cover
Contact Name
Veri Hardinansyah Dja'far
Contact Email
admin@transpublika.co.id
Phone
+6281234560500
Journal Mail Official
admin@transpublika.co.id
Editorial Address
Bumi Royal Park Blok A-14 Bumiayu, Kedungkandang, Malang East Java, Indonesia
Location
Kota malang,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI)
Published by Transpublika Publisher
ISSN : -     EISSN : 2809896X     DOI : https://doi.org/10.55047/polri
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI) is an international journal established by Transpublika Research Center. POLRI is an open access, double peer-reviewed e-journal which aims to offer an international scientific platform for national as well as cross-border legal research. The materials published include major academic papers dealing critically with various aspects and field of laws as well as shorter papers such as recently published book review and notes on topical issues of law. Furthermore, POLRI also aims to publish new work of the highest calibre across the full range of legal scholarship, which includes but not limited to works in the law and history, legal philosophy, sociology of law, Socio-legal studies, International Law, Environmental Law, Criminal Law, Private Law, Islamic Law, Agrarian Law, Administrative Law, Criminal Procedural Law, Commercial Law, Constitutional Law, Human Rights Law, Civil Procedural Law and Adat Law. All papers submitted to this journal should be written either in English or Indonesian.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 234 Documents
The Gap Between Service Excellence and Procedural Justice in Criminal Investigation Services at the West Jakarta Metro Police Akbar, Muhammad Rizky Ali; Sumartomo, Agus
POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): APRIL
Publisher : Transpublika Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55047/polri.v5i2.2212

Abstract

Within the criminal justice system, investigative services serve as a critical arena where police legitimacy is shaped through citizens’ direct experiences, yet gaps between administrative compliance and public expectations often trigger dissatisfaction. This study aims to identify the implementation of service excellence in the criminal investigation process at the Criminal Investigation Unit (Satreskrim) of the West Jakarta Metro Police, to analyze complainants’ experiences of procedural justice, and to explain the gap between administrative service standards and public experience that may trigger complaints (Dumas). A qualitative case study approach was employed, with data collected through semi-structured interviews with 13 informants (investigators and complainants), document review, and observation. The findings indicate that while the unit demonstrates strong administrative compliance with standard operating procedures and criminal procedural law, a significant gap remains in interaction and communication between investigators and complainants. Within the A6 service excellence framework, ability and internal accountability function relatively well, whereas action and external accountability remain weak, particularly in inconsistent delivery of case progress updates and limited explanation of investigation delays. From a procedural justice perspective, this condition reduces complainants’ perceptions of trustworthiness and respect. This study concludes that Dumas is more often triggered by lack of process clarity (process-related complaints) than by dissatisfaction with case outcomes alone. Accordingly, improving investigative services requires enhancing the readability of case progress through scheduled, consistent, and substantive communication to strengthen procedural transparency and public trust.
The Role of Local Government in Boosting Investment Under East Java Provincial Regulation No. 4 of 2021 Silalahi, Jur Udin; Saragih, Joy Zaman Felix; Siregar, Sheila Ananda; Syahputra, Muhammad Daffa; Susanto, Jocelyn Phebelia; Pranoto, Ananda Bima Al Wajdi Majid
POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): APRIL
Publisher : Transpublika Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55047/polri.v5i2.2226

Abstract

Investment plays a crucial role in driving regional economic growth, creating jobs, and improving public welfare. As part of the governance structure, local governments are responsible for creating a conducive investment climate through supportive policies and regulations. East Java Provincial Regulation Number 4 of 2021 concerning Investment serves as the legal basis for managing and developing investment in East Java. This study aims to analyze the role of local governments in increasing investment based on the provisions of this regulation and identify challenges in its implementation. The method used in this research is a normative-juridical approach, examining laws and regulations, legal documents, and related literature. The study results indicate that local governments play a role in formulating investment policies, simplifying licensing processes, providing incentives, and fostering and supervising investment activities. However, implementation still faces obstacles such as complex bureaucracy, limited supporting infrastructure, and suboptimal inter-agency coordination. Therefore, efforts to strengthen policies, improve licensing services, and foster synergy between local governments and business actors are needed to achieve the goal of increasing investment effectively and sustainably.
Deconstructing the Ambiguity of the Right to Build (HGB) over the Right of Management (HPL): Delegitimizing HPL on Non-Vital Land and Reconstructing Land Law in Indonesia Rusdian, Ibnu; Pandamdari, Endang; Marianne, Irene
POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): APRIL
Publisher : Transpublika Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55047/polri.v5i2.2243

Abstract

The Indonesian land law system faces a fundamental problem in which HGB above HPL does not fully function as an independent land right due to its structural dependency on the administrative authority of the HPL holder. This research aims to examine the ambiguity of the construction of the Right to Build (HGB) over the Right of Management (HPL), to delegitimize the applicability of HPL on non-vital land, and to formulate a land law reconstruction that provides greater legal certainty and independence of rights. This research is normative legal research employing conceptual, statutory, legal theory, and comparative law approaches. Analysis is conducted qualitatively and prescriptively using Jacques Derrida’s legal deconstruction to dismantle the legitimacy of HPL, and Mochtar Kusumaatmadja’s Development Law Theory as the basis for legal reconstruction. The results show that the ambiguity of HGB over HPL stems from the structural dependency of HGB on the administrative authority of the HPL holder, which causes HGB to not fully function as an independent land right. Through the deconstructive approach, it was found that the legitimacy of HPL over non-vital land no longer has a strong public basis, because such land has in fact developed into a stable private or semi-private space. The findings suggest restricting HPL to strategically vital land while transferring non-vital land to a more independent rights regime through partial HPL release, state land reclassification, and stronger HGB holder protections.
Reformulation of the Investigation Time Limit for Money Politics Electoral Crimes in Indonesia Agus Nanang Irnawan; Maria Silvya E. Wangga; Tri Sulistyowati
POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): JULY
Publisher : Transpublika Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55047/polri.v5i3.2273

Abstract

Money politics remains a dominant electoral violation in Indonesia and Malaysia, undermining democratic integrity and the principles of direct, universal, free, secret, honest, and fair elections. Weak law enforcement, normative disparities between election supervisory bodies and national police, and a transactional political culture exacerbate the problem. This paper analyzes criminal law policy on electoral money politics and evaluates reform implementation, focusing on the disharmonization between working-day and calendar-day investigation time limits, which affects the Integrated Law Enforcement Center’s effectiveness. Using normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and sociolegal approaches, the study finds that money politics persists through cash distribution, social assistance, and misuse of government programs. Discrepancies in time limit terminology stall many cases at investigation stages, as formal and material requirements cannot be met within tight deadlines. Current criminal sanctions lack deterrent effect due to enforcement weaknesses and evidentiary complexity. The paper recommends reformulating investigation time limits from calendar days to working days, strengthening coordination among law enforcement bodies, enhancing political financing transparency, and intensifying public political education to reinforce electoral integrity and prevent money politics.