cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Zulkipli Lessy
Contact Email
jkiipasca@gmail.com
Phone
+6288227810471
Journal Mail Official
jkiipasca@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Published by Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta Website: http://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/pasca/jkii Gedung Pascasarjana UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta Jl. Marsda Adisucipto Yogyakarta
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Kajian Islam Interdisipliner
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
ISSN : 25794930     EISSN : 27758281     DOI : https://doi.org/10.14421/jkii.v6i2.1195
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities, Art, Social,
Religion Arts Humanities Social Sciences
Jurnal Kajian Islam Interdisipliner welcomes original research for manuscripts with various theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches. It invites researchers and scholars of all backgrounds related to Islamic studies to contribute their research covering all aspects of Islam and the Islamic world in the areas of philosophy, history, religion, political science, international relations, psychology, sociology, anthropology, economics, environmental and development issues etc. related to scientific research. Jurnal Kajian Islam Interdisipliner offers an open platform for exchanging knowledge and ideas (with various perspectives) to facilitate methodological reform in Islamic studies and promote critical academic methodologies that respond to the current issues in Islam and the Islamic world.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Sosial (Lain-Lain)
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "vol. 10 no. 2 (2025)" : 5 Documents clear
Kepercayaan Diri dalam Perspektif Psikologi Umum dan Islam: Kajian Pemikiran Peter Lauster dan Malik Badri Fatimah Tuzaroh
Jurnal Kajian Islam Interdisipliner Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/jkii.v10i2.1438

Abstract

Kepercayaan diri menjadi elemen krusial dalam kehidupan individu modern, di mana tantangan seperti tekanan media sosial, persaingan ketat dan ketidakpastian ekonomi sering menurunkan keyakinan diri, sehingga meningkatkan kasus kecemasan serta depresi di kalangan generasi muda. Penelitian sebelumnya telah membahas kepercayaan diri dari perspektif Islam secara umum, seperti cara membangunnya atau faktor-faktor Qur'ani, namun masih meninggalkan research gap signifikan berupa kurangnya analisis komparatif mendalam dan model integratif holistik antara pemikiran psikologi umum Peter Lauster—yang menekankan sikap positif realistis melalui pengalaman—dengan perspektif Islam Malik Badri yang mengintegrasikan tawakkal, syukur, dan ma'rifatun nafs. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkomparasikan persamaan serta perbedaan konsep kepercayaan diri keduanya, mengintegrasikannya menjadi Model Integratif Kepercayaan Diri (MIKD), serta menjabarkan implikasi teoritis, praktis, dan metodologis bagi psikologi Islam. Metode yang digunakan adalah studi pustaka kualitatif deskriptif-interpretatif melalui kajian mendalam terhadap buku, artikel, dan sumber akademik terkait Lauster serta Badri dengan analisis sistematis untuk menggali makna dan keterkaitan gagasan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan persamaan pada sikap positif, faktor internal-eksternal, dan peran adaptif kepercayaan diri, tetapi perbedaan mendasar pada dimensi spiritual Badri yang melengkapi pendekatan empiris Lauster; integrasi menghasilkan MIKD holistik yang menggabungkan konsep diri realistis-spiritual, proses tafakkur-optimisme, serta faktor tawakkal-eksternal, dengan implikasi seperti pengayaan teori psikologi Islam, workshop konseling berbasis CBT-dzikir, dan rekomendasi pengujian empiris.
Model Internalisasi Nilai Tasāmuḥ Melalui Program Sekolah Sisan Ngaji di Kabupaten Blora: Sebuah Inovasi Pendidikan Islam Inklusif Depi Arisanti Nyimas
Jurnal Kajian Islam Interdisipliner Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/k8e34z55

Abstract

Artikel ini menganalisis model internalisasi nilai tasāmuḥ (toleransi Islam) melalui Program Sekolah Sisan Ngaji (SSN) di Kabupaten Blora sebagai inovasi pendidikan Islam inklusif di tingkat lokal. Penelitian ini penting mengingat perlunya model konkret pendidikan agama berbasis komunitas yang mampu memperkuat kohesi sosial dan moderasi beragama. Dengan menggunakan perspektif studi Islam, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi bagaimana nilai tasāmuḥ tidak hanya dipahami sebagai konsep normatif, tetapi juga diartikulasikan sebagai praktik sosial dan kompetensi kewargaan di lingkungan sekolah. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus untuk menangkap dinamika empiris dari program yang bersifat kontekstual ini. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Program SSN berhasil mengintegrasikan nilai-nilai toleransi melalui kurikulum berbasis kearifan lokal, sehingga dapat menjadi best practice dalam internalisasi moderasi beragama. Implikasi penelitian ini menawarkan model kebijakan pendidikan bagi pemerintah daerah dan institusi pendidikan Islam dalam mengelola keragaman masyarakat multikultural secara inklusif.
Religion and Interfaith Education for Peacebuilding: An Integrative Review of Curricular and Pedagogical Approaches Sandi Pratama
Jurnal Kajian Islam Interdisipliner Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/r0xjp466

Abstract

In increasingly plural and polarized societies, religion continues to play an ambivalent role as both a source of conflict and a potential resource for peace. This article presents an integrative narrative review examining the contribution of interfaith education to peacebuilding, with particular attention to curricular and pedagogical implications within formal and non-formal educational settings. Drawing on interdisciplinary literature from peace studies, religious education, theology, and educational research published predominantly within the last 10–15 years, the study synthesizes conceptual, empirical, and policy-oriented sources. While adopting a global and comparative perspective, this review also engages Islamic ethical traditions and educational contexts in Muslim-majority societies as integral to contemporary interfaith peacebuilding discourses. Using a thematic synthesis approach, five major themes are identified: conceptualizations of peace in education; religion as both barrier and bridge to peace; interfaith education as a means of fostering religious literacy and ethical awareness; pedagogical strategies for interfaith peace education; and educational outcomes and transformative impacts. The findings indicate that interfaith education supports peacebuilding by addressing cultural and structural dimensions of violence, enhancing dialogical competence, and cultivating empathy, critical thinking, and civic responsibility among learners. Based on this synthesis, the article proposes the Integrative Interfaith Peace Education Framework (IIPEF), which links theoretical foundations, interfaith learning processes, pedagogical strategies, and peace-oriented educational outcomes. The study contributes to the literature by repositioning religion including Islamic educational and ethical perspectives as a pedagogical asset rather than a risk factor, and by offering a coherent framework to guide curriculum development, teacher education, and educational policy in plural societies.
Eco-Sufism Consumption: Integrating Sociology, Circular Economy, and Zuhud Sufism in Gen Z's Thrifting Ethics Alif Nur Hanifah; Iksan Kamil Sahri; Khoirun Ni’am
Jurnal Kajian Islam Interdisipliner Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/r7p1s391

Abstract

The phenomenon of thrifting among Generation Z (Gen Z) presents a paradox between environmental preservation claims and the reality of consumptive behavior. While thrifting is perceived as an implementation of the circular economy, practically, it is often trapped in motives of signaling status (flexing) and hoarding, which exacerbates textile waste. This study aims to formulate a new consumption ethic termed "Eco-Sufism Consumption" to bridge the gap between lifestyle and ecological responsibility. This research employs a qualitative method with an interdisciplinary conceptual analysis framework, integrating Sociology of Consumption, Circular Economy, and Sufi Theology. The results reveal three main findings. First, sociologically, Gen Z's thrifting motives are dominated by sign value and simulacra, where second-hand goods are recommodified as social status symbols. Second, economically, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) analysis validates that thrifting can reduce water footprints by up to 98% and carbon emissions by 90% compared to new production, yet this effectiveness relies on consumption volume. Third, theologically, the concepts of Zuhd (asceticism) and Qana’ah (contentment) serve as the primary controlling variables. The study concludes with a new ethical formulation: Ekp = Z x (Sos + Eko), asserting that spiritual consciousness (Zuhd) is the determining coefficient that validates the ethical value of social and economic actions. Without spiritual control, thrifting remains merely a destructive consumerist trend. This study contributes to sustainability and consumption studies by introducing a spiritually grounded ethical framework that integrates social, economic, and theological dimensions.
The Limits of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Reasoning: Jurisprudential Analysis of Islamic Legal Authority Panji Anugrah; Ahmad Rizky Ilyas; Kurniati; Zulhas’ari Mustafa
Jurnal Kajian Islam Interdisipliner Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/4nhp7791

Abstract

The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in judicial systems has raised debates regarding its limitations in judicial reasoning, particularly within the Religious Courts. Previous studies have generally examined AI from technological and administrative perspectives, while Islamic legal studies have focused more on judicial reasoning and ijtihad. However, limited research has integrated AI with the perspective of the four madhhabs in judicial reasoning. This study aims to analyze the legitimacy, limitations, and position of AI in the legal reasoning of Religious Court judges based on positive law and the perspectives of the four Islamic schools of thought. This research employs a qualitative method with a normative juridical approach through library research and document analysis of Supreme Court regulations, court decisions, classical fiqh literature, and scholarly articles related to AI and law. The findings indicate that AI may function as a supporting tool for legal data retrieval and analysis but cannot replace judges’ authority in making legal decisions. The four madhhabs consistently position humans as the primary subjects of legal determination due to their scholarly competence, moral judgment, and religious responsibility. These findings contribute to the development of legal technology studies by integrating Islamic jurisprudence perspectives into contemporary debates on AI governance in modern judicial systems.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 11 No. 1 Juni (2026) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2018) Vol 5, No 2 (2020) Vol 5, No 1 (2020) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2020) Vol 4, No 2 (2019) Vol 4, No 1 (2019) Vol 3, No 2 (2018) Vol 3, No 1 (2018) Vol 2, No 2 (2017) Vol 2, No 1 (2017) Vol 1, No 2 (2016) Vol 1, No 1 (2016) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2016) More Issue