cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Randy Atma R. Massi
Contact Email
randyatma@uindatokarama.ac.id
Phone
+6282345682297
Journal Mail Official
comparativa@uindatokarama.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Diponegoro No. 23, Lere, Kota Palu
Location
Kota palu,
Sulawesi tengah
INDONESIA
COMPARATIVA: Jurnal Ilmiah Perbandingan Mazhab dan Hukum
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri DATOKARAMA PALU
ISSN : -     EISSN : 27748111     DOI : https://doi.org/10.24239/comparativa
Core Subject : Religion, Social,
Religion Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Comparativa is a Mazhab and Law Comparison journal which provide immediate open access as an effort to disseminate research results that focus on Comparativa Journal study includes (but is not limited to): Islamic Law and Comparison School of Law in terms of Islamic Law and Positive Law. Comparativa is a semi-annual journal issued on June and December.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 62 Documents
 3   4   5   6   7 
Body Shaming in Contemporary Islamic Law: A Comparative Analysis of the Ja’fari Methodology and Al-Ghazali’s Maqashid Approach Gilang, Rahmat
Comparativa: Jurnal Ilmiah Perbandingan Mazhab dan Hukum Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Program Studi Perbandingan Mazhab, Fakultas Syariah, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Datokarama Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24239/comparativa.v7i1.246

Abstract

The phenomenon of body shaming on social media demonstrates how digital spaces can give rise to new forms of harassment that impact individuals’ dignity and psychological well-being, calling for a reinterpretation of Islamic law through contemporary ijtihad. This study examines the application of contextual ijtihad in addressing body shaming by comparing the Ja’fari istinbath methodology with Al-Ghazali’s maqashid approach through qualitative research. The findings indicate that the Ja'fari istinbath methodology, which positions reason as the third source of law after the Qur’an and hadith, offers greater scope for formulating legal provisions on digital ethics and social media harassment. Meanwhile, Al-Ghazali’s maqashid approach emphasizes safeguarding the five basic human needs (al-kulliyyat al-khams), particularly hifdz al-nafs and hifdz al-‘aql, directly related to dignity and psychological integrity. Both approaches converge in affirming the urgency of preserving human dignity as a core objective of Sharia. This study concludes that integrating the Ja’fari methodology and Al-Ghazali’s maqashid provides a comprehensive foundation for an Islamic legal response to body shaming, encompassing prevention, victim protection, and behavioral rehabilitation for perpetrators.
A Comparison of the Reconstruction of Zakat Collectors’ Rights: Comparative Analysis of MUI Fatwa No. 8/2011 and Irsyad Fatwa No. 168/2022 Regarding the Operational Deficit of Zakat Institutions Annisaa Hakim; Mohamad Athoillah; Fathimah Madaniyyah; Fahmi Hasan Nugroho
Comparativa: Jurnal Ilmiah Perbandingan Mazhab dan Hukum Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Program Studi Perbandingan Mazhab, Fakultas Syariah, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Datokarama Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24239/comparativa.v7i1.314

Abstract

Zakat collection agencies in Indonesia and Malaysia face operational deficits due to limitations on the rights of zakat collectors, even though zakat collection continues to increase. This study aims to compare MUI Fatwa No. 8 of 2011 and the Federal Territory Mufti’s Irsyad al-Fatwa No. 168 of 2022 regarding the limitations on the rights of zakat collectors. Using a normative qualitative approach with descriptive-analytical methods and literature review, the analysis is framed by the theories of Maqasid al-Sharia and Maslahah Mursalah. The results show that the MUI Fatwa emphasizes flexibility without fixed limits to adapt to operational contexts, while the Irsyad Fatwa strictly limits the fee to 1/8 to uphold the trust in accordance with the Shafi’i school of thought. These differing approaches impact operational efficiency and public trust: flexibility enhances efficiency but requires strict oversight, while rigid restrictions build trust but hinder institutional performance. This study enriches the discussion on contemporary fiqh muamalah and offers policy recommendations for sustainable zakat management.

Page 7 of 7 | Total Record : 62

 3   4   5   6   7 

Filter by Year

2020 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020) More Issue