Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Article Per Year (5 Year)

All

Reformasi Hukum Trisakti

refor
Website

Published by Universitas Trisakti

ISSN : - EISSN : 2657182X DOI : https://doi.org/10.25105/refor

Core Subject : Social,

Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

The scope of this journal is in the field of legal science for case studies in Indonesia and also other regions of the world. Jurnal Reformasi Hukum Trisakti comes from a half of the results of the sudents undergraduate thesis of the Faculty of Law Trisakti University, in subjects : Business Law International Law Labour Law Family Law Land Law Constitutional Law Criminal Law Etc

Arjuna Subject : Seni dan Humaniora - Seni dan Humaniora (Lain-Lain)

Articles 1,070 Documents

29 30 31 32 33

TANGGUNG JAWAB PENGANGKUT TERHADAP PENUMPANG AKIBAT TENGGELAMNYA KAPAL KMP BILI TAHUN 2021 Ghani Al Farozi Sitompul; Elfrida Ratnawati
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

18 persons received minor injuries as a result of the KMP Bili ship's sinking in West Kalimantan, while 83 cars went down. According to Government Regulation Number 20 of 2010 concerning Water Transportation, what is PT ASDP Indonesia Ferry's obligation for the sinking of the KMP Bili Ship in West Kalimantan in 2021, and how should PT ASDP Indonesia Ferry be made whole for the KMP Bili Ship's passengers? This kind of study employs a normative legal research approach that is analytically descriptive in nature and based on primary and secondary data. Data is gathered via literary data, which is then evaluated using qualitative techniques to reach deductive conclusions. The findings of the study demonstrate that (1) PT ASDP Indonesia Ferry is accountable for the passengers required by Government Regulation Number 10 of 2010 regarding water transportation, Article 180-181, Paragraphs 1-2. (2) Due to a contradiction with the transportation agreement, which specifies the type of obligation the carrier must bear, PT ASDP Indonesia Ferry does not compensate passengers or PT Jasa Raharja Putera.

TINJAUAN YURIDIS SURAT PERINTAH PENGHENTIAN PENYIDIKAN BERUPA PENERBITAN KETERANGAN LUNAS BANK INDONESIA Rachma Aulia Putri Yusuf Darmawan; Abdul Ficar Hadjar
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

In Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 19 of 2019 concerning the Second Amendment to Provisions No. 30 of 2002 Concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission, Article 40 of Law No. 19 of 2019 regulates certainty regarding the KPK. The most recent KPK law gives the KPK permission to stop investigations, in contrast to earlier requirements. Definition of the issue: The KPK has the authority to issue an investigation termination (SP3) on cases of criminal acts of corruption in the form of Publication of a Certificate of Settlement (SKL) to the Bank Indonesia and Issuance of a Certificate of Payment (SKL) Against Bank Indonesia Liquidity Assistance Obligors (BLBI). in accordance with Law No. 19 of 2019 on the Corruption Eradication Commission of the Republic of Indonesia (KPK), Liquidity Assistance Obligor (BLBI). Legal-normative research methodology is employed. Qualitative data analysis methodologies. Concluding things using the deductive approach. Research findings, analysis, and conclusions In order to establish legal clarity and reduce abuse of power, it is important that the Corruption Eradication Commission be granted the authority to create an Investigation Termination Letter (SP3). Additionally, the approval of SP3 for the Corruption Eradication Commission appears to be ineffectual, particularly because it restricts and obstructs the space available for the Commission in the Corruption Eradication application.

PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN DENGAN KEKERASAN SECARA BERSAMA-SAMA Kelvin Leo Putra; Azmi Syah Putra
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

The stealing offense is a group offence. People must be more cautious due to the increase in theft-related criminal cases in Indonesia. In DKI Jakarta, there were 1,279 cases of theft without violence in 2019 and 266 cases of theft with violence, according to research by the Central Statistics Agency. In 2020, there was an increase in cases of theft without violence, reaching 1,950 cases, and a decrease in cases of theft with violence, reaching 184 cases. The formulation of the issue is how the judge should apply Article 368 Paragraph 1 and Article 55 Paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code given the facts and components of the defendant's activities. The nature of normative legal study, its analytical descriptive, and the data analysis is qualitative, in the research. How to use deductive reasoning to arrive to conclusions. Results of the study, discussion, and conclusions The defendant should have been punished under Article 365 Paragraph 1 Jo Paragraph 2 to 1 and 2 of the Criminal Code, which deals with theft that is preceded by threats of violence to facilitate theft, committed on a public highway, and committed jointly, i.e. by two people or more.

Front and Back Front Cover
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Front and Back

TINJAUAN YURIDIS PENANGKAPAN IKAN TANPA SIPI DAN MENGGUNAKAN JARING TRAWL Ernawaty Putri Elisabet Siburian; Dyah Setyorini
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Every fishing activity in the water area of the Republic of Indonesia must have a permit and meet the requirements for the use of fishing nets as regulated in the Regulations. This research discusses Fishing without SIPI. This research is normative and descriptive analytical legal research, using secondary data obtained through library research. The data is analyzed qualitatively and the conclusions are drawn using deductive logic. The conclusion from this research is the fishing by Sugianto did not use SIPI and violated article 27 paragraph (1) Law Number 45/2009 from Law Number 31/2004 concerning fishery and Sugianto also using nets in the form of Trawls Nets. On the other hand the actions he did categorized as Illegal Fishing.

PEMBERLAKUAN ASAS CABOTAGE PERAIRAN SULAWESI TENGGARA BERDASAR-KAN INPRES JO UNDANG-UNDANG PELAYARAN Beby Ansel Apriliya Imran; Elfrida Ratnawati Gultom
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Indonesia has vast waters and the cabotage principle applies to connecting waters in Indonesia. The research’s problem: how to enforce cabotage principle in Southeast Sulawesi waters and how to empower Indonesian shipping in Southeast Sulawesi waters after cabotage principle enactment based on Presidential Instruction Number 5 of 2005 concerning Empowerment of the National Shipping Industry in conjunction with Law Number 17 of 2008 concerning Shipping. This research is normative and descriptive analytical legal research, using primary data to support secondary data, primary and secondary legal materials. The data is analyzed qualitatively and the conclusions drawn using deductive method. The conclusion is that the application of cabotage principle regulations in Southeast Sulawesi waters are going well, but cabotage principle has not carried out optimally. The positive impacts of cabotage principle implementation are: growing the country's economy, growing local companies, increasing the empowerment of human resources and reducing pollution and the negative impacts are in the form of a limited types of ships, one of which is mother vessels which are very few owned by Indonesia and because of this, the use of foreign ships is still being carried out due to the limited types of ships and high demand for services.

EKSEKUSI HAK TANGGUNGAN DI BANK SYARIAH (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 5530/PDT.G/2017/PA.BADG) Syifa Esthiningtyas Putri Widodo; Dyah Setyorini
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

The Mortgage Law and Objects Related to Land, namely Law Number 4 of 1996, (hereinafter reffered as the Mortgage Law) states that there are three ways if the debtor breaks a promise (wanprestasi) and the creditor can carry out the execution of the Mortgage object. The three methods consist of Parate Execution as stated in the Mortgage Law Article 6, Executorial Title as stated in the Mortgage Law Article 14 paragraphs (2) and (3), as well as Underhand Execution. Execution of Mortgage carried out by Islamic Banks in the Study of Decision Number 5530/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Badg remains subject to the Mortgage Law and the auction process which is carried out on the basis of Minister of Finance Regulation Number 27/PMK.06/2016 concerning The Instructions for Auction has been amended by The Minister of Finance Regulation Number 213/PMK.06/2020 concerning Instructions for Auction Implementation. The judge's considerations in adjudicating the Decision Number 5530/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Badg case are in accordance with the Mortgage Law, especially in Article 6 with the creditor still having the right to carry out execution through auction according to Minister of Finance Regulation Number 27/PMK. 06/2016 which has now been amended by Minister of Finance Regulation Number 213/PMK.06/2020.

TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN FISIK MENGAKIBATKAN KEMATIAN DALAM LINGKUP RUMAH TANGGA (PUTUSAN NO.27/PID.B/2021/PN.TRT) Nurul 'Arifah Dharmaningtyas; Vientje Ratna Multiwijaya
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Criminal acts regarding a violence or abuse in a household matters are included in 2 (two) laws, which is the Criminal Code which has a public characteristic and Law number 23 of 2004 that has a specific characteristic. The main research’s problem are: whether the Defendant's actions is in accordance with Article 354 paragraph (2) in conjunction with Article 356 1 of the Criminal Code (Decision Number 27/Pid.B/2021/PN.Trt) and the punishment of the perpetrators of physical violence that resulting in death within the household (Decision Number 27/Pid.B/2021/PN.Trt). The research conducted in normative and descriptive analytical legal research, using secondary data obtain through library research. The data is analyzed qualitatively and the conclusions are drawn using deductive method. The actions of the perpetrator in this case constituted an act of physical violence resulting in death within the household that is in accordance with Article 44 paragraph (3) of Law no. 23 of 2004. The sentencing of the perpetrators is in accordance with sentencing theories.

ANAK PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PERSETUBUHAN BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG PERLINDUNGAN ANAK (PUTUSAN No.7/PID.SUS-ANAK/2020/PN.MBN) Nurul Kamila; Vientje Ratna Multiwijaya
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

The crime of child sexual intercourse and abuse is regulated specifically in Law number 35 of 2014 Article 76D concerning Child Protection. It explains that each individual is not justified in committing violence or sending threats of violence and forcing child to have sex with him or with another individual. The research’s problems: is the action of a child who commits crime of intercourse are in accordance with Article 81 (2) of Law number 17 of 2016 concerning Child Protection (Decision No.7/Pid.Sus- Anak/2020/PN.Mbn) and whether the prison sentence imposed on perpetrator meets sentencing requirements in Law number 11 of 2012 concerning Juvenile Criminal Justice System. The research object is decision number 7/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN.Mbn and the research is a normative and descriptive analytical legal research, using secondary data obtain through library research, analyzed qualitatively and conclusions are drawn using inductive method. The research’s conclusions: The actions of child perpetrators in the crime of intercourse are inappropriate if they only use Article 81 (2), but must also be based on Article 81 (1) of Law number 17 of 2016 concerning Child Protection, Punishment of the Child Defendant is in accordance with Law number 11 of 2012 but should not be given additional punishment.

PUTUSAN ULTRA PETITA DALAM TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NARKOTIKA Hafizhah Azzahra; Setiyono
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

The case that occurred on February 1st, 2019 involved a sale and purchase transaction of methamphetamine by Boiy Sairy alias Busairi Bin Tomin. The decision from the Panel of Judges of Situbondo District Court is different from the article charged by the public prosecutor in a single indictment. The defendant was charged with Article 112 of the Narcotics Law, while the judges gives a decision under Article 127 of the Narcotics Law. This research is normative and descriptive analytical legal research, using secondary data obtain through litearure studies and interviews. The data is analyzed qualitatively and conclusions are drawn using deductive understanding. The conclusion of the research is that the Judges use Article 127 while in the indictment and the facts of the trial and the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court Decision No. 675 K/Pid/1987, the Defendant BS was proven to have abused Narcotics so that the Judge imposed a criminal sentence and this decision has permanent legal force so that it is valid in the eyes of the law.

Page 31 of 107 | Total Record : 1070

29 30 31 32 33

Filter by Year

2019 2025

Filter By Issues

All Issue Vol 7 No 4 (2025): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 7 No 3 (2025): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 7 No 2 (2025): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 7 No 1 (2025): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 4 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 3 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 2 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 1 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 4 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 3 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 2 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 4 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 3 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 2 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 1 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 4 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 3 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 2 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 1 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 2 No. 2 (2020): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti More Issue

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name
Narita Adityaningrum

Contact Email
narita.a@trisakti.ac.id

Phone
+6281528282851

Journal Mail Official
reformasihukum@trisakti.ac.id

Editorial Address
Jl. Kyai Tapa No 1, Grogol Jakarta Barat

Location
Kota adm. jakarta barat,

Dki jakarta

INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name Narita Adityaningrum

Contact Email narita.a@trisakti.ac.id

Phone +6281528282851

Journal Mail Official reformasihukum@trisakti.ac.id

Editorial Address Jl. Kyai Tapa No 1, Grogol Jakarta Barat

Location Kota adm. jakarta barat, Dki jakarta INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Contact Name
Narita Adityaningrum

Contact Email
narita.a@trisakti.ac.id

Phone
+6281528282851

Journal Mail Official
reformasihukum@trisakti.ac.id

Editorial Address
Jl. Kyai Tapa No 1, Grogol Jakarta Barat

Location
Kota adm. jakarta barat,

Dki jakarta

INDONESIA