Based on the degree of cohesiveness this textbook has already accomplished the grammatical device very well but lexically it still needs to be improved. Keywords: cohesion, grammatical cohesion, lexical cohesion, reading text, textbook INTRODUCTION Nowadays English is one of the foreign languages that play an important for the International relationship.. Teaching English is aimed to develop students&rsquo; writing, speaking, listening and speaking skills. Recently, reading considers to be an essential skill. Reading text can be used to improve and build up reading skill of the student. Good reading skill benefits students to be able to speak well. A textbook is one of the instruments of the English teaching at school. It means that reading texts presented in the textbook should be meaningful. Although a text is made up of grammatical units (clauses, phrases, etc.), the text is not just a collection of clauses because to be text, there must be texture, created through patterns of cohesion. It is thought that students of junior high school, particularly year seven, are beginner learners of English. Therefore, they need more attention in learning this foreign language, mainly in reading class. Grammatical and lexical cohesion as the cohesive devices seems to be important in the reading text. This study is intended : (1) to describe the realization of Grammatical cohesion in &ldquo;English in Focus&rdquo; textbook (2) to describe the realization of Lexical cohesion in &ldquo;English in Focus&rdquo; textbook. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY The main objectives of this study were to describe the presentation of grammatical and lexical cohesion that written in the reading materials in the &ldquo;English in Focus&rdquo;. The object of the study was an English textbook for the seventh graders&rsquo; of Junior High School entitled &ldquo;English in Focus&rdquo; published by Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. The data of this study were all the reading materials in the reading section presented in the textbook entitled &ldquo;English in Focus&rdquo; for the seventh graders of Junior High School. The materials in this textbook were in the forms of texts (text with genre and short functional texts).This study was only focused on the presentation of Grammatical and Lexical Cohesion in the reading text. The data were reading materials taken from the first and second semester in the textbook. This study was designed to use descriptive qualitative on which the result of analysis is in the form of words or pictures. This study also belonged to a documentary analysis since the researcher analyzed the data or text derived from the textbook (Gerald, 1992). The researcher was the main research instrument and used checklist to help her in analyzing the data. RESULT AND DATA ANALYSIS The first research question is about how grammatical cohesion written in the textbook. The researcher found out that all of the texts are already used the grammatical cohesion but not all of the types are applied here. For example in the text 5 and text 14 there is only one aspect of grammatical cohesion is used which is conjunction, only text 12 that provides all of the type of grammatical cohesion. The researcher counted that the dominant device of grammatical cohesion utilize in the text is reference. Reference almost always appears in each text, except text 5 and text 14, consists of personal pronoun, demonstratives reference and comparative reference. It&rsquo;s described on the percentage clearly that the percentage of reference exceeds almost 60 percent. The lowest percentage of grammatical aspects is ellipsis. It is just 2,4 percent. The second research question is about how the lexical cohesion written in the textbook. The researcher found out that all of the texts are used lexical cohesion although it is still lack in the quantity. Only text two that provides 2 items of collocation, the rest is just 1 item. The dominant percentage of lexical cohesion is reiteration. It is 13,2 percent. The lowest percentage is collocation, it is only 8,5 percent. All in all most of the text in the English in Focus text book already applied the cohesion but only one text that applied all of the cohesion. Beside that there are two aspects of grammatical cohesion that rarely appear in text which are substitution and ellipsis. The lexical cohesion also lack in the quantity, especially collocation. Degree of Cohesiveness shows the cohesiveness of each cohesion. The writer determines the degree of cohesiveness in the textbook through Scinto formula. From the seventeen texts above that have been analyzed by the writer, there are the differences of cohesiveness degree of grammatical and lexical cohesion Grammatical cohesion has very high level while lexical cohesion has low level. Grammatical cohesion through it&rsquo;s own tools gives contribution to connect one sentence to the other sentences. The impacts of grammatical cohesion that have high level of cohesiveness degree are to ease the reader to understand the context, and the sentences are arranged well. On the other hand, lexical cohesion is still in low grade of cohesiveness degree. It builds the text become monotonous. Without development of words by some variation words can make the readers unexciting and feel bored. Based on the Irwin and Champman in Horning&rsquo;s article that stated increasing the level of cohesion in the text improves reading comprehension, the English in Focus still need to add the varieties of cohesive devices. The theory from Irwin and Champman in Horning&rsquo;s article that increasing the level of cohesion in the text improves reading comprehension is also need the consideration because of some reason: In the text sometimes we find that all of the text are used all of the kinds of the cohesive devices but in the low quantity. Moreover, there is also some texts that provides only few cohesive devices but in the big quantity. All in all the high level of cohesion it&rsquo;s not just about how many times that the cohesive devices occurs but also about how many types of the cohesive devices are used. There is some texts that no need all of the cohesive devices in the text 5 there is only 3 types of cohesive devices are appeared because the text is advertisement and in the text 14 which is procedure text. The last is how many topic of the text that will discuss which is has the effect in the length of the text. If the text is short it is has the effect in the quantity of the cohesive devices. CONCLUSION This study aims to discover whether the reading material in English in Focus textbook ties Grammatical and Lexical Cohesion which is considered can help the students to comprehend reading better. Based on the aim, there are several conslusions that can be drawn.The first conclusion is English in Focus textbook has already applied all of the grammatical and lexical cohesion utilize in the seventeen reading texts in the preceding chapter. Through the grammatical and lexical cohesion the authors can produce the texts that can be understood well by the students because they can keep the idea tie up and cohesiveness. There is all of the grammatical cohesion stated in the seventeen texts. They are reference, ellipsis, substitution, and conjunction. The dominant device of grammatical cohesion is reference, especially personal reference. It can be seen from the percentage calculation that is stated in the chapter 4. Its percentage exceeds about fifty percent compared to the other devices. Then, the dominant lexical cohesion device is repetition. It has percentage more than fifteen percent according to the percentage calculation. The other types of lexical cohesion that appeared in the text are collocation. The cohesiveness of the texts are established because all of them are appropriately applied in those texts. The grammatical cohesion built the text grammatically whereas lexical cohesion built the text lexically. From the degree of cohesiveness it can be inferred that grammatical cohesion has high level but in the other hand lexical cohesion has very low level. In conclusion, it can be asserted that the reading materials presented in the first and second semester of English in Focus textbook were already applied all of the Grammatical and Lexical Cohesion. It is good in Grammatical, but Lexically still needs to be improved. SUGGESTION Dealing with the result of the study, some suggestions are given in this part. The suggestions are directed to the authors who compose and arrange the reading materials in the textbook entitled English in Focus, the teacher who have been or will be using the reading materials in the textbook and also the researchers who are interested in the same field of study . The suggestions are: 1. The authors who composed and arrange the reading material in English in Focus textbook; All of the Grammatical and Lexical Cohesion are already applied in this textbook but lexically still needs to be improved. The authors can increase the level of lexical cohesion in the erading text so that the students can learn a new vocabulary also. This will give the reading materials in English in Focus textbook be more suitable both for the teacher who uses it as a tool in teaching and learning process and learners who use it as a guidance in learning. 2. The teachers who have been or will be using English in Focus textbook; The teacher who have been or will be using English in Focus textbook should be more selective in choosing English textbook. They have to be capable in analyzing textbook which will be used in English teaching and learning process. However, English in Focus textbook still can be used in the class, but teacher should use an additional textbook as complement to overcome the non-conformities of English in Focus textbook. 3. Other researchers; The future researchers can be conduct a research in the other kinds of the text in this book or others. If this research only covers cohesion generally, for further analysis, people can discover more specific device of cohesion. REFERENCES Arikunto, S. 1996. Prosedur Penelitian Pendekatan Praktek. Bandung: Rineka Cipta Baker, M. 1992. In Other Words: A Course Book on Translation. London: Routledge Best, JW. 1981. Research in Education. Fourth Edition. Engelwood, USA: Prentice hall Inc Brown, J.D. 1988. Understanding Research in Second language Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press Eggins, S. 1994. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistic. London: Pinter Publishers Feez, S. and Joyce, H. 1998. Text &ndash; Based Syllabus Design. Sydney: Ligare Pty Ltd Halliday, M.A.K. and Hasan, R. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman Halliday, M.A.K. and Hasan, R. 1985. Language, Context, and Text, Aspect of language in Social Semiotic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Harmer, J. 2002. The Practice of english Language Teaching. London: Longman Horning, A. Readable Writing: The Role of Cohesion and Redudancy. http/jac.gsu.edu/jac/11.1/ articles/ g. htm (retrieved August, 9th 2006) McCarthy, M. 1991. Discourse Analysis of Language Teachers. New York: Cambridge University Press Miles, M.B and A. Michael H. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage Publications Mickulecky, B. S. 1986. Reading Power. Massachussetts: Adison Wesley Publishing Company Scott, W and Ytreberg, L.H. 1990. Teaching English to Children. New York: Longman Inc Wong, R.H.K. 1974. The Educational Role and Cultural Orientation of Englsih reading Materials. http/ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textbook. (retrieved October, 4th 2006)
AN ANALYSIS OF READING MATERIALS IN TEXTBOOK ENGLISH IN FOCUS FOR GRADE VII JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL PUBLISHED BY DEPARTMENT OF NATIONAL EDUCATION  
RETAIN Vol 2 No 1 (2014): Volume 2, Nomor1, Januari - April 2014
Publisher : RETAIN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

AN ANALYSIS OF READING MATERIALS IN TEXTBOOK ENGLISH IN FOCUS FOR GRADE VII JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL PUBLISHED BY DEPARTMENT OF NATIONAL EDUCATION Niken Wahyuningsih S1- English Education, Language and Art Faculty, Surabaya State University dan niken.agushari@gmail.com Drs. Aswandi, M.Pd S1- English Education, Language and Art Faculty, Surabaya State University Abstrak Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah materi reading dalam buku pelajaran English in Focus dapat memenuhi aspek isi, aspek penyajian, aspek penggunaan bahasa dan keterbacaan serta aspek hubungan antar bahan yang direkomendasikan oleh Pusat Perbukuan, Kementrian Pendidikan Nasional. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian deskriptif kualitatif dimana hasil penelitian dideskripsikan dalam bentuk kata atau kalimat tanpa adanya perhitungan statistik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa materi reading semester pertama pada buku pelajaran English in Focus tidak dapat memenuhi kriteria buku Bahasa Inggris yang berkualitas yang telah direkomendasikan oleh Pusat Perbukuan, Kementrian Pendidikan Nasional. Dari hasil penelitian ditemukan dua ketidaksesuaian di dalam buku pelajaran English in Focus sebagai berikut: (a) beberapa materi reading yang harus diajarkan di semester satu tidak dapat ditemukan dalam buku, dan (b) materi reading yang dapat mendorong pengembangan teknologi dan seni tidak ada dalam buku. Kata kunci: analisa, materi reading, buku pelajaran. Abstract The objectives of the study are to describe wehether the reading materials in English in Focus textbook for grade VII Junior High School can meet the aspect of contents, aspect of presentation, aspect of language use and readability and aspect of relation between chapters suggested by Pusat Perbukuan, Ministry of National Education. This study was designed as a documentary analysis in the form of descriptive qualitative research, in which the result would be described in the form of words without any statistical calculation. The result show that the reading materials of first semester in English in Focus textbook were not appropriate with the criteria of quality English textbook suggested by Pusat Perbukuan, Ministry of National Education. There were two non-conformities found in the textbook: (a) there were some reading materials which were not presented in the textbook and (b) there were no reading materials which could encourage the development of technology and arts. Keywords: analysis, reading material, textbook INTRODUCTION Nowadays English plays an important role in today&rsquo;s global era. The importance of English cannot be denied since English is the most common language spoken everywhere. There are four skills that need to be learnt in learning English. They are listening, speaking, reading and writing. Those skills are used to create a discourse in daily life. According to Concord (1973) as cited in Nunan (2005:17) the relationship between those skills is very close in which the strength of each skill influence each other. Reading is one of the skills in English that has to be mastered by the students when they are learning English. Because of that, students have to learn reading as well as the other skills if they want to master English. According to Nunan (2003:68) reading is a fluent process where in building the meaning, readers should combine information from the text with their own background of knowledge. While, Alyousef (2005:144) states that &ldquo;Reading can be seen as an &ldquo;interactive&rdquo; process between a reader and a text which lead to automaticity or (reading fluency)&rdquo;. It is assumed that reading is not a passive skill because it needs so many times to practice and exercise. The improvement of the readers&rsquo; comprehension is based on how they work on it. It means that if the reader read more, they get better reading or comprehension. In teaching and learning process, teacher should considered the learning materials which are used in the class. Textbook is one of the learning materials which are commonly used. It is kind of printed materials which have an important part in teaching and learning process. According to Tomlinson (1999:2), textbook is a main learning material which is usually used by teacher and students. Textbook also has many advantages in teaching and learning process. According to Richard (2001:249), the advantages of textbook are (1) providing structure and a syllabus for a program; (2) helping standardized instruction; (3) maintaining quality; (4) providing a variety of learning resources; (5) being efficient; (6) providing effective language models and input; (7) training teachers; and (8) being visually appealing. To make students able to achieve the English materials, they need some English textbooks which have good quality. By learning those quality textbooks, they are able to improve their English skill productivity. Dealing with the quality of a textbook, in 2008 Department of National Education publishes some BSE (Buku Sekolah Elektronik) English textbooks. One of them is an English textbook for Seventh Graders of Junior High School entitled &ldquo;English in Focus&rdquo; which is not only used by public schools but also private schools. However, the researcher think there is no guarantee that textbook published by Department of National Education is meeting the expectation of quality English textbook. Therefore, this study is intended: (1) to describe whether the reading materials in English in Focus textbook published by Department of National Education for seventh graders of junior high school meet the aspect of contents suggested by Pusat Perbukuan, Ministry of National Education (2) to describe whether the reading materials in English in Focus textbook published by Department of National Education for seventh graders of junior high school meet the aspect of presentation suggested by Pusat Perbukuan, Ministry of National Education (3) to describe whether the reading materials in English in Focus textbook published by Department of National Education for seventh graders of junior high school meet the aspect of language use and readability suggested by Pusat Perbukuan, Ministry of National Education, and (4) to describe whether the reading materials in English in Focus textbook published by Department of National Education for seventh graders of junior high school meet the aspect of relation between chapter suggested by Pusat Perbukuan, Ministry of National Education. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY This study is concerned with analyzing the content of a textbook, in this case is the reading materials of an English textbook entitled &ldquo;English in Focus for Grade VII Junior High School&rdquo; published by Department of National Education, with the quality of English textbook (based on aspect of contents, aspect of presentation, aspect of language use and readability, also aspect of relation between chapters) suggested by Pusat Perbukuan, Department of National Education. Based on the objectives of the study, the design used in this study was descriptive qualitative. As stated by Ary et al (2010:29), &ldquo;the goal of qualitative research is a holistic picture and depth of understanding rather than a numeric analysis of data&rdquo;. The result of this study would be described in the form of words (qualitatively) without any statistical calculation. The object of this study was the English textbook for the seventh graders of junior high school entitled English in Focus. This book was written by Artono Wardiman et al. This textbook was known as one of the BSE (Buku Sekolah Elektronik) which was published by Department of National Education. There were two reasons of why the researcher wanted to analyze this textbook. Firstly, the textbook was recommended by Department of National Education and it was used in some public and private schools. Secondly, there was no previous study which analyzed the reading materials found in the textbook based on the aspect of contents, aspect of presentation, aspect of language use and readability, also aspect of relation between chapters. The data of this study was the reading materials which were found in &ldquo;English in Focus&rdquo; textbook in the first semester. This textbook consists of eight units and a hundred and seventy six pages. The first semester was discussed about chapter one to chapter four. The instrument which was used to analyze the data in this study is checklist. There were four checklists which were applied to answer the research questions. First, the checklist used to analyze the relevancy between reading materials found in the textbook with the aspect of contents. Second, the checklist used to analyze the relevancy between reading materials found in the textbook with the aspect of presentation. Third, the checklist used to analyze the relevancy between reading materials found in the textbook with the aspect of language use and readability. Fourth, the checklist used to analyze the relevancy between reading materials found in the textbook with the aspect of relation between chapters. The technique which was used in collecting the data is document analysis. First, the researcher collected the textbook entitled English in Focus for seventh graders of junior high school published by Department of National Education. Then, the researcher overviewed the contents of the textbook especially the reading materials. After that, the researcher selected checklists suggested by Pusat Perbukuan, Ministry of National Education. In this point, the researcher only choose some points which refer to the reading materials point of view. Last, the data of the textbook were collected by analyzing the reading materials based on the aspects of quality English textbook suggested by Pusat Perbukuan, Ministry of National Education. After collecting the data, analysis toward the data was needed. Data analysis was one of the ways which was used to analyze the data related with the research questions. There were several steps taken in analyzing the data: (1) Analyzing the reading materials based on the aspects of quality English textbook; (2) Describing the result of the findings to find out whether the textbook can meet the criteria of quality English textbook or not; (3) Concluding the result of the analysis in the form of words. RESULT AND DISCUSSION In this part, there will be presented results and discussion of the relevancy between reading materials with aspect of contents, aspect of presentation, aspect of language use and readability, also aspect of relation between chapters. The Relevancy between Reading Materials in English in Focus Textbook with Aspect of Contents Adapted from Ministry of National Education In this part, there will be The first research question is about the relevancy between reading materials in English in Focus textbook with aspect of contents adapted from Ministry of National Education. To answer this research question, the researcher should analyze six points according to the aspect of contents. In the first point, the researcher analyzed the conformity between reading materials and curriculum. Based on the result, the researcher found that most of reading materials were not in line with the 2006 English Standard Competence. It was because the reading materials such as announcement, greeting card, shopping list, SMS and instruction were not covered in the English in Focus textbook. While, in the second point, the researcher reviewed kind of genres found in the reading materials. The reading materials found in the textbook were compatible with the second point of aspect of contents. It is because the reading materials in the first semester consists of some genres. In the third point, the researcher reviewed the arrangement of reading materials based on the level of difficulty. Actually all the materials which were presented from the first to fourth chapter were varied and there were no repeated explanation. Therefore, the reading materials found in the textbook were compatible with the third point of aspect of contents. Meanwhile, in the fourth point, the researcher analyzed reading tasks which are given to develop students&rsquo; ability. All the reading tasks which were presented in each chapter were enough; it can be used for exercise in the class even for homework. Therefore, the reading materials found in the textbook were compatible with the fourth point of aspect of contents. In the fifth point, the researcher analyzed about the reading materials which are supporting life skills. Generally, each chapter of first semester in English in Focus textbook had already presented reading materials which were supporting students&rsquo; life skills. The differences between each chapter were the themes of the materials. All of those themes along with the exercises given had already presented life skills for the students. Therefore, the reading materials found in the textbook were compatible with the fifth point of aspect of contents. Furthermore, in the sixth point, the researcher analyzed the aspect of gender, religion, race and SARA. Based on the analysis, the materials presented in each chapter of first semester in English in Focus textbook had already compatible with the sixth point of aspect of contents. There was no emphasizing on the aspect of gender, ethnic, religion, race and SARA. The Relevancy between Reading Materials in English in Focus Textbook with Aspect of Presentation Adapted from Ministry of National Education The second research question is about the relevancy between reading materials in English in Focus textbook with aspect of presentation adapted from Ministry of National Education. To answer this research question, the researcher should analyze six points according to the aspect of presentation. In the first point of aspect of presentation, the researcher analyzed the learning objectives. Based on the presentation of each chapter in the textbook, the researcher found that the learning objectives which were stated in the first semester of English in Focus were compatible with the first point of aspect of presentation. There were explanation of learning objectives in each chapter which helped the students to understand about the materials that they were going to learn and ability that they got after learning the materials. Besides, the materials leaded the students to master the English communication competence. In the second point, the researcher reviewed about the presentation of each chapter in the textbook which should reflect the logical and coherence path. The researcher found that the first chapter to the fourth chapter already fulfilled the aspect of presentation which reflected the logical and coherence path. It was because each chapter presented the materials which were properly arranged and understandable. The third point was about the presentation of each chapter which arranged from easy to difficult materials. Based on the analysis result, the researcher found that all the reading materials were started from the easy part, then the level of difficulty were increased in the later materials. Therefore, the reading materials presented in the first semester of English in Focus textbook were compatible with the third point of aspect of presentation. Meanwhile, in the fourth point the researcher analyzed about the conformity between tasks and materials in the textbook. Based on the analysis result, the tasks and exercises given on the first to fourth chapters in English in Focus textbook were compatible with the reading materials given. Therefore, the reading materials presented in the first semester of English in Focus textbook were appropriate with the fourth point of aspect of presentation. In the fifth point, the researcher reviewed about the presentation of each chapter which engaging students to communicate using English actively. based on the analysis result, all the reading materials of the first semester of English in Focus textbook were presented both in texts and pictures, the materials were vary also. There were no repetition materials which made the students get bored. Because of that, the presentations of reading materials in each chapter were considered attractive. Therefore, the reading materials presented in the first semester of English in Focus textbook were compatible with the fifth point of aspect of presentation. In the sixth point, the researcher analyzed about the presentation of each chapter which encourages students to be interested in English subject. Based on the analysis result, all the materials presented in the first semester of English in Focus textbook were innovative since there were some exercises with different models and completed with some pictures in each chapter. Therefore, the reading materials presented in the first semester of English in Focus textbook were compatible with the sixth point of aspect of presentation. Furthermore, in the seventh point, the researcher analyzed about the presentation of each chapter which could encourages students to reflect and evaluate their self. Based on the analysis result, all materials in the first semester of English in Focus textbook were helped students to reflect and evaluate their self by providing some tasks and exercises in each chapter. From the breakdown tasks, it can be seen that each chapter of first semester in English in Focus textbook had already presented reading tasks which can be used to evaluate students&rsquo; comprehension. Kind of the reading tasks which were found were also innovative. It can make the students more motivated to do the tasks. Therefore, the reading materials presented in the first semester of English in Focus textbook were compatible with the seventh point of aspect of presentation. The Relevancy between Reading Materials in English in Focus Textbook with Aspect of Language Use and Readability Adapted from Ministry of National Education The third research question is about the relevancy between reading materials in English in Focus textbook with aspect of language use and readability adapted from Ministry of National Education. To answer this research question, the researcher should analyzed four points. In the first point, the researcher reviewed about the use of English language according to the English language rules. This point discuss about the use of punctuation. Based on the analysis result, the use of punctuations in the reading materials of first semester in English in Focus textbook were in good order. It was compatible with the English language rules. Therefore, the reading materials presented in the first semester of English in Focus textbook were compatible with the first point of aspect of language use and readability. Meanwhile, in the second point, the researcher analyzed about the use of English which is appropriate with needs of communication learning. It means that, the language which is used should be efficient and communicative so that students could understand the learning&rsquo;s aim. Based on the analysis result, all the instructions given in the reading materials of first semester in English in Focus textbook were considered efficient and communicative. It was because the language which used was simple and brief so it was easy to understand by the students. Therefore, the reading materials presented in the first semester of English in Focus textbook were compatible with the second point of aspect of language use and readability. The third point is about the use of paragraphs which are presented effectively and efficiently by considering the aspect of coherence and cohesiveness. Based on the analysis result, there was no material in the form of paragraph in the first and fourth chapter of the textbook. But, the second and third chapter presented reading materials in the form of paragraph. Generally, texts which were presented in the second and third chapter had already fulfilled the rules of paragraph writing, which was consist of topic sentence, contents and closing sentence. The relations between concepts inside the paragraph were already appropriate too. Therefore, the reading materials presented in the first semester of English in Focus textbook were compatible with the third point of aspect of language use and readability. Furthermore, in the fourth point, the researcher analyzed the use of illustrations in the reading materials. Based on the analysis result, the researcher found that every chapter in the first semester of English in Focus textbook had presented some illustrations. All the illustrations given from the first to fourth chapter had already relevant with the topic of the material. Therefore, the reading materials presented in the first semester of English in Focus textbook were compatible with the fourth point of aspect of language use and readability. The Relevancy between Reading Materials in English in Focus Textbook with Aspect of Contents Adapted from Ministry of National Education The fourth research question is about the relevancy between reading materials in English in Focus textbook with aspect of relation between chapters adapted from Ministry of National Education. To answer this research question, the researcher should analyzed four points. In the first point, the researcher reviewed about the relevancy between materials with education purposes. Actually, the materials presented in the first semester of English in Focus textbook had appropriate with the education purposes (developing students&rsquo; awareness about the importance of learning English, developing students&rsquo; comprehension about the connection between languages and culture, so that they have cross cultural perception and engage their self to the culture diversity, also supporting the development of students&rsquo; intelligence in mastering knowledge, technology and arts). It means that the textbook did not only teach about the use of English, but also gave exercises which were supporting students&rsquo; intelligences. However, there was no material in the first semester of English in Focus which supported the development of technology and arts. Therefore, the reading materials presented in the first semester of English in Focus textbook were not compatible with the first point of aspect of relation between chapters. Meanwhile, in the second point, the researcher analyzed about the relevancy between the reading materials with the development of knowledge, technology and arts. Based on the analysis result, the material which could encourage the development of technology and arts had not been presented in the first semester of English in Focus textbook. But, all the materials given in the first semester were based on the aspect of human life, such as: introduction, things around us, life school and shopping. Therefore, the reading materials presented in the first semester of English in Focus textbook were not compatible with the second point of aspect of relation between chapters. The third point is about the relationship between materials in the textbook. Based on the analysis results, the reading material in the first chapter of English in Focus textbook were not related to another chapter on the textbook. While, the second, third and fourth chapter were related to each other and took advantages from the existing explanations in the previous chapter. Therefore, the reading materials presented in the first semester of English in Focus textbook were compatible with the third point of aspect of relation between chapters. Furthermore, in the fourth point, the researcher analyzed about anatomy, norms/ ethics and the completeness of a textbook. Based on the analysis, the researcher found that the English in Focus textbook had already presented the preface which was containing of vision and mission of the textbook. The preface can be found on page IV of the textbook. While, the guidance of the textbook had also already presented, it can be found on page V. The guidance consists of the explanation about each part of the textbook. Next, the textbook also presented table of contents, it can be found on page VI &ndash; VII. The tables of contents showed the distribution of four skills and its materials in each chapter. Further, the bibliography of the textbook had also already presented, it can be found on page 165. Last, the glossary can be found on page 167, in which this part contains definition of the words or foreign terms. Therefore, the reading materials presented in the first semester of English in Focus textbook were compatible with the four point of aspect of relation between chapters. It is because the textbook had already fulfilled the anatomy, norms and the completeness of a textbook. Overall, based on the analysis result of the four aspects, the researcher stated that the reading materials of first semester in the English in Focus textbook were not met the criteria of quality English textbook suggested by Pusat Perbukuan, Ministry of National Education. CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS Conclusions This study aims to discover whether the reading material in English in Focus textbook could meet the aspects of a quality English textbook. The reading materials has been analyzed based on aspect of contents, aspect of presentation, aspect of language use and readability, also aspect of relation between chapters. Based on the aim, there are several conslusions that can be drawn. The first conclusion is regarding to the contents of the English in Focus textbook. Dealing with aspect of contents of the textbook, there are some points to analyze. Those points are the conformity between reading materials and curriculum, kind of genres found in the reading materials, the arrangement of reading materials based on the level of difficulty, reading tasks which are given to develop students&rsquo; abilty, the reading material which are supporting life skills and the reading materials which are consider about the aspects of gender, religion, race and SARA. Actually, all the points of aspect of contents had already fulfilled by English in Focus textbook, except the conformity between reading materials and curriculum. Based on the findings, there are some reading indicators that can not be found in the reading materials of first semester. While, the second conclusion is regarding to the presentation of English in Focus textbook. Dealing with the aspect of presentation of the textbook, there are some points to analyze. Those points are learning purpose which stated explicitly and lead to mastery of communication competence, the presentation of each chapter reflect the logical path and coherence, the presentation of each chapter arranged from easy to difficult materials, conformity between tasks and materials, the presentation of each chapter engaging students to communicate using English actively, the presentation of each chapter supporting students to be interested in English subject and the presentation of each chapter supporting students to reflect and evaluate their self. Based on the findings, all the points of aspect of presentation had already fulfilled by English in Focus textbook. The third conclusion is regarding to the language use and readability of English in Focus textbook. Dealing with the aspect of language use and readability of the textbook, there are some points to analyze. Those points are the standard of English language use according to the language rules, the use of English which is appropriate with needs of communication learning, the presentation of paragraphs which are presented effectively by considering coherences and cohesiveness and the use of illustrations which are functional and relevant with the materials. Based on the findings, all the points of aspect of language use and readability had already fulfilled by English in Focus textbook. Furthermore, the fourth conclusion is regarding to the relation between chapter of English in Focus textbook. Dealing with the aspect of relation between chapter of the textbook, there are some points to analyze. Those points are the relevancy between the materials with education purposes, the relevancy between the materials with the development of knowledge, technology and arts, the relationship between materials, and anatomy, norms/ ethics and the completeness of a textbook. Actually, all of the points of aspect of relation between chapter had already fulfilled by the textbook, except the relevancy between the materials with the development of knowledge, technology and arts. Based on the findings, the non-conformity found because there was no presentation about the development of technology and arts in the first semester of the textbook. In conclusion, it can be asserted that the reading materials presented in the first semester of English in Focus textbook were not meet the criteria of aspect of contents and aspect of relation between chapter suggested by Pusat Perbukuan, Ministry of National Education. Therefore, teacher should use an additional textbook as complement if they still want to use the English in Focus textbook Suggestions Dealing with the result of the study, some suggestions are given in this part. The suggestions are directed to the authors who compose and arrange the reading materials in the textbook entitled English in Focus, the teacher who have been or will be using the reading materials in the textbook and also the researchers who are interested in the same field of study . The suggestions are: 1. The authors who composed and arrange the reading material in English in Focus textbook; Because of some non-confomities found in the English in Focus textbook, the authors of the textbook should look at the 2006 English Standart Competence and criteria of quality English textbook suggested by Pusat Perbukuan, Ministry of National Education. This will give the reading materials in English in Focus textbook be more suitable both for the teacher who uses it as a tool in teaching and learning process and learners who use it as a guidance in learning. 2. The teachers who have been or will be using English in Focus textbook; The teacher who have been or will be using English in Focus textbook should be more selective in choosing English textbook. They have to be capable in analyzing textbook which will be used in English teaching and learning process. However, English in Focus textbook still can be used in the class, but teacher should use an additional textbook as complement to overcome the non-conformities of English in Focus textbook. 3. Other researchers; The future researchers can be conduct a research in the same field, for example by focusing on the presentation of other skills in the English in Focus textbook. It could be concerned with the listening, speaking or writing materials. REFERENCES Pusat Perbukuan.2005. Pedoman Penilaian Buku Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris untuk Sekolah Menengah Pertama dan Sekolah Menengah Atas. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Brown, Douglas. 2000. Teaching by Principles- 2nd Edition. Longman. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2005. Pedoman Penulisan Buku Pelajaran-Penjelasan Standar Mutu Buku Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris. Nunan, David. 2005. Practical English Language Teaching Grammar. New York, NY: Mc Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. Nunan, David. 2003. Practical English Language. Singapore: Mc Graw Hill. Alyousef, Hesham Suleiman. 2005. Teaching Reading Comprehension to ESL/ EFL Learners.The Reading Matrix, Vol. 5 No. 2; 144. Harmer, Jeremy. 1998. How to Teach English. England: Longman. Budiharso, Teguh. 2004. Prinsip dan Strategi Pengajaran Bahasa. Surabaya: Lutfansah. Tomlinson, Brian. 1999. Materials Development in Language Teaching II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Richard, Jack C. 2001. Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Gerry Abbott, John Greenwood, Douglass McKeating and Peter Wingard. 1981. The Teaching of English as an International Language. Collins: Glasgow and London. Mandasari, Yuyun Putri. 2007. An Analysis of the Reading Materials in Being Competent in English for the First Year Students of Senior High School Published by Mediatama. Unpublished Thesis: Universitas Negeri Surabaya Richards, Jack, C. 2001. Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. USA: Cambridge University Press. Carr, Judy, F, and Douglas E. Harris. 1993. Getting it Together (Process Workbook for K12 Curriculum Development, Implementation and Assesment. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon. Dubin, Fraida and Elite, Olsthain. 1986. Course Design: Developing Programs and Material for Language Learning. London: Cambridge University Press.