Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JUSPI (Jurnal Sejarah Peradaban Islam) Al-Majaalis : Jurnal Dirasat Islamiyah Jurnal Kajian Islam Interdisipliner An-Nur : Jurnal Studi Islam
Panji Anugrah
Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
Religion Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Metode Takhrij Hadis Klasik dan Modern: Studi Komparatif terhadap Prosedur dan Karakteristik Metodologis: (A Comparative Study of Procedures and Methodological Characteristics) Panji Anugrah; Imam Nugraha
Al-Majaalis : Jurnal Dirasat Islamiyah Vol 13 No 2 (2026): AL-MAJAALIS : JURNAL DIRASAT ISLAMIYAH
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Dirasat Islamiyah Imam Syafi'i Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37397/al-majaalis.v13i2.1411

Abstract

Hadith takhrij is a fundamental methodological process in hadith studies aimed at tracing the sources of transmission and assessing the reliability of both sanad and matan. The evolution of digital technology in recent decades has significantly influenced the practice of hadith takhrij and raised methodological questions concerning the continuity and transformation of classical approaches. This article addresses the main question of how classical and modern methods of hadith takhrij compare in terms of their procedures and methodological characteristics. Within the framework of the study of hadith scientific methodology, this research employs a qualitative library-based approach by examining classical hadith literature and contemporary academic works on digital takhrij. The discussion is conducted through a comparative analysis focusing on procedural similarities, methodological differences, and patterns of continuity and evolution between classical and modern approaches. The results imply that both methods share the same epistemological foundation in the verification of sanad and matan, while differing in operational tools and efficiency. The study argues that modern hadith takhrij does not replace classical methodology but serves as a complementary technical development. The integration of classical analytical rigor with digital efficiency provides significant added value by minimizing technical-instrumental errors in contemporary hadith verification while preserving scholarly accuracy and methodological reliability.
The Limits of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Reasoning: Jurisprudential Analysis of Islamic Legal Authority Panji Anugrah; Ahmad Rizky Ilyas; Kurniati; Zulhas’ari Mustafa
Jurnal Kajian Islam Interdisipliner Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/4nhp7791

Abstract

The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in judicial systems has raised debates regarding its limitations in judicial reasoning, particularly within the Religious Courts. Previous studies have generally examined AI from technological and administrative perspectives, while Islamic legal studies have focused more on judicial reasoning and ijtihad. However, limited research has integrated AI with the perspective of the four madhhabs in judicial reasoning. This study aims to analyze the legitimacy, limitations, and position of AI in the legal reasoning of Religious Court judges based on positive law and the perspectives of the four Islamic schools of thought. This research employs a qualitative method with a normative juridical approach through library research and document analysis of Supreme Court regulations, court decisions, classical fiqh literature, and scholarly articles related to AI and law. The findings indicate that AI may function as a supporting tool for legal data retrieval and analysis but cannot replace judges’ authority in making legal decisions. The four madhhabs consistently position humans as the primary subjects of legal determination due to their scholarly competence, moral judgment, and religious responsibility. These findings contribute to the development of legal technology studies by integrating Islamic jurisprudence perspectives into contemporary debates on AI governance in modern judicial systems.
Fiqh Analysis of Four Schools Against the Mappatabe' Tradition in South Sulawesi Abu Haif; Arwinni Eka Putri Ahmad; Panji Anugrah; Muhammad Afif; Ahmad Muhajir Almusafir; Ismail Ismail; Hasna Mardanus; Zulfitriana Zulfitriana; Abd. Rahman
JUSPI (Jurnal Sejarah Peradaban Islam) Vol 9, No 2 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30829/juspi.v9i2.26885

Abstract

Islamic civilization has developed dynamically and continuously interacted with local cultures through a selective process of acculturation. In Indonesia, particularly in South Sulawesi, the tradition of mappatabe'-which involves saying “tabe'” while slightly bowing as a sign of respect toward elders-represents a clear example of the integration between local culture and Islamic values. Nevertheless, this practice has generated fiqh-related debates concerning the limits of human respect so that it does not resemble acts of worship such as rukūʿ or sujūd, which are exclusively devoted to Allah SWT. This study aims to examine and analyze the perspectives of the four Sunni schools of Islamic jurisprudence Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi‘i, and Hanbali) regarding the mappatabe' tradition as a local cultural practice within the framework of Islamic law. The research employs a library-based qualitative method with a normative-fiqh approach, supported by ex post facto and descriptive methods to explore causal relations and to describe the practice of mappatabe' in its social and legal contexts. Data were collected from primary sources, including the Qur'an, the Prophet's hadiths, classical fiqh texts of the four schools, works of contemporary scholars, and relevant religious fatwas, complemented by secondary sources such as academic books and scholarly journal articles. The findings indicate that the mappatabe' tradition is fundamentally permissible as long as it is understood as a form of social etiquette and respect, does not involve elements of servitude or worship, does not resemble the physical acts of rukuʿ or sujud, and does not promote discrimination among individuals. Therefore, mappatabe' can be regarded as a form of cultural acculturation that aligns with the principles of Islamic law and reflects noble moral values in social life.
Electronic Evidence in Indonesian Judiciary: An Analysis of the Principle La Yunkaru Taghayyur Al-Ahkam Bi Taghayyur Al-Zaman Panji Anugrah; Musliadi; Imran Anwar Kuba; Achmad Musyahid
AN NUR: Jurnal Studi Islam Vol. 18 No. 01 (2026): An-Nur: Jurnal Studi Islam
Publisher : Institut Ilmu Al-Qur'an (IIQ) An-Nur Yogyakarta Komplek PP An Nur Ngrukem PO BOX 135 Bantul 55702 Yogyakarta Tlp/Fax (0274) 6469012. http://jurnalannur.ac.id/

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37252/annur.v18i01.2635

Abstract

Digital transformation has significantly reshaped the evidentiary system within the Indonesian judiciary, particularly through the recognition of electronic evidence such as emails, chats, and digital documents. This shift raises critical issues regarding the legitimacy and limitations of such evidence from the perspective of Islamic law, which traditionally relies on the concept of bayyinah. This study aims to analyze the validity and boundaries of electronic evidence by employing the legal maxim L? yunkaru taghayyur al-a?k?m bi taghayyur al-zam?n as an analytical framework. The research adopts a normative qualitative method with approaches rooted in usul al fiqh, statutory analysis, and conceptual examination. Data sources include classical and contemporary Islamic legal texts, legal maxims, statutory regulations, and relevant academic literature. The findings indicate that electronic evidence can be accepted as valid within Islamic law by positioning it as a form of modern qarinah, provided it meets criteria of authenticity, integrity, and relevance. However, such acceptance is not absolute, as it must remain within the boundaries of justice and public interest. Therefore, a structured evaluative framework is essential to ensure that the use of electronic evidence aligns with the fundamental objective of achieving truth and justice.
Co-Authors Abd. Rahman Abu Haif, Abu Achmad Musyahid Idrus Ahmad Muhajir Almusafir Ahmad Rizky Ilyas Arwinni Eka Putri Ahmad Hasna Mardanus Imam Nugraha Imran Anwar Kuba Ismail Ismail Kurniati Muhammad Afif Musliadi Zulfitriana Zulfitriana Zulhas’ari Mustafa