cover
Contact Name
Murdani Abdullah
Contact Email
ina.jghe@gmail.com
Phone
+6285891498517
Journal Mail Official
ina.jghe@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Divisi Gastroenterologi, Departemen Ilmu Penyakit Dalam, FKUI/RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo, Jl. Diponegoro No. 71 Jakarta 10430 Indonesia
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Digestive Endoscopy
ISSN : 14114801     EISSN : 23028181     DOI : -
Core Subject : Health,
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Digestive Endoscopy is an academic journal which has been published since 2000 and owned by 3 Societies: The Indonesian Society of Gastroenterology; Indonesian Association for the Study of the Liver; The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy. The aim of our journal is to advance knowledge in Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy fields. We welcome authors for original articles, review articles, and case reports in the fields of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy.
Articles 12 Documents
Search results for , issue "VOLUME 14, NUMBER 3, December 2013" : 12 Documents clear
Liver Disorders in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Suzanna Ndraha; Marshell Tendean; Fendra Wician; Henny Tanadi Tan; Helena Yap
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 14, NUMBER 3, December 2013
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (534.278 KB) | DOI: 10.24871/1432013154-157

Abstract

Background: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are frequently diagnosed with some abnormal liver features. These liver abnormalities are suggested to be correlated with insulin resistance. The aim of thisstudy was to evaluate liver abnormalities and fasting insulin levels in patients with T2DM.Method: This study was conducted in Koja Hospital from February to July 2013. Study design was analytical study. Data for sex, age, complication, body mass index (BMI), liver function, liver enzyme, and fasting insulinlevel were collected. Univariate and bivariate statistical analyses were done using SPSS 20.Results: Twenty eight patients were included in this study, 71.43% of them were female. The age group of 40-60 years was the highest among the patients (64.28%). Highest complication was neuropathy, BMI of mostpatients were obese. Liver abnormalities were documented in 35.8% patients, liver enzyme increased in 21.4% patients. Non alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) were noted in 46.6% patients, and one patient was positive for hepatitis B. Mean fasting insulin in T2DM with NAFLD were higher than in T2DM without NAFLD. However, it was not statistically significant (40.08 ± 36.8 μU/mL vs. 54.3 ± 37.1 μU/mL; p = 0.27).Conclusion: Liver abnormalities found in T2DM patients were elevated liver enzyme, decreased albumin and increased of bilirubin. Through ultrasound, NAFLD and liver cirrhosis were found. Fasting insulin levelwas higher in T2DM with NAFLD but it was not statistically significant.Keywords: type 2 diabetes mellitus, non alcoholic steato-hepatitis, fasting insulin
Diagnosis of Autoimmune Hepatitis using International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group Scoring Sigit Triyus Priyantoro; Harijono Ahmad
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 14, NUMBER 3, December 2013
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (514.042 KB) | DOI: 10.24871/1432013184-187

Abstract

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is described as T lymphocyte suppressor disturbance, thus there is formation of autoantibody which attacks surface antigen of liver cells or hepatocytes. Diagnosis of AIH is done after other liver abnormalities have been ruled out. The diagnosis of AIH needs to be done with thorough and careful examination as there is no pathognomonic clinical appearance.Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is described as T lymphocyte suppressor disturbance, thus there is formation of autoantibody which attacks surface antigen of liver cells or hepatocytes. Diagnosis of AIH is done after other liver abnormalities have been ruled out. The diagnosis of AIH needs to be done with thorough and careful examination as there is no pathognomonic clinical appearance.Keywords: autoimmune hepatitis, asymptomatic, increased transaminase
Comparison between Intermittent Propofol Bolus Techniques and Target-Controlled Infusion in Patients Underwent Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Arif HM Marsaban; Luki Sumaratih; Pryambodho Pryambodho
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 14, NUMBER 3, December 2013
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (451.499 KB) | DOI: 10.24871/1432013132-138

Abstract

Background: Nowadays, the use of propofol for sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopic procedure has become more popular, either by intermittent-bolus (IB) technique or target-controlled infusion (TCI). Theaim of this study was to compare the outcomes of both techniques including the total consumption of propofol, consumption per minute, total cost, side effects and its recovery time.Method: This study was a single-blinded randomized clinical trial conducted at Digestive Endoscopy Center, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta between October and November 2013. There were fifty patients with pre-operative American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) Physical Status Classification I-III, aged 18-65 years, body mass index 18-30 kg/m2 who were randomized to obtain sedation with IB propofol or TCI after having a premedication with 1 μg/kgBW fentanyl. The outcomes including the duration of sedation, total dose, propofol consumption per minute, the total cost, the incidence of hypotension, the incidence of desaturation, and recovery time were then evaluated using SPSS version 21.0.Results: Duration of procedure between two groups was not significantly different (p = 0.718). Total dose of propofol, its consumption per minute and total cost were higher in TCI group (p = 0.010; p = 0.004; p = 0.001). The incidence of hypotension, desaturation and recovery time were not  significantly different (p = 0.248; p = 0.609; p = 0.33) in both groups.Conclusion: IB technique is more efficient in terms of total propofol dose, consumption per minute and total cost compared to the TCI technique. The incidences of hypotension, desaturation and recovery time profiles were comparable between the two groups.Keywords: gastrointestinal endoscopy, intermittent bolus, propofol, sedation, TCI
Proton Pump Inhibitors Therapy in Children with Gastroesophageal Reflux Aldo Reynaldo; Badriul Hegar
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 14, NUMBER 3, December 2013
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (439.384 KB) | DOI: 10.24871/1432013158-164

Abstract

Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) has been widely used by clinicians to treat diseases that require suppression of gastric acid. PPI work by inhibiting the proton pump in gastric parietal cells.In adult patients, PPI hasbeen widely studied and showed effective results and safe. This result make PPI positioning as the first choice medicine in the treatment of diseases that require suppression of gastric acid. As the primary choice therapy, PPI administration has been increased not only in adults but also in children.PPI is often administered to children with a diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) which defined as symptoms or complications caused by gastroesophageal reflux (GER). GERD diagnosis in children is quite difficult, so it is common to find that diagnosis is established only by the basis of clinical symptoms, resulting in overdiagnosis and over-treatment of GERD. The use of PPI in children still needs further study andcan not be inferred based on adult studies. Inappropropriate PPI prescription without indication will increase side effect, risk and also harm the children. Thus, it is important to know the indications, side effects and safety of PPI therapy in children.Keywords: proton pump inhibitor, children, gastroesophageal reflux disease
Role of Lamivudine as Preemptive Therapy in Cancer Patients with Hepatitis B undergoing Chemotherapy Andree Kurniawan; Andri Sanityoso Sulaiman
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 14, NUMBER 3, December 2013
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (386.299 KB) | DOI: 10.24871/1432013188-193

Abstract

Patients diagnosed with hematology malignancy and solid tumor who underwent chemotherapy, frequently encountered hepatitis B reactivation. Patients with blood cancer, including lymphoma, had higher risk of reactivation compared to those with solid tumor. Steroid and immunosuppressant drugs contained in chemotherapy regimens were responsible for those events. Hepatitis B reactivation during chemotherapy treatment could contribute to acute liver failure and increase mortality. Administration of analog nucleoside therapy in this group of patient prior to the initiation of chemotherapy could prevent reactivation of hepatitis B.A 43 year-old male patient were diagnosed with diffuse large B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma stadium II BE (oropharynx) under chemotherapy and had hepatitis B. In this evidence based case report, we reported a critical appraisal of the role of lamivudine as preemptive therapy in blood cancer and solid tumor.Keywords: chemotherapy, hepatitis B reactivation, malignancy
Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Ratio Index and FibroScan for Predicting Liver Fibrosis with Chronic Hepatitis B Tarigan, Elias; Yusuf, Rustam Effendi; Dairy, Leonardo Basa; Sembiring, Juwita; Sihombing, Mabel HM; Siregar, Gontar Alamsyah; Zain, Lukman Hakim
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 14, NUMBER 3, December 2013
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (533.298 KB) | DOI: 10.24871/1432013139-144

Abstract

Background: Non-invasive test have been constructed and evaluated mainly for binary diagnoses. The accuracy of non-invasive tests such as aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) and transientelastography/FibroScan should be evaluated especially in clinical practice. The aim of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of detailed fibrosis classification available for APRI and FibroScan to liver biopsy in chronichepatitis B patients.Method: A cross sectional study was conducted in 51 patients with chronic hepatitis B. The patients underwent laboratory test, FibroScan and liver biopsy between April 2011 and July 2013 at Adam Malik Hospital, Medan.Liver biopsy was assessed based on the METAVIR score. Area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) predictive value was used to evaluate the accuracy of APRI and FibroScan. All data were analyzedusing SPSS 20.0.Results: APRI versus METAVIR diagnosed severe fibrosis and cirrhosis with sensitivity 40% and specificity 83.9%, positive predictive value (PPV) 61.5%, negative predictive value (NPV) 68.4%, positive likelihood ratio(LR) 2.48 and negative LR 0.72 with diagnostic accuracy 66.7%. The AUROC value was 0.619 (95% CI = 0.446 – 0.715); kappa = 0.255; p 0.05. FibroScan versus METAVIR predictive value with sensitivity 75% andspecificity 67.6% were PPV 60%, NPV 67.7%, positive LR 2.31 and negative LR 0.36 with diagnostic accuracy 70.6%. The AUROC value was 0.714 (95% CI = 0.567–0.861); kappa 0.409; p 0.05.Conclusion: FibroScan has better accuracy than APRI for predicting severe fibrosis and cirrhosis in patientswith chronic hepatitis B.Keywords: APRI, FibroScan, liver biopsy, chronic hepatitis B
Current Diagnosis and Management of Helicobacter pylori Nikko Darnindro; Ari Fahrial Syam
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 14, NUMBER 3, December 2013
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (488.855 KB) | DOI: 10.24871/1432013165-173

Abstract

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a microbe which cause chronic infection in human. Currently, the prevalence in developed countries continue to decrease, but the same does not happen in developing countries. Orofecal transmission and its connection with environmental condition is assumed to be its cause.Impact of H. pylori infection in gastric mucosa is influenced by the bacteria pathogenesis which is able to survive in acid condition and causes inflammatory reaction. The diagnosis is differentiated through endoscopy or non-endoscopy depends on the alarm symptoms, local prevalence, pre-test probability, availability, cost and aim of examination.Management of H. pylori depends on the high rate of clarithromycin resistence. In area with resistency prevalence below 20% triple therapy can still be used, while in increasing resistency area, use of four times daily therapy or other antibiotics such as levofloxacin and furazolidone can be considered.Keywords: Helicobacter pylori, diagnosis, alternative therapy
Ultrasound-Diagnosed Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease among Medical Check Up Patients Suharjo B Cahyono; Putut Bayupurnama; Neneng Ratnasari; Sutanto Maduseno; Siti Nurdjanah
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 14, NUMBER 3, December 2013
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (135.952 KB) | DOI: 10.24871/1432013145-149

Abstract

Background: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is recognised as one of the most important causes of chronic liver disease and has become an important health issue in many countries. The aim of the study wasto evaluate the prevalence and risk factors of NAFLD patients based on ultrasound diagnosed in medical check up setting.Method: In this study, of 2,105 patients undergoing medical check up in Charitas Hospital, Palembang between January 2011 to August 2013, 115 NAFLD patients and 113 non-NAFLD patients as controls were included. Diagnosis of NAFLD was based on ultrasound appearance, patients did not consume alcohol, with negative HBsAg and hepatitis C virus antibodies.Results: The prevalence of NAFLD in medical check up patients was 7.9% whereas 39% patients had normal body mass index (BMI) ( 25 kg/m2). Patients with NAFLD compared with non-NAFLD patients had higher values of BMI (p 0.001), triglycerides (p = 0.001), aspartate aminostransferase (AST) (p 0.001), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (p 0.001), fasting glucose (p = 0.002), and lower HDL cholesterol (p = 0.001). Obesity was the strongest associated factor for NAFLD (95% CI = 1.87-7.85; OR = 3.83; p 0.001), followed by high glucose levels (95% CI = 1.38 - 8.31; OR = 3.83; p = 0.008) and hypertriglyceridemia (95% CI = 1.38 - 4.11;OR = 2.38; p = 0.002).Conclusion: About 7.9% patients suffered from NAFLD. Approximately 39% medical check up patients had NAFLD with normal BMI. Obesity, hypertriglyceridemia and high glucose levels were the risk factors for NAFLD.Keywords: non-alcoholic liver disease, body mass index, prevalence, metabolic syndrome
Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Treatment in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Perdana Aditya; Rinaldi A Lesmana
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 14, NUMBER 3, December 2013
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (764.431 KB) | DOI: 10.24871/1432013174-180

Abstract

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a spectrum of liver disease, from steatosis to liver cirrhosis in individual who does not consume alcohol in significant amount. The prevalence of NAFLD in Indonesia was estimated around 30%, this condition related to the increased incidence of metabolic disorders. Current understanding of NAFLD pathogenesis is the third-hit theory, in which insulin resistance resulting in free fatty acid accumulation that triggers inflammation causing fibrosis and hepatocyte death, and these conditions are not followed by adequate hepatocyte proliferation.Treatment of NAFLD requires both non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions. Life style intervention includes restricting calories, low saturated fat and low sugar diet, and also physical activity. Bariatricsurgery remains controversial since in several study participants had experienced deterioration of disease. There are no definitive treatment for NAFLD currently. Treatment is aimed to improved insulin sensitivity, decreased oxidative stress and inflammation. Several agents use for treatment of NAFLD are insulin sensitizer (metformin and glitazones), statin, omega-3, vitamin E, ursodeoxycholic acid, orlistat, pentoxyphylline, and losartan.Keywords: NAFLD, treatment, pharmacologic, non-pharmacologic
Gastrointestinal Problems in HIV/AIDS Patients Zulkhairi Zulkhairi; Imelda Rey; Taufik Sungkar; Lukman Hakim Zain
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 14, NUMBER 3, December 2013
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (270.147 KB) | DOI: 10.24871/1432013150-153

Abstract

Background: Gastrointestinal (GI) and hepatobiliary disorders are the most common complaints in patients with HIV/AIDS disease. These fundamental problems have not yet been addressed and remains a rewarding area for research. Data about the problems are scarce, especially in Indonesia. This study was aimed to identify gastrointestinal problems in HIV/AIDS patients who were hospitalized in Adam Malik Hospital, Medan.Method: A descriptive study was conducted based on medical records data from non-ambulatory HIV/AIDS patients who had GI problems and who were hospitalized in Internal Medicine wards of Adam Malik Hospital,Medan from 2010-2012. Spearman rank test was used to evaluate the correlation between CD4 level and GI problems among 68 patients with CD4 data.Results: We found 647 HIV/AIDS patients, i.e. 524 (80.9%) male and 123 (19.1%) female patients. Gastrointestinal problems were found in 315 (48.7%) patient among them. Oral candidiasis was the mostcommon case found in 306 (97.1%), which was followed by chronic diarrhea 73 (23.2%), oral candidiasis with chronic diarrhea 64 (20.3%), dyspepsia 22 (6.9%), non-cirrhotic ascites 20 (6.3%), acute diarrhea 8 (2.5%), hepatomegaly 8 (2.5%), dysphagia 6 (1.9%), chronic hepatitis C virus 6 (1.9%), chronic hepatitis B virus 4 (1.3%), GI bleeding 3 (0.9%), and acute hepatitis A virus 1 (0.3%). Unfortunately, we found that therewas only 68 data of CD4. Results of statistical tests showed a significant correlation between CD4 level and gastrointestinal problems (p = 0.04).Conclusion: Oral candidiasis is the most common gastrointestinal problems in HIV/AIDS patients hospitalized in Internal Medicine Wards of Adam Malik Hospital.Keywords: gastrointestinal, HIV/AIDS, oral candidiasis,CD4

Page 1 of 2 | Total Record : 12


Filter by Year

2013 2013


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 26, No 2 (2025): VOLUME 26, NUMBER 2, AGUSTUS, 2025 Vol 26, No 1 (2025): VOLUME 26, NUMBER 1, April, 2025 Vol 25, No 3 (2024): VOLUME 25, NUMBER 3, December, 2024 Vol 25, No 2 (2024): VOLUME 25, NUMBER 2, August, 2024 Vol 25, No 1 (2024): VOLUME 25, NUMBER 1, April, 2024 Vol 24, No 3 (2023): VOLUME 24, NUMBER 3, December, 2023 Vol 24, No 2 (2023): VOLUME 24, NUMBER 2, August, 2023 Vol 24, No 1 (2023): VOLUME 24, NUMBER 1, April, 2023 Vol 23, No 3 (2022): VOLUME 23, NUMBER 3, December 2022 Vol 23, No 2 (2022): VOLUME 23, NUMBER 2, August 2022 Vol 23, No 1 (2022): VOLUME 23, NUMBER 1, April 2022 Vol 22, No 3 (2021): VOLUME 22, NUMBER 3, December 2021 Vol 22, No 2 (2021): VOLUME 22, NUMBER 2, August 2021 Vol 22, No 1 (2021): VOLUME 22, NUMBER 1, April 2021 Vol 21, No 3 (2020): VOLUME 21, NUMBER 3, December 2020 Vol 21, No 2 (2020): VOLUME 21, NUMBER 2, August 2020 Vol 21, No 1 (2020): VOLUME 21, NUMBER 1, April 2020 Vol 20, No 3 (2019): VOLUME 20, NUMBER 3, December 2019 Vol 20, No 2 (2019): VOLUME 20, NUMBER 2, August 2019 Vol 20, No 1 (2019): VOLUME 20, NUMBER 1, April 2019 Vol 19, No 3 (2018): VOLUME 19, NUMBER 3, December 2018 Vol 19, No 2 (2018): VOLUME 19, NUMBER 2, August 2018 Vol 19, No 1 (2018): VOLUME 19, NUMBER 1, April 2018 Vol 18, No 3 (2017): VOLUME 18, NUMBER 3, DECEMBER 2017 Vol 18, No 2 (2017): VOLUME 18, NUMBER 2, AUGUST 2017 Vol 18, No 1 (2017): VOLUME 18, NUMBER 1, April 2017 Vol 17, No 3 (2016): VOLUME 17, NUMBER 3, December 2016 Vol 17, No 2 (2016): VOLUME 17, NUMBER 2, August 2016 Vol 17, No 1 (2016): VOLUME 17, NUMBER 1, April 2016 Vol 16, No 3 (2015): VOLUME 16, NUMBER 3, December 2015 Vol 16, No 2 (2015): VOLUME 16, NUMBER 2, August 2015 Vol 16, No 1 (2015): VOLUME 16, NUMBER 1, April 2015 Vol 15, No 3 (2014): VOLUME 15, NUMBER 3, December 2014 Vol 15, No 2 (2014): VOLUME 15, NUMBER 2, August 2014 Vol 15, No 1 (2014): VOLUME 15, NUMBER 1, April 2014 VOLUME 14, NUMBER 3, December 2013 VOLUME 14, NUMBER 2, August 2013 VOLUME 14, NUMBER 1, April 2013 VOLUME 13, NUMBER 3, Desember 2012 VOLUME 13, NUMBER 2, August 2012 VOLUME 13, NUMBER 1, April 2012 VOLUME 12, NUMBER 3, December 2011 VOLUME 12, NUMBER 2, August 2011 VOLUME 12, NUMBER 1, April 2011 VOLUME 11, NUMBER 3, December 2010 VOLUME 11, NUMBER 2, August 2010 VOLUME 11, NUMBER 1, April 2010 VOLUME 10, NUMBER 3, December 2009 VOLUME 10, ISSUE 2, August 2009 VOLUME 10, ISSUE 1, April 2009 VOLUME 9, ISSUE 3, December 2008 VOLUME 9, ISSUE 2, August 2008 VOLUME 9, ISSUE 1, April 2008 VOLUME 8, ISSUE 3, December 2007 VOLUME 8 ISSUE 2 August 2007 VOLUME 8, ISSUE 1, April 2007 VOLUME 7, ISSUE 3, December 2006 VOLUME 7, ISSUE 2, August 2006 VOLUME 7, ISSUE 1, April 2006 VOLUME 6, ISSUE 3, December 2005 VOLUME 6, ISSUE 2, August 2005 VOLUME 6, ISSUE 1, April 2005 VOLUME 5, ISSUE 3, December 2004 VOLUME 5, ISSUE 2, August 2004 VOLUME 5, ISSUE 1, April 2004 VOLUME 4, ISSUE 3, December 2003 VOLUME 4, ISSUE 2, August 2003 VOLUME 4, NUMBER 1, April 2003 VOLUME 3, NUMBER 3, December 2002 VOLUME 3, NUMBER 2, August 2002 VOLUME 3, NUMBER 1, April 2002 VOLUME 2, NUMBER 3, December 2001 VOLUME 2, NUMBER 2, August 2001 VOLUME 2, NUMBER 1, April 2001 VOLUME 1, NUMBER 1, December 2000 More Issue