cover
Contact Name
Rudi Cahyono
Contact Email
rdc@pzhgenggong.or.id
Phone
+62885257274667
Journal Mail Official
ejournal@stihzainulhasan.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Panglima Sudirman No. 360 Kraksaan, Probolinggo, Jawa Timur, Indonesia. Kodepos: 67282
Location
Kab. probolinggo,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Justness : Jurnal Hukum Politik dan Agama
ISSN : -     EISSN : 28290607     DOI : -
JUSTNESS : Jurnal Hukum dan Agama Pernyataan kode etik ilmiah merupakan pernyataan kode etik semua pihak yang terlibat dalam proses publikasi JUSTNESS: Jurnal Hukum Politik dan Agama, yaitu pengelola, editor, mitra bestari dan pengarang/penulis.
Articles 64 Documents
Kajian Kritis Peraturan Penanggulangan Ujaran Kebencian dalam Pasal 2 Ayat 45a Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 dari Perspektif Maqasid Al-Syariah Muhammad; Azzer Arifuddin; Farahdilla Mutiara Khansa; Andi Muh. Taqiyuddin BN; Samsidar Jamaluddin
JUSTNESS - Jurnal Hukun dan Agama Vol 5 No 2 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : STIH Zainul Hasan Kraksaan Kraksaan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61974/justness.v5i2.98

Abstract

This study aims to explain the regulation of hate speech mitigation in Article 45A(2) of Law No. 1 of 2024 and to examine the criticism of Maqasid Al Syari'ah against the regulation of hate speech mitigation in Article 45A(2) of Law No. 1 of 2024. This study is a qualitative research. The research design is a literature review. The findings of this study indicate that: First, Article 45A(2) of Law No. 1 of 2024 is a legislative effort to address the spread of hate speech based on ethnicity, religion, and race through electronic media. By understanding and complying with these provisions, the public is expected to contribute to creating an inclusive and harmonious digital space. However, the success of implementing this regulation depends heavily on consistent law enforcement, strengthening digital literacy, and collaboration between the government, the public, and social media platforms. With a holistic approach, it is hoped that this regulation can become an effective instrument in creating a safe and inclusive digital space. Second, Maqasid al Syari'ah's criticism of the hate speech mitigation regulation in Article 2 of Section 45A of Law No. 1 of 2024, namely that the regulation is not yet fully considered in line with the preservation of religion (hifz al-din), life (hifz al-nafs), intellect (hifz al-'aql), lineage (hifz al-nasl), and property (hifz al-mal).
Konsistensi Realitas Sosial dalam Tradisi Uang Panai di Sulawesi Selatan Berdasarkan Fatwa MUI No. 02 Tahun 2022 tentang Uang Panai Terkait dengan Sila Kelima Pancasila dan Maqasid Al-Syari'ah Muhammad; Trisnawati; Andi Muh. Taqiyuddin BN; Samsidar Jamaluddin; Ahmad Arief
JUSTNESS - Jurnal Hukun dan Agama Vol 5 No 2 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : STIH Zainul Hasan Kraksaan Kraksaan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61974/justness.v5i2.99

Abstract

This study aims to examine the consistency of social reality in the tradition of Uang Panai’ in the South Sulawesi MUI Fatwa Number 02 of 2022 concerning Uang Panai’ with the fifth principle of Pancasila and Maqasid al-Syari’ah. This study is a qualitative research. The research design is a literature review. The results of the study indicate that; first, the concept of Uang Panai’ was originally intended to honour the bride’s family. Uang Panai’ among the Bugis people is used as wedding celebration money or commonly referred to as shopping money, with the purpose of expressing the groom’s respect for the bride. Second, based on the social reality of the Uang Panaik tradition as stated in the MUI South Sulawesi Fatwa No. 02 of 2022 on Uang Panaik, it can be concluded that this social reality is inconsistent with the fifth principle of Pancasila and the Maqasid al-Syariah. Although the initial purpose of the dowry tradition, which is to honour the bride and meet financial needs in the marriage ceremony, is considered consistent with the fifth principle of Pancasila and Maqasid al-Syari’ah.
Akibat Hukum Penerbitan Hak Guna Bangunan Di Atas Laut Dakam Perspektif Hukum Agraria Dan Tata Ruang Yusuf Margo Prihandoyo
JUSTNESS - Jurnal Hukun dan Agama Vol 5 No 2 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : STIH Zainul Hasan Kraksaan Kraksaan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61974/justness.v5i2.102

Abstract

The issuance of Building Use Rights (HGB) over marine areas has become a legal polemic in Indonesia because it contradicts the Basic Agrarian Law, which explicitly stipulates that the object of HGB is land. This study aims to examine the legal validity of the issuance of HGB over the sea and its resulting legal consequences, using normative legal methods with a conceptual and statutory approach. This study shows that the issuance of HGB over the sea constitutes a form of legal deviation because the sea is not included as an object of land rights. This action creates legal uncertainty, overlapping regulations between the Basic Agrarian Law and sectoral laws such as Law No. 32 of 2014 concerning Maritime Affairs and Law No. 1 of 2014 concerning the Management of Coastal Areas and Small Islands, and negatively impacts coastal community access and marine environmental sustainability. The case of the issuance of HGB in Kohod Village is a clear example of weak inter-agency coordination and legal loopholes exploited by certain individuals. The issuance of HGB is only valid if it is carried out on reclaimed land that has been designated as state land. Therefore, harmonization of regulations between agrarian and maritime law, strengthening oversight, law enforcement, and protecting the rights of coastal communities are needed. This study contributes to reforming Indonesia's land law system to align it with the principles of justice, legal certainty, and sustainable development, particularly in the context of managing marine and coastal areas, which are increasingly strategic in the era of future spatial utilization.
Pengaturan Transplantasi Organ yang Berkeadilan : Upaya Pencegahan Komersialisasi Organ Tubuh Manusia Evanadya Izza Nurrahmah; Yovita Arie Mangesti
JUSTNESS - Jurnal Hukun dan Agama Vol 5 No 2 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : STIH Zainul Hasan Kraksaan Kraksaan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61974/justness.v5i2.106

Abstract

Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health explicitly prohibits all forms of organ trade and commercialization, regardless of the reason. This provision is intended to prevent organ trafficking practices that violate human dignity and ethical principles in healthcare. However, the law does not clearly define the scope or meaning of “organ trade” and “commercialization,” which creates challenges in terms of legal certainty. A particular dilemma arises when a recipient voluntarily gives money to a donor as a token of gratitude, without any prior agreement or transactional intent. This study adopts a normative legal method by analyzing Law Number 17 of 2023 and related regulations. The findings show that current legal provisions do not offer detailed parameters to distinguish between illegal organ trade and voluntary, humanitarian-based expressions of appreciation. As a result, there is an urgent need for supplementary regulations or more detailed implementing provisions to ensure legal clarity, prevent the criminalization of good-faith donors, and provide adequate legal protection for all parties involved in voluntary, non-commercial organ donation.