cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Veri Hardinansyah Dja'far
Contact Email
admin@transpublika.co.id
Phone
+6281234560500
Journal Mail Official
admin@transpublika.co.id
Editorial Address
Bumi Royal Park Blok A-14 Bumiayu, Kedungkandang, Malang East Java, Indonesia
Location
Kota malang,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI)
Published by Transpublika Publisher
ISSN : -     EISSN : 2809896X     DOI : https://doi.org/10.55047/polri
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI) is an international journal established by Transpublika Research Center. POLRI is an open access, double peer-reviewed e-journal which aims to offer an international scientific platform for national as well as cross-border legal research. The materials published include major academic papers dealing critically with various aspects and field of laws as well as shorter papers such as recently published book review and notes on topical issues of law. Furthermore, POLRI also aims to publish new work of the highest calibre across the full range of legal scholarship, which includes but not limited to works in the law and history, legal philosophy, sociology of law, Socio-legal studies, International Law, Environmental Law, Criminal Law, Private Law, Islamic Law, Agrarian Law, Administrative Law, Criminal Procedural Law, Commercial Law, Constitutional Law, Human Rights Law, Civil Procedural Law and Adat Law. All papers submitted to this journal should be written either in English or Indonesian.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 13 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): APRIL" : 13 Documents clear
Indonesian Migrant Workers: The Analysis of Legal Policy in Gender Issue Mukhammad, Bahir; Kridasakti, Sri Wahyu; Rudolf, Paulus; Hilmy, Umu
POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): APRIL
Publisher : Transpublika Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55047/polri.v4i2.1706

Abstract

The majority of Indonesian migrant workers (PMI) are women (85%), who frequently face gender-based rights violations and inadequate legal protection abroad. While the Declaration of Human Rights promotes equality, these principles often remain nominal, with basic human rights (Law No. 39/1999) being overlooked by host country authorities. Legal issues faced by female PMI stem largely from limited legal literacy regarding both Indonesian and host country labor laws. From a legal-historical perspective, gender-related socio-legal constructions have perpetuated an unequal division of roles for women. This study addresses the historical legal regulation of Indonesian migrant workers from a gender perspective in host countries. The study aims to offer policy insights for curriculum development in PMI training and promote legal literacy through MOOCs. Using a normative legal-historical approach and statute-based analysis, this research examines labor laws from four host countries (Saudi Arabia, Hong Kong, Malaysia, and Taiwan), supported by secondary sources such as academic texts and media reports. All materials are analyzed using an interactive qualitative data model and the analytical theory of legal protection. The results show gaps in laws for protecting workers, mainly due to limited regulations and legal knowledge. While national efforts such as Law No. 18 of 2017 and the establishment of BNP2TKI (via Presidential Regulation No. 81/2006) represent progress, further improvement is needed.  Hence, the study suggests adding gender-sensitive legal topics into PMI training and using MOOCs to increase legal awareness for female migrant workers.
Transformation of Dittipidkor towards the Police Corruption Eradication Corps: An Urgency Wigrhananto, Rizky Adhi; Setyabudi, Chairul Muriman; Fadri, Iza
POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): APRIL
Publisher : Transpublika Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55047/polri.v4i2.1711

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the role of the Directorate of Corruption Crimes (Dittipidkor) Bareskrim Polri in combating corruption in Indonesia, examine the urgency of developing the organization into the Police Corruption Eradication Corps (Kortastipidkor), and identify factors considered in the development process. Corruption problems that are complex, massive, and involve various sectors require a more structured, focused and responsive handling. In this context, Dittipidkor Polri has a central role as the executor of law enforcement in synergy with other institutions such as the Corruption Eradication Commission and the Attorney General's Office. This research uses a qualitative approach with a field study method, through in-depth interviews with key informants such as the Head of the Renmin Subdivision of Dittipidkor and the Head of the Lempus Stamarena Polri, as well as analysis of legal and regulatory documents. This type of research is police management administration, with qualitative descriptive analysis techniques using the data triangulation method. The results showed that Dittipidkor plays a vital role in investigating corruption cases, but is hampered by various structural and resource constraints. Therefore, the transformation into Kortastipidkor is considered urgent to strengthen the effectiveness, professionalism and independence of handling corruption. Factors considered in organizational development include the legal basis, the need for structural reform, increasing HR competence, strengthening technology, and cross-agency coordination. With this transformation, it is hoped that Polri will be able to play a more strategic, responsive and accountable role in combating corruption in Indonesia.
A Comparative Analysis of the Royalty Sharing Rules of the Spotify Digital Music Player Service Channel in Europe and Indonesia Virjana, I Made Nara
POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): APRIL
Publisher : Transpublika Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55047/polri.v4i2.1720

Abstract

The development of digital technology has transformed the way music is consumed, with streaming platforms such as Spotify, YouTube Music, and Apple Music becoming the primary channels for music distribution. In Indonesia, the use of digital music services continues to grow, creating significant opportunities for the music industry while also presenting challenges related to fair royalty distribution mechanisms. This study aims to conduct a comparative analysis of royalty distribution regulations in digital music streaming services, particularly Spotify, in Europe and Indonesia. This study employs a normative juridical method with a comparative legal approach, analyzing secondary data consisting of legislation, legal documents, court decisions, and relevant literature through a descriptive-analytical framework to compare digital music royalty distribution regulations in Europe and Indonesia. The study shows that royalty distribution regulations in Indonesia, particularly those referring to Government Regulation No. 56 of 2021, still face uncertainties in implementation, especially regarding royalty distribution for independent musicians and digital service providers. Although efforts have been made to manage copyright through the National Collective Management Organization, the mechanisms for royalty collection and distribution are hindered by poor coordination between institutions and a lack of transparency in music usage reports. A comparison with regulations in the European Union indicates that Indonesia needs to adjust its regulations to better align with the complexities of the current digital music market. To establish a fair and transparent royalty distribution system in Indonesia, more comprehensive regulatory improvements and better coordination among relevant institutions are necessary.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 13

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): JANUARY Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): OCTOBER Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): JULY Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): APRIL Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): JANUARY Vol. 3 No. 4 (2024): OCTOBER Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): JULY Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): APRIL Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): JANUARY Vol. 2 No. 4 (2023): OCTOBER Vol. 2 No. 3 (2023): JULY Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): APRIL Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): JANUARY Vol. 1 No. 4 (2022): OCTOBER Vol. 1 No. 3 (2022): JULY Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): APRIL Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): JANUARY More Issue