cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Debrina Rahmawati
Contact Email
debrina.rahmawati@gmail.com
Phone
+6281231915486
Journal Mail Official
perspektif@wisnuwardhana.ac.id
Editorial Address
Magister Ilmu Hukum PPs. Universitas Wisnuwadhana Malang Jalan Danau Sentani 99 Malang Telp/fax: 0341-713604/0341-713603
Location
Kota malang,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif
Published by Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang
ISSN : 20866526     EISSN : 26220873     DOI : https://doi.org/10.37303/jurnal%20magister.v14i1
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Dogmatika Hukum (Legal Dogmatics), Teori Hukum (Legal Theory), Fisafat Hukum (Legal Philosophy) dan Perbandingan Hukum (Comparative Hukum) serta hasil penerapan hukum dengan topik Hukum Perdata dan segala spesifikasinya, Hukum Pidana dan spesisfikasinya, Hukum Konstitusional/Tata Negara dan spesifikasinya, Hukum Administrasi dan spesifikasinya, Hukum Adat dan spesifikasinya, Hukum Internasional dan spesifikasinya dan Hukum Kesehatan serta di bidang hukum lainnya.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 16 No. 1 (2025)" : 6 Documents clear
DISHARMONI PENGATURAN TINDAK PIDANA POLITIK UANG DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG PEMILU DAN UNDANG-UNDANG PILKADA Aditya Wiguna Sanjaya
Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif Vol. 16 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37303/magister.v16i1.118

Abstract

The regulatory dichotomy between regional elections and general elections for the president, vice president, members of the DPR, DPRD and DPD (elections) has led to differences in arrangements between the two, one of which is regarding regulation of money politics, which in this case is interpreted as an attempt to give or promise something to voters to not exercise their right to vote or vote for a particular candidate. Arrangements regarding the prohibition of giving or promising something to voters not to exercise their right to vote or vote for certain candidates in the Pilkada Law are formed in pairs, both for the giver and also for the recipient, namely as stipulated in Article 187 A paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of the Pilkada Law, while for the same material actions the Election Law only contains a prohibition for the giving party, as stipulated in Article 523 of the Election Law, while for the receiving party there are no prohibitions or criminal sanctions in the a quo law. This shows that there is disharmony between the Pilkada Law and the Election Law, especially in the Election Law it appears that there is a legal vacuum (vacuum of norm) regarding the prohibition for receiving parties in the practice of money politics. This research departs from two problems. First, is the regulation of money politics as a crime in the Election Law reflecting justice. Second, what is the ideal policy for formulating money politics in the context of ius constituendum? The research method used in writing this paper is normative research method. The results of the study show that the regulation of money politics as a crime in the Election Law does not yet reflect justice, for this reason it is necessary to reconstruct the regulation of money politics in the future Election Law, namely by criminalizing passive money politics. Keywords: Disharmony, Crime, Money Politics, Elections
PERAN BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN (BPSK) DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN Wahjuningati, Edi
Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif Vol. 16 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37303/magister.v16i1.119

Abstract

Article 1 point (1) of UUPK states that consumer protection is an effort to ensure legal certainty in order to provide protection to consumers. Therefore, consumers get protection in conducting trade transaction activities. The purpose of this study is to determine and analyze the regulation of consumer protection in Indonesia and the role of BPSK in consumer protection. The formulation of the problems taken in this study (1) How is the regulation of consumer protection in Indonesia and (2) What is the role of BPSK in consumer protection This research is a normative legal research with a statutory approach and concept approach. Legal materials use primary and secondary legal materials. Legal materials are collected through document review and literature study. The results of the research were analyzed using qualitative descriptive techniques. The results of this study are (1) Legal arrangements for consumer protection can be seen in article 5 of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection which explains the rights and obligations of consumers and business actors, (2) The role of BPSK is to have enforcement authority in the field of consumer protection law in order to save consumer disputes which if using court channels will take a long time. Keywords: Settlement of consumer disputes, Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency (BPSK)
PENEGAKAN HUKUM ATAS PENEBANGAN HUTAN SECARA LIAR: MASALAH DAN SOLUSI Radiah, Aisyatur; Pramono, Agus
Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif Vol. 16 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37303/magister.v16i1.120

Abstract

Illegal logging is a global problem that causes serious environmental damage, ranging from deforestation, biodiversity loss, to increased carbon emissions. Indonesia, as one of the countries with the largest tropical forests in the world, faces great challenges due to this practice, especially due to weak law enforcement and not optimal stakeholder involvement. The problems raised are (1) What are the main factors that cause illegal logging to occur, and (2) How is law enforcement against illegal logging activities in Indonesia. The objectives of this paper are (1) to find out what factors cause the occurrence of illegal logging criminal acts and (2) to find out the law enforcement against illegal logging activities in Indonesia. The type of research used is normative juridical with statutory and conceptual approaches. The results of this study are (1) Factors that cause illegal logging criminal acts to occur are due to economic, social, and political factors, (2) Law enforcement against illegal logging activities is regulated in the UUPPLH and the Law on Prevention and Eradication of Forest Destruction as well as legality verification by KLHK. In addition to these regulations, other efforts are still needed to optimize law enforcement on illegal logging. Keywords: Illegal logging, law enforcement, environment, criminal offense
URGENSI PEMBUATAN PERJANJIAN PENGIKATAN JUAL BELI DALAM PROSES JUAL BELI TANAH Chrisdanty, Febry; Wahyulina, Diah
Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif Vol. 16 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37303/magister.v16i1.121

Abstract

Land is a valuable asset that can be owned by legal subjects. Owning land can be done in several ways, one of which is through the buying and selling process. Legal transfer of land rights can only be done by making a Sale and Purchase Deed (AJB) made before the Land Deed Making Officer (PPAT). Making an AJB all administrative requirements both related to the subject and object are complete. In the field there are several conditions that result in the requirements for making an AJB not being able to be done, so there is a deed called a Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement (PPJB). PPJB is a preliminary agreement made to bind the seller and buyer, until an AJB can be made. PPJB and AJB are different, but many people still understand the two to be the same. The purpose of this study is to determine the position of PPJB in the land buying and selling process, and to analyze the differences between PPJB and AJB. The formulation of the problem raisedare (1) What is the position of PPJB in the process of buying and selling land and (2) What are the differences between PPJB and AJB? This paper is a type of empirical legal research, with an interview research approach method and questionnaire distribution, and using a descriptive analysis method. The results of this are (1) The position of PPJB and AJB is different in the process of buying and selling research land, (2) The differences between PPJB and AJB are as follows. PPJB is a preliminary agreement used to bind the parties and has no legal effect on the transfer of a land right, while AJB can prove the transfer of land rights made by the parties before a PPAT. Keywords: Binding, Sale and purchase, Agreement, Land.
PRESIDENTIAL THRESHOLD LEGAL ANALYSIS WITHIN INDONESIAN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION (2003-2020) Wiryawan, Anindita; Al-Hakim, Rosyid
Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif Vol. 16 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37303/magister.v16i1.122

Abstract

Presiden, Mahkamah Konstitusi, dan DPR adalah lembaga negara yang menjalankan fungsi eksekutif, yudikatif, dan legislatif untuk menegakkan konstitusi. Presiden dipilih langsung oleh rakyat, dengan tata cara pencalonan diatur dalam Pasal 6 dan 6A UUD 1945, yaitu melalui partai politik atau gabungan partai politik. Sejak 2003 hingga 2018, sejumlah regulasi seperti UU No. 23/2003, No. 42/2008, dan No. 7/2017 mengatur ambang batas pencalonan presiden dan wakil presiden berdasarkan perolehan suara hasil pemilu legislatif. Dalam praktiknya, sejumlah pihak mengajukan uji materi ke Mahkamah Konstitusi, namun hingga kini tidak ada putusan yang membatalkan klausul ambang batas tersebut. Ambang batas presiden dinilai membatasi hak calon independen dan membatasi partai politik mencalonkan presiden dan wakil presiden. Mahkamah Konstitusi bahkan dinilai seolah menjadi lembaga legislatif kedua karena memiliki pengaruh besar dalam pembentukan hukum. Namun, baik lembaga legislatif maupun yudikatif tidak proaktif mengubah klausul ini dan justru memperkuatnya. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, putusan pengadilan, dan teori hukum. Penelitian ini mengkaji wacana ambang batas presidensial dari 2003–2018 dan dampaknya terhadap ambang batas parlemen, sistem multipartai, kompetisi politik, sistem presidensial, serta pemilihan presiden dan pemilu serentak. Kata Kunci: Ambang batas pencalonan presiden, Pencalonan presiden, Pemilu serentak Indonesia, Sistem multi-partai, Sistem presidensial.
REUPLOAD FILM DI TELEGRAM: PERSPEKTIF UU HAK CIPTA DAN HUKUM BISNIS SYARIAH Taufiqur Rahman , Tegar Taufiqur Rahman; Asi Islami, Trinah; Fitria, Norma
Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif Vol. 16 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37303/magister.v16i1.123

Abstract

Reuploading movies on telegram needs to be investigated in terms of copyright and sharia business law as a form of legal protection. Copyright is part of the IPR branch that protects human creations in the fields of art, literature and science. Haqq al-ibtikar is a description of the thoughts produced by a scientist through the ability of thought and analysis is the first discovery or creation, which has not been put forward by scientists before. Copyright studies on video re-uploading via telegram based on sharia business law is still rarely studied. The purpose of this research is to find out the position of video reupload on Telegram from the perspective of UUHC and sharia business law perspective. Therefore, the formulation of the problem taken is (1) How is the re-uploading of movie videos on the telegram application, (2) What is the perspective of UUHC on the re-uploading of movie videos on the telegram application, and (3) How is the perspective of sharia business law on the re-uploading of movie videos on the tellegram application. The type of research used is normative juridical with a phenomenological, statutory and conceptual approach. Primary and secondary legal materials are used to answer the existing problems by using descriptive analytical methods. The results showed that (1) Video re-uploading in the Telegram application can be done through private and public channels, (2) Re-uploading in videos via Telegram has not applied the elements of article 40 letter m of the UUHC, (3) Video re-uploading via Telegram from the perspective of sharia business law has not fulfilled the principle of ibtikar rights so that it can be categorized as theft. Keywords: Movie, Telegram, Copyright, Haqq Al-Ibtikar, Sharia Business Law.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 16 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 16 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 15 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 15 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 14 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 14 No. 1 (2023) Vol 14 No 1 (2023) Vol 13 No 2 (2022) Vol 13 No 1 (2022) Vol 12 No 2 (2021) Vol. 12 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 12 No. 1 (2021) Vol 12 No 1 (2021) Vol. 11 No. 2 (2020) Vol 11 No 2 (2020) Vol 11 No 1 (2020) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2019) Vol 10 No 2 (2019) Vol. 10 No. 1 (2019) Vol 10 No 1 (2019) More Issue