cover
Contact Name
Johni R. V. Korwa
Contact Email
johnikorwa@gmail.com
Phone
+6282199251848
Journal Mail Official
pjdir.uncen2021@gmail.com
Editorial Address
The International Relations Study Program, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Cenderawasih University. Jl. Kamp Wolker, Jayapura, Papua, Indonesia, 99351
Location
Kota jayapura,
P a p u a
INDONESIA
Papua Journal Of Diplomacy And International Relations
ISSN : -     EISSN : 27970957     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31957/
Papua Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations (PJDIR) is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal published by the International Relations Study Program, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Cenderawasih University, in collaboration with the Indonesian Association for International Relations (AIHII). As a region located strategically between Asia and the Pacific, the International Relations Study Program in Papua is committed to becoming a research center of excellence for disseminating original articles. This journal accepts articles covering the issues in the field of diplomacy and international relations from researchers and practitioners with interests in those issues. The PJDIR is published twice a year in May and November. The focus and scope of Papua Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations (PJDIR) are listed below, but not limited to: Diplomacy International Security International Political Economy Transnational Issues Foreign Policy Analysis Conflict Resolution Regional Studies International Border Human Rights in International Relations Gender in International Relations Other issues related to Diplomacy and International Relations
Articles 62 Documents
Deconstructing Peace Through the Human Needs Theory on The Protracted Mozambique Conflict Humaira, Salsabila; Habibillah, Dhafin Mufid; Dermawan, Windy; Akim
Papua Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Cenderawasih

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31957/pjdir.v6i1.5142

Abstract

Despite being hailed as a post-conflict success story following the 1992 Rome General Peace Accords, Mozambique has relapsed into recurring cycles of violence, including the recent insurgency in Cabo Delgado. This study investigated the fragility of this peace construction by analyzing the structural causes of conflict through the lens of John Burton’s Need-Based Conflict Theory (1991). Adopting a Systematic Literature Analysis (SLA) based on PRISMA guidelines, the research synthesizes findings from ten key academic articles published between 2020–2025. The analysis reveals that post-war stability was merely a negative peace characterized by elite settlements that failed to address non-negotiable human needs. Specifically, the findings highlight critical deficits in four dimensions, distributive justice due to elite resource capture; identity suppressed by hegemonic national narratives; security biased toward strategic assets over human safety; and recognition denied to victims and marginalized groups. The study concludes that sustainable peace in Mozambique requires a paradigm shift from managerial conflict settlement to structural conflict resolution that satisfies these fundamental ontological needs, particularly regarding economic fairness and cultural inclusion. KEYWORDSConflict Resolution; Distributive Justice; Human Needs Theory (HNT); Mozambique
The Melanesian Way in South Pacific Regional Diplomacy: Implications for the Papua Issue Elys Krisdiana
Papua Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Cenderawasih

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31957/pjdir.v6i1.5268

Abstract

This article examines how the tension between Melanesian solidarity and state sovereignty shapes the Melanesian Spearhead Group’s (MSG) diplomacy on the Papua issue. Drawing on a qualitative research design, the analysis is based on interpretive document analysis of MSG leaders’ communiqués, ministerial statements, and official declarations issued between 2010 and 2022. The study is informed by constructivism and norm contestation theory to assess how competing norms are articulated and managed in regional practice. It offers a novel contribution to International Relations by reconceptualizing the Papua issue in MSG diplomacy not as a problem to be resolved, but as a condition sustained through ongoing norm contestation. The findings reveal that Melanesian solidarity legitimizes regional attention while state sovereignty constrains collective action, producing a dynamic interplay rather than convergence. By demonstrating that ambiguity, selective activation, and discursive balancing function as stabilizing mechanisms, this article challenges conventional assumptions that unresolved issues reflect institutional weakness and instead shows how they can sustain regional cohesion.   KEYWORDS Melanesian Spearhead Group; Diplomacy; Norm Contestation; Papua; Sovereignty.