cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Murdani Abdullah
Contact Email
ina.jghe@gmail.com
Phone
+6285891498517
Journal Mail Official
ina.jghe@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Divisi Gastroenterologi, Departemen Ilmu Penyakit Dalam, FKUI/RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo, Jl. Diponegoro No. 71 Jakarta 10430 Indonesia
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Digestive Endoscopy
Published by The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy
ISSN : 14114801     EISSN : 23028181     DOI : -
Core Subject : Health,
Medicine & Pharmacology
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Digestive Endoscopy is an academic journal which has been published since 2000 and owned by 3 Societies: The Indonesian Society of Gastroenterology; Indonesian Association for the Study of the Liver; The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy. The aim of our journal is to advance knowledge in Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy fields. We welcome authors for original articles, review articles, and case reports in the fields of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy.
Arjuna Subject : Kedokteran - Ilmu Pencernaan
Articles 7 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "VOLUME 9, ISSUE 3, December 2008" : 7 Documents clear
Upper Gastrointestinal Abnormalities in Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Examination: Descriptive Study in PSUPAU Endoscopic Unit Julwan Pribadi; Sedijono Sedijono; Suryantini Suryantini; Marcellus Simadibrata; Ari Fahrial Syam; Murdani Abdullah; Achmad Fauzi; Dadang Makmun; Chudahman Manan; Daldiyono Daldiyono; Abdul Aziz Rani
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 9, ISSUE 3, December 2008
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/93200882-85

Abstract

Background: The Endoscopy Unit of Indonesian Air Force Central Hospital Dr. Esnawan Antariksa, Jakarta, Indonesia, has just been established in late 2004 and it is still in developing process. This study was aim to depict the profile of patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy procedure in the unit. Method: This study was a retrospective study that analyzed data in endoscopic registry of patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) examination from September 2004 to December 2007. Result: Total of 108 patients underwent EGD examination, comprised of 66 (61%) males and 42 (39%) females, with average age of 45.4 years old (range 16-77 years old). The most frequent indication for EGD was dyspepsia 63%, followed by hematemesis-melena 26% and dysphagia 5.5%. Among patients with dyspepsia, EGD revealed organic abnormalities in 71% patients, with descriptions of erosive gastritis 35%, gastritis 18%, bile reflux 7%, esophagitis 5% and gastric ulcer 3%. Among patients with hematemesis-melena, EGD revealed abnormalities, which were described as erosive gastritis 48%, esophageal varices bleeding 22%, gastric ulcer 18%, caustic injury 4%, and esophagitis 4%. Conclusions: EGD is an important procedure to ascertain the occurence of organic abnormalities in patient with gastrointestinal symptoms and signs e.g. dyspepsia and gastrointestinal bleeding. More than half of patients with dyspepsia showed organic abnormalities. Among patients with hematemesis-melena, erosive gastritis is more common than variceal bleeding. Keywords: esophagogastroduodenoscopy, dyspepsia, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, hematemesis melena
Dilatation Treatment for Esophageal Strictures Zakiah Zakiah; Ana Mira Lubis; Marcellus Simadibrata; Nurmiati Amir
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 9, ISSUE 3, December 2008
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/93200898-102

Abstract

A patient with adjustment disorder and depression had experienced a suicide temptation by ingesting corrosive substance since 6 months before her hospital admission. On the first day care, she only can swallow “soft-fluid diet” which is given very slowly. Subsequently, the patient had a series of dilatation treatment guided by fluoroscopy and demonstrated a very impressive result. On the first dilatation, a 7 mm dilator was used, and then respectively 9, 10, 5, 12, 8 and 14 mm dilator was applied. We needed to perform three sessions of dilatation until the 9 mm dilator can be inserted. After the second dilatation, the patient had started to be able to eat refine porridge and subsequently rice porridge with soft vegetables and side dishes. At the end of treatment, she had already been able to eat normally. The general management of esophageal stricture by using dilator will be discussed in this article.   Keywords: stricture, corrosive substance, dilatation treatment, dysphagia
A 17-Years Old Man of Colitis Tuberculosis with Fistula Perianal Paulus Kusnanto; Marcellus Simadibrata; Ari Fahrial Syam; Achmad Fauzi; Murdani Abdullah; Dadang Makmun; Chudahman Manan; Daldiyono Daldiyono; Abdul Aziz Rani; Ening Krisnuhoni
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 9, ISSUE 3, December 2008
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/932008103-106

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) remains to be one of the most common problems in developing countries such as Indonesia. It can involve many organs including gastrointestinal tracts. Colonic tuberculosis is an ancient disease and has long been recognized. However, it is sometimes difficult to make early diagnosis due to its nonspecific signs and symptoms. Perianal granulomas or perianal fistula presents some degree of diagnostic difficulty. A spectrum of diseases can produce granulomas in perianal region and perineum. Most are infectious or inflammatory diseases. Standard histological diagnosis often less significant to clarify the etiology and treatment will vary from one to another disease entity. In this report, we present a case 17-years old man with colitis TB and fistula perianal, in which the initial diagnostic workup suggested Crohn’s disease. Mantoux test, Acid Fast Bacilli test on fecal examination and polymerase chain reaction analysis revealed negative result. The chest X-ray was normal; while the fistulography X-ray: revealed 2 orifices in rectosigmoid area. The colonoscopy revealed mucosa edema with ulceration in rectosigmoid and pedincular polyp in the caecum. Initial colonoscopy diagnosis was Crohn’s disease with differential diagnosis colitis ulcerative, colitis TB, colitis infection. results of direct or post homogenizes examination (Ziel–Nielsen staining) revealed that no acid-fast bacilli was found. Multiple biopsies were done, which indicated  mucosa edema with ulceration in rectosigmoid area, pedincular polyp in the caecum, and surrounded by fistula perianal; while histopathological examination showed inflammatory-caseating-epithelioid-granulomas and giant cells (Langhans datia cell) caused by tuberculosis. It highlights the need for awareness of intestinal TB along with the differential diagnosis of chronic intestinal disease. Standard regimen of antituberculosis treatment was given and the patient showed good clinical response. Keywords: Crohn’s disease, caseating epithelioid granuloma, giant cell, colitis TB, perianal fistula
Gastroesophageal Reflux: Are There Differences of Characteristic in Infants and Children Badriul Hegar; Anita Juniatiningsih
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 9, ISSUE 3, December 2008
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/93200875-77

Abstract

Background: Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is an involuntary passage of gastric contents into the esophagus. GER in infancy is usually a physiologic reflux whereas GER in children more than 12 months old is often considered as a pathologic reflux although without any clinical complications. This consideration may lead over-treatment of GER in children. The objective of this study was to find out the difference of GER characteristic in ‘healthy’ infants and children. Method: Cross sectional study in children age 0-36 months at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital Jakarta during 2005-2007 with inclusion criteria: clinically healthy, regurgitations/vomits ³ 4 times/day, well nourished and other etiologies of vomiting had been excluded. The characteristic of GER was evaluated by esophageal pH monitoring (pH-metri) included number of reflux episodes, reflux duration 5 minutes, and reflux index. Results: Sixty children were enrolled in the study; consisting 30 infants (age 0-12 months) and 30 children (age 13-36 months). The median number of reflux in infants was 18 ( range1-19), whereas the median in children was 17 (range 3-27) ( p = 0.47). The median number of reflux 5 minutes was 2 (range 0-2), whereas the median in children was 3 (0-30) (p = 0.85). The median reflux index in infants was 4.5% (range 0.6%-22.9%) whereas the median in children was 6.35% (0.1%-87.%) (p = 0.34). Conclusion: The characteristic of GER in ‘healthy’ infants and children were not significantly different; however reflux index 5% (pathologic GER) was seen in children age 13-36 months. Clinical course monitoring are important in infants and children with GER. Keywords: gastroesophageal reflux, regurgitation, infant, children, pH monitoring
Gallstone and Diabetes Mellitus Hery Djagat Purnomo; Hirlan Hirlan
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 9, ISSUE 3, December 2008
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/93200886-90

Abstract

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a metabolic disease which has high prevalence among the population. The prevalence is increasing in accordance to life style changes in the society. Gallstone is frequently found in diabetic patients especially in women with type 2 DM. Nevertheless, studies on the prevalence of gallstone among diabetic patients population have shown inconsistent/contradictive results. Insulin resistance which is frequently found in type 2 DM patients is the underlying factor that correlates obesity, central adiposity, and low physical activity with gallstone disease. Two important physiological reasons in diabetic patients that may increase the risk of gallstone formation are: (1) Increased total cholesterol synthesis that causes bile becomes more easily transformed into cholesterol stone (lithogenic); (2) Diabetic patients have larger size and probably reduced motility of the gallbladder that cause increased formation of cholesterol crystals. However, recent study demonstrated that DM that merely exists without any contribution of other factors is not significant to increase the risk of gallstone formation. The gallstone management in diabetic patients is the same as the management in non-diabetic patients. Elective surgery with laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the treatment of choice for symptomatic cases. Drug treatment is indicated for patients with cholesterol stone, small stone (diameter 5 mm), and well-functioned cystic duct. Keywords: diabetes mellitus, gallstone, insulin resistance, cholesterol synthesis, motility, laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Profile of Colorectal Cancer Patients in Endoscopic Unit at Dr. Pirngadi Hospital - Medan Rustam Effendi; Dasril Efendi; Leonardo Basa Dairy; Juwita Sembiring; Mabel Sihombing; Betthin Marpaung; Sri Maryuni Soetadi; Gontar Alamsyah Siregar; Lukman Hakim Zain
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 9, ISSUE 3, December 2008
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/93200878-81

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer is the third most prevalent cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death worldwide every year. Rates of this malignancy vary by country. In Indonesia, the prevalence is estimated to have an increased tendency. The objectives of this sudy was to examine the prevalence and profile of colorectal cancer, which are diagnosed by endoscopic examination. Method: The study was conducted retrospectively, by examining the Result of endoscopic findings of patients with rectal bleeding, altered bowel habit, chronic diarrhea, unexplain abdominal pain, and other signs and symptoms at The Endoscopic Unit Department of Internal Medicine, Dr. Pirngadi hospital from January 2004 to June 2008. Results: We found 197 patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) from 760 patients examined by colonoscopy (25.9%). One hundred and one patients (51.3%) out of 197 CRC patients were female. Most were in the group of age 51-60 years (28.9%). The most frequent ethnic of the patients were Bataknese (46.2%). The most common symptom was rectal bleeding (70.6%). The most common location of CRC was in the rectum (74.6%). Histopathologic Result was adenocarcinoma. Conclusion: The prevalence of colorectal cancer in this study were twenty six percents. Rectal bleeding appeared to be the most common sign in this study. Rectum was the most common site of the cancer. Most of patients were Bataknese. Patients were at advanced stage and most of them were having well-differentiated adenocarcinoma.   Keywords: colorectal cancer, rectal bleeding, altered bowel habits, colonoscopy
The Role of Esophageal pH-metri Test on Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease Diagnosis Katharina Setyawati; Murdani Abdullah; Ari Fahrial Syam; Achmad Fauzi; Dadang Makmun; Marcellus Simadibrata; Chudahman Manan; Abdul Aziz Rani
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 9, ISSUE 3, December 2008
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/93200891-97

Abstract

Gastro-esophageal reflux disease is a pathological condition of esophagus which is caused by gastric content reflux into esophagus. There is an increased prevalence of gastro-esophageal reflux disease. The roles of esophageal pH-metry in clinical application include looking for abnormal acid exposure on esophagus with no abnormality found in endoscopy; evaluating patients following the anti-reflux surgery who are being suspected for abnormal esophageal reflux; evaluating patients with normal endoscopic result but still having refractory reflux symptoms against proton pump inhibitor medication; detecting refractory reflux in patients chest pain following the heart evaluation; evaluating patients with otolaryngologic manifestations (laryngitis, pharyngitis, chronic cough) of the esophageal reflux disease after therapeutic failure of 4-weeks proton pump inhibitor treatment; and looking for correlation between adult onset gastro-esophageal reflux disease and non-allergic asthma. Keywords: gastro-esophageal reflux disease, esophagus pH-metry, symptoms-reflux correlation

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 7

 1 

Filter by Year

2008 2008


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 26, No 2 (2025): VOLUME 26, NUMBER 2, AGUSTUS, 2025 Vol 26, No 1 (2025): VOLUME 26, NUMBER 1, April, 2025 Vol 25, No 3 (2024): VOLUME 25, NUMBER 3, December, 2024 Vol 25, No 2 (2024): VOLUME 25, NUMBER 2, August, 2024 Vol 25, No 1 (2024): VOLUME 25, NUMBER 1, April, 2024 Vol 24, No 3 (2023): VOLUME 24, NUMBER 3, December, 2023 Vol 24, No 2 (2023): VOLUME 24, NUMBER 2, August, 2023 Vol 24, No 1 (2023): VOLUME 24, NUMBER 1, April, 2023 Vol 23, No 3 (2022): VOLUME 23, NUMBER 3, December 2022 Vol 23, No 2 (2022): VOLUME 23, NUMBER 2, August 2022 Vol 23, No 1 (2022): VOLUME 23, NUMBER 1, April 2022 Vol 22, No 3 (2021): VOLUME 22, NUMBER 3, December 2021 Vol 22, No 2 (2021): VOLUME 22, NUMBER 2, August 2021 Vol 22, No 1 (2021): VOLUME 22, NUMBER 1, April 2021 Vol 21, No 3 (2020): VOLUME 21, NUMBER 3, December 2020 Vol 21, No 2 (2020): VOLUME 21, NUMBER 2, August 2020 Vol 21, No 1 (2020): VOLUME 21, NUMBER 1, April 2020 Vol 20, No 3 (2019): VOLUME 20, NUMBER 3, December 2019 Vol 20, No 2 (2019): VOLUME 20, NUMBER 2, August 2019 Vol 20, No 1 (2019): VOLUME 20, NUMBER 1, April 2019 Vol 19, No 3 (2018): VOLUME 19, NUMBER 3, December 2018 Vol 19, No 2 (2018): VOLUME 19, NUMBER 2, August 2018 Vol 19, No 1 (2018): VOLUME 19, NUMBER 1, April 2018 Vol 18, No 3 (2017): VOLUME 18, NUMBER 3, DECEMBER 2017 Vol 18, No 2 (2017): VOLUME 18, NUMBER 2, AUGUST 2017 Vol 18, No 1 (2017): VOLUME 18, NUMBER 1, April 2017 Vol 17, No 3 (2016): VOLUME 17, NUMBER 3, December 2016 Vol 17, No 2 (2016): VOLUME 17, NUMBER 2, August 2016 Vol 17, No 1 (2016): VOLUME 17, NUMBER 1, April 2016 Vol 16, No 3 (2015): VOLUME 16, NUMBER 3, December 2015 Vol 16, No 2 (2015): VOLUME 16, NUMBER 2, August 2015 Vol 16, No 1 (2015): VOLUME 16, NUMBER 1, April 2015 Vol 15, No 3 (2014): VOLUME 15, NUMBER 3, December 2014 Vol 15, No 2 (2014): VOLUME 15, NUMBER 2, August 2014 Vol 15, No 1 (2014): VOLUME 15, NUMBER 1, April 2014 VOLUME 14, NUMBER 3, December 2013 VOLUME 14, NUMBER 2, August 2013 VOLUME 14, NUMBER 1, April 2013 VOLUME 13, NUMBER 3, Desember 2012 VOLUME 13, NUMBER 2, August 2012 VOLUME 13, NUMBER 1, April 2012 VOLUME 12, NUMBER 3, December 2011 VOLUME 12, NUMBER 2, August 2011 VOLUME 12, NUMBER 1, April 2011 VOLUME 11, NUMBER 3, December 2010 VOLUME 11, NUMBER 2, August 2010 VOLUME 11, NUMBER 1, April 2010 VOLUME 10, NUMBER 3, December 2009 VOLUME 10, ISSUE 2, August 2009 VOLUME 10, ISSUE 1, April 2009 VOLUME 9, ISSUE 3, December 2008 VOLUME 9, ISSUE 2, August 2008 VOLUME 9, ISSUE 1, April 2008 VOLUME 8, ISSUE 3, December 2007 VOLUME 8 ISSUE 2 August 2007 VOLUME 8, ISSUE 1, April 2007 VOLUME 7, ISSUE 3, December 2006 VOLUME 7, ISSUE 2, August 2006 VOLUME 7, ISSUE 1, April 2006 VOLUME 6, ISSUE 3, December 2005 VOLUME 6, ISSUE 2, August 2005 VOLUME 6, ISSUE 1, April 2005 VOLUME 5, ISSUE 3, December 2004 VOLUME 5, ISSUE 2, August 2004 VOLUME 5, ISSUE 1, April 2004 VOLUME 4, ISSUE 3, December 2003 VOLUME 4, ISSUE 2, August 2003 VOLUME 4, NUMBER 1, April 2003 VOLUME 3, NUMBER 3, December 2002 VOLUME 3, NUMBER 2, August 2002 VOLUME 3, NUMBER 1, April 2002 VOLUME 2, NUMBER 3, December 2001 VOLUME 2, NUMBER 2, August 2001 VOLUME 2, NUMBER 1, April 2001 VOLUME 1, NUMBER 1, December 2000 More Issue