cover
Contact Name
Suryo Saputra Perdana
Contact Email
thehipkneejournal@gmail.com
Phone
+6281298563988
Journal Mail Official
thehipkneejournal@gmail.com
Editorial Address
https://thehipkneejournal.id/index.php/hipknee/pages/view/editorial
Location
Kota adm. jakarta selatan,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
The Hip and Knee Journal
The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, case reports, and short communications. In addition, the regular content includes letters to the Editor and conference proceedings. Submitted papers must be written in English for an initial review stage by editors and further review process by a minimum of two reviewers. The topics covered include, but are not limited to: Basic sciences include: Anatomy, physiology, biomolecular, and biomechanics Imaging and diagnostic studies; Trauma; Surgery includes: Arthroplasty, Arthroscopy and Sports Injury, Trauma, Joint preservation surgery Rehabilitation and advances in the development of prosthetic, orthotic and augmentation devices of hip and knee joint
Articles 5 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 5, No 2 (2024): August" : 5 Documents clear
Current Technology in Hip Replacement Phatama, Krisna Yuarno
The Hip and Knee Journal Vol 5, No 2 (2024): August
Publisher : Indonesian Hip and Knee Society (IHKS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46355/hipknee.v5i2.181

Abstract

Hip replacement, also known as total hip arthroplasty (THA), is widely regarded as an incredibly effective surgical procedure, often hailed as a ground-breaking achievement in medicine.1 The initial development of total hip replacement dates back to 1938 when Wiles made significant progress.2 However, it wasn't until the 1960s that this procedure gained widespread recognition and popularity. Sir John Charnley's introduction of "low-friction arthroplasty" revolutionized the treatment of arthritic joints.1 Over time, significant progress has been made in THA's design, materials, and surgical techniques, significantly enhancing patient satisfaction, minimizing surgical complications, and improving clinical outcomes. Patients' expectations regarding life after total hip arthroplasty (THA) have significantly shifted. They prioritize long-term survival and the various aspects of maintaining a good quality of life. They have a strong desire to pursue their professional and personal interests, which require a high level of physical activity.3The initial technological advancement in hip replacement surgery was the introduction of Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS), which reduced the surgical footprint. MIS techniques involve smaller incisions and less soft tissue disruption, reducing postoperative pain and faster recovery times. This approach contrasts with traditional open surgery, which typically requires larger incisions and more extensive muscle dissection. MIS procedures have been proven to enhance cosmetic outcomes, minimize hospital stays, and accelerate rehabilitation.4,5A growing focus has recently been on customizing joint replacement procedures to suit individual patients rather than relying on a generic and uniform approach. A computer-assisted surgery (CAS) and robotic-assisted surgery represent significant technological leaps in hip replacement. CAS utilizes preoperative imaging and intraoperative navigation to enhance the precision of implant placement. CAS improves the alignment of the acetabular and femoral components, thereby reducing the risk of dislocation and improving functional outcomes.6 Robotic-assisted systems, such as the MAKO robotic arm, have refined this precision. These systems allow for patient-specific surgical planning and real-time adjustments during the procedure. Studies have shown that robotic-assisted surgery results in superior implant positioning and reduced variability in component placement.6,7 The integration of these technologies into clinical practice represents a significant advancement in achieving optimal surgical outcomes.Another enhancement in hip replacement surgery is the development of advanced biomaterials, which have been pivotal in extending the longevity of hip implants. Traditional metal-on-polyethylene bearings, while effective, are prone to wear and osteolysis over time. Recent advancements have introduced ceramic-on-ceramic and ceramic-on-polyethylene bearings, which exhibit lower wear rates and higher biocompatibility.8 Ceramic materials, being more complex and smoother than metals, significantly reduce friction and wear particles, enhancing the implant's lifespan. Highly porous metals, such as trabecular metal, have also been developed to improve osseointegration. These materials mimic the trabecular structure of natural bone, promoting biological fixation and reducing the reliance on bone cement. The benefits of trabecular metal are in providing a stable and durable implant-bone interface, which is crucial for the long-term success of hip replacements.9Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols represent a multidisciplinary approach to optimizing perioperative care. These protocols focus on preoperative education, optimized pain management, and early mobilization. ERAS protocols have been shown to reduce hospital stays, decrease complications, and improve overall patient outcomes in hip replacement surgery. Implementing ERAS has led to a paradigm shift in postoperative care, emphasizing patient-centered approaches and evidence-based practices.10Despite these advancements, challenges remain in hip replacement surgery. Implant longevity in younger, more active patients continues to be a concern. Additionally, periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) pose a significant risk to implant success. Current researHip replacement, also known as total hip arthroplasty (THA), is widely regarded as an incredibly effective surgical procedure, often hailed as a ground-breaking achievement in medicine.1 The initial development of total hip replacement dates back to 1938 when Wiles made significant progress.2 However, it wasn't until the 1960s that this procedure gained widespread recognition and popularity. Sir John Charnley's introduction of "low-friction arthroplasty" revolutionized the treatment of arthritic joints.1 Over time, significant progress has been made in THA's design, materials, and surgical techniques, significantly enhancing patient satisfaction, minimizing surgical complications, and improving clinical outcomes. Patients' expectations regarding life after total hip arthroplasty (THA) have significantly shifted. They prioritize long-term survival and the various aspects of maintaining a good quality of life. They have a strong desire to pursue their professional and personal interests, which require a high level of physical activity.3The initial technological advancement in hip replacement surgery was the introduction of Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS), which reduced the surgical footprint. MIS techniques involve smaller incisions and less soft tissue disruption, reducing postoperative pain and faster recovery times. This approach contrasts with traditional open surgery, which typically requires larger incisions and more extensive muscle dissection. MIS procedures have been proven to enhance cosmetic outcomes, minimize hospital stays, and accelerate rehabilitation.4,5A growing focus has recently been on customizing joint replacement procedures to suit individual patients rather than relying on a generic and uniform approach. A computer-assisted surgery (CAS) and robotic-assisted surgery represent significant technological leaps in hip replacement. CAS utilizes preoperative imaging and intraoperative navigation to enhance the precision of implant placement. CAS improves the alignment of the acetabular and femoral components, thereby reducing the risk of dislocation and improving functional outcomes.6 Robotic-assisted systems, such as the MAKO robotic arm, have refined this precision. These systems allow for patient-specific surgical planning and real-time adjustments during the procedure. Studies have shown that robotic-assisted surgery results in superior implant positioning and reduced variability in component placement.6,7 The integration of these technologies into clinical practice represents a significant advancement in achieving optimal surgical outcomes.Another enhancement in hip replacement surgery is the development of advanced biomaterials, which have been pivotal in extending the longevity of hip implants. Traditional metal-on-polyethylene bearings, while effective, are prone to wear and osteolysis over time. Recent advancements have introduced ceramic-on-ceramic and ceramic-on-polyethylene bearings, which exhibit lower wear rates and higher biocompatibility.8 Ceramic materials, being more complex and smoother than metals, significantly reduce friction and wear particles, enhancing the implant's lifespan. Highly porous metals, such as trabecular metal, have also been developed to improve osseointegration. These materials mimic the trabecular structure of natural bone, promoting biological fixation and reducing the reliance on bone cement. The benefits of trabecular metal are in providing a stable and durable implant-bone interface, which is crucial for the long-term success of hip replacements.9Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols represent a multidisciplinary approach to optimizing perioperative care. These protocols focus on preoperative education, optimized pain management, and early mobilization. ERAS protocols have been shown to reduce hospital stays, decrease complications, and improve overall patient outcomes in hip replacement surgery. Implementing ERAS has led to a paradigm shift in postoperative care, emphasizing patient-centered approaches and evidence-based practices.10Despite these advancements, challenges remain in hip replacement surgery. Implant longevity in younger, more active patients continues to be a concern. Additionally, periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) pose a significant risk to implant success. Current research explores antibacterial coatings and systemic antibiotic regimens to address PJIs.11 Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) into hip replacement surgery offers promising future directions. AI-driven predictive analytics can assist in preoperative planning by identifying patients at higher risk of complications and customizing treatment plans. Furthermore, ML algorithms can analyze postoperative data to monitor patient recovery and predict long-term outcomes.12ch explores antibacterial coatings and systemic antibiotic regimens to address PJIs.11 Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) into hip replacement surgery offers promising future directions. AI-driven predictive analytics can assist in preoperative planning by identifying patients at higher risk of complications and customizing treatment plans. Furthermore, ML algorithms can analyze postoperative data to monitor patient recovery and predict long-term outcomes.12
A Safe Surgical Hip Dislocation For Treating Pipkin Fracture: a case report Jayanegara, R.Muhammad David
The Hip and Knee Journal Vol 5, No 2 (2024): August
Publisher : Indonesian Hip and Knee Society (IHKS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46355/hipknee.v5i2.105

Abstract

Pipkin fractures are rare events and usually occur as a consequence for high-energy trauma. Surgery to obtain anatomical reduction and fixation is the mainstay treatment for the majority of these injuries. The surgical treatment for Pipkin fractures remains a source of controversy, especially regarding the best surgical approach. Case presentation a 18-year-old male, which sustained a type I Pipkin fracture following a motorcycle accident. In the emergency department, an emergent closed reduction was performed, followed by surgery two weeks later. Using a surgical hip dislocation, a successful anatomical reduction and fixation was performed. The discussion safe surgical hip dislocation allows full access to the femoral head and acetabulum, without increasing the risk for a femoral head avascular necrosis or posttraumatic arthritis and minimizing trauma to the abductor musculature. Simultaneously, this surgical approach gives the opportunity to repair associated acetabular or labral lesions, which explains the growing popularity with this technique. The conclusion although technically demanding, safe surgical hip dislocation represents an excellent option in the reduction and fixation for Pipkin fractures.  
Current Treatment Update for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears in Adolescence: A Narrative Review Yushan, Rafael Marvin; Winaga, Handriadi; Singjie, Leonard Christianto
The Hip and Knee Journal Vol 5, No 2 (2024): August
Publisher : Indonesian Hip and Knee Society (IHKS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46355/hipknee.v5i2.158

Abstract

To follow up regarding orthopedic updates in respect of the treatment of ACL tears in adolescence. The methods we performed a comprehensive literature search from four databases to synthesize a narrative review of available evidence on the recent update of ACL treatment in adolescence. The results is conservative treatment remains preferred for partial ACL tears in adolescence. Some surgeons have favored non-operative or delayed surgical treatment until skeletal maturity has reached or after a failed trial of non-operative management. However, adolescent patients who delayed ACLR for more than 12 weeks had increased risk of meniscal pathology and irreparable meniscal tears by a 4.3 and 3.2 times, respectively. Various ACL reconstruction techniques for adolescents have developed to respect growing physes, these are physeal sparing (extraphyseal and all-epiphyseal), partial transphyseal, and transphyseal. The conclusions is early operative treatment of ACL injury is preferred compared to non-operative or delayed treatment. The reconstruction techniques were adjusted to each patient's potential for growth, the facilities' capabilities, and the surgeons' skills. High-growth potential patients should still undergo surgery using a technique with the slightest manipulation of growth cartilage.
Adhesive Plastic Drapes Did Not Prove to Prevent Surgical Site Infection in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial Pontoh, Ludwig Andretia Powantia; Dilogo, Ismail Hadisoebroto; Putra, Anggaditya; Widodo, Wahyu; Oesman, Ihsan; Fiolin, Jessica; Herdiman, Joshua Alward
The Hip and Knee Journal Vol 5, No 2 (2024): August
Publisher : Indonesian Hip and Knee Society (IHKS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46355/hipknee.v5i2.159

Abstract

Surgical site infection (SSI) prevention is crucial in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures. One controllable factor is preventing foreign substances from contaminating the surgical field, for which adhesive draping over surgical drapes is commonly used. To determine whether using adhesive transparent film dressing has any effect on the occurrence of SSI in TKA. We conducted a study comparing 100 TKA, divided into two groups (each with 50 participants). The first group received adhesive plastic draping during TKA, while the second group was the control. Bacterial aerobic culture swabs were taken before applying the plastic draping and after surgery following skin closure. Follow-up evaluations were conducted within one month to detect signs of SSI. The results none of the 100 TKAs included in the study yielded positive bacterial culture results. One-month post-operative evaluations revealed no signs of SSI in any of the groups.The conclusion use of adhesive plastic drapes does not provide any benefit in preventing SSI in TKA. Skin preparation, prophylaxis, and surgeon preparation protocols are more crucial for SSI prevention than adhesive plastic drapes.
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty In Medial Osteoarthritis Knee With Anterior Cruciate Deficiency: A Case Report Fendy, Fendy
The Hip and Knee Journal Vol 5, No 2 (2024): August
Publisher : Indonesian Hip and Knee Society (IHKS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46355/hipknee.v5i2.180

Abstract

Advantages of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) include the preservation of more tissue, maintenance of knee kinematics, and a faster recovery period. However historically absence of an ACL could affect knee stability and lead to various degenerative changes, such as intra-articular damage and knee instability. Case presentation a 60-year-old female patient presented with severe left medial knee pain and functional limitations and persisted with conservative treatment. Clinical examinations revealed tenderness over the medial joint line, a positive varus stress test, and a Lachman test. Radiographic imaging confirmed severe medial compartment osteoarthritis with ACL deficiency without significant damage to other knee structures. Patient was diagnosed with medial compartment osteoarthritis in an ACL-deficient knee. UKA using Oxford medial unicompartment implant was performed cement inserted into the medial compartment. The patient followed a routine rehabilitation program. At the 2 days after operation patient can full extension of the knee and flexion of the knee about 120 degree with minimal pain. Radiographic evaluation showed adequate implant positioning. The discussion several studies have shown that with meticulous patient selection and accurate surgical technique, UKA can yield favorable outcomes even in cases of ACL deficiency. Preserving the ACL is critical to the success of UKA but achieving good results in ACL-deficient patients if the joint proves stable and well-balanced intraoperatively is possible. The conclusion isUKA might be a viable option for patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis with ACL deficiency.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5