cover
Contact Name
Hunaepi
Contact Email
reflection.litpam@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
reflection.litpam@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Mataram, West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia
Location
Kota mataram,
Nusa tenggara barat
INDONESIA
Reflection Journal
ISSN : -     EISSN : 28081501     DOI : https://doi.org/10.36312/rj
Core Subject : Education,
Reflection Journal (ISSN: 2808-1501) is a forum for publishing the results of review and empirical original research papers in the field of education. Reflection Journal published by Lembaga Penelitian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (LITPAM) twice a year (bianually) in June and December.
Articles 42 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Desember" : 42 Documents clear
Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah Berbasis Gender dalam Meningkatkan Budaya Kerja Berkualitas: Studi Multisitus di SDN 23 Ampenan dan SDN 26 Mataram Rohayani, Rohayani; Mustari, Mohamad; Asrin, Asrin; Hakim, Mansyur; Jaelani, Abdul Kadir
Reflection Journal Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/7yppgs75

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bagaimana praktik kepemimpinan kepala sekolah membentuk budaya kerja profesional guru di sekolah dasar, dengan mempertimbangkan dinamika konteks dan perbedaan pendekatan kepemimpinan. Studi ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain multisitus yang dilaksanakan di SDN 23 Ampenan dan SDN 26 Mataram. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara mendalam, observasi partisipatif, dan studi dokumentasi, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan model interaktif Miles dan Huberman yang meliputi reduksi data, penyajian data, serta penarikan kesimpulan. Keabsahan data dijaga melalui triangulasi sumber dan teknik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kepala sekolah menerapkan praktik kepemimpinan yang berbeda namun sama-sama berkontribusi terhadap pembentukan budaya kerja profesional guru. Di SDN 23 Ampenan, kepemimpinan situasional tercermin melalui ketegasan dalam disiplin, dukungan profesional, serta fleksibilitas pengambilan keputusan sesuai kesiapan guru. Praktik tersebut berkontribusi pada penguatan disiplin, tanggung jawab, kolaborasi, dan komitmen terhadap mutu pembelajaran. Sementara itu, di SDN 26 Mataram, kepemimpinan demokratis diwujudkan melalui partisipasi guru, komunikasi dua arah, dan pengambilan keputusan kolektif yang mendorong budaya kerja kolaboratif dan keterbukaan profesional. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa pengaruh kepemimpinan terhadap budaya kerja guru tidak bersifat tunggal atau universal, melainkan bergantung pada kesesuaian praktik kepemimpinan dengan konteks sekolah dan dinamika profesional guru. Gender-Based School Leadership in Enhancing Quality Work Culture: A Multi-Site Study at SDN 23 Ampenan and SDN 26 Mataram This study aims to analyze how school principals’ leadership practices shape teachers’ professional work culture in elementary schools, with particular attention to contextual dynamics and variations in leadership approaches. The research employed a qualitative approach with a multi-site design conducted at SDN 23 Ampenan and SDN 26 Mataram. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, participant observation, and document analysis, and were analyzed using Miles and Huberman’s interactive model consisting of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. Data credibility was ensured through source and technique triangulation. The findings reveal that principals applied different leadership practices that nonetheless contributed to the development of teachers’ professional work culture. At SDN 23 Ampenan, situational leadership was reflected in firm discipline enforcement, professional support, and flexible decision-making based on teachers’ readiness. These practices strengthened teachers’ discipline, responsibility, collaboration, and commitment to instructional quality. In contrast, at SDN 26 Mataram, democratic leadership was manifested through teacher participation, two-way communication, and collective decision-making, fostering a collaborative and open professional culture. Overall, the study demonstrates that the influence of school leadership on teachers’ professional work culture is not uniform, but rather depends on the alignment between leadership practices, school context, and teachers’ professional dynamics.
Google Classroom in EFL Writing: Students’ Perceived Improvement and Interview-Based Insights into Feedback–Revision Cycles Sudiani, Sudiani; Zuhdi, Herman
Reflection Journal Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/32zsap73

Abstract

This study examines students’ perceived improvement in EFL writing when using Google Classroom (GC), with particular attention to mechanisms related to asynchronous feedback and revision cycles enabled through GC–Google Docs. A mixed-methods design was employed, involving a questionnaire administered to 100 EFL students and semi-structured interviews with 10 students at Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah Haji Abdul Rasyid. Descriptive survey results show that 75% of respondents perceived GC as helpful for improving writing, while 25% did not. Patterns across usage categories suggest a positive gradient between frequency of GC use and perceived improvement: students who used GC daily reported higher perceived improvement than those who used it less frequently. Interview findings indicate that perceived improvement is primarily associated with repeated engagement in feedback–revision cycles, where students check lecturer comments, interpret feedback, and revise drafts iteratively. Students also emphasized that the usefulness of GC depends on the specificity and actionability of lecturer feedback, the analytical quality of peer feedback, and contextual constraints such as internet stability and device access. Because outcomes are self-reported, findings are interpreted as evidence of perceived effectiveness and process-level mechanisms rather than objectively verified performance gains. The study recommends designing GC-based writing instruction around structured multi-draft tasks, actionable feedback practices, and scaffolded peer review, alongside institutional support for infrastructure and lecturer capacity building.