cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Murdani Abdullah
Contact Email
ina.jghe@gmail.com
Phone
+6285891498517
Journal Mail Official
ina.jghe@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Divisi Gastroenterologi, Departemen Ilmu Penyakit Dalam, FKUI/RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo, Jl. Diponegoro No. 71 Jakarta 10430 Indonesia
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Digestive Endoscopy
Published by The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy
ISSN : 14114801     EISSN : 23028181     DOI : -
Core Subject : Health,
Medicine & Pharmacology
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Digestive Endoscopy is an academic journal which has been published since 2000 and owned by 3 Societies: The Indonesian Society of Gastroenterology; Indonesian Association for the Study of the Liver; The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy. The aim of our journal is to advance knowledge in Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy fields. We welcome authors for original articles, review articles, and case reports in the fields of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy.
Arjuna Subject : Kedokteran - Ilmu Pencernaan
Articles 11 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "VOLUME 11, NUMBER 2, August 2010" : 11 Documents clear
Imaging of the Biliary Tract Achmad Nurman
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 11, NUMBER 2, August 2010
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/112201088-95

Abstract

Imaging is central to the investigation and diagnoses of biliary tract disease. Upper abdominal pain, jaundice and abnormal liver function test are common symptoms and signs and imaging of the biliary tract should be performed to make an exact diagnosis of the disease. There are many options in the field of imaging from simple to more sophisticated examinations. Several imaging techniques are obsolete namely oral cholecystography, Intravenous cholangiography and biliary scintigraphy, and should therefore be omitted. These imaging techniques are expensive and we should choose one or two options. Abdominal ultrasound is less expensive and can be performed rapidly without special preparation or contrast agent. It is the imaging of choice in the initial evaluation to evaluate patients with hepatopacreaticobiliary diseases. From the Result of abdominal ultrasound examination we can choose further the right imaging technique that can disclose the diagnoses of the disease.Keywords: biliary tract, diseases, imaging
Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of GERD Score for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Koja Hospital Suzanna Ndraha
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 11, NUMBER 2, August 2010
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/112201075-78

Abstract

Background: The frequency scale for the symptoms of GERD (FSSG) was a specific questionnaire to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), which has been validated against the endoscopic findings in Japan. The high score FSSG is one of the factors related to failure of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) mono therapy. The purpose of this study is to determine FSSG score in patients with GERD at Koja hospital, in order to predict the need for combination therapy of PPI with pro- kinetic drug or PPI only. Method: Dyspeptic patients which had have heartburn and/or regurgitation were collected in the period of March until July 2010. The FSSG score was obtain containing 12 questions which consisted of seven questions for reflux symptoms and five questions for dysmotility/dyspeptic symptoms. Results: There were 129 patients, 51 (39.5%) males and 78 (60.5%) females, mostly in the age group of 40 years (55.8%), body mass index of most patients (66.6%) were normal, only 12.4% were overweight. FSSG score revealed the mean of total score of 17.6 ± 6.9. From 129 dyspepsia patients who complained heartburn and or regurgitation, obtained 121 (94%) met criteria for GERD with cutoff eight. The mean of reflux score was 7.4 ± 4.6 while the mean of dyspeptic/dysmotility score was 10.1 ± 4. Thus from 129 patients studied, the symptoms of dyspeptic/dysmotility more dominant than symptoms of reflux Conclusion: GERD patients in Koja hospital have a high mean FSSG score, whereas dysmotility symptoms was proved to be more dominant than acid reflux Keywords: GERD, FSSG, dyspeptic/dysmotility score, reflux score
Dyspeptic Syndrome in Urban Population of Jakarta Marcellus Simadibrata; Murdani Abdullah; Ari Fahrial Syam; Achmad Fauzi; Dadang Makmun; Chudahman Manan; Abdul Aziz Rani; Aan Santi; Ekowati Rahajeng
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 11, NUMBER 2, August 2010
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/112201066-70

Abstract

Background:  Dyspeptic syndrome is experienced by many patients who visit general practitioners and gastroenterologist. In Indonesia, a small number of epidemiological data about dyspeptic syndrome are available. The aim of this study was to obtain data on prevalence, characteristics and factors/lifestyle associated with dyspeptic syndrome in urban population of Jakarta. Method: The study was conducted by interview to 1,645 respondents representing the population of Jakarta in the year 2007 using the Steps WHO version 1.4 instruments. The selection of respondents was performed by multistage cluster random sampling, i.e. each municipality is represented by one district and each was represented by a number of villages and respondents interviewed at random. Dyspeptic syndrome is defined whenever there is one or more complaints of nausea, vomiting, belching, epigastric pain, no appetite, early satiety, bloating. Scoring was performed for each category of questions using wstep1 method prior to the analysis. Data analysis was performed with Chi-square test or t-test. Results: Of the 1,645 respondents, the prevalence of dyspeptic syndrome was 58.1%. The most apparent clinical complaint ranges consecutively, i.e. nausea 30.1%, epigastric pain 28.7%, bloating 23.8%, etc. Dyspeptic syndrome is significantly more often experienced by female respondents (p 0.001). Dyspeptic syndrome were more common in respondents who have less/no fruit (p 0.001) and vegetables (p = 0.049) intake. Dyspeptic syndrome is more common in respondents with anxiety and depression (p 0.001) also in respondents who consume non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (p 0.001). Conclusion: Prevalence of dyspeptic syndrome in Jakarta urban population is 58.1%. Dyspeptic syndrome was more common in female, respondents who have less / no fruit and vegetables intake, in respondents who experienced anxiety and depression and respondents who consume NSAIDs. Keywords: dyspeptic syndrome, Jakarta, urban population, prevalence
Obesity as a Risk Factor of Erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Hotmen Sijabat; Marcellus Simadibrata; Ari Fahrial Syam; Endang Susalit; Djulzasri Albar; Abdul Aziz Rani
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 11, NUMBER 2, August 2010
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/112201061-65

Abstract

Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a pathological condition of esophagus caused by reflux of gastric content or gastric juice with multifactorial etiologies. Some complications may occur such as: ulcer, bleeding, stricture, Barret’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. One of risk factors that currently taken into concern is obesity. Our study aimed to identify obesity and abdominal obesity as the risk factor in the development of erosive GERD and to recognize that abdominal obesity is more important factor compared to obesity itself as the risk factor on the incidence of erosive GERD.. Method: Our study was a cross-sectional study. Data was obtained from eligible patients at Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia between June and September 2009 Results: Samples were 74 patients with mean age of 48.61 ± 8.64 years. The proportion of female patients was larger than male (60.81% vs. 39.19%). The endoscopic assessment of upper gastrointestinal tract based on Los Angeles Classification included: Grade A esophagitis: 27.03%, Grade B: 16.21%, Grade C: 4.05%, Grade D: 1.35%. Obesity (odds ratio (OR) 17.160; 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.219 – 56.418, p = 0.000) and abdominal obesity (OR 10.371, 95% CI 3.260 – 32.915; p = 0.000) has been proven as risk factors in the development of erosive GERD. Conclusion: There is a correlation between obesity and abdominal obesity as risk factors on the development of erosive GERD. Obesity becomes a more important factor compared to abdominal obesity as the risk factor on the development of erosive GERD. Keywords: erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease, obesity, abdominal obesity, risk factor
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Indonesia Marcellus Simadibrata
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 11, NUMBER 2, August 2010
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/112201053-54

Abstract

.
The Cyclooxygenase-2 and Nuclear Factor-kappa B Expressions in Colorectal Polyps Ahmar Abyadh; Diah Rini Handjari; Murdani Abdullah; Pamela Abineno Damaledo; Abdul Aziz Rani
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 11, NUMBER 2, August 2010
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/112201055-60

Abstract

Background: Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is the rate-limiting enzyme in prostaglandin synthesis, while nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kB) is a family of transcription factors. Both play an important role in tumorigenesis. In the present study, we examined NF-kB and COX-2 expressions pattern, and their association in neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal polyps (CP). Method: Formalin-fixed and paraffin embedded tissue blocks from 77 patients with CP were immunostained with anti-NF-kB (p 65) and anti-COX-2. Expressions of NF-kB, and COX-2 were detected immunohistochemically. The relationship between these expressions and the two types of CP, and other clinicopathological findings were evaluated Results: The expressions of NF-kB and COX-2 in patients with neoplastic and non-neoplastic CP were high. The results of this study indicated that generally in CP, NF-kB was associated with COX-2 and the association was also seen in neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps. There was no significant difference of NF-kB and COX-2 expressions in terms of patient’s age, sex, histologic type, and location of the CP. Neoplastic CPs were more common in the distal colon, female patients and older patients ( 60 years) compared with non-neoplastic CPs. Neoplastic CP were located more at the distal colon, more in female, and more in older ( 60 years) patients as compared with the non-neoplastic CP. Further studies are needed to elaborate the role of inflammation in sporadic colorectal carcinogenesis. Conclusion: The expressions of NF-kB and COX-2 in patients with CP were high, and strong correlated each other. There were no significant differences between expression of NF-kB and COX-2 in neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps. Keywords: colorectal polyps (CP), NF- B, COX-2, inflammation
Diagnosis and Management Pancolitis in Patient with Ulcerative Colitis Cindy Cindy; Riki Tenggara; Yudistira Panji Santoso; Mario Steffanus
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 11, NUMBER 2, August 2010
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/112201096-99

Abstract

ABSTRACT Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a form of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that usually affects the rectum and part of the colon, which spreads continuously with no skip area. Pancolitis occurs in 20% of patients with UC. Patients with chronic UC, especially pancolitis, have a higher risk of colon cancer. In patients with pancolitis, the risk of cancer increases by 0.5-1% per year after having 8-10 years of disease. A 72-year-old man came with complaint of bloody-mucus diarrhea associated with abdominal cramps. The colonoscopic appearance of colitis was observed in whole lumen throughout colon. Histopathological analysis demonstrated dense infiltrates of granulocytes and macrophages formed by severe inflammation. Normal appearances were observed in the remaining epithelial cells. No parasites, specific process, or malignancy were found. Moreover, no acid-resistant bacteria were found. However, atypical cells were found in one of the biopsy specimens. The patient was diagnosed with extensive type of severe UC. The initial management of treatment included improvement of his general condition along with antibacterial therapy of metronidazole and ciprofloxacin. Specific treatment of sulphasalazine and prednisone were given after pancolitis appearance was revealed, which has similar clinical manifestations in accordance with UC.   Keywords: pancolitis, ulcerative colitis, chronic diarrhea, inflammatory bowel disease
Association between HBV DNA Level and Intrahepatic HBcAg Protein Expression of Hepatocytes in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Devy Serevina; Ening Krisnuhoni; Rino Alvani Gani
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 11, NUMBER 2, August 2010
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/112201079-82

Abstract

Background: Correlation between serum Hepatitis B viral deoxyribonucleic acid (HBV DNA) and hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAg) protein expression in the liver regarding hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg) status have not been well studied. This study was aimed to demonstrate association between serum HBV DNA and HBeAg levels with HBcAg expressions in the liver. Method: A total of 55 naive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients were enrolled. All samples were tested for HBeAg serum by serological test enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and HBV DNA was determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) HBsAg and HBcAg were evaluated immunohistochemically in the liver tissue Results: Of 55 patients, 44 (80%) were HBeAg positive and 11 (20%) were HBeAg negative. There was a positive correlation between serum HBV DNA and HBcAg expression in the nuclei (r: 0.383; p = 0.004). There was association between HBcAg expression in the nucleus and qualitative HBeAg (p = 0.017). Conclusion: In the patient with chronic HBV, there is a very significant positive correlation between the level of viral replication and HBcAg expression in the nucleus of hepatocytes. Moreover, there is association between HBcAg expression in the hepatocytes nucleus and HBeAg serum level. These finding lead to the proposition that nucleus localization of HBcAg protein function to amplify the pool of cccDNA in the replication cycle of HBV.. Keywords: HBV DNA, Imunohistochemistry, HBcAg
Complicated Benign Peptic Stricture of the Esophagus Mulia Mulia; Jeffry Beta Tenggara; Murdani Abdullah; Marcellus Simadibrata
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 11, NUMBER 2, August 2010
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/1122010100-105

Abstract

Peptic esophageal stricture secondary to gastroesophageal reflux is an important cause of esophageal stenosis and dysphagia. Symptoms of peptic strictures are usually insidious but progressive beginning with dysphagia to solids followed by dysphagia to liquids. It was estimated to occur in up to 20% of untreated patients, which has decreased significantly since the era of proton pump inhibitor therapy. The presence of esophageal reflux stricture is typically diagnosed by means of a barium esophagogram, although endoscopy may have both diagnostic and therapeutic value. Treatment usually involves dilation combined with acid- suppressive therapy. We reported a 43-year-old patient with complicated benign peptic stricture of the esophagus that finally underwent esophageal resection, a rarely therapeutic option.   Keywords: gastroesophageal reflux disease, benign peptic esophageal stricture, dysphagia, esophageal dilatation, surgical treatment
Clinical Scoring of Positive Histophatology Findings for Inflammatory Bowel Disease at Four Hospital in Jakarta Dasril Nizam; Marcellus Simadibrata; Chudahman Manan; Dadang Makmun; Murdani Abdullah; Adang Bachtiar
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 11, NUMBER 2, August 2010
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/112201071-74

Abstract

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in the form of Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) is chronic IBD which still difficult to diagnose and clinically characterized by exacerbation and spontaneous remission. A precise diagnosis is needed and essential for appropriate treatment. Most of internists in Indonesia have to cope with a condition of poorly equipped endoscopic facilities - especially colonoscopy and subsequently refer their patients to endoscopic centers with colonoscopy facilities as well as sending biopsy specimens for histopathology examination. They also should be concerned that it would be expensive, time- consuming, and patients may suffer from considerable distress while waiting for the results of diagnostic confirmation. Therefore, we were interested in studying the clinical scoring for IBD to determine the diagnosis of possible IBD by assessing the combination of clinical reporting aspects, identification of probable IBD and histopathology examination Method: The study design was cross-sectional. We collected data pertinent to this study from medical records of patients with IBD clinical features at the endoscopic units of four hospitals in Jakarta between 1999 and 2009. Student t-test and logistic regression analysis were used for the statistic examination. Results: Based on colonoscopy examination, there were 213 patients with positive IBD and 173 patients with negative results. Histopathology results were considered as the gold standard in diagnosis of IBD. The mean clinical score was 9 (nine) points. Subjects with positive histopathology findings were significantly had higher average score than those with negative histopathology findings. Using ROC curves, we found cut-off score of 10 points with a sensitivity and specificity of 73% and 88% consecutively; while by applying logistic regression analysis, we found odds ratio (OR) of 20 (9.9-40.0 Conclusion: The clinical scoring for IBD is a valuable diagnostic tool in determining definitive diagnostic of IBD based on histopathology findings Keywords: clinical scoring, histopathology findings, definitive IBD

Page 1 of 2 | Total Record : 11

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2010 2010


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 26, No 2 (2025): VOLUME 26, NUMBER 2, AGUSTUS, 2025 Vol 26, No 1 (2025): VOLUME 26, NUMBER 1, April, 2025 Vol 25, No 3 (2024): VOLUME 25, NUMBER 3, December, 2024 Vol 25, No 2 (2024): VOLUME 25, NUMBER 2, August, 2024 Vol 25, No 1 (2024): VOLUME 25, NUMBER 1, April, 2024 Vol 24, No 3 (2023): VOLUME 24, NUMBER 3, December, 2023 Vol 24, No 2 (2023): VOLUME 24, NUMBER 2, August, 2023 Vol 24, No 1 (2023): VOLUME 24, NUMBER 1, April, 2023 Vol 23, No 3 (2022): VOLUME 23, NUMBER 3, December 2022 Vol 23, No 2 (2022): VOLUME 23, NUMBER 2, August 2022 Vol 23, No 1 (2022): VOLUME 23, NUMBER 1, April 2022 Vol 22, No 3 (2021): VOLUME 22, NUMBER 3, December 2021 Vol 22, No 2 (2021): VOLUME 22, NUMBER 2, August 2021 Vol 22, No 1 (2021): VOLUME 22, NUMBER 1, April 2021 Vol 21, No 3 (2020): VOLUME 21, NUMBER 3, December 2020 Vol 21, No 2 (2020): VOLUME 21, NUMBER 2, August 2020 Vol 21, No 1 (2020): VOLUME 21, NUMBER 1, April 2020 Vol 20, No 3 (2019): VOLUME 20, NUMBER 3, December 2019 Vol 20, No 2 (2019): VOLUME 20, NUMBER 2, August 2019 Vol 20, No 1 (2019): VOLUME 20, NUMBER 1, April 2019 Vol 19, No 3 (2018): VOLUME 19, NUMBER 3, December 2018 Vol 19, No 2 (2018): VOLUME 19, NUMBER 2, August 2018 Vol 19, No 1 (2018): VOLUME 19, NUMBER 1, April 2018 Vol 18, No 3 (2017): VOLUME 18, NUMBER 3, DECEMBER 2017 Vol 18, No 2 (2017): VOLUME 18, NUMBER 2, AUGUST 2017 Vol 18, No 1 (2017): VOLUME 18, NUMBER 1, April 2017 Vol 17, No 3 (2016): VOLUME 17, NUMBER 3, December 2016 Vol 17, No 2 (2016): VOLUME 17, NUMBER 2, August 2016 Vol 17, No 1 (2016): VOLUME 17, NUMBER 1, April 2016 Vol 16, No 3 (2015): VOLUME 16, NUMBER 3, December 2015 Vol 16, No 2 (2015): VOLUME 16, NUMBER 2, August 2015 Vol 16, No 1 (2015): VOLUME 16, NUMBER 1, April 2015 Vol 15, No 3 (2014): VOLUME 15, NUMBER 3, December 2014 Vol 15, No 2 (2014): VOLUME 15, NUMBER 2, August 2014 Vol 15, No 1 (2014): VOLUME 15, NUMBER 1, April 2014 VOLUME 14, NUMBER 3, December 2013 VOLUME 14, NUMBER 2, August 2013 VOLUME 14, NUMBER 1, April 2013 VOLUME 13, NUMBER 3, Desember 2012 VOLUME 13, NUMBER 2, August 2012 VOLUME 13, NUMBER 1, April 2012 VOLUME 12, NUMBER 3, December 2011 VOLUME 12, NUMBER 2, August 2011 VOLUME 12, NUMBER 1, April 2011 VOLUME 11, NUMBER 3, December 2010 VOLUME 11, NUMBER 2, August 2010 VOLUME 11, NUMBER 1, April 2010 VOLUME 10, NUMBER 3, December 2009 VOLUME 10, ISSUE 2, August 2009 VOLUME 10, ISSUE 1, April 2009 VOLUME 9, ISSUE 3, December 2008 VOLUME 9, ISSUE 2, August 2008 VOLUME 9, ISSUE 1, April 2008 VOLUME 8, ISSUE 3, December 2007 VOLUME 8 ISSUE 2 August 2007 VOLUME 8, ISSUE 1, April 2007 VOLUME 7, ISSUE 3, December 2006 VOLUME 7, ISSUE 2, August 2006 VOLUME 7, ISSUE 1, April 2006 VOLUME 6, ISSUE 3, December 2005 VOLUME 6, ISSUE 2, August 2005 VOLUME 6, ISSUE 1, April 2005 VOLUME 5, ISSUE 3, December 2004 VOLUME 5, ISSUE 2, August 2004 VOLUME 5, ISSUE 1, April 2004 VOLUME 4, ISSUE 3, December 2003 VOLUME 4, ISSUE 2, August 2003 VOLUME 4, NUMBER 1, April 2003 VOLUME 3, NUMBER 3, December 2002 VOLUME 3, NUMBER 2, August 2002 VOLUME 3, NUMBER 1, April 2002 VOLUME 2, NUMBER 3, December 2001 VOLUME 2, NUMBER 2, August 2001 VOLUME 2, NUMBER 1, April 2001 VOLUME 1, NUMBER 1, December 2000 More Issue